Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Court: supreme court of india Year: 2014 Page 6 of about 192 results (0.086 seconds)

Jun 30 2014 (SC)

Dr.(Mrs.) Malathi Ravi, M.D. Vs. Dr. B.V . Ravi M.D.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jun-30-2014

..... a proceeding was initiated before the learned principal judge, family court, bangalore and in the said proceeding the learned principal judge passed the following order: - matter is settled before the mediation centre where in parties have entered into a memorandum of settlement. contents of the memorandum of settlement are admitted by the parties. court is satisfied that the same is voluntary ..... perceive the approach of this court: - 46. the high court further noted that the appellant wife sent a notice through her advocate to the respondent husband during the pendency of mediation proceedings in the high court wherein she alleged that the respondent was having another wife in usa whose identity was concealed. this was based on the fact that in his .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 09 2014 (SC)

Kunwarpal @ Surajpal and Ors. Vs. State of Uttarkhand and Anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-09-2014

..... admitted that there was marriage proposal of accused no.1 kunwarpal with his sister's sister-in-law and that did not materialize and he was not the person who mediated it and he has also specifically denied the suggestion that he developed animosity against a1 in this regard. hence this contention of the appellants is devoid of merit. as already .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 07 2014 (SC)

Vishwa Lochan Madan Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-07-2014

..... that fatwas are advisory in nature and no muslim is bound to follow those. further, dar-ul-qaza does not administer criminal justice and it really functions as an arbitrator, mediator, negotiator or conciliator in matters pertaining to family dispute or any other dispute of civil nature between the muslims. according to the union of india, dar-ul-qaza can be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 2014 (SC)

Enercon (India) Ltd and ors Vs. Enercon Gmbh and anr

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-14-2014

..... senior counsel also submitted that an arbitration agreement would include the following: a. intention to arbitrate; b. intention to settle by arbitration after failure of adr i.e. negotiations/conciliation/mediation. c. some law (i.e. proper law) to settle the disputes (which in this case is indian law) d. does the arbitration clause cover all disputes or is there a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 25 2014 (SC)

Ravindra Trimbak Patil Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-25-2014

..... live with the appellant and her in-laws. sometime later, appellant gave a telephonic call and told pw3- shivaji marathe- father of shobha that they were coming with shobha and mediators. at that time, the appellant and his mother said shobha was not doing household work and they wanted divorce while shobha complained that the appellant used to beat her and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 19 2014 (SC)

Baljinder Kaur Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-19-2014

..... (father of the deceased) gave sufficient dowry at the time of his daughter s marriage, after two months of her marriage, the deceased told her father and harbans singh-the mediator of marriage that the second accused-pritam singh and his family members were demanding dowry and harassing her. about two months after the marriage, the appellant-baljinder kaur (sister-in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 25 2014 (SC)

Rajkumar Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-25-2014

..... has shocked not only the judicial conscience but even the conscience of society as well. the high court also recorded the finding that the offence had been committed in pre-mediated manner. the death sentence was affirmed and the appeal was dismissed. hence, these appeals.3. ms. a. sumathi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant, has submitted that the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 19 2014 (SC)

Commercial Tax Officer, Rajasthan Vs. Binani Cement Ltd. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-19-2014

reportable in the supreme court of india civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal no.336 of2003|commercial tax officer, | | |rajasthan |..appellant(s) | versus |m/s. binani cements ltd. & anr. |..respondent(s) | judgment h.l. dattu, j.1. the revenue is in appeal before us against the impugned judgment and order passed by the high court of rajasthan at jodhpur in s.b. sales tax revision petition no.582 of 1999, dated 02.07.2001 whereby and whereunder the high court has dismissed the revision petition filed by the revenue and upheld the case of the respondent-assessee.2. the respondent-assessee is a new industrial unit manufacturing cement situated within panchayat samiti, pindwara, rajasthan. it is an admitted fact that it started its commercial production on 27.05.1997. it is also not disputed that the respondent-assessee has fixed capital investment (for short, the fci ) exceeding rs.500/- crores and employs more than 250 employees.3. the core issue arises out of the respondent-assessee s application for grant of eligibility certificate for exemption from payment of central sales tax and rajasthan sales tax to the state level screening committee, jaipur under the sales tax new incentive scheme for industries, 1989 (for short the scheme ).4. for convenience of discussion, we would first notice the relevant scheme and certain provisions and thereafter proceed towards analysis of the facts in the instant case. the scheme for exemption from payment of sales tax was notified by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 28 2014 (SC)

Usha Bharti Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-28-2014

reportable in the supreme court of india civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal no . of2014(arising out of slp (c) no.22035 of 2013) usha bharti appellant versus state of u.p. & ors. ...respondents with contempt petition (c) no.287 of 2013 in civil appeal no . of2014(arising out of slp (c) no.22035 of 2013) with civil appeal no of2014(arising out of slp(c) no.29740 of 2013) judgment surinder singh nijjar, j.1. leave granted.2. these appeals are directed against the judgment and order passed by the high court of judicature at allahabad (lucknow bench) in review petition no.103 of 2013 on 4th july, 2013 dismissing the review petition filed by the appellant.3. since the issues raised in these appeals are pristinely legal, it would not be necessary to make a detailed reference to the facts, leading to the filing of the present appeals. even otherwise, the high court in the impugned judgment has made an elaborate survey of the facts. therefore, it is unnecessary to repeat the same. however, the foundational facts for challenging the impugned judgment of the high court are recapitulated for ready reference.4. the appellant successfully contested the election held in october, 2010 for becoming a member of the zila panchayat, sitapur, u.p. 62 candidates were elected as the members of the zila panchayat including the appellant and respondents 5 to 37. on 12th december, 2010, the appellant was elected as adhyaksh of the zila panchayat, sitapur. on 30th october, 2012, a notice of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 09 2014 (SC)

Muralidhar @ Gidda and anr. Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-09-2014

reportable in the supreme court of india criminal appellate jurisdiction criminal appeal no.551 of2011muralidhar @ gidda & anr. appellants versus state of karnataka respondent with criminal appeal no.791 of2011and criminal appeal no.1081 of2011judgment r.m. lodha, j.these three criminal appeals arise from the common judgment and, therefore, they were heard together and are being disposed of by the common judgment.2. the statement (ex.p-22) recorded by the police on 17.08.2002 between 9.55 p.m. and 10.20 p.m. at k.r. hospital, mandya triggered the prosecution of the appellants and one swamy. ex.p-22 is in kannada, which in english translation reads: the statement of pradeep son of swamygowda, 28 years, vakkaligaru by community, agriculturist residing at majigepura village, srirangapatna taluk. today at about 8.30 p.m. night, i was sitting in front of shaving shop by the side of shop of javaregowda on k.r.s. majigepura road along with vyramudi, prakash and umesh. at that time naga, s/o ammayamma, jagga s/o sentu kumar s sister, gunda, gidda, s/o fishari nanjaiah, swamy, manju and hotte ashoka and others who were having old enmity assaulted me by means of chopper, long on my hand, head, neck and on other parts of the body with an intention to kill me and they have assaulted umesh who was with me. vyramudi said do not kill us and went away. prakash ran away. please take action against those who have attempted to kill me. 3. after registration of the first information report ( .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //