Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Sorted by: old Court: delhi Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 266 results (0.081 seconds)

May 30 2003 (HC)

Mr. Akshay Kapur and ors. Vs. Mr. Rishav Kapur and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-30-2003

Reported in : 2003(2)ARBLR508(Delhi); 105(2003)DLT467; 2003(69)DRJ332; 2003(3)RAJ189

..... an effective alternate system of dispute resolution, conceptually quicker and cheaper than the jural establishment. there is a conscious shift from the courts to the arbitral tribunals. in this respect, mediation has become the substitute to arbitration. these are not the only differences between the two acts. i do not feel the necessity to adumbrate others since they may not be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 07 2003 (HC)

Ashok Kumar Dhingra and ors. Vs. the Oriental Insurance Company Limite ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-07-2003

Reported in : AIR2004Delhi161; 2003(70)DRJ470

..... with the insurance company. rule 14(2) requires the ombudsman to dispose of a complaint 'fairly and equitably'. a complaint filed before the ombudsman may be settled by agreement through mediation of the ombudsman. in such eventuality, the ombudsman, as prescribed under rule 15 makes recommendations which, if accepted by the complainant, would dispose of the complaint fully and finally and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 18 2003 (HC)

Tata Iron and Steel Company Ltd. Vs. Jhalani Tools Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-18-2003

Reported in : 2003IIIAD(Delhi)547; 104(2003)DLT834; 2003(69)DRJ592; [2003]47SCL757(Delhi)

..... the agreement by the petitioner company. in this respect, i am not taking into account the letter dated 23rd february, 1998, cited by the petitioner which was issued by a mediator between the parties as it was private correspondence and was termed as personal and confidential. 13. the explanationn given in respect of the acknowledgment given by shri y.c. jhalani .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 24 2003 (HC)

Assn. of Victims of Uphaar Tragedy and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) a ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-24-2003

Reported in : II(2003)ACC114; 2003ACJ1631; 2003IIIAD(Delhi)321; 104(2003)DLT234; 2003(68)DRJ128; 2003RLR333

..... parapet wall but the management of the theatre had also constructed a dispensary above the ramp which was also in clear violation of the building bye laws. construction of inter-mediate floor with the aid of r s joists was also in violation of the building bye laws. the municipal corporation of delhi has not placed any material on record to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 30 2003 (TRI)

Rajesh Kumar Soni and Shri Krishna Vs. Cc

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Jul-30-2003

Reported in : (2003)(90)ECC541

..... reply to the show cause notice, he claimed that the money was meant for purchase of a mini bus from one shri om parkash rao by soni through jaiswal as mediator. keshari's position has, thus, been contradictory before and after the issuance of the show cause notice.nevertheless, the department's case, as brought out in the impugned order and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 23 2003 (HC)

Daler Singh Vs. State of Nct of Delhi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-23-2003

Reported in : 2004(72)DRJ465

..... additional amount of was being demanded; complainant was told that the pass-port would not be given back, without payment of rs. 5.0 lacs. surinder singh, who was a mediator tried to persuade the complainant to arrange for another sum of rs. 2 to 3 lacs to get the passport. on 12.8.2003, the complainant came to delhi with .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 21 2003 (HC)

Dr. Harbhajan Singh Awla Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-21-2003

Reported in : 2003VIIIAD(Delhi)337; AIR2004Delhi172; 108(2003)DLT628; 2004(72)DRJ146

..... to be borne in mind in exercising the discretion. firstly, there are constraints within which the corporation has to exercise its discretion. the corporation is a public utility organisation where mediating motion is efficiency and effectiveness of public service. efficiency and effectiveness of public service are the basic concepts which cannot be sacrificed in public administration by any statutory corporation. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 24 2003 (HC)

DeseIn Private Limited Vs. Industrial Tribunal Iii and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-24-2003

Reported in : 2004(72)DRJ365

..... , may make a complaint in writing, [in the prescribed manner, - (a) to such conciliation officer or board, and the conciliation officer or board shall take such complaint into account in mediating in, and promoting the settlement of, such industrial dispute; and(b) to such arbitrator, labour court, tribunal or national tribunal and on receipt of such complaint, the arbitrator, labour court .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 20 2003 (HC)

Dekay's Food Products Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. Vs. New Delhi Municipal Corpo ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-20-2003

Reported in : 2003IAD(Delhi)477; 102(2003)DLT584; 2003(66)DRJ451

vikramajit sen, j.1. the plaintiffs have filed this suit for permanent injunction against the ndmc (defendant no. 1) and pearey lal and sons private limited(defendant no. 2) from interfering with the plaintiffs' possession or dispossessing the plaintiffs from the portion of the suit property admeasuring 30 x 40 sq. ft. in b phase, ground floor, 13-29, harsha bhawan, middle circle, connaught place, new delhi shown in red in the site plan filed along with the plaint ( hereinafter referred to as the `electric sub station' ) and also for restraining the defendant no.2 from dealing with the said properties in any manner. an ex-parte ad interim injunction was passed on 8.3.2002 directing the maintenance of status quo with regard to the possession of the suit property. arguments have been heard at length. 2. the plaintiffs and defendant no.2 had entered into agreements to sell dated 24.2.1989 (plaintiff no.1), 7.2.1989 (plaintiff no.2) and 9.2.1989 (plaintiff no.3). for the present purposes the following clause is of pivotal importance:'the vendor hereby agrees to sell to the purchaser and/or his nominee a portion of the ground floor of phase-b, forming part of harsha bhawan, which portion is more specifically delineated on the plan annexed hereto and thereon shown with its area shaded and coloured red, for a consideration of rs.7,75,000.00 (rs. seven lacs seventy five thousand only)'.3. regretfully, for reasons which are obviously known only to the plaintiffs and defendant no. 2, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 29 2003 (HC)

S.R. Bhutani and ors. Vs. D.D.A.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-29-2003

Reported in : 2003(68)DRJ380

sanjay kishan kaul, j. 1. rule 2. with the consent of learned counsel for the parties the matter is taken up for final disposal. 3. a perpetual sub-lease deed dated 16.2.1973 was executed by the president of india in favor of one sh. m.l tandon in respect of plot bearing no. c-566, new friends colony, new delhi. the said sh. tandon entered into an agreement for transfer of the property and also executed a registered wilt on 28.3.1977. sh. tandon expired on 3.1.1980 and in terms of order dated 14.1.1982 passed by the respondent the property was mutated in the name of mohd. yunus on the basis of the registered will and an endorsement to that effect was also made on the perpetual sub-lease deed. 4. the petitioners entered into an agreement with mohd. yunus for purchase of the property in question on 27.6.1992. mohd. yunus also executed a registered general power of attorney on the same date in favor of petitioner no. 4. 5. in april, 1992 government of india announced a scheme for conversion of plots up to size of 500 sq. metres and the petitioners applied to the respondent on 22.2.1993 for conversion into free-hold and paid the amount in installments in terms of the scheme from 1993 to 1997 including 33% surcharge since it is a power of attorney transaction. the petitioner kept on making representations for execution of the free-hold document of title but respondents did not execute the same. 6. respondent no. 2 issued a notice dated 23.7.2001 demanding a sum of rs. 3,16,933/- .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //