Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Court: rajasthan Year: 2014 Page 4 of about 108 results (0.016 seconds)

May 23 2014 (HC)

Radhakishan Vs. Smt.Radha Devi

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : May-23-2014

1 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur :judgment: s.b.civil second appeal no.125/2013 radha kishan versus smt. radha devi date of judgment :: 23.05.2014 present hon'ble mr.justice arun bhansali mr.r.s.mankad, for the appellant. mr.g.r.singhvi, for the respondent. ---- by the court: this second appeal under section 100 cpc is directed against judgment and decree dated 06.04.2013 passed by additional district judge, jodhpur, whereby, the appeal filed by the appellant against the judgment and decree dated 20.04.2011 passed by civil judge (senior division).bilara has been upheld. the facts in brief may be noticed thus: the plaintiff- respondent filed a suit for recovery of arrears of rent and possession of the house, inter alia, with the averments that a house of the ownership of the plaintiff is situated at bilara in chawanda colony, which was let out to the defendant at a monthly rent of rs.3,100/- on 06.09.2006 for which a rent-note was executed; the tenancy was for 11 months; the defendant 2 did not pay the rent as per the rent-note and, therefore, a legal notice was served through registered post and upc on 21.05.2007 terminating the tenancy. the defendant avoided notice; whereafter, the plaintiff published the notice in dainik bhaskar newspaper on 08.06.2007 and the service of the notice on the defendant was sufficient. it was prayed that a decree for arrears of rent and possession be passed against the defendant. a written statement was filed by the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 02 2014 (HC)

Mala Ram Vs. State and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Jul-02-2014

d.b.cr. appeal no.1029/2013 1 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur judgment mala ram versus the state of raj. d.b.criminal appeal no.1029/2013 under section 372, criminal procedure code against the judgment dated 23.10.2013 passed by addl sessions judge sujangarh, district churu in sessions case no.16/2006(20/2007).date of judgment : 02.7.2014. present hon'ble mr.govind mathur,j. hon'ble mr.atul kumar jain, j. mr.g.r.punia, sr.advocate assisted by mr.dinesh gyani for the appellant. mr.j.p.bhardwaj, public prosecutor for the state. reportable by the court( per hon'ble mr.jain,j.).in this appeal, which has been filed by mala ram, who is brother of deceased ram narain, against the judgment dated 23.10.2013 passed by addl. sessions judge, sujangarh, district churu in sessions case no.16/2006(20/2007) titled as state of rajasthan versus bheeka ram & ors., whereby that court has acquitted all the three accused- respondents from the charges of sections 302, 302/34, 436, 436/34, 201 and 201/34, indian penal code. accused-respondent smt. lichhma devi wife of deceased ram narain and accused-respondent bheeka ram and nanu ram are real brothers of smt. lichhma devi. as per the prosecution story, there was a dispute regarding registry of sale-deed d.b.cr. appeal no.1029/2013 2 of a well (a source of irrigation) and in the charge-sheet it was mentioned that the deceased ram narain was interested to get the sale-deed of well registered in the name of his mother, while .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 13 2014 (HC)

Sav Ji and anr Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Oct-13-2014

d.b.cr. jail appeal no.706/2006 1 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur judgment savji & anr.v.the state of rajasthan d.b.criminal jail appeal no.706/2006 under section 383 of criminal procedure code against the judgment dated 12.7.2006 passed by additional sessions judge (fast track) no.1, udaipur in sessions case 19/2006(relating to f.i.r.no.165/2005 of police station jhadol) date of judgment : 13.10.2014 present hon'ble mr.gopal krishan vyas,j. hon'ble mr.atul kumar jain, j. mr.k.r.bhati for the appellants. mr.j.p.s.choudhary, public prosecutor for the state. by the court( per hon'ble mr.jain,j.).this jail appeal was filed by accused-appellants (1) savji and (2) homa against the judgment dated 12.10.2006 passed by the addl. sessions judge(fast track) no.1, udaipur in sessions case no.19/2006 titled as state v. savji and anr. whereby both the accused- appellants were convicted under section 302/34 of indian penal code by life imprisonment and a fine of rs.5,000/- d.b.cr. jail appeal no.706/2006 2 and in default of payment of fine, each of the accused- appellants was ordered to suffer one year's additional rigorous imprisonment. both the accused-appellants are in jail in this case since 15.12.2005. mr.k.r.bhati was appointed amicus curiae on behalf of the accused-appellants. it has been submitted by him that the trial court had convicted the accused-appellants on the basis of alleged extra-judicial confession by the accused persons before nagji ram, up- .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 12 2014 (HC)

Jafar Vs. Mohd. Babu and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Mar-12-2014

1 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur :judgment: s.b.civil second appeal no.378/2011 jafar versus mohd. babu & ors.date of judgment :: 12th march, 2014 present hon'ble mr.justice arun bhansali mr.r.k.charan, for the appellant. ---- by the court: this second appeal under section 100 cpc is directed against judgment and decree dated 15.03.2011 passed by additional district judge, deedwana, whereby, the appeal preferred by the appellant against the judgment and decree dated 19.08.2009 passed by additional civil judge (senior division).deedwana has been dismissed. the facts in brief may be noticed thus : plaintiff mohd. babu filed a suit for cancellation of registered sale deed dated 25.02.1984 against jafar (purchaser).aslam (vendor) and hanif with the averments that land ad measuring 16 bigha 17 biswa comprised in khasr.no.1864 situated at deedwana was in the ancestral khatedari of plaintiff and his brothers aslam and hanif, whose recorded khatedar was their father dulla alias abdulla, who died in september, 1982; whereafter the khatedari should have been recorded in the names of three sons; however, the defendant no.1 jafar got the same mutated in the name of defendant no.2 aslam only, which is ab initio void; all the three 2 sons have 1/3rd share each in the said land; on 25.02.1984 the sale of the land was executed by someone claiming himself to be aslam; at the time of registration defendant no.2 aslam was minor and the said registration was suppressed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 04 2014 (HC)

State Vs. Rajkumar

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Apr-04-2014

db cr.appeal no.64/1988 1 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur :judgment: :: state of rajasthan versus raj kumar & ors d.b.criminal appeal no.64/1988 date of judgment :: 4th april 2014 present hon'ble mr.justice dinesh maheshwari hon'ble mr.justice v.s.siradhana mr.ar nikub, pp for the state mr.hss kharlia with mr.ss dhillon, for the respondent by the court: (per dinesh maheshwari,j.) this appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 27.06.1987, as passed in sessions case no.32/1986 whereby the additional sessions judge, nohar, while giving benefit of doubt, has acquitted the accused-respondents raj kumar, mst.chhoti @ naraini and mst.durga, who were charged for the offence under sections 302/34 ipc on the allegations of causing death of mst. kamla wife of purshottam after setting her on fire. the accused were related to the deceased kamla as being her brother-in-law, mother-in-law and sister-in-law respectively. it may be noticed at the outset that in this state appeal against acquittal, the accused persons raj kumar, mst. chhoti and mst. durga have been arrayed as respondents nos.1,2 and 3 respectively. however, the respondents nos.2 and 3, mst. chhoti @ narayani and mst. durga, were reported to have expired. the db cr.appeal no.64/1988 2 learned public prosecutor, after obtaining verification, submitted that they had indeed expired in the years 2008 and 2010 respectively. thus, it was observed on 20.02.2013 that this appeal has abated qua the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 14 2014 (HC)

Narayan Lal Vs. Board of Revenue Ajmer and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : May-14-2014

1 d.b.civil special appeal no.626/2014 narayan lal v/s the board of revenue, ajmer and ors.14.5.2014 hon'ble the chief justice mr.amitava roy hon'ble mr.justice vijay bishnoi mr.madan lal purohit for the appellant. the remonstrance of the appellant (respondent no.5 in the writ petition) is against the perceived summary rejection of his application under article 226(3) of the constitution of india seeking vacation of the interim restraint granted vide order dated 20.5.2013 passed in s.b.civil writ petition no.5660/2013. we have heard mr.madan lal purohit, learned counsel for the appellant. abridged version of the pleaded facts as available would provide the factual background. the respondent no.3 herein has instituted the aforementioned writ proceeding mounting a challenge to the judgment and order dated 6.3.2013 passed by the learned board of revenue, ajmer in reference/lr/4242/2008/udaipur and the order dated 25.2.2008 passed by the learned district collector, udaipur in case no.89/2007. elaborating the relevant facts, the respondent no.3 (writ-petitioner) has averred that the land involved measuring about 6 bigha 9 biswa was originally recorded in the name of the respondents no.4 and 5 herein, but was later on recorded in his name pursuant to the judgment and decree dated 2 15.2.1979 passed by the learned sdo, vallabhnagar in revenue case no.9/1979. while admitting that he (respondent no.3) did belong to a non-scheduled caste, he has further stated that by the order dated .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 28 2014 (HC)

Smt. Nisha Mathur and ors Vs. State and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Jul-28-2014

s.b. civil writ petition no.2329/2014. smt. nisha mathur & ors. vs. state of rajasthan & ors. (alongwith 58 other connected matter as mentioned in schedule) date of judgment :28. 07.2014 1/33 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur. .. :: judgment :: s.b. civil writ petition no.2329/2014. smt. nisha mathur & ors. vs. state of rajasthan & ors. (alongwith 58 other connected matters as mentioned in the attached schedule) .. date of judgment ::28. h july, 2014. present hon'ble dr. justice vineet kothari appearance: mr. g.r. punia, sr. advocate with ]. mr. y.p. khileree ]. mr. narpat singh ]. mr. suniel purohit ].- for the petitioner(s). mr. t.s. rathore ]. mr. n.r. choudhary ]. mr. r.s. choudhary ]. mr. s.s. gour ]. mr. s.p. singh ]. mr. hanuman singh choudhary ]. mr. narpat singh rajpurohit ]. mr. mahaveer bishnoi ]. dr. p.s. bhati, aag for the state. mr. sajjan singh rathore, assistant to the aag. -- reportable by the court:1. this lot of writ petitions is being disposed of by this common judgment and all the present petitioners are working as auxiliary nurse midwife ('anm') who are now called health workers (female).2. the rai-son ??tre of the petitioners before this court is their claim for regularisation in service, since they have worked for more than 10 years on continuous basis without any break in service, even s.b. civil writ petition no.2329/2014. smt. nisha mathur & ors. vs. state of rajasthan & ors. (alongwith 58 other connected matter as mentioned .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 27 2014 (HC)

Oma Ram Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Nov-27-2014

d.b.criminal appeal nos.530/2007 and 392/2007 1 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur : judgment: d.b.criminal appeal no.530/2007 mangi lal versus state of rajasthan and d.b.criminal appeal no.392/2007 oma ram versus state of rajasthan date of judgment :: 27th november, 2014 present hon'ble mr justice gopal krishan vyas hon'ble mr.justice atul kumar jain mr.dhirendra singh ].mr.surednra surana ]., for the appellants. mr.jps choudhary, public prosecutor. mr.b.r.bishnoi, for the complainant. mr.c.s.ojha, public prosecutor. by the court: (per hon'ble mr.justice g.k.vyas) both above appeals are filed under section 374(2) cr.p.c.by the appellants against the judgment dated 17.5.2007 passed by the sessions judge, balotra in sessions case no.34/2005 whereby present appellants mangi lal and oma ram alongwith pukhraj who died during pendency of appeals were convicted and following punishment was awarded for the offence of the murder to them: 1. mangi lal: under section 302 ipc life imprisonment with fine for rs.5000/- and in default of payment of d.b.criminal appeal nos.530/2007 and 392/2007 2 fine, further undergo two months simple imprisonment. under section 3/25(1)(a) arms act two years simple imprisonment with fine of rs.2000/- and in default of payment of fine, further undergo two months' simple imprisonment. under section 27 arms act two years.simple imprisonment with fine of rs.2000/- and in default of payment of fine, further undergo two months' simple .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 27 2014 (HC)

Mangi Lal Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Nov-27-2014

d.b.criminal appeal nos.530/2007 and 392/2007 1 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur : judgment: d.b.criminal appeal no.530/2007 mangi lal versus state of rajasthan and d.b.criminal appeal no.392/2007 oma ram versus state of rajasthan date of judgment :: 27th november, 2014 present hon'ble mr justice gopal krishan vyas hon'ble mr.justice atul kumar jain mr.dhirendra singh ].mr.surednra surana ]., for the appellants. mr.jps choudhary, public prosecutor. mr.b.r.bishnoi, for the complainant. mr.c.s.ojha, public prosecutor. by the court: (per hon'ble mr.justice g.k.vyas) both above appeals are filed under section 374(2) cr.p.c.by the appellants against the judgment dated 17.5.2007 passed by the sessions judge, balotra in sessions case no.34/2005 whereby present appellants mangi lal and oma ram alongwith pukhraj who died during pendency of appeals were convicted and following punishment was awarded for the offence of the murder to them: 1. mangi lal: under section 302 ipc life imprisonment with fine for rs.5000/- and in default of payment of d.b.criminal appeal nos.530/2007 and 392/2007 2 fine, further undergo two months simple imprisonment. under section 3/25(1)(a) arms act two years simple imprisonment with fine of rs.2000/- and in default of payment of fine, further undergo two months' simple imprisonment. under section 27 arms act two years.simple imprisonment with fine of rs.2000/- and in default of payment of fine, further undergo two months' simple .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2014 (HC)

Mangi Lal Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Jan-31-2014

d.b.cr. jail appeal no.568/2008 1 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur judgment mangi lal versus the state of rajasthan d.b.criminal jail appeal no.568/2008 under section 383 , criminal procedure code against the judgment dated 18.7.2007 passed by sessions judge, jodhpur in sessions case no.7/2006. date of judgment : 31.1.2014 present hon'ble mr.govind mathur,j. hon'ble mr.atul kumar jain, j. mr.shambhoo singh for the appellant. mr.k.r.bishnoi, public prosecutor for the state. by the court( per hon'ble mr.jain,j.).this jail appeal had been filed by accused mangi lal who had been convicted on 18.7.2007 in sessions case no.7/2006 by sessions judge, jodhpur under section 302 of indian penal code. he had been sentenced by the said court under section of 302 of indian penal code by life imprisonment and a fine of rs.5,000/-. d.b.cr. jail appeal no.568/2008 2 it has also been ordered by the trial court that in default of payment of fine, he will have to suffer six months' additional simple imprisonment. the case of the accused had been conducted in the trial court by amicus curiae appointed by the court. in this court, mr.shambhoo singh, advocate has assisted the court on behalf of accused-appellant mangi lal. it has been argued by the accused-appellant that the judgment of the trial court is totally against the law as well as against the facts. it has also been argued that in spite of the material contradictions in the statements of the witnesses and the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //