Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Court: rajasthan Year: 2014 Page 7 of about 108 results (0.012 seconds)

Mar 03 2014 (HC)

Sandeep Kumar Vs. Raj. State Road Tran. Corpn. and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Mar-03-2014

sbcwp no.6757/2013 panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors. along with 13 other connected matters judgment dt:3/3/2014 1/71 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur judgment panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors s.b.civil writ petition no.6757/2013 along with 13 other connected matters (see schedule) date of judgment :3. d march, 2014 present hon'ble dr.justice vineet kothari dr. nupur bhati, ]. mr.mukesh rajpurohit, ]. mr.lokesh mathur, ]. mr. s.k.verma, ]. mr. vipin mankad, ]. for the petitioners. mr. m.s.rathore ]. mr. inderjeet yadav, ]. mr. p.r.singh, addl. advocate general for rsrtc. reportable by the court:1. this bunch of cases has come up before this court on account of termination of services of the petitioners, who were appointed as conductors in the respondent rsrtc, a corporation incorporated under the provisions of the road transport corporations act, 1950. the facts illustratively are taken from sbcwp no.6757/2013 panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors.2. in the selection process initiated by the respondent rsrtc in sbcwp no.6757/2013 panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors. along with 13 other connected matters judgment dt:3/3/2014 2/71 pursuance of advertisement annex.1 no.219/2009-10, in all 793 posts were advertised for different categories, namely; 190 post of drivers, 472 posts of conductors, 12 posts of artisan gr.ii and 119 posts of artisan gr.iii. the petitioners were appointed after a litigative battle in this court. the impugned termination order is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 03 2014 (HC)

Sandeep Kumar and ors Vs. Raj. State Road Tran. Corpn. and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Mar-03-2014

sbcwp no.6757/2013 panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors. along with 13 other connected matters judgment dt:3/3/2014 1/71 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur judgment panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors s.b.civil writ petition no.6757/2013 along with 13 other connected matters (see schedule) date of judgment :3. d march, 2014 present hon'ble dr.justice vineet kothari dr. nupur bhati, ]. mr.mukesh rajpurohit, ]. mr.lokesh mathur, ]. mr. s.k.verma, ]. mr. vipin mankad, ]. for the petitioners. mr. m.s.rathore ]. mr. inderjeet yadav, ]. mr. p.r.singh, addl. advocate general for rsrtc. reportable by the court:1. this bunch of cases has come up before this court on account of termination of services of the petitioners, who were appointed as conductors in the respondent rsrtc, a corporation incorporated under the provisions of the road transport corporations act, 1950. the facts illustratively are taken from sbcwp no.6757/2013 panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors.2. in the selection process initiated by the respondent rsrtc in sbcwp no.6757/2013 panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors. along with 13 other connected matters judgment dt:3/3/2014 2/71 pursuance of advertisement annex.1 no.219/2009-10, in all 793 posts were advertised for different categories, namely; 190 post of drivers, 472 posts of conductors, 12 posts of artisan gr.ii and 119 posts of artisan gr.iii. the petitioners were appointed after a litigative battle in this court. the impugned termination order is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 03 2014 (HC)

Panne Singh and ors Vs. Raj. State Road Tran. Corpn. and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Mar-03-2014

sbcwp no.6757/2013 panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors. along with 13 other connected matters judgment dt:3/3/2014 1/71 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur judgment panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors s.b.civil writ petition no.6757/2013 along with 13 other connected matters (see schedule) date of judgment :3. d march, 2014 present hon'ble dr.justice vineet kothari dr. nupur bhati, ]. mr.mukesh rajpurohit, ]. mr.lokesh mathur, ]. mr. s.k.verma, ]. mr. vipin mankad, ]. for the petitioners. mr. m.s.rathore ]. mr. inderjeet yadav, ]. mr. p.r.singh, addl. advocate general for rsrtc. reportable by the court:1. this bunch of cases has come up before this court on account of termination of services of the petitioners, who were appointed as conductors in the respondent rsrtc, a corporation incorporated under the provisions of the road transport corporations act, 1950. the facts illustratively are taken from sbcwp no.6757/2013 panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors.2. in the selection process initiated by the respondent rsrtc in sbcwp no.6757/2013 panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors. along with 13 other connected matters judgment dt:3/3/2014 2/71 pursuance of advertisement annex.1 no.219/2009-10, in all 793 posts were advertised for different categories, namely; 190 post of drivers, 472 posts of conductors, 12 posts of artisan gr.ii and 119 posts of artisan gr.iii. the petitioners were appointed after a litigative battle in this court. the impugned termination order is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 03 2014 (HC)

Vijay Kumar Vs. Raj. State Road Tran. Corpn. and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Mar-03-2014

sbcwp no.6757/2013 panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors. along with 13 other connected matters judgment dt:3/3/2014 1/71 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur judgment panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors s.b.civil writ petition no.6757/2013 along with 13 other connected matters (see schedule) date of judgment :3. d march, 2014 present hon'ble dr.justice vineet kothari dr. nupur bhati, ]. mr.mukesh rajpurohit, ]. mr.lokesh mathur, ]. mr. s.k.verma, ]. mr. vipin mankad, ]. for the petitioners. mr. m.s.rathore ]. mr. inderjeet yadav, ]. mr. p.r.singh, addl. advocate general for rsrtc. reportable by the court:1. this bunch of cases has come up before this court on account of termination of services of the petitioners, who were appointed as conductors in the respondent rsrtc, a corporation incorporated under the provisions of the road transport corporations act, 1950. the facts illustratively are taken from sbcwp no.6757/2013 panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors.2. in the selection process initiated by the respondent rsrtc in sbcwp no.6757/2013 panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors. along with 13 other connected matters judgment dt:3/3/2014 2/71 pursuance of advertisement annex.1 no.219/2009-10, in all 793 posts were advertised for different categories, namely; 190 post of drivers, 472 posts of conductors, 12 posts of artisan gr.ii and 119 posts of artisan gr.iii. the petitioners were appointed after a litigative battle in this court. the impugned termination order is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 03 2014 (HC)

Jaipal Singh Yadav and ors Vs. Raj. State Road Tran. Corpn. and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Mar-03-2014

sbcwp no.6757/2013 panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors. along with 13 other connected matters judgment dt:3/3/2014 1/71 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur judgment panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors s.b.civil writ petition no.6757/2013 along with 13 other connected matters (see schedule) date of judgment :3. d march, 2014 present hon'ble dr.justice vineet kothari dr. nupur bhati, ]. mr.mukesh rajpurohit, ]. mr.lokesh mathur, ]. mr. s.k.verma, ]. mr. vipin mankad, ]. for the petitioners. mr. m.s.rathore ]. mr. inderjeet yadav, ]. mr. p.r.singh, addl. advocate general for rsrtc. reportable by the court:1. this bunch of cases has come up before this court on account of termination of services of the petitioners, who were appointed as conductors in the respondent rsrtc, a corporation incorporated under the provisions of the road transport corporations act, 1950. the facts illustratively are taken from sbcwp no.6757/2013 panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors.2. in the selection process initiated by the respondent rsrtc in sbcwp no.6757/2013 panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors. along with 13 other connected matters judgment dt:3/3/2014 2/71 pursuance of advertisement annex.1 no.219/2009-10, in all 793 posts were advertised for different categories, namely; 190 post of drivers, 472 posts of conductors, 12 posts of artisan gr.ii and 119 posts of artisan gr.iii. the petitioners were appointed after a litigative battle in this court. the impugned termination order is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 03 2014 (HC)

Amit Tiwari and ors Vs. State and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Mar-03-2014

sbcwp no.6757/2013 panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors. along with 13 other connected matters judgment dt:3/3/2014 1/71 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur judgment panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors s.b.civil writ petition no.6757/2013 along with 13 other connected matters (see schedule) date of judgment :3. d march, 2014 present hon'ble dr.justice vineet kothari dr. nupur bhati, ]. mr.mukesh rajpurohit, ]. mr.lokesh mathur, ]. mr. s.k.verma, ]. mr. vipin mankad, ]. for the petitioners. mr. m.s.rathore ]. mr. inderjeet yadav, ]. mr. p.r.singh, addl. advocate general for rsrtc. reportable by the court:1. this bunch of cases has come up before this court on account of termination of services of the petitioners, who were appointed as conductors in the respondent rsrtc, a corporation incorporated under the provisions of the road transport corporations act, 1950. the facts illustratively are taken from sbcwp no.6757/2013 panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors.2. in the selection process initiated by the respondent rsrtc in sbcwp no.6757/2013 panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors. along with 13 other connected matters judgment dt:3/3/2014 2/71 pursuance of advertisement annex.1 no.219/2009-10, in all 793 posts were advertised for different categories, namely; 190 post of drivers, 472 posts of conductors, 12 posts of artisan gr.ii and 119 posts of artisan gr.iii. the petitioners were appointed after a litigative battle in this court. the impugned termination order is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 03 2014 (HC)

Puneet Shrivastava Vs. Raj. State Road Tran. Corpn. and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Mar-03-2014

sbcwp no.6757/2013 panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors. along with 13 other connected matters judgment dt:3/3/2014 1/71 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur judgment panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors s.b.civil writ petition no.6757/2013 along with 13 other connected matters (see schedule) date of judgment :3. d march, 2014 present hon'ble dr.justice vineet kothari dr. nupur bhati, ]. mr.mukesh rajpurohit, ]. mr.lokesh mathur, ]. mr. s.k.verma, ]. mr. vipin mankad, ]. for the petitioners. mr. m.s.rathore ]. mr. inderjeet yadav, ]. mr. p.r.singh, addl. advocate general for rsrtc. reportable by the court:1. this bunch of cases has come up before this court on account of termination of services of the petitioners, who were appointed as conductors in the respondent rsrtc, a corporation incorporated under the provisions of the road transport corporations act, 1950. the facts illustratively are taken from sbcwp no.6757/2013 panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors.2. in the selection process initiated by the respondent rsrtc in sbcwp no.6757/2013 panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors. along with 13 other connected matters judgment dt:3/3/2014 2/71 pursuance of advertisement annex.1 no.219/2009-10, in all 793 posts were advertised for different categories, namely; 190 post of drivers, 472 posts of conductors, 12 posts of artisan gr.ii and 119 posts of artisan gr.iii. the petitioners were appointed after a litigative battle in this court. the impugned termination order is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 03 2014 (HC)

Harveer Singh Vs. State and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Mar-03-2014

sbcwp no.6757/2013 panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors. along with 13 other connected matters judgment dt:3/3/2014 1/71 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur judgment panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors s.b.civil writ petition no.6757/2013 along with 13 other connected matters (see schedule) date of judgment :3. d march, 2014 present hon'ble dr.justice vineet kothari dr. nupur bhati, ]. mr.mukesh rajpurohit, ]. mr.lokesh mathur, ]. mr. s.k.verma, ]. mr. vipin mankad, ]. for the petitioners. mr. m.s.rathore ]. mr. inderjeet yadav, ]. mr. p.r.singh, addl. advocate general for rsrtc. reportable by the court:1. this bunch of cases has come up before this court on account of termination of services of the petitioners, who were appointed as conductors in the respondent rsrtc, a corporation incorporated under the provisions of the road transport corporations act, 1950. the facts illustratively are taken from sbcwp no.6757/2013 panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors.2. in the selection process initiated by the respondent rsrtc in sbcwp no.6757/2013 panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors. along with 13 other connected matters judgment dt:3/3/2014 2/71 pursuance of advertisement annex.1 no.219/2009-10, in all 793 posts were advertised for different categories, namely; 190 post of drivers, 472 posts of conductors, 12 posts of artisan gr.ii and 119 posts of artisan gr.iii. the petitioners were appointed after a litigative battle in this court. the impugned termination order is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 03 2014 (HC)

Surendra Kumar Vs. Raj. State Road Tran. Corpn. and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Mar-03-2014

sbcwp no.6757/2013 panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors. along with 13 other connected matters judgment dt:3/3/2014 1/71 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur judgment panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors s.b.civil writ petition no.6757/2013 along with 13 other connected matters (see schedule) date of judgment :3. d march, 2014 present hon'ble dr.justice vineet kothari dr. nupur bhati, ]. mr.mukesh rajpurohit, ]. mr.lokesh mathur, ]. mr. s.k.verma, ]. mr. vipin mankad, ]. for the petitioners. mr. m.s.rathore ]. mr. inderjeet yadav, ]. mr. p.r.singh, addl. advocate general for rsrtc. reportable by the court:1. this bunch of cases has come up before this court on account of termination of services of the petitioners, who were appointed as conductors in the respondent rsrtc, a corporation incorporated under the provisions of the road transport corporations act, 1950. the facts illustratively are taken from sbcwp no.6757/2013 panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors.2. in the selection process initiated by the respondent rsrtc in sbcwp no.6757/2013 panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors. along with 13 other connected matters judgment dt:3/3/2014 2/71 pursuance of advertisement annex.1 no.219/2009-10, in all 793 posts were advertised for different categories, namely; 190 post of drivers, 472 posts of conductors, 12 posts of artisan gr.ii and 119 posts of artisan gr.iii. the petitioners were appointed after a litigative battle in this court. the impugned termination order is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 28 2014 (HC)

Chetan Trivedi and ors Vs. Rrvpnl and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Mar-28-2014

[1].in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur **** :: order :: (1) madan dan arha & anr. versus rajasthan rajya vidyut prasaran nigam ltd & ors (s.b.civil writ petition no.747/2014) (2) chetan trivedi & ors.versus rajasthan rajya vidyut prasaran nigam ltd & ors (s.b.civil writ petition no.767/2014) petitions under article 226 of the constitution of india date of order:: march 28, 2014 present hon'ble mr.justice p.k.lohra mr.sandeep shah, for the petitioners.mr.manoj bhandari, for the respondents. by the court: both these petitions involve common question of law and facts, therefore, both are heard together and disposed of by this common order. for disposal of both the petitions, apposite facts pleaded by the respective parties in s.b.civil writ [2].petition no.747/2014 are narrated for convenience hereinafter. the petitioners of this writ petition are the agriculturists having agricultural land situated in khasr.no.761 and 771 adjacent to each other in village peshua, tehsil pindwara, district sirohi, alongwith other lands. the land in question is duly mutated in their name and in support thereof jamabandi has been placed on record. about a decade back, respondents installed 132 kv line dedicated for supply of power to j.k.cement industry and in the process respondents installed certain poles on the land belonging to the petitioners.as per the version of petitioners.at the time of installation of poles, objections were raised but after due negotiations agreed .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //