Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Court: rajasthan Year: 2014 Page 6 of about 108 results (0.009 seconds)

May 19 2014 (HC)

Anirudh Singh Vs. State of Raj. and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : May-19-2014

s.b. civil writ petition no.3415/2010 farukh hussain vs. state of rajasthan & ors. along-with connected 3 writ petitions. order dated 19/05/2014 1/8 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur order (1) s.b. civil writ petition no.3415/2010 farukh hussain vs. state of rajasthan & ors. & (2) s.b. civil writ petition no.3403/2010 ganesh ram vs. state of rajasthan & ors. & (3) s.b. civil writ petition no.3417/2010 ajay pal singh vs. state of rajasthan & ors. & (4) s.b. civil writ petition no.3418/2010 anirudh singh vs. state of rajasthan & ors. date of order ::::19. h may, 2014 present hon'ble dr. justice vineet kothari appearance: mr. narpat singh, for the petitioners. mr. manish patel, addl. govt. counsel. -- by the court:1. both the learned counsel for the parties state at bar that the controversy involved in the present case is squarely covered by s.b. civil writ petition no.3415/2010 farukh hussain vs. state of rajasthan & ors. along-with connected 3 writ petitions. order dated 19/05/2014 2/8 the decision of this court in the case of hukam singh & ors. vs. state of rajasthan & ors. along-with connected 28 writ petitions (sbcwp no.6188/2009 decided on 15th july, 2010) wherein this court has held as under: - 1. heard learned counsel for the parties.2. this writ petition has been filed by the petitioners working as 'gram rojgar sahayak' employed on contract basis for fixed periods by the state government in various panchayat samiti(s) to undertake and implement .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 19 2014 (HC)

Ganesh Ram Vs. State of Raj. and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : May-19-2014

s.b. civil writ petition no.3415/2010 farukh hussain vs. state of rajasthan & ors. along-with connected 3 writ petitions. order dated 19/05/2014 1/8 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur order (1) s.b. civil writ petition no.3415/2010 farukh hussain vs. state of rajasthan & ors. & (2) s.b. civil writ petition no.3403/2010 ganesh ram vs. state of rajasthan & ors. & (3) s.b. civil writ petition no.3417/2010 ajay pal singh vs. state of rajasthan & ors. & (4) s.b. civil writ petition no.3418/2010 anirudh singh vs. state of rajasthan & ors. date of order ::::19. h may, 2014 present hon'ble dr. justice vineet kothari appearance: mr. narpat singh, for the petitioners. mr. manish patel, addl. govt. counsel. -- by the court:1. both the learned counsel for the parties state at bar that the controversy involved in the present case is squarely covered by s.b. civil writ petition no.3415/2010 farukh hussain vs. state of rajasthan & ors. along-with connected 3 writ petitions. order dated 19/05/2014 2/8 the decision of this court in the case of hukam singh & ors. vs. state of rajasthan & ors. along-with connected 28 writ petitions (sbcwp no.6188/2009 decided on 15th july, 2010) wherein this court has held as under: - 1. heard learned counsel for the parties.2. this writ petition has been filed by the petitioners working as 'gram rojgar sahayak' employed on contract basis for fixed periods by the state government in various panchayat samiti(s) to undertake and implement .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 19 2014 (HC)

Ajay Pal Singh Vs. State of Raj. and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : May-19-2014

s.b. civil writ petition no.3415/2010 farukh hussain vs. state of rajasthan & ors. along-with connected 3 writ petitions. order dated 19/05/2014 1/8 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur order (1) s.b. civil writ petition no.3415/2010 farukh hussain vs. state of rajasthan & ors. & (2) s.b. civil writ petition no.3403/2010 ganesh ram vs. state of rajasthan & ors. & (3) s.b. civil writ petition no.3417/2010 ajay pal singh vs. state of rajasthan & ors. & (4) s.b. civil writ petition no.3418/2010 anirudh singh vs. state of rajasthan & ors. date of order ::::19. h may, 2014 present hon'ble dr. justice vineet kothari appearance: mr. narpat singh, for the petitioners. mr. manish patel, addl. govt. counsel. -- by the court:1. both the learned counsel for the parties state at bar that the controversy involved in the present case is squarely covered by s.b. civil writ petition no.3415/2010 farukh hussain vs. state of rajasthan & ors. along-with connected 3 writ petitions. order dated 19/05/2014 2/8 the decision of this court in the case of hukam singh & ors. vs. state of rajasthan & ors. along-with connected 28 writ petitions (sbcwp no.6188/2009 decided on 15th july, 2010) wherein this court has held as under: - 1. heard learned counsel for the parties.2. this writ petition has been filed by the petitioners working as 'gram rojgar sahayak' employed on contract basis for fixed periods by the state government in various panchayat samiti(s) to undertake and implement .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 21 2014 (HC)

Sushil Kumar and anr Vs. Special Dis. Judge - 1 and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Jan-21-2014

[1].in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur order sushil kumar & anr. versus special district judge-i, (pong dam oustees cases).sr.ganganagar & others.s.b.civil writ petition no.383/2014 under article 226 & 227 of the constitution of india. date of order: january 21, 2014. present hon'ble mr.justice p.k.lohra, j. mr.b.s.sandhu, for the petitioners.*** by the court: petitioners have ventilated their grievances in the instant petition against the impugned order dated 13th of august 1998 (annex.9) passed by the firs.respondent as well as order dated 9th of may 1992 (annex.6) passed by the sub divisional officer, raisinghnagar and has prayed for annulment of both these orders.besides the aforesaid main prayer, the petitioners have also craved for other ancillary reliefs. scorning the checkered history of the case, the brief facts essential for appreciating the afflictions of the [2].petitioners are that the petitioners.father was an agriculturist owning agricultural land in himachal pradesh, which was acquired for the purpose of constructing pong dam reservoir and in benefit thereof state of rajasthan allotted him the land in indira gandhi canal area by treating him a pong dam oustee in the form of compensation. as compensation, he was allotted 25 bighas of land in 6 bgd tehsil vijay nagar, murabba no.143/337 alongwith a land of plot in abadi area of 6 bgd. the possession of the land was taken over by father of the petitioners and he started cultivation on 25th .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 07 2014 (HC)

Smt.Saroj and ors Vs. Prabhu NaraIn and anr

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Feb-07-2014

1 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur :judgment: s.b. civil first appeal no.152/2013 smt. saroj & ors. vs. prabhu narain mathur & anr. date of judgment ::07. h february, 2014 present hon'ble mr. justice arun bhansali mr. h.r. soni, for the appellants. mr. m.d. boob ) mr. mahesh joshi ), for the respondents. ---- by the court: reportable this appeal is directed against judgment and decree dated 22.01.2013 passed by additional district judge no.1, jodhpur metropolitan, jodhpur, whereby, the suit filed by the plaintiffs for partition and permanent injunction has been dismissed and order dated 22.02.2013 passed by said court, whereby, the judgment dated 22.01.2013 was reviewed and the counter claim filed by the defendant no.1 for possession, which was originally dismissed, has been decreed. the facts in brief may be noticed thus: the appellants- plaintiffs filed a suit, inter alia, with the averments that they are legal representatives of late kailash narayan mathur (knm) and defendant no.1 prabhu narayan mathur (pnm) is younger brother of late knm; the families of knm and pnm were joint and both the families were living together; as pnm had no issue, he alongwith his wife were living with the family of knm as members of knm's family; knm expired in the year 2001; it was 2 then claimed that late knm and pnm purchased plot no.60, sector 4/f from the urban improvement trust, jodhpur ('the uit, jodhpur') by jointly paying the consideration; on account of cordial .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 03 2014 (HC)

Mool Singh Charan Vs. Raj. State Road Tran. Corpn. and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Mar-03-2014

sbcwp no.6757/2013 panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors. along with 13 other connected matters judgment dt:3/3/2014 1/71 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur judgment panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors s.b.civil writ petition no.6757/2013 along with 13 other connected matters (see schedule) date of judgment :3. d march, 2014 present hon'ble dr.justice vineet kothari dr. nupur bhati, ]. mr.mukesh rajpurohit, ]. mr.lokesh mathur, ]. mr. s.k.verma, ]. mr. vipin mankad, ]. for the petitioners. mr. m.s.rathore ]. mr. inderjeet yadav, ]. mr. p.r.singh, addl. advocate general for rsrtc. reportable by the court:1. this bunch of cases has come up before this court on account of termination of services of the petitioners, who were appointed as conductors in the respondent rsrtc, a corporation incorporated under the provisions of the road transport corporations act, 1950. the facts illustratively are taken from sbcwp no.6757/2013 panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors.2. in the selection process initiated by the respondent rsrtc in sbcwp no.6757/2013 panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors. along with 13 other connected matters judgment dt:3/3/2014 2/71 pursuance of advertisement annex.1 no.219/2009-10, in all 793 posts were advertised for different categories, namely; 190 post of drivers, 472 posts of conductors, 12 posts of artisan gr.ii and 119 posts of artisan gr.iii. the petitioners were appointed after a litigative battle in this court. the impugned termination order is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 03 2014 (HC)

Sharwan Ram Saran Vs. Raj. State Road Tran. Corpn. and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Mar-03-2014

sbcwp no.6757/2013 panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors. along with 13 other connected matters judgment dt:3/3/2014 1/71 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur judgment panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors s.b.civil writ petition no.6757/2013 along with 13 other connected matters (see schedule) date of judgment :3. d march, 2014 present hon'ble dr.justice vineet kothari dr. nupur bhati, ]. mr.mukesh rajpurohit, ]. mr.lokesh mathur, ]. mr. s.k.verma, ]. mr. vipin mankad, ]. for the petitioners. mr. m.s.rathore ]. mr. inderjeet yadav, ]. mr. p.r.singh, addl. advocate general for rsrtc. reportable by the court:1. this bunch of cases has come up before this court on account of termination of services of the petitioners, who were appointed as conductors in the respondent rsrtc, a corporation incorporated under the provisions of the road transport corporations act, 1950. the facts illustratively are taken from sbcwp no.6757/2013 panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors.2. in the selection process initiated by the respondent rsrtc in sbcwp no.6757/2013 panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors. along with 13 other connected matters judgment dt:3/3/2014 2/71 pursuance of advertisement annex.1 no.219/2009-10, in all 793 posts were advertised for different categories, namely; 190 post of drivers, 472 posts of conductors, 12 posts of artisan gr.ii and 119 posts of artisan gr.iii. the petitioners were appointed after a litigative battle in this court. the impugned termination order is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 03 2014 (HC)

Ashok Kumar Gurjar and ors Vs. Raj. State Road Tran. Corpn. and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Mar-03-2014

sbcwp no.6757/2013 panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors. along with 13 other connected matters judgment dt:3/3/2014 1/71 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur judgment panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors s.b.civil writ petition no.6757/2013 along with 13 other connected matters (see schedule) date of judgment :3. d march, 2014 present hon'ble dr.justice vineet kothari dr. nupur bhati, ]. mr.mukesh rajpurohit, ]. mr.lokesh mathur, ]. mr. s.k.verma, ]. mr. vipin mankad, ]. for the petitioners. mr. m.s.rathore ]. mr. inderjeet yadav, ]. mr. p.r.singh, addl. advocate general for rsrtc. reportable by the court:1. this bunch of cases has come up before this court on account of termination of services of the petitioners, who were appointed as conductors in the respondent rsrtc, a corporation incorporated under the provisions of the road transport corporations act, 1950. the facts illustratively are taken from sbcwp no.6757/2013 panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors.2. in the selection process initiated by the respondent rsrtc in sbcwp no.6757/2013 panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors. along with 13 other connected matters judgment dt:3/3/2014 2/71 pursuance of advertisement annex.1 no.219/2009-10, in all 793 posts were advertised for different categories, namely; 190 post of drivers, 472 posts of conductors, 12 posts of artisan gr.ii and 119 posts of artisan gr.iii. the petitioners were appointed after a litigative battle in this court. the impugned termination order is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 03 2014 (HC)

Nemi Chand Muwal Vs. Raj. State Road Tran. Corpn. and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Mar-03-2014

sbcwp no.6757/2013 panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors. along with 13 other connected matters judgment dt:3/3/2014 1/71 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur judgment panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors s.b.civil writ petition no.6757/2013 along with 13 other connected matters (see schedule) date of judgment :3. d march, 2014 present hon'ble dr.justice vineet kothari dr. nupur bhati, ]. mr.mukesh rajpurohit, ]. mr.lokesh mathur, ]. mr. s.k.verma, ]. mr. vipin mankad, ]. for the petitioners. mr. m.s.rathore ]. mr. inderjeet yadav, ]. mr. p.r.singh, addl. advocate general for rsrtc. reportable by the court:1. this bunch of cases has come up before this court on account of termination of services of the petitioners, who were appointed as conductors in the respondent rsrtc, a corporation incorporated under the provisions of the road transport corporations act, 1950. the facts illustratively are taken from sbcwp no.6757/2013 panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors.2. in the selection process initiated by the respondent rsrtc in sbcwp no.6757/2013 panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors. along with 13 other connected matters judgment dt:3/3/2014 2/71 pursuance of advertisement annex.1 no.219/2009-10, in all 793 posts were advertised for different categories, namely; 190 post of drivers, 472 posts of conductors, 12 posts of artisan gr.ii and 119 posts of artisan gr.iii. the petitioners were appointed after a litigative battle in this court. the impugned termination order is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 03 2014 (HC)

Surendra Singh Ratnu Vs. Raj. State Road Tran. Corpn. and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Mar-03-2014

sbcwp no.6757/2013 panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors. along with 13 other connected matters judgment dt:3/3/2014 1/71 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur judgment panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors s.b.civil writ petition no.6757/2013 along with 13 other connected matters (see schedule) date of judgment :3. d march, 2014 present hon'ble dr.justice vineet kothari dr. nupur bhati, ]. mr.mukesh rajpurohit, ]. mr.lokesh mathur, ]. mr. s.k.verma, ]. mr. vipin mankad, ]. for the petitioners. mr. m.s.rathore ]. mr. inderjeet yadav, ]. mr. p.r.singh, addl. advocate general for rsrtc. reportable by the court:1. this bunch of cases has come up before this court on account of termination of services of the petitioners, who were appointed as conductors in the respondent rsrtc, a corporation incorporated under the provisions of the road transport corporations act, 1950. the facts illustratively are taken from sbcwp no.6757/2013 panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors.2. in the selection process initiated by the respondent rsrtc in sbcwp no.6757/2013 panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors. along with 13 other connected matters judgment dt:3/3/2014 2/71 pursuance of advertisement annex.1 no.219/2009-10, in all 793 posts were advertised for different categories, namely; 190 post of drivers, 472 posts of conductors, 12 posts of artisan gr.ii and 119 posts of artisan gr.iii. the petitioners were appointed after a litigative battle in this court. the impugned termination order is .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //