Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Court: supreme court of india Year: 1978 Page 1 of about 76 results (0.174 seconds)

Aug 30 1978 (SC)

Sunil Batra Vs. Delhi Administration and ors. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-30-1978

Reported in : AIR1978SC1675; AIR1980SC1579; 1978CriLJ1741; 1980CriLJ1099; (1978)4SCC494; (1980)3SCC488; [1979]1SCR392; [1980]2SCR557

..... its behalf. shri tarkunde has made legal submissions fuelled by passion for jail reforms. the intervention of social welfare organisation in litigative processes pregnant with wider implications is a healthy mediation between the people and the rule of law. wisely permitted, participative justice, promoted through mass based organizations and public bodies with special concern seeking to intervene, has a democratic potential ..... past and smooth reconciliation with a radical constitutional value-set are the object, uses the art of reading down and reading wide, as part of interpretational engineering. judges are the mediators between the societal tenses. this court in r.l. arora v. state of uttar pradesh and ors. : [1964]6scr784 and in a host of other cases, has lent precedential support .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 1978 (SC)

Vishvas Aba Kurane Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-19-1978

Reported in : AIR1978SC414; 1978CriLJ484; (1978)1SCC474; 1978(10)LC84(SC)

..... . on may 18, 1968, another fracas between maruti arid dinkar, the brother of sharkar (p.w. 2) took place which did not, howver, assume a grave funi because of the mediation of a few persons including the brothers of dinkar. on the fateful evening of may 19, 1968, jaywant left his house for his field to keep a vigil, on the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 13 1978 (SC)

Madan Gopal Bhatnagar Vs. Smt. Jogya Devi and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-13-1978

Reported in : 1980Supp(1)SCC777; 1978(10)LC373(SC)

jaswant singh, j. 1. this appeal by special leave which is directed against the judgment and older dated november 17, 1976 of the high court of judicature at allahabad in s.a. no. 886 of 1975 raises a very interesting question of law via. whether a lessee of land taken by him for building a house can for his own benefit acquire an easement of way or of flow of water over other land of his lessor. though this question seems to have arisen a number of times in different high court of india, it is a question of first impression so far as this court is concerned as it was left open in chapsibhai dhamjibhai damed purusbottam : [1971]1scr335 .2. for a proper determination of this question, it is necessary to refer a few provisions of the indian easements act, 1882 (act v of 1882)(hereinafter called 'the act').3. section 4 of the act defines 'easement' as a right which the owner or occupier of certain land possesses, as such, for the beneficial enjoyment of that land, to do and continue to do something, or to prevent and continue to prevent something being done, in or upon, or in respect of, certain other land not his own.4. section 12 of the act specifies the persons who can acquire easements and provides that an easement can be acquired by the owner of an immoveable property or, on his behalf, by any person in occupation of the same.5. section 15 of the act deals with the method of acquiring easements.6. the words 'owner...or on his behalf by any person in occupation of the same' .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 25 1978 (SC)

Mrs. Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-25-1978

Reported in : AIR1978SC597; (1978)1SCC248; [1978]2SCR621

..... , and at all times : no human laws are of any validity, if contrary to this; and such of them as are valid derive, all their force and all their authority, mediately or immediately, from this original.17. the identification of natural law with divine will or dictates of god may have, quite understandably, vanished at a time when men see god .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 13 1978 (SC)

Kamlapati Trivedi Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-13-1978

Reported in : AIR1979SC777; 1979CriLJ679; (1980)2SCC91; [1979]2SCR717

..... ; it has acquired the meaning of the place where justice is administered and, further, has come to mean the persons who exercise judicial functions under authority derived either immediately or mediately from the sovereign. all tribunals, however, are not courts, in the sense in which the term is here employed, namely, to denote such tribunals as exercise jurisdiction over persons by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 18 1978 (SC)

Ram Adhar Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-18-1978

Reported in : AIR1979SC702; 1980CriLJ817; (1979)3SCC774; 1979(11)LC139(SC)

v.d. tulzapurkar, j.1. the appellant-accused was sentenced to death by the second temporary civil and sessions judge, kanpur under section 302 ipc for committing the murder of his uncle phool ghand in sessions case no. 279 of 1972 on november 25, 1972, which conviction and sentence were confirmed by the allahabad high court in criminal appeal no. 3336 of 1972 and reference case no. 128 of 1972. he has challenged his said conviction and sentence in this appeal by special leave granted on december 2, 1975. 2. the incident during the course of which phool chand was assaulted by the appellant-accused with a 'karauli' inflicting numerous injuries is said to have taken place on march 16, 1972, at about 6.00 p.m. in the 8 biswa field of phool chand in village bhagwantpur and the motive for the assault was property dispute. briefly stated the prosecution case was that deceased phool chand, whose only daughter had died some 16/17 years ago, had brought his son-in-law salig ram and three grand sons babu, chote lal and raghuraj (pw 1) to his village bhagwantpur and they were living with him. about 10 months prior to the occurrence phool ghand had executed a gift deed (ex. ka-27) in respect of his l/3rd separated share in the ancestral lands (admeasuring 111/2 bighas) in favour of smt. rajeshwar widow of babu (who had in the mean time died), chote lal and raghuraj (pw 1), this was not relished by the appellant-accused and his brother mahadev (nephews of phool chand. after the execution .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 22 1978 (FN)

Beth Israel Hosp. Vs. Nlrb

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-22-1978

..... the health care institution and the labor organization participate in mediation at the direction of the fmcs. section 1(e), 88 stat. 396, added a new 8(g) to the nlra, requiring labor organizations to give a 10-day ..... 8(d) of the nlra by requiring, with respect to health care institutions, 90-day notice of termination or expiration of a contract, 60-day notice to the federal mediation and conciliation service (fmcs) of contract termination or expiration, and 30-day notice to fmcs with respect to initial contract negotiation disputes arising after recognition, and by requiring that ..... 16 ] page 437 u. s. 499 moreover, congress addressed its concern for the unique problems presented by labor disputes in the health care industry by adding specific strike notice and mediation provisions designed to avert interruption in the delivery of critical health care services; none expresses a policy in favor of curtailing self-organizational rights. [ footnote 17 ] indeed, although congress ..... extent the board had required at the time the 1974 amendments were enacted. in extending coverage of the act to nonprofit hospitals, congress enacted special provisions for strike notice and mediation, applicable solely to the health care industry, intended to avoid disruptions of patient care caused by strikes. [ footnote 12 ] page 437 u. s. 497 it is significant that, although .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 08 1978 (SC)

Maulana ShamsuddIn Vs. Khushilal and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-08-1978

Reported in : AIR1978SC1740; (1979)1SCC121; [1979]1SCR582; 1978(10)LC723(SC)

untwalia, j.1. in this appeal by certificate granted by the madhya pradesh high court the question of law which falls for our determination is whether conferral of bhumiswami rights on shri khushi lal, respondent no. 1 in respect of the lands in question in accordance with section 190 of the madhya pradesh land revenue code, 1959, hereinafter referred to as the m.p. code of 1959, by the revenue authorities is correct and sustainable.2. maulana shamsuddin, the sole appellant in this appeal, was a muafidar in the erstwhile state of bhopal of the disputed lands in accordance with the bhopal state land revenue act, 1932 (for brevity, the bhopal act of 1932). the first respondent claimed to be a shikmi of the appellant in respect of the lands in question. his case was that the appellant was the occupant of the lands within the meaning of the bhopal act of 1932. on the coming into force of the m.p. code of 1959, the appellant became a bhumiswami under clause (c) of section 158 and the respondent became an occupancy tenant under section 185(1)(iv)(b). thus he became entitled to conferment of bhumiswami rights under section 490. he applied before the tahsildar, huzur, respondent no. 5 for mutation of his name as a bhumiswami in the revenue records. the tahsildar by his order dated the 24th june, 1963 directed khushi lal to deposit compensation equivalent to 15 times of the land revenue on the payment of which his name was to be recorded as a bhumiswami of the holdings. it appears his .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 26 1978 (FN)

Duke Power Co. Vs. Carolina Env. Study Group

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-26-1978

..... under the price-anderson act, but under the fifth amendment itself. jurisdiction under 1337 extends only to actions vindicating rights created by an act of congress. compare switchmen v. national mediation board, 320 u. s. 297 , 320 u. s. 300 (1943), with general committee v. missouri-kansas-texas r. co., 320 u. s. 323 , 320 u. s. 337 (1943). since it .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 21 1978 (FN)

Ballew Vs. Georgia

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Mar-21-1978

..... authors also criticized the michigan study because it ignored two other important changes that had occurred when the size of civil juries was decreased from 1 to 6 members: a mediation board, which encouraged settlements, had been introduced, and rules that permitted discovery of insurance policy limits had taken effect. see saks 43. [ footnote 33 ] we do not rely on any .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //