Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Court: supreme court of india Year: 1964 Page 1 of about 56 results (0.096 seconds)

Oct 06 1964 (SC)

Commissioner of Income-tax, Punjab Vs. R.D. Aggarwal and Company

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-06-1964

Reported in : AIR1965SC1526; [1965]56ITR20(SC); [1965]1SCR660

..... 'conforming to their general terms of sales', and were to receive 2 1/2 per cent commission on the net cash amounts arising from the accepted business 'concluded by the mediation' of the assessees or directly by the italian company with the customers. the belgian company appointed the assessees their representatives for the whole of india on condition that the latter .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 21 1964 (SC)

Som Chand Sanghvi Vs. Bibhuti Bhusan Chakravarty

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-21-1964

Reported in : AIR1965SC588; 1965CriLJ499; [1964]6SCR275

mudholkar, j.1. this is an appeal against the judgment of the calcutta high courtquashing the issue of process against the respondent. 2. the respondent is an assistant commissioner of police in the city ofcalcutta and the appellant had made a complaint against him alleging that hehad committed an offence under s. 348, i.p.c. that is, wrongful confinement inorder to extort a confession or compel restoration of property. 3. the fact as alleged by the appellant are as follows : one manoharlal seth had lodged a complaint on july 28,1960 against him and two other persons fatehlal and jaichand for offences unders. 120b/420, i.p.c. and s. 420 i.p.c. manoharlal seth had alleged in hiscomplaint that these persons had induced him to purchase a bar of brass for rs.6,000 on the representation that it was of gold and thus duped him. upon thiscomplaint, investigation was taken up by the police. he came to know manoharlalseth in the course of his business. they were on quite friendly terms in thebeginning and later on considerable differences arose between him andmanoharlal seth. as a result of that manoharlal seth told him that unless hesettled his differences with manoharlal seth according to the latter's dictateshe would put him into trouble through his friend, the respondent, and that itis because of this that manoharlal lodged a complaint against him for cheating.this complaint was thus a false complaint and it is common ground thatultimately it was dismissed by the presidency .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 28 1964 (SC)

Mallappa Basappa Desai Vs. Mallappa Veerabhadrappa Desai and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-28-1964

Reported in : AIR1965SC658; [1965]1SCR168

gajendragadkar, c.j. 1. the short question which this appeal raises for our decision is in relation to the construction of rule 9 of bombay regulation viii of 1827. purporting to act under the said rule the learned additional district judge at bijapur has order that the dy. commissioner of bijapur district be appointed the administrator for the management of the estate of deceased kashibai sangappa gadigappa desai who died on the 1st january, 1958. according to this direction, the administrator has to manage the estate of the said deceased kashibai including the scheduled property, both movable and immovable, until the right of succession is determined by a competent court of law. the appellant mallappa basappa desai challenged the propriety and the validity of this order by moving the mysore high court in its revisional jurisdiction under section 115 of the code of civil procedure. the high court was, however, satisfied that there was no ground to interfere with the order passed by the learned additional district judge. against this decision the appellant has come to this court by special leave; and on his behalf, mr. pathak has urged that the impugned order is not justified by the terms of r. 9. that is how the only question which we have to decide in the present case is about the construction of r. 9. 2. it appears that sangappa gadigappa desai was the last male holder of the desgat properties with which the present proceedings are concerned. these properties are extensive .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 17 1964 (SC)

Amba Prasad Vs. Abdul Noor Khan and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-17-1964

Reported in : AIR1965SC54; [1964]7SCR800

..... he is entitled to regain possession in spite of any order or decree to the contrary. the word 'occupant' thus signifies occupancy and enjoyment. mediate possession, (except where the immediate possessor holds on behalf of the mediate possessor) is of no consequence. in this way even persons who got into occupation when lands were abandoned get recognition. the section eliminates inquiries into .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 10 1964 (SC)

Ben Gorm Nilgiri Plantations Company, Coonoor and ors. Vs. Sales Tax O ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-10-1964

Reported in : AIR1964SC1752; [1964]7SCR706; [1964]15STC753(SC)

..... be answered is therefore whether the sales now under consideration do not form part and parcel of a single integrated transaction with the export or are they distinct, distant and mediate, the sale and the export being related to each other only in sense of one leading to the other or the one succeeding the other merely in point of time .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 13 1964 (SC)

Suraj Ratan Thirani and ors. Vs. the Azamabad Tea Co. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-13-1964

Reported in : AIR1965SC295; [1964]6SCR192

..... in court on the date fixed for trial. the only othermatter to be mentioned is that the plaintiffs have, by their purchases,acquired from the several co-heirs, directly or mediately, the entire 16 as.share in the property assuming that their vendors had any such right. armedwith these purchases the plaintiffs filed this suit for the reliefs alreadyindicated. 11. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 30 1964 (SC)

isher Singh Vs. Sarwan Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-30-1964

Reported in : AIR1965SC948

n. rajagopala ayyangar, j.1. a very short point whether a finding in a previous suit between the same parties on the issue relating to the relationship of the respondent to the deceased owner *(see second appeal no. 249 of 1957 dated 3-5-1960 -- punjab.) of the suit property is or is not res judicata in the suit out of which this appeal arises, is the only question for consideration in this appeal by special leave.2. the original owner of the suit-properties which consist of agricultural land measuring about 66 bighas and odd in the village kotla and a kutcha house in the same village and another extent of 13 bighas and odd of land in neighbouring village, was one jati who died childless on may 20, 195.1, his widow also having pre-deceased him. the respondents sarwan singh and three others claimed to be the collaterals of the deceased and his nearest heirs. soon after the death of jati the appellant isher singh, who put forward a claim based on an oral will by the deceased jati, managed to obtain possession of the properties. the respondents made applications to the revenue authorities for mutation in their favour and they secured favourable orders on these petitions ignoring the appellant's claim under the oral will which he set up. as the mutation proceedings, however, did not conclusively determine the title of the parties to the properties ishar singh challenged the right of the respondents by filing a suit against them in the court of sub judge, second class, rajpura, on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 06 1964 (FN)

Carey Vs. Westinghouse Elec. Corp.

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-06-1964

..... be the desirable method for settlement of grievance disputes arising over the application or interpretation of an existing collective bargaining agreement. the service is directed to make its conciliation and mediation services available in the settlement of such grievance disputes only as a last resort and in exceptional cases." 61 stat. 154, 29 u.s.c. 173(d). [ footnote 5 ] senator ..... , 137 n.l.r.b. 1753, 1757. section 201 of the labor management relations act of 1947 declares the national policy to be the use of governmental facilities for conciliation, mediation, and voluntary arbitration of disputes between employers and employees. 61 stat. 152, 29 u.s.c. 171(b). section 203(d) provides: "final adjustment by a method agreed upon by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 24 1964 (SC)

idol of Thakurji Shri Govind Deoji Maharaj Vs. Board of Revenue, Rajas ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-24-1964

Reported in : AIR1965SC906; [1965]1SCR96

gajendragadkar, c.j.1. the short point of law which arises in this appeal is whether under rule 5 of the jaipur matmi rules, 1945, the appellant, the idol of thakurji shri govind deoji maharaj, is liable to pay the matmi amount in question. it appears that respondent no. 1, the board of revenue, had passed an order on november 6, 1956, directing that the matalaba matmi amounting to rs. 15,404/14/6 be recovered from the shebait of the appellant temple. the appellant disputed the validity of this order and filed a writ petition (no. 10 of 1957) in the high court of rajasthan contending that the said amount was not recoverable from the appellant. the high court has dismissed this writ petition and the appellant has come to this court with a certificate granted by the high court. 2. in its petition, the case for the appellant was that several lands had been granted to the appellant from time to time and that these grants were made in the name of the idol, and that the seva pooja of the idol and the management of its properties was entrusted to the goswami ever since the idol of thakurji shri govind deoji maharaj was taken to jaipur from brindaban. on the death of the ninth shebait, goswami shri krishna chandra succeeded to the shebaitship in 1888 and continued to be in management as such shebait until 1935. on his death, his eldest son goswami bhola nath succeeded and seva pooja was looked after by him during his lifetime. on the death of goswami bhola nath in 1945, his eldest .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 30 1964 (SC)

State of Gujarat Vs. Vora Fiddali BadruddIn Mithibarwala

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-30-1964

Reported in : AIR1964SC1043; [1964]6SCR461

civil appellate jurisdiction: civil appeals nos. 182-186 of 1963. appeals by special leave from the judgment and order dated january 1961 of the gujarat high court in second appeals nos. 105, 106, 107, 112 and 193 of 1960. c. k. daphtary, attorney-general, r. ganapathy iyer, r. k. p. shankardass and r. h. dhebar, for the appellant (in all the appeals). purshottam trikamdas, b. parthasarathy, j. b. dadachanji o. c. mathur and ravinder narain, for the resdondents (in all the appeals). january 30, 1964. hidayatullah j., shah j., and mudholkar j. delivered separate judgments allowing the appeal. raghubar dayal j. agreed with the order proposed by hidayatullah j. the dissenting opinion of sinha c.j. and rajagopala ayyangar j. was delivered by ayyangar j. subba rao j. delivered a separate dissenting opinion. ayyangar j.-in this batch of five analogous appeals, by special leave, the main question for determination is whether the rights which were in controversy between the parties in the courts below could be enforced by the munici pal courts; or in other words, whether or not "act of state" pleaded by the state of gujarat is an effective answer to the claims made by the respective respondents to the rights over forests claimed by them in the suits giving rise to these appeals. vora fiddali badruddin mithibarwala is the respondent in civil appeals nos. 182 and 184 of 1963. vora hakimuddin tayabali amthaniwala is the respondent in civil appeal no. 183 of 1963. mehta kantilal .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //