Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Court: supreme court of india Year: 1988 Page 1 of about 65 results (0.134 seconds)

Nov 02 1988 (SC)

Mallela Seetharmaiah and anr. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-02-1988

Reported in : AIR1989SC421; 1989CriLJ968; JT1988(4)SC261; 1988(2)SCALE1109; 1989Supp(1)SCC74; 1989(1)LC190(SC)

..... further stated that he might have deposed once or twice in criminal cases filed by the police in the last three years. this obviously proves that he is a police mediator and he is called by the police whenever it is necessary to have mediatornama signed by a witness in whose presence the alleged recovery of articles is made. there is ..... the shop of p.w. 28 at about 7.30 p.m. on august 25, 1975 is also false and the recovery from his person the properties mentioned in the mediators' report (ex. p. 32) in the presence of p.w. 22 and another is also false. a-2 was in fact arrested at his house at chhattaparru on the ..... (m.o. 2) in the presence of t. sambi reddy (p.w. 22) and another. p.w. 31 then seized chandraharam (m.o. 15) from p.w. 28 under the mediators' report (ex. p. 32) in the presence of p.w. 22 and another6. the accused a-1 and a-2 were charged under section 302 read with 34 of indian ..... p.w. 29 and another and seized rs. 2870/- (m.o. 24) and some gold jewels and seized them under the mediators' report (ex. p. 65)5. on getting information from k. g. paul, the d.s.i., lalapet (p.w. 30) that a-2 pledged a gold chandraharam with b. sambasivarao ..... of two rows with black beads and red locket (m.o. 1) after removing them from near his waist. p.w. 31 seized m.os. 1 and 5 under the mediators' report (ex. p. 15). it is also alleged that p.w. 31 opened the iron-safe which was in the northern room behind the central hall in the presence of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 19 1988 (SC)

Navnit R. Kamani and ors. Vs. R.R. Kamani

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-19-1988

Reported in : AIR1989SC9; [1989]66CompCas132(SC); (1988)3CompLJ162(SC); JT1988(3)SC700; (1989)ILLJ47SC; 1987(2)SCALE1415; (1988)4SCC387; [1988]Supp3SCR123; (1990)3UPLBEC1456

..... the sick undertakings. in the course of the discussion in the earlier part of this order we have referred to the abortive efforts made by the learned mediator and the members of the different family groups of kamanis for selling 90% of the shares of ktl. it however appears that no purchaser was coming ..... to frame a scheme of their own for revival of the 'sick' unit. what exactly transpired 2-1/2 years back has been recorded in the mediator's minutes dated july 2,1986:at the end of the discussions it was decided that the different groups of the family or any of them would ..... in their part, and the kamani employees union (keu) extended its hand of cooperation to the kanani family group as has been noticed by the learned mediator in his minutes dated july 2, 1986:the bona fides of the applicant workers would be clear from the fact that in spite of the fact that ..... mess to a considerable extent. this is evident from the fact that after the learned mediator came on the scene income tax and capital gains tax dues to the tune of over rs. 48 lakhs and over rs. 35 lakhs respectively have ..... in the larger interest of the warring factions as also in order to protect the interests of the community and the workers in august 1984. the learned mediator has invested considerable time, effort and acumen in order to resolve the problems presented in the course of the proceedings and has successfully disentangled the economic .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 18 1988 (SC)

Karanpura Development Company Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-18-1988

Reported in : AIR1988SC1478; JT1988(2)SC586; 1988(1)SCALE1003; 1988Supp(1)SCC488; 1988(2)LC393(SC)

..... equivalent to actual physical possession. a lessee, in law is in possession through a sub-lessee though the possession of the sub-lessee is 'immediate' and that of the lessee 'mediate'. shri goburdhan's contention can not be reconciled with the pronouncement in the bihar miness' case.8. in the act the expression 'person-interested' is defined under section 2 (d .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 29 1988 (FN)

Commun. Workers of Amer. Vs. Beck

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-29-1988

..... union security provisions, rather than explicit comparisons of 8(a)(3) with the provisions of the rla. for example, senator taft explained: "in effect, the bill inserts in the railway mediation law almost the exact provisions, so far as they fit, of the taft-hartley law, so that the conditions regarding the union shop and the check-off are carried into ..... should have the same right that any other union has to negotiate for the union shop"); id. at 16267 (remarks of sen. taft) ("[t]he bill inserts in the railway mediation law almost the exact provisions . . . of the taft-hartley law"); id. at 17049 (remarks of rep. beckworth) (the bill permits railway unions "to bring about agreements with carriers providing for ..... become 2, eleventh, congress did not look to 8(a)(3) merely for guidance. rather, as senator taft argued in support of the legislation, the amendment "inserts in the railway mediation law almost the exact provisions, so far as they fit, of the taft-hartley law, so that the conditions regarding the union shop and the check-off are carried into .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 24 1988 (FN)

Pennell Vs. City of San Jose

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Feb-24-1988

..... of a tenant in possession [ footnote 2 ] by as much as eight percent; if a tenant objects to an increase greater than eight percent, a hearing is required before a "mediation hearing officer" to determine whether the landlord's proposed increase is "reasonable under the circumstances." the ordinance sets forth a number of factors to be considered by the hearing officer .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 15 1988 (FN)

Webster Vs. Doe

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-15-1988

..... be rejected without hesitation." see, e.g., chicago & southern air lines, inc. v. waterman s.s. corp., 333 u. s. 103 , 333 u. s. 110 -114 (1948); switchmen v. national mediation board, 320 u. s. 297 , 320 u. s. 301 -306 (1943); united states v. george s. bush & co., 310 u. s. 371 , 310 u. s. 379 -380 (1940); reaves v .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 27 1988 (FN)

Pierce Vs. Underwood

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-27-1988

..... 1454, 1457 (ca8 1986); haitian refugee center v. meese, 791 f.2d 1489, 1496 (ca11 1986); united states v. yoffe, 775 f.2d 447, 451 (ca1 1985); russell v. national mediation bd., 775 f.2d 1284, 1289 (ca5 1985); essex electro engineers, inc. v. united states, 757 f.2d 247, 252-253 (ca fed.1985); hicks v. heckler, 756 f.2d .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 02 1988 (SC)

Diwan Naubat Rai and ors. Vs. State Through Delhi Administration and a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-02-1988

Reported in : AIR1989SC542; 1989CriLJ802; JT1988(4)SC570; 1988(2)SCALE1531; (1989)1SCC297

n.d. ojha, j.1. the prayer in the writ petitions is for quashing of the proceedings in a case arising out of first information report no. 472 dated 3rd may, 1978 under section 448 i.p.c. p.s. moti nagar pending in the court of shri s.p. singh choudhary, additional sessions judge whereas the prayer in the miscellaneous petitions is for initiating contempt proceedings against (1) state through administrator, delhi administration (2) shri r.k. sharma, inspector general of police, goa and (3) shri ajai chadha, deputy commissioner of police (west zone), new delhi. on these writ petitions and criminal miscellaneous petitions notice was issued by this court on 23rd august, 1988 confined to respondents 1 and 2.2. the facts giving rise to these proceedings may be stated here in a nutshell. the petitioners are being prosecuted on the basis of the allegations made in the first information report referred to above in the court of an additional sessions judge. writ petition (criminal) nos. 359-362 of 1987 were filed by the petitioners before this court for quashing all the proceedings in pursuance of the aforesaid first information report on various grounds. these writ petitions, however, were dismissed by this court on 13th july, 1987 by the following order:-the writ petition is dismissed subject to the direction that the trial of the case will go on from day-to-day after the learned addl. sessions judge fixes a date for commencement of the trial some time in the third week of august, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 23 1988 (SC)

Asian Paints India Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-23-1988

Reported in : AIR1988SC1087; 1988(16)ECC172; 1988(35)ELT3(SC); JT1988(2)SC8; 1988(1)SCALE628; (1988)2SCC470; [1988]3SCR339; [1988]70STC38(SC); 1988(2)LC104(SC)

sabyasachi mukharji, j.1. in this appeal under section 35l of the central excise and salt act, 1944 (hereinafter called 'the act'), the question involved is whether 'decoplast' manufactured by the asian paints india ltd., the appellant herein, is plastic emulsion paint and, therefore, classifiable under tariff item 14(i)(3)(iv) of the first schedule of the act as plastic emulsion paint or it should be classifiable under tariff item no. 14(i)(v) that is as 'paints not otherwise specified'.2. the customs excise and gold (control) appellate tribunal (hereinafter called 'the cegat'), by the impugned order challenged in this appeal held that decoplast is plastic emulsion paint. the appellant felt aggrieved thereby. in so holding the technical member of the tribunal observed that in view of its composition, characteristics and uses, decoplast should be considered as emulsion paint. the judicial member of the tribunal was of the view that the revenue had not adduced any evidence of rebuttal of the evidence adduced by the appellant as the commercial understanding but the evidence adduced by the appellant was intrinsically untrustworthy. therefore, inspite of the affidavits and absence of evidence in rebuttal, he agreed with the other member that decoplast is plastic emulsion paint and the appeal before the tribunal should be dismissed.3. it appears that the appellants had filed revision application before the government of india against the order of the revenue authorities. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 18 1988 (SC)

Munna Khan and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-18-1988

Reported in : [1988]57ITR193(SC); JT1989(3)SC26; 1989Supp(2)SCC99

k.n. singh and; m.h. kania, jj.1. heard learned counsel for the parties.2. in view of the decision of this court in catering cleaners of southern railway v. union of india1 and having regard to the facts and circumstances of this case, we direct the central government to take appropriate action under section 10 of the contract labour (abolition and regulation) act in the matter of prohibiting the employment of contract labour in the work of cleaning catering establishments and pantry cars in the western railway. this must be done within six months from today. without waiting for the decision of the central government the administration of the western railway will be free, of its own motion to abolish the contract labour system and to regularise the services of those employed in the work of cleaning catering establishments and pantry cars in the western railway. in any case, the administration of the western railway will refrain, until the decision of the central government under section 10, from employing contract labour. the work of cleaning catering establishments and pantry cars will be done departmentally by employing these workmen who were previously employed by the contractor on the same wages and conditions of work as are applicable to those engaged in similar work by the western railway. if there is any dispute whether an individual workman was or was not employed by the contractor such dispute shall be decided by the deputy labour commissioner, bombay. any further .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //