Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Court: rajasthan Year: 2015 Page 1 of about 70 results (0.012 seconds)

Jan 28 2015 (HC)

Ram Singh and Ors Vs. Bhikam Chand and Ors

Court : Rajasthan - Jodhpur

Decided on : Jan-28-2015

sbc first appeal no.469/2009 ram singh & ors. vs. bhikam chand & ors. judgment dt:28. 1/2015 1/35 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur judgment ram singh & ors. vs. bhikam chand & ors. s.b.civil first appeal no.469/2009 date of judgment :28. h january, 2015 present hon'ble dr. justice vineet kothari mr.jitendra chopra, for the appellant-defendants mr. suresh shrimali, ]. mr.sundeep bhandawat,]. for the respondent-plaintiffs. mr.ashok patel, ]. by the court: reportable1 the defendants ram singh s/o ghasi ram & ors have filed the present first appeal under section 96 cpc against bhikam chand s/o ram jeevan & anr. being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 12/8/2009 passed learned addl. district judge (fast track) no.3, jodhpur in a suit for specific performance being civil suit no.603/2004 (351/2004) bhikam chand & arun kumar vs. ram singh s/o ghasi ram & ors.2. the said suit for specific performance was filed by the plaintiffs bhikam chand & ors. on 2/11/2004 in respect of agriculture land belonging to ghasi ram, father of the present appellant-defendant ram singh, ad-measuring 28 bighas 19 biswas situated of khasra no.821, 822, 823, 824, 827 & 827/1 in village baga, tehsil & district sbc first appeal no.469/2009 ram singh & ors. vs. bhikam chand & ors. judgment dt:28. 1/2015 2/35 jodhpur, which was agreed to be sold to the plaintiffs under the agreement to sell dated 28/10/1989 at the rate of rs.51,000/- per bigha and this agreement dated 28/10/1989 .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 13 2015 (HC)

Soorajmal @ Suryabhan Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : May-13-2015

..... investigating the case and his assistants shall be allowed no share in the conduct the test. track found, which it is desired to test comparison as above, shall be protected:: mediately of discovery, and their nature measurements and peculiarities shall be recorded at the time in the case diary of a investigating officer. the details of the preparation of the test .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 24 2015 (HC)

Faiyaz Khan Vs. State and Ors

Court : Rajasthan - Jodhpur

Decided on : Nov-24-2015

faiyaz khan vs. state of rajasthan & ors. (s.b.civil writ petition no.246/99) 1 faiyaz khan vs. state of rajasthan & ors. (s.b.civil writ petition no.246/99) dated:- 24.11.15. hon'ble mr.justice sangeet lodha mr.h.r.soni alongwith ms.tripati soni, for the petitioner. mr.o.p.boob, government counsel.1. this writ petition is directed against order dated 10.9.98 of the board of revenue rajasthan, whereby while accepting the reference made by the additional collector, pali under section 82 of rajasthan land revenue act, 1956 ( for short the act of 1956 .) vide order dated 26.3.98, the transfer of the land measuring 4 bighas and 18 biswas comprising khasra no.166 situated at village-jaitaran, district-pali, made in favour of the petitioner, which was recorded in the revenue record as khudkast land of doli banam aasan gudadpeer, has been held to be illegal and accordingly, the mutation effected in the revenue record is directed to be cancelled.2. the relevant facts are that the land measuring 4 bighas and 18 biswas comprising khasra no.166 was recorded in the revenue record in the name of doli banam aasan gudadpeer and the name of balunath chela shivnath was recorded as pujari of the idol. after resumption of jagir, under the provisions of faiyaz khan vs. state of rajasthan & ors. (s.b.civil writ petition no.246/99) 2 rajasthan land reforms and resumption of jagir act, 1952 ( for short the jagir act, 1952 .), the land in question was sold by azeem bux in favour of the petitioner .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 06 2015 (HC)

Kapil Deo Prasad Vs. State of Raj and Another

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Apr-06-2015

1. the petitioner was served with a charge-sheet on 25th september, 1991, under rule 16 of the rajasthan civil services (classification, control and appeal) rules, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the 'rules of 1958', for short) and consequently was inflicted with the penalty of stoppage of three grade increments with cumulative effect by the disciplinary authority vide order dated 31st august, 1996. aggrieved of the penalty imposed, the petitioner has instituted the present writ proceedings, with a prayer to quash and set aside the order of penalty and to exonerate the petitioner of the charges levelled against him. 2. shorn off unnecessary details, the indispensable material facts, necessary for appreciation of the controversy raised, needs to be first noticed. the petitioner was initially appointed as 'amin' in the settlement department on 17th august, 1961 and was accorded promotion to the post of inspector settlement in the month of september, 1989, and he has maintained a clean and unblemished record. the disciplinary action initiated relates to three mutation entries which pertains to village pinan tehsil rajgarh, district alwar. the entries were made in the revenue records after sanction/order of the assistant settlement officer viz. shri chhagan lal verma. though a preliminary enquiry was conducted against one shri ramesh chandra sharma 'amin' along with the petitioner but the proceedings were dropped against him. the petitioner was not accorded any opportunity of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 18 2015 (HC)

Ram Kumar Vs. State and Ors

Court : Rajasthan - Jodhpur

Decided on : Aug-18-2015

1 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur1 d.b.civil special appeal no.375/2002 ram kumar v/s state of rajasthan & ors.2. d.b.civil special appeal no.35/2002 ram kumar v/s het ram date of judgment::- 18th.8.2015 present hon ble chief justice mr.sunil ambwani hon ble mr.justice ajit singh mr.j.l.purohit, senior advocate ) with mr.rajeev purohit )-for the appellant. mr.s.l.jain ) mr.k.l.bishnoi )-for the respondents. judgment (reportable) by the court (per hon'ble sunil ambwani, chief justice) special appeal no.375/2002 1. this special appeal is directed against the judgment of learned single judge dated 20.5.2002, by which he partly allowed the writ petition with direction that shri het ram will execute the sale deed in pursuance of the agreement of sale dated 3.4.1984 to the extent of his transferable share of 2.4 bighas. it was found that the land was agreed to be purchased at the rate of rs.11,000/- per bigha, for which rs.80,000/- was paid and thus, shri het ram will refund the excess amount to the appellant-ram kumar. shri het ram was directed to execute the sale deed to the extent of his share and not of any specific part of the land. after the sale 2 deed is executed and registered, the appellant-ram kumar may file a suit for division of the holding under section 53 of the rajasthan tenancy act, 1955 to get the land partitioned.2. brief facts giving rise to this special appeal, which was held to be maintainable vide order dated 5.5.2015 as it was filed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 18 2015 (HC)

Ram Kumar Vs. Het Ram

Court : Rajasthan - Jodhpur

Decided on : Aug-18-2015

1 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur1 d.b.civil special appeal no.375/2002 ram kumar v/s state of rajasthan & ors.2. d.b.civil special appeal no.35/2002 ram kumar v/s het ram date of judgment::- 18th.8.2015 present hon ble chief justice mr.sunil ambwani hon ble mr.justice ajit singh mr.j.l.purohit, senior advocate ) with mr.rajeev purohit )-for the appellant. mr.s.l.jain ) mr.k.l.bishnoi )-for the respondents. judgment (reportable) by the court (per hon'ble sunil ambwani, chief justice) special appeal no.375/2002 1. this special appeal is directed against the judgment of learned single judge dated 20.5.2002, by which he partly allowed the writ petition with direction that shri het ram will execute the sale deed in pursuance of the agreement of sale dated 3.4.1984 to the extent of his transferable share of 2.4 bighas. it was found that the land was agreed to be purchased at the rate of rs.11,000/- per bigha, for which rs.80,000/- was paid and thus, shri het ram will refund the excess amount to the appellant-ram kumar. shri het ram was directed to execute the sale deed to the extent of his share and not of any specific part of the land. after the sale 2 deed is executed and registered, the appellant-ram kumar may file a suit for division of the holding under section 53 of the rajasthan tenancy act, 1955 to get the land partitioned.2. brief facts giving rise to this special appeal, which was held to be maintainable vide order dated 5.5.2015 as it was filed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 16 2015 (HC)

Modu Ram Vs. Board of Revenue Ajmer and Ors

Court : Rajasthan - Jodhpur

Decided on : Feb-16-2015

1 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur :order : s.b.civil writ petition no.2866/2014 modu ram v/s. board of revenue & ors.date of order :: 16.2.2015 present hon'ble mr.justice arun bhansali mr.g.r.punia, senior advocate assisted by mr.rajesh punia, for the petitioner/s. mr.i.r.choudhary) for the respondent/s. mr.k.r.choudhary) mr.vikas bijarnia ) ----- by the court: this writ petition is directed against the orders dated 6.6.2013 and 7.2.2014 passed by the sdo, makrana, district nagaur and the board of revenue ('board') respectively, whereby the application filed by the petitioner under order vii, rule 11 cpc has been rejected by the sdo and the revision petition arising therefrom has also been rejected by the board. the respondents no.2 to 4 kunni devi, anni devi and sugani devi all daughters of harkaran filed a suit for declaration, partition and permanent injunction before the sdo, makrana against their brothers modu ram, ramu ram and dharma ram and transferee hukma ram besides state and sub-registrar with the averments that the agriculture land in dispute ad measuring 2 91 bigha 16 biswa was recorded in the name of their father harkaran ram and was their parental land; harkaran ram expired in samwat 2029 intestate and in terms of section 8 of the hindu succession act, 1956 ('the act').the plaintiffs (daughters).sons and the widow are his successors.at the time of father's death, their mother was alive, however, she has also expired. it was alleged that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 13 2015 (HC)

Narayan Das Guru Mahant Vasu Devji Khaki Vs. Kumawat Samaj and Ors

Court : Rajasthan - Jodhpur

Decided on : Mar-13-2015

1 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur :order: s.b.civil writ petition no.1980/2015 narayan das guru mahant vashu dev ki khaki versus kumawat samaj & ors.date of order :: 13.03.2015 present hon'ble mr.justice arun bhansali mr.anil mehta, for the petitioner. mr.manish shishodia, for the respondents. ---- by the court: this writ petition is directed against the order dated 28.11.2014 passed by the appellate rent tribunal, whereby the application filed by the petitioner under order i, rule 10 cpc has been rejected. an eviction petition was filed by the respondent kumawat samaj, rajsamand ('samaj') against sagan kshetra vikas samiti, rajsamand ('samiti').wherein one narayan das s/o. mangidas was later on impleaded as party before the rent tribunal, rajsamand. after the parties led evidence, the rent tribunal, inter alia, came to the conclusion that the premises were required reasonably and bonafidely by the samaj; the suit premises were sublet by the samiti to narayan das and based on its findings ordered eviction. 2 during consideration of the issue pertaining to subletting, the rent tribunal also came to the conclusion that the disputed premises were comprised in aaraji no.1670, which was recorded in the name of samaj and not in aaraji no.1649, regarding which, it was claimed by narayan das s/o. mangidas that he has applied for regularization. feeling aggrieved against the judgment and recovery certificate issued by the rent tribunal, narayan das filed an .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 15 2015 (HC)

Samela and Ors Vs. State and Ors

Court : Rajasthan - Jodhpur

Decided on : Jul-15-2015

1 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur1 d.b.civil special appeal no.185/2001 tara & ors. v/s state of rajasthan & anr.2. d.b.civil writ petition no.266/1996 mahant damodar dass & ors.v/s state of rajasthan 3. d.b.civil writ petition no.2309/1996 samela & ors. v/s state of rajasthan & ors.4. d.b.civil special appeal no.444/2004 state of rajasthan & anr. v/s board of revenue & ors.5. d.b.civil writ contempt petition no.323/2007 mahant damodar dass chaila v/s jagdish prasad garg, rts prabhudas & anr.6. d.b.civil special appeal no.1048/2007 shri shanti nath ji sthan deh v/s the state of raj. & ors.7. d.b.civil special appeal no.947/2012 ram karan & ors. v/s state of raj. & ors.8. d.b.civil special appeal no.948/2012 kishan lal & ors. v/s state of raj. & ors.9. d.b.civil special appeal no.949/2012 ram narain & ors. v/s state of raj. & ors.10. d.b.civil special appeal no.950/2012 thandi & anr. v/s board of revenue, ajmer & ors.11. d.b.civil special appeal no.951/2012 ladu & ors. v/s state of raj. & ors.12. d.b.civil special appeal no.952/2012 mangi lal & ors. v/s state of raj. & ors.13. d.b.civil special appeal no.953/2012 mst.kesar & ors. v/s board of revenue, ajmer & ors.14. d.b.civil special appeal no.954/2012 ram swaroop & ors. v/s state of raj. & ors.15. d.b.civil special appeal no.955/2012 chhitar & ors. v/s state of raj. & ors.16. d.b.civil writ petition no.12253/2012 nangi & ors. v/s board of revenue & ors. 2 17. d.b.civil writ petition no.12254/2012 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 15 2015 (HC)

Shri Shanti Nath Ji Sthan Deh Vs. the State of Raj. and Ors

Court : Rajasthan - Jodhpur

Decided on : Jul-15-2015

1 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur1 d.b.civil special appeal no.185/2001 tara & ors. v/s state of rajasthan & anr.2. d.b.civil writ petition no.266/1996 mahant damodar dass & ors.v/s state of rajasthan 3. d.b.civil writ petition no.2309/1996 samela & ors. v/s state of rajasthan & ors.4. d.b.civil special appeal no.444/2004 state of rajasthan & anr. v/s board of revenue & ors.5. d.b.civil writ contempt petition no.323/2007 mahant damodar dass chaila v/s jagdish prasad garg, rts prabhudas & anr.6. d.b.civil special appeal no.1048/2007 shri shanti nath ji sthan deh v/s the state of raj. & ors.7. d.b.civil special appeal no.947/2012 ram karan & ors. v/s state of raj. & ors.8. d.b.civil special appeal no.948/2012 kishan lal & ors. v/s state of raj. & ors.9. d.b.civil special appeal no.949/2012 ram narain & ors. v/s state of raj. & ors.10. d.b.civil special appeal no.950/2012 thandi & anr. v/s board of revenue, ajmer & ors.11. d.b.civil special appeal no.951/2012 ladu & ors. v/s state of raj. & ors.12. d.b.civil special appeal no.952/2012 mangi lal & ors. v/s state of raj. & ors.13. d.b.civil special appeal no.953/2012 mst.kesar & ors. v/s board of revenue, ajmer & ors.14. d.b.civil special appeal no.954/2012 ram swaroop & ors. v/s state of raj. & ors.15. d.b.civil special appeal no.955/2012 chhitar & ors. v/s state of raj. & ors.16. d.b.civil writ petition no.12253/2012 nangi & ors. v/s board of revenue & ors. 2 17. d.b.civil writ petition no.12254/2012 .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //