Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Court: supreme court of india Page 100 of about 7,791 results (0.101 seconds)

Mar 21 1978 (FN)

Ballew Vs. Georgia

Court : US Supreme Court

..... authors also criticized the michigan study because it ignored two other important changes that had occurred when the size of civil juries was decreased from 1 to 6 members: a mediation board, which encouraged settlements, had been introduced, and rules that permitted discovery of insurance policy limits had taken effect. see saks 43. [ footnote 33 ] we do not rely on any .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 01 1978 (FN)

Fmc Vs. Pacific Maritime Assn.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... 15 jurisdiction over labor agreements. in 1938, congress created a maritime labor board (mlb) for the purpose of encouraging collective bargaining and assisting in the peaceful settlement of disputes through mediation. a provision of the 1938 measure, 1005, 52 stat. 967, required every maritime employer to file with the mlb a copy of every contract with any group of its employees .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 18 1979 (FN)

Chrysler Corp. Vs. Brown

Court : US Supreme Court

..... (emphasis added; footnote omitted): "[exemption 4] would assure the confidentiality of information obtained by the government through questionnaires or through material submitted and disclosures made in procedures such as the mediation of labor-management controversies. it exempts such material if it would not customarily be made public by the person from whom it was obtained by the government. . . . it would . . . include .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 27 1980 (FN)

Thomas Vs. Washington Gas Light Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

thomas v. washington gas light co. - 448 u.s. 261 (1980) u.s. supreme court thomas v. washington gas light co., 448 u.s. 261 (1980) thomas v. washington gas light co. no. 79-116 argued march 19, 1980 decided june 27, 1980 448 u.s. 261 certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fourth circuit syllabus petitioner, a resident of the district of columbia, received an award of disability benefits from the virginia industrial commission under the virginia workmen's compensation act for injuries received in virginia while employed by respondent employer (hereafter respondent), which was principally located in the district of columbia, where petitioner was hired. subsequently, petitioner received a supplemental award under the district of columbia workmen's compensation act over respondent's contention that since, as a matter of virginia law, the virginia award excluded any other recovery "at common law or otherwise" on account of the injury in virginia, the district of columbia's obligation to give that award full faith and credit precluded a second, supplemental award in the district. the administrative order upholding the supplemental award was reversed by the court of appeals, which held that the award was precluded by the full faith and credit clause. held: the judgment is reversed, and the case is remanded. pp. 448 u. s. 266 -286; 448 u. s. 286 -290. 598 f.2d 617, reversed and remanded. mr. justice stevens, joined by mr. justice brennan, mr. justice stewart, and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 29 1981 (FN)

Nlrb Vs. Amax Coal Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... (b)(3), but that the union had acted illegally in attempting to coerce amax to join the multiemployer bargaining unit for the western mines, in failing to notify the federal mediation and conciliation service of its dispute with amax before striking, and by insisting to impasse on certain contract proposals that would have violated 8(e) of the act, 29 u .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 06 1981 (FN)

Barrentine Vs. Arkansas-best Freight Sys.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... forms, [ footnote 2/1 ] the national institute of justice, under the leadership of attorney general griffin bell, in 1979 launched a multimillion-dollar program of field studies to test whether mediation at a neighborhood level could resolve small disputes out of courts in a fashion satisfactory to the parties. neighborhood justice centers field test: final evaluation report 7-8 (1980). the ..... centers field test: final evaluation report 26 (1980). resolution came within a matter of days or weeks. ibid. interviews were conducted with one or both disputants in 63% of the mediated cases six months later. for both complainants and respondents, 88% were satisfied with the experience; 80% of complainants and 83% of respondents were satisfied with the agreement reached. in addition .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 02 1982 (FN)

Railway Labor Executives' Assn. Vs. Gibbons

Court : US Supreme Court

..... to avoid disruption of rail service and undue displacement of employees, the rock island railroad and labor organizations representing the employees of such railroad, with the assistance of the national mediation board, may enter into an agreement providing protection for employees of such railroad who are adversely affected as a result of a reduction in service by such railroad. such employee .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 11 1983 (FN)

Bowen Vs. Usps

Court : US Supreme Court

..... no means under a duty to the employer to take any grievances to arbitration. see infra at 459 u. s. 239 -241. [ footnote 2/4 ] statistics developed by the federal mediation and conciliation service (fmcs) show that, in 1981, the average time between the filing of a grievance and the rendering of an arbitral award was 230.26 days. for the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 26 1984 (FN)

Ruckelshaus Vs. Monsanto Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... and terms of compensation nor on a procedure for reaching an agreement on the amount and terms of compensation, either person may initiate binding arbitration proceedings by requesting the federal mediation and conciliation service to appoint an arbitrator from the roster of arbitrators maintained by such service. . . . [t]he findings and determination of the arbitrator shall be final and conclusive, and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 27 1985 (FN)

Mass. Mut. Life Ins. Co. Vs. Russell

Court : US Supreme Court

..... railroad passengers, 414 u. s. 453 , 414 u. s. 458 (1974); nashville milk co. v. carnation co., 355 u. s. 373 , 355 u. s. 375 -376 (1958); switchmen v. national mediation board, 320 u. s. 297 , 320 u. s. 301 (1943); botany worsted mills v. united states, 278 u. s. 282 , 278 u. s. 289 (1929). [ footnote 16 ] see, e.g .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //