Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Court: supreme court of india Year: 2014 Page 11 of about 192 results (0.085 seconds)

Apr 23 2014 (SC)

State of Jharkhand and ors. Vs. Kamal Prasad and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-23-2014

reportable in the supreme court of india civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal no.4809 of2014(arising out of slp(c) 266 of2012 state of jharkhand & ors. appellants vs. kamal prasad & ors. respondents with civil appeal no.4837 of2014(arising out of slp(c) no.21936 of 2013) civil appeal no.4810 of2014(arising out of slp(c) no.34437 of 2012) civil appeal no.4811 of2014(arising out of slp(c) no.36515 of 2012) civil appeal no.4812 of2014(arising out of slp(c) no.37628 of 2012) civil appeal no.4813 of2014(arising out of slp(c) no.37701 of 2012) civil appeal no.4814 of2014(arising out of slp(c) no.37702 of 2012) civil appeal no.4815 of2014(arising out of slp(c) no.37740 of 2012) civil appeal no.4816 of2014(arising out of slp(c) no.37819 of 2012) civil appeal no.4817 of2014(arising out of slp(c) no.37834 of 2012) civil appeal no.4818 of2014(arising out of slp(c) no.37850 of 2012) civil appeal no.4819 of2014(arising out of slp(c) no.37864 of 2012) civil appeal no.4820 of2014(arising out of slp(c) no.37930 of 2012) civil appeal no.4821 of2014(arising out of slp(c) no.37952 of 2012) civil appeal no.4822 of2014(arising out of slp(c) no.37981 of 2012) civil appeal no.4823 of2014(arising out of slp(c) no.38012 of 2012) civil appeal no.4824 of2014(arising out of slp(c) no.38039 of 2012) civil appeal no.4825 of2014(arising out of slp(c) no.38044 of 2012) civil appeal no.4826 of2014(arising out of slp(c) no.38053 of 2012) civil appeal no.4827 of2014(arising out of slp(c) no.38224 of 2012) .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 24 2014 (SC)

J.N. Chaudhary and ors. Etc. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-24-2014

reportable in the supreme court of india civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal nos. 4854-4855 of2014(arising out of s.l.p. (c) nos.1581-1582/2011 j.n. chaudhary & ors. etc. ..appellants versus state of haryana & ors. ..respondents with civil appeal nos. 4856-4857 of2014(arising out of s.l.p. (c) nos. 4758-59/2011) mount everest co-operative house building society ltd. ..appellant versus state of haryana & ors. etc. etc. ..respondents judgment gyan sudha misra, j.1. delay in slp (civil) 4758-59/2011 condoned.2. leave granted in both sets of special leave petitions.3. these appeals by special leave have been preferred against the judgment and order dated 27.08.2010 passed by the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh in letters patent appeal nos.215 and 216 of 2007 (o&m) whereby the division bench of the high court dismissed both the letters patent appeals by a common judgment and order which is under challenge herein.4. the letters patent appeals which stood dismissed arose out of two writ petitions filed in the high court before the learned single judge bearing writ petition nos.6491/2005 and 7742/2005 which were filed challenging the orders dated 13.12.2002, 05.09.2003 and 19.11.2004 in the high court at chandigarh which were the suspension order, removal order of the erstwhile committee and order of the dy. registrar who dismissed the appeal against removal. the facts stated therein disclosed that on 04.03.1994, a co-operative society in the name of mount .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 23 2014 (SC)

Rajeev Dhawan Vs. Gulshan Kumar Mahajan and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-23-2014

reportable in the supreme court of india criminal original jurisdiction contempt petition (crl.) no.2 of1994rajeev dhawan petitioner vs. gulshan kumar mahajan & ors. respondents with contempt petition (crl.) no.4a of1994judgment r.m. lodha, cji. as a result of the incidents at ayodhya on 06.12.1992, the president of india issued a proclamation under article 356 of the constitution of india assuming to himself all the functions of the government of uttar pradesh, dissolving the u.p. vidhan sabha. initially, the acquisition of certain area at ayodhya ordinance, 1993 (no.8 of 1993) was promulgated. the said ordinance was later on replaced by acquisition of certain area at ayodhya act, 1993 (no.33 of 1993) (for short, the 1993 act ). on the same day, i.e. on 07.01.1993, when act no.33 of 1993 was enacted, special reference (being special reference no.1 of 1993) was made to this court by the president of india under article 143 (1) of the constitution of india. the constitutional validity of the 1993 act and the maintainability of the special reference no.1 of 1993 were being examined by the constitution bench of this court. it is alleged that the vishwa hindu parishad (vhp), which was banned at that time, held dharam sansad in the first week of april, 1994 and after the dharam sansad was over, its president, vishnu hari dalmia and joint general secretary, giriraj kishore made certain derogatory statements concerning this court in the news conference. the statements to the media .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 23 2014 (SC)

Dr. Subramanian Swamy Vs. Arun Shourie

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-23-2014

reportable in the supreme court of india criminal original jurisdiction contempt petition (crl.) no.11 of1990dr. subramanian swamy petitioner vs. arun shourie respondent with contempt petition (crl.) no.12 of1990judgment r.m. lodha, cji. in the issue of indian express of august 13, 1990, an editorial was published bearing the caption if shame had survived . the editorial reads as under: if shame had survived the legal opinion that the former chief justice of india, mr. y. v. chandrachud, has given on the kuldip singh commission s report is a stunning indictment. succinct, understated to the point of being deferential, scrupulously adhering to facts and law, eschewing completely the slightest attribution of any motive to the commission, the opinion is a model of rectitude. nothing in the report survives it evidence that it was agreed would not be pressed relied on as a fulcrum; evidence of the one witness who was the hub of the decisions wholly disregarded; indictments framed on probable possibility , theories invented to read meanings into documents and the manifest, straightforward explanation ignored; the commission itself as well as the energetic prosecutor himself declaring one day that neither had a shred of evidence which cast a doubt on hegde and the very next day declaring a conclusion; refusing to common witnesses for cross-examination on the pretext that the commission did not have the power to call them this in the face of clear judgments to the contrary; then .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 13 2014 (SC)

Purshottam Das Tandon Dead by Lrs.and anr. Vs. Military Estate Officer ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-13-2014

reportable in the supreme court of india civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal no.2147 of2006purshottam das tandon dead by lrs. appellant (s) versus military estate officer & ors. respondent (s) judgment ranjan gogoi, j.1. the challenge in this appeal is against the common order dated 27.05.2005 passed by the high court of judicature at allahabad in civil misc. writ petition no.13353 of 1992 and civil misc. writ petition no.28558 of 2002. the high court, by the impugned order, has dismissed both the writ petitions filed by the appellant and has further held that the entitlement of the appellant to the reliefs claimed therein will have to be adjudicated in a suit for declaration of title.2. the elaborate facts will necessarily have to be recited for the purposes of bringing out the controversy involved and also to embark upon a scrutiny of the correctness of the impugned conclusions recorded by the high court in the order under challenge.3. the suit property is bungalow no.29, chaitham lines, allahabad covered by survey no.143, old cantonment, allahabad. there is no dispute that late lala manohar lal grandfather of the present appellant had purchased the said property for a sum of rs. 2900/- in a court auction held on 25.11.1848. the auction sale was confirmed by the court on 27.12.1848. the possession of the property of the predecessors-in-interest of the appellant and thereafter of the appellant is not in dispute.4. the union of india issued a resumption notice dated 26. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 27 2014 (SC)

Deny Bora Vs. State of Assam

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-27-2014

in the supreme court of india criminal appellate jurisdiction criminal appeal no.679 of2013deny bora ..appellant versus state of assam ..respondent judgment dipak misra, j.the present appeal is preferred under section 19 of the terrorist and disruptive activities (prevention) act, 1987 ( tada for short) assailing the judgment passed by the designated court, guwahati in tada sessions case no.47 of 2001, whereby the designated court has acquitted the appellant under tada on the foundation that there is no material to implicate him under the provisions of tada and found that there is adequate material to convict him under section 302 of the indian penal code, 1860 ( ipc for short) and accordingly recorded the conviction and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life with fine of rs.50,000/-, in default, to suffer further rigorous imprisonment for five years. the prosecution case, as unfolded, is that on 2.3.1991 about 6.30 p.m., the deceased, dr. swapan sathi barman, a medical practitioner, while attending to the patients in his clinic, was shot by two unidentified youths from the point blank range as a consequence of which he breathed his last. an fir was lodged by one kumud bora on the following day i.e. 3.3.1991 at jamuguri police station under sonitpur district and on the basis of the said fir station case no.20/91 u/s 302/34 ipc read with sections 3/4 of tada was registered which set the criminal law in motion. during investigation, certain incriminating .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 31 2014 (SC)

Faseela M. Vs. Munnerul Islam Madrasa Committee and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-31-2014

reportable in the supreme court of india civil appellae jurisdiction civil appeal nos. 4250-4252 of2014(arising out of s.l.p. (civil) nos. 23157-23159 of 2012) faseela m. appellant(s) versus munnerul islam madrasa committee & anr. respondent(s) judgment r.m. lodha, j.leave granted.2. sections 6 and 7 of the waqf act, 1995 (for short, 'act') provide for determination of certain disputes regarding auqaf only by the waqf tribunal. these provisions as amended by act 27/2013 read as under : section 6. disputes regarding auqaf.- (1) if any question arises whether a particular property specified as waqf property in the list of auqaf is waqf property or not or whether a waqf specified in such list is a shia waqf or sunni waqf, the board or the mutawalli of the waqf or any person aggrieved may institute a suit in a tribunal for the decision of the question and the decision of the tribunal in respect of such matter shall be final: provided that no such suit shall be entertained by the tribunal after the expiry of one year from the date of the publication of the list of auqaf. provided further that no suit shall be instituted before the tribunal in respect of such properties notified in a second or subsequent survey pursuant to the provisions contained in sub- section (6) of section 4. (2) notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), no proceeding under this act in respect of any waqf shall be stayed by reason only of the pendency of any such suit or of any appeal or other .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 03 2014 (SC)

Paschimanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ld. andor Vs. M/S Adarsh Textiles an ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-03-2014

reportable in the supreme court of india civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal no.10707 of2014(arising out of slp (civil) no.29322 of2010 paschimanchal vidyut vitran nigam ltd. & ors. ... appellants versus m/s adarsh textiles & anr. ...respondents with civil appeal no.10708 of2014(arising out of slp (civil) no.9869 of2008 with civil appeal no.10709 of2014(arising out of slp (civil) no.30528 of2009 with civil appeal no.10710 of2014(arising out of slp (civil) no.29320 of2010 and civil appeal no.10711 of2014(arising out of slp (civil) no.29324 of2010 judgment arun mishra, j.1. leave granted in all the special leave petitions.2. the question involved in the appeals is whether policy decision dated 14.6.2006 issued by the government of uttar pradesh regarding supply of the electricity to power loom bunkers on the flat rate could have been applied by the u.p. electricity regulatory commission (hereinafter referred to as "the commission") to the industries availing hv-2 category connection.3. to dispose of the appeals, we notice facts from civil appeal arising out of slp (civil) no.9869 of 2008. the backdrop facts indicate that the commission fixed tariff for the year 2004-2005, whereby rebate of rs.5,000/- per consumer was granted to power loom bunkers availing lmv-2 and lmv-6 connections in accordance with policy of the u.p. government.4. lmv-2 is a non domestic light, power and electricity connection, lmv- 6 electricity connection is of small and medium power having connected .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 18 2014 (SC)

Additional District and Sessions Judge, X Vs. Registrar General, High ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-18-2014

reportable in the supreme court of india civil original jurisdiction writ petition (civil) no.792 of2014additional district and sessions judge 'x' ... petitioner versus registrar general, high court of madhya pradesh and others ... respondents judgment jagdish singh khehar, j.1. the present writ petition has been filed by a former additional district and sessions judge of the madhya pradesh higher judicial service. the factual narration in the writ petition incorporates allegations of sexual harassment aimed at the petitioner, at the behest of a sitting judge of the high court of madhya pradesh (herein after referred to as, 'the high court'), who has been impleaded by name as respondent no.3. the authenticity of the allegations levelled by the petitioner, which have been expressly disputed by respondent no.3, would stand affirmed or repudiated only after culmination of due process. such being the sensitivity of the matter, it would be inappropriate to disclose the identity either of the petitioner or of respondent no.3. in the title of the present writ petition, as also in its contents, the petitioner has been described as additional district and sessions judge 'x'. we shall refer to her as addl.d&sj 'x'. this would help to preserve the dignity of the petitioner. insofar as respondent no.3 is concerned, since he is a sitting judge of the high court, his reputation deserves a similar protection, we shall refer to him as justice 'a'.2. the averments made in the writ petition .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 17 2014 (SC)

Raman Vs. Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Lt. and Ors

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-17-2014

reportable in the supreme court of india civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal no.11466 of2014(arising out of slp(c) no.8113 of2014 raman .........appellant vs. uttar haryana bijli vitran nigam ltd.& ors. .........respondents judgment v.gopala gowda, j.leave granted.2. the appellant, represented through his natural guardian father - manoj kumar, has filed this appeal questioning the judgment and order dated 30.10.2013 passed by the division bench of the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh in the letters patent appeal no.1631 of 2013 in civil writ petition no.14046 of 2012.3. the brief facts are stated herein: the appellant, a four year old boy was electrocuted on 03.11.2011 by coming in direct contact with the naked electric wire lying open on the roof of his house. immediately after the incident, the boy was taken for first aid to a nearby r.m. anand hospital in panipat, haryana from where he was referred to post graduate institute of medical sciences, rohtak. the final treatment was given at safdarjang hospital, new delhi, where the doctors left with no other option but to carry out triple amputation by removing both his arms upto arm pit and left leg upto knee as the grievous injuries suffered were not curable. on 08.02.2012, the disability certificate was issued to the appellant certifying to be 100% permanent disability.4. it is stated on behalf of the appellant that prior to this tragic incident, on 16.08.2011 the appellant's father along with other .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //