Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Page 18 of about 111,744 results (0.019 seconds)

Aug 30 2013 (HC)

Mrs.S.Komala Vs. Mrs.S.Sumathi

Court : Chennai

..... . for petitioners : mr.p.b.balaji for respondents : mr.t.n.rajagopalan for d1 and d2 mr.r.dharanikumar for d3 order this civil suit was referred for mediation to the tamil nadu mediation and conciliation centre, high court of madras, by the order of this court, dated 6.1.2012.2. a communication, dated 9.10.2012, of the tamil nadu ..... or coercion from any side have agreed as follows: pending the above suit for partition, separate possession and mesne profit, the parties have met in the mediation centre and with the intervention of the mediators and their respective advocates, the parties have decided to amicably settle their disputes and have arrived at the following terms and conditions:1. the 5th plaintiff, r ..... sent back to the hon'ble court.".3. as the parties have arrived at a settlement in terms of the mediation agreement, dated 8.8.2012, this civil suit is listed for passing orders in terms of the said mediation agreement.4. the mediation agreement, dated 8.8.2012, signed by the parties and the counsels appearing for the plaintiffs and the defendants ..... mediation and conciliation centre, high court of madras, enclosing a copy of its mediation report, dated 4.10.2012, has been received, and in the said mediation report, it is stated as follows:- ".both parties appeared before the centre along with their counsel. parties arrived .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 14 2018 (HC)

M/S Narinjan Das Anand and Sons vs.senbo Engineering Ltd and Ors

Court : Delhi

..... cannot be blamed for acting on his instructions. moreover, the authorized representative of the defendant no.1/company had been appearing with mr. bhattacharya, advocate before the learned mediator. had there been any substance in the plea of the defendant no.1/company that no instructions were given to their previous counsel for negotiating a settlement with the plaintiff ..... company through mr.somnath mukherjee, the very same authorised representative, the averments made in the affidavit filed by mr. bhattacharya, advocate were denied. it was reiterated that since the mediation had failed, there was no question of a settlement being arrived at between the parties. mr. bhattacharya, advocate was given an opportunity to rejoin to the affidavit filed on ..... him before the learned mediator, including on 09.07.2015.16. categorically denying the contention of the counsel for the defendant no.1/company that he had no instructions to make a statement ..... agreeable. he explains that it was in this background that a joint request was made to the court on 03.07.2015 that the suit may be referred to mediation. immediately thereafter, learned counsel had informed the authorised representative of the defendant no.1/company about the development and the said authorised representative had attended all the proceedings alongwith .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 16 2013 (HC)

Havels India Ltd. Vs. Electrium Sales Ltd.

Court : Delhi

..... supply agreement and now cannot claim otherwise.20. the plaintiff has also asserted that this court must not rely upon the communications exchanged between the parties regarding the mediation, stating that the communications were without prejudice and according to the established rules of evidence under section 23 of the indian evidence act, such without prejudice documents could ..... at delhi, the delhi courts would have jurisdiction. with regard to the correspondence and the communication regarding the submission of the plaintiff to the dispute resolution mechanism of mediation and arbitration, it is contended that the entire correspondence, which is sought to be relied upon by the defendant, is without prejudice and further that the submission of ..... the transaction with the defendant covered therein. the submissions of the plaintiff to the mediation followed by managing committee meeting and then arbitration in terms of clauses 14 and 15, would clearly evidence that the plaintiff has submitted to the dispute resolution mechanism ..... this umbrella agreement. the defendant proceeds to refer to the correspondence and communication taken place between itself and the plaintiff and while referring to clause 14 relating to mediation and clause 15 relating to arbitration in the supply agreement, submits that the plaintiff itself has been throughout taking the supply agreement to be the umbrella agreement and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 19 2013 (HC)

G.Lakshmanan Vs. P.Sumathi

Court : Chennai

..... the complaint in stc no.648 of 2012, pending on the file of the judicial magistrate, ariyalur, against the petitioner.2. this criminal original petition was referred for mediation to the tamil nadu mediation and conciliation centre, high court of madras, by the order of this court, dated 12.4.2013.3. a communication, dated 3.10.2013, of the tamil nadu ..... sent back to the hon'ble court.".4. as the parties have arrived at a settlement in terms of the mediation agreement, dated 6.9.2013, this petition is listed for passing orders in terms of the said mediation agreement.5. the mediation agreement, dated 6.9.2013, signed by the parties and the counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel ..... conciliation centre, high court of madras, this petition is disposed of, recording the terms of the mediation agreement, dated 6.9.2013. the terms of the mediation agreement, dated 6.9.2013 and the mediation report, dated 6.9.2013, of the mediation centre, shall form part of the order. connected m.p.no.1 of 2013 is closed. 19.12.2013 index : yes ..... mediation and conciliation centre, high court of madras, enclosing a copy of its mediation report, dated 6.9.2013, has been received, and in the said mediation report, it is stated as follows:- ".both the parties appeared before the centre alone with their counsel. matter .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 30 2013 (HC)

M.Ravikumar Raju Vs. Inspector of Police

Court : Chennai

..... register a case on the complaint, dated 7.8.2012, given by the petitioner and investigate according to law, expeditiously.2. this criminal original petition was referred for mediation to the tamil nadu mediation and conciliation centre, high court of madras, by the order of this court, dated 9.7.2013.3. a communication, dated 21.8.2013, of the tamil nadu ..... sent back to the hon'ble court.".4. as the parties have arrived at a settlement in terms of the mediation agreement, dated 1.8.2013, this petition is listed for passing orders in terms of the said mediation agreement.5. the mediation agreement, dated 1.8.2013, signed by the parties and the counsels appearing for the petitioner and the intervenor, reads ..... conciliation centre, high court of madras, this petition is disposed of, recording the terms of the mediation agreement, dated 1.8.2013. the terms of the mediation agreement, dated 1.8.2013 and the mediation report, dated 1.8.2013, of the mediation centre, shall form part of the order. 30.8.2013 index :yes/no internet:yes/no to the inspector of police ..... mediation and conciliation centre, high court of madras, enclosing a copy of its mediation report, dated 1.8.2013, has been received, and in the said mediation report, it is stated as follows:- ".both the parties appeared before the centre along with their counsel. matter .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 30 2013 (HC)

Ghewarchand Vs. the State

Court : Chennai

..... .5. here by both the parties mutually agree that there is no further claim or counter claim against each other from the date of this mutual agreement signed at the mediation centre.6. petitioners have paid a sum of rs.4,50,000/- (rupees four lakhs and fifty thousand only) to the defacto complainant/ intervenor and his brother as full and ..... the petitioners on bail in the event of arrest in crime no.not known on the file of the respondent.2. this criminal original petition was referred for mediation to the tamil nadu mediation and conciliation centre, high court of madras, by the order of this court, dated 10.4.2013.3. a communication, dated 22.8.2013, of the tamil nadu ..... sent back to the hon'ble court.".4. as the parties have arrived at a settlement in terms of the mediation agreement, dated 13.8.2013, this petition is listed for passing orders in terms of the said mediation agreement.5. the mediation agreement, dated 13.8.2013, signed by the parties and the counsels appearing for the petitioners and the intervenor, reads ..... mediation and conciliation centre, high court of madras, enclosing a copy of its mediation report, dated 13.8.2013, has been received, and in the said mediation report, it is stated as follows:- ".both the parties appeared before the centre along with their counsel. matter .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 25 2014 (HC)

G.Sundaramoorthy Vs. the Additional Commissioner of Police

Court : Chennai

..... .o.p.no.8955 of 2013 for anticipatory bail. in view of the aforesaid complaint made by ms.madhavi, the matter was referred to tamilnadu mediation and conciliation centre. a settlement was arrived before the mediation centre and the same was recorded by this court by order dated 16.08.2013 in crl.o.p.no.8955 of 2013 as follows: 3 ..... sent back to the hon'ble court. 4.as the parties have arrived at a settlement in terms of the mediation agreement, dated 5.7.2013, this petition is listed for passing orders in terms of the said mediation agreement. 5.the mediation agreement, dated 5.7.2013, signed by the parties and their respective counsels, reads as follows: both sides, out of ..... conciliation centre, high court of madras, this petition is disposed of, recording the terms of the mediation agreement, dated 5.7.2013. the terms of the mediation agreement, dated 5.7.2013 and the mediation report, dated 5.7.2013, of the mediation centre, shall form part of the order. 5.as per the aforesaid order and the settlement between the parties, ms.madhavi ..... . a communication, dated 15.07.2013, of the tamil nadu mediation and conciliation centre, high court of madras, enclosing a copy of its mediation report, dated 5.7.2013, has been received, and in the said mediation report, it is stated as follows:- petitioners and the defacto complainant appeared before the centre along with their .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 11 2014 (HC)

Mr.PravIn Kumar Tatia Vs. S.Abdul Salam Sahib

Court : Chennai

..... is entitled for the suit amount.4. since the plaintiff and 19th and 20 defendants are only the contesting parties, others are not present in the mediation. 20th defendant is represented by her husband 19th defendant.5. the suit may be decreed on the above terms. 5. in terms of the settlement arrived ..... defendants : mr.b.jayaraman c o m m o n order the civil suit in c.s.no.481 of 2010, was referred for mediation to the tamil nadu mediation and conciliation centre, high court of madras, by the order of this court, dated 30.9.2013.2. a communication, dated 10.4.2014 ..... 'ble court.".3. as the parties have arrived at a settlement in terms of the mediation agreement, dated 28.1.2014, these civil suits are listed for passing orders in terms of the said mediation agreement.4. the mediation agreement, dated 28.1.2014, signed by the parties and the counsels appearing for the ..... , of the tamil nadu mediation and conciliation centre, high court of madras, enclosing a copy of its mediation report, dated 28.1.2014, has been received, and in the said mediation report, it is stated as follows:- ".as agreed by both parties the matter has ..... conciliation centre, high court of madras, these suits are decreed, recording the terms of the mediation agreement, dated 28.1.2014. the terms of the mediation agreement, dated 28.1.2014 and the mediation report of the mediation centre, dated 28.1.2014, shall form part of the decree. connected application no.2499 of 2013 is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 27 2013 (HC)

J.D.Chalceydoney Kanagaselvi Vs. C.Vinayagamurthy

Court : Chennai

..... of rs.20,000 per month from the date of the sale deed and till the date of the filing the suit.2. this civil suit was referred for mediation to the tamil nadu mediation and conciliation centre, high court, madras, by the order of this court, dated 12.07.2013.3. a communication, dated 25.09.2013, of the tamil nadu ..... sent back to the hon'ble court.".4. as the parties have arrived at a settlement in terms of the mediation agreement, dated 12.09.2013, this civil suit is listed for passing orders in terms of the said mediation agreement.5. the mediation agreement, dated 12.09.2013, signed by the parties and their respective counsel, read as follows:- ".both sides, out ..... conciliation centre, high court of madras, this civil suit is decreed, recording the terms of the mediation agreement, dated 12.09.2013. the terms of the mediation agreement, dated 12.09.2013 and the mediation report, dated 12.09.2013, of the mediation centre, shall form part of the decree. refund of court fee to the plaintiff, permissible under section 69-a of the ..... mediation and conciliation centre, high court, madras, enclosing a copy of its mediation report, dated 12.09.2013, has been received, and in the said mediation report, it is stated as follows:- ".parties appeared before the centre along with their counsel. parties arrived at .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 23 1966 (FN)

Railway Clerks Vs. Florida E. C. R. Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... make rather sweeping departures in numerous respects from the existing collective bargaining agreements. negotiations between fec and the unions broke down. the unions then invoked the mediation services of the national mediation board relative to the proposed changes, but the carrier refused. page 384 u. s. 242 the unions thereafter agreed to submit the underlying dispute ..... reached. the act makes no provision for compulsory arbitration. section 5 first [ footnote 3 ] does, however, provide for voluntary arbitration at the suggestion of the national mediation board. the suggestion was made, but both the unions and fec refused. further negotiations were unsuccessful, and, on january 23, 1963, the nonoperating unions struck. when that ..... of supervisory personnel and replacements, with whom it made individual employment agreements which were substantially different from the existing collective bargaining agreements. fec refused union-proposed mediation by the national mediation board. then, although both sides had rejected arbitration prior to the strike, the unions changed their position and urged arbitration; again, fec refused. the ..... and job abolitions made on behalf of nonoperating railroad employees of virtually all class i railroads, including the florida east coast railway company (fec), negotiations and mediation occurred under the railway labor act. section 2 seventh provides in part that no carrier shall change employee pay rates, rules, or working conditions as embodied in .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //