Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Court: telecom disputes settlement and appellate tribunal tdsat Year: 2012 Page 1 of about 4 results (0.014 seconds)

Aug 30 2012 (TRI)

Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. Tata Teleservices Ltd. and Another

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

Decided on : Aug-30-2012

..... addition there are complexities involved in accounting for iuc for sms. sms is sent by the ss7 signalling channel and in order to bill and verify sms termination internally, the mediation system needs to be able to generate ss7 cdrs for billing system to count and rate the number of sms messages. the terminating operators, in many cases, may have to ..... addition there are complexities involved in accounting for iuc for sms. sms is sent by the ss7 signaling channel and in order to bill and verify sms termination internally, the mediation system needs to be able to generate ss7 cdrs for the billing system to count and rate the number of sms messages. the terminating operators, in many cases, may have .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 26 2012 (TRI)

Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. Department of Telecommunication and Another

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

Decided on : Sep-26-2012

..... of obtaining the rest of the data at the earliest possible time, the petitioner was intimated by mr. mandeep that he would be going to access mediation server located at noida to get the desired cdrs and transfer the same to bhopal. even the same did not serve any purpose. the respondent no. ..... the reason for the wrong cli issue with bsnl numbers. we found all these raw cdrs in our msc. however while processing the raw data by our mediation server, we are not getting non rated/non chargeable i.e. pri calls in the cdr fetched from our data warehouse. 4. when the meeting ..... shrivastava (adg term) visited our gnsc and fetched the hlr and configuration data on 20th jan11 and simultaneously we have also arranged his visit to the mediation server location in noida on 21st jan11. 2and3. first of all we would like to clarify that we have never camouflage in cli of calls and ..... :- though m/s bharti airtel extended its cooperation during the investigation, certain acts on your end could not be understood. 1. why the wrong location of mediation server was informed? 2. why the cli camouflaged calls did not appear in the 3-hour cdr provided to us. 3. why the cli camouflaged calls did ..... .2011 which is as under :- 1. we humbly submit that we have never communicated the wrong location of mediation server rather we have mediation server in delhi and data warehouse server in pune. the mediation server get the raw data from msc and push the data to the data warehouse after converting it into readable .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 22 2012 (TRI)

Conscious Citizen Forum Vs. Den Network Ltd. and Others

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

Decided on : Aug-22-2012

the maintainability of this petition is in question. 2. the petitioner is said to be a group of consumers. it is registered under the provisions of bombay public trust act. the first two respondents are companies incorporated and registered under the indian companies act, 1956. the respondent nos. 3 to 9 are directors and / or officers of the respondents no. 1 and 2. the collector of the thane district has been arrayed as respondent no. 10; whereas the commissioner of police, navi mumbai has been arrayed as respondent no.11. 3. the substance of the allegations in the petition is that petitioners no. 1 and 2, who are multi service operators and thus are required to obtain postal registration certificate in terms of section 3 of the cable television networks (regulation) act, 1995 and rule 3 of the cable television networks rules, 1994, had been broadcasting a local channel known as nm tv illegally and unauthorizedly. 4. respondent in its short reply contended that the petitioner has for self same reliefs filed a writ petition before the bombay high court which was marked as writ petition no. 2824 of 2010; wherein by an order dated 8.4.2010, it was directed as under:- in this pil, the petitioner has alleged that there are certain persons who are unauthorized cable operators. it has been submitted in the petition that he is unable to give names of those persons because there are chances that those persons might harm the petitioner. 2. in the above-referred circumstances, we .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 09 2012 (TRI)

God Father Communications Vs. Sun 18 Media Services North (P) Ltd.

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

Decided on : Aug-09-2012

p.k. rastogi, member this petition has been filed as the respondent has rejected the application of the petitioner for supply of signals to its network. the petitioner is a multi system operator in amritsar and the respondent is a broadcaster as defined under the telecommunication (broadcasting and cable services) interconnection regulation, 2004. the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs: (i) declare the action of rejecting the application for affiliation/request for grant of signals as wrong and illegal; (ii) direct the respondent to sign subscription agreement with the petitioner, provide tv signals to petitioners cable tv network and also direct the respondent to supply of decoders boxes of channels of bouquet-ia comprising of colors, ibn 7, cnbc awaz, ibn lokmat and bouquet- 2 comprising of mtc, nick, vhi, cnbc tv and cnn ibn to the petitioner on reasonable terms and conditions. 2. the petitioner has submitted that it had sent a letter to the respondent in the year 2010 and a reminder on 1.4.2011 requesting the respondent to enter into subscription agreement with the petitioner. however, as no response was received from the respondent, a legal notice dated 8.4.2011 was sent to the respondent along with all the relevant documents with a request to supply the signals to the cable tv network of the petitioner. the respondent vide letter dated 25.4.2011 sent an application form and asked the petitioner to send the duly filled application form along with all the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //