Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Sorted by: old Court: gujarat Year: 1992 Page 1 of about 31 results (0.007 seconds)

Dec 15 1992 (HC)

Amarsinh Swaroopsinh and ors. Vs. Jagdish Processors

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Dec-15-1992

Reported in : (1993)2GLR1398; (1994)ILLJ743Guj

..... . this is consistent with the object sought to be achieved by the provision of the act. the act aims at settlement of disputes by agreement or through conciliation or through mediation of different officers. emphasis is on settlement of disputes. therefore, the correct interpretation of the expression 'no such application shall lie unless....' and of the expression 'no agreement has been ..... for settlement of industrial disputesand machinery has been provided at differentlevels to see that the employer and the employee settle their disputes either by agreement or through conciliation or through mediation of different officers. attempt has been made to see that as far as possible few matters should betaken to the labour court and industrial court. the prime object of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 04 1992 (HC)

Hargovindbhai Prabhubhai Patel and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : May-04-1992

Reported in : (1993)2GLR1100

..... is here to serve. to serve what? toserve, insofar as law can properly do so, within limits that i have already stressed, the realisation of man's ends, ultimate and mediate...law cannot stand aside from the social changes around it.it is possible that in the last century the prevalent concept of family was of a certain pattern. indeed in .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 01 1992 (HC)

Maganji Govindji (Since Decd.) Through His Heirs and Lrs. Vs. Competen ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : May-01-1992

Reported in : (1993)2GLR1808

s.d. shah, j. 1. rule. mr. r.m. chhaya, learned a.g.r waives service of rule. with the consent of the parties the matter is finally heard.2. by this petition the petitioners who are the heirs and legal representatives of deceased maganji govindji are challenging the order passed by urban land ceiling tribunal dated 5th july, 1989 in ceiling appeal no. 51 of 1988 confirming the order passed by competent authority, surat dated 5th april, 1988.3. the facts giving rise to the present petition are as under:deceased maganji govindji was the holder of parcels of land bearing survey no. 68 admeasuring 4654 sq mtrs. and survey no. 73 admeasuring 2934 sq. mtrs. at jahangirabad and rander of district surat. he purchased the said parcels of land in the year 1938 by registered sale deed. on coming into force of urban land (ceiling and regulation) act, 1976 he filed statement under section 6(1) of the said act. in the said form he described the property as his own property and mentioned that no one else had any right, title or interest in the said property.4. the competent authority thereupon issued draft statement under section 8(3) of the said act calling upon deceased maganji govindji to file his objection to the said draft statement. deceased maganji govindji filed his objection and after taking into consideration such objection, the competent authority was pleased to pass order dated 9th january, 1984 holding that deceased maganji was holding excess vacant land to the extent of 6088 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 07 1992 (HC)

Ramjibhai Morarbhai Patel Vs. Additional Development Commissioner and ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-07-1992

Reported in : (1992)2GLR1204; (1993)2GLR1713

s.d. shah, j.1. the petitioner in special civil application no. 412 of 1991 is ramjibhai m. patel, sarpanch of manud gram panchayat, patan taluka of mehsana district. the petitioner in special civil application no. 413 of 1991 is shankarbhai n. patel who is upa-sarpanch of said gram panchayat.2. both these petitions are directed against the order of suspension passed by the district development officer, mehsana-the second respondent herein on 12-10-1987 under section 51(1) of the gujarat panchayats act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the said act'). the said order of suspension was challenged by the petitioner in each petition by preferring appeal to the additional development commissioner-the respondent no. 1 herein under section 51(3) of the said act and said order of suspension is confirmed by the appellate authority by judgment and order, dated 29-12-1990.3. being aggrieved by the order passed by the additional development commissioner on 29-12-1990 confirming the order of the d.d.o., dated 12-10-1987, the petitioners have moved this court under article 227 of the constitution of india.4. few facts giving rise to the present proceedings are required to be stated hereunder:(i) the petitioners in these petitions are duly elected sarpanch and upa-sarpanch of manud gram panchayat. one khodabhai shankarbhai patel who was presiding officer in the election of taluka panchayat filed a criminal complaint before the police on 20-1-1987, inter alia, alleging that the sarpanch of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 18 1992 (HC)

Dilipkumar Amrutlal Ganatra Vs. District Magistrate and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-18-1992

Reported in : (1992)2GLR1460; (1992)2GLR1471

order food & civil supplies department 14, sardar bhavan, 6th floor, sachivalaya, gandhinagar. dated 30th october, 1991.no. prl/1191/2 72/spl: in exercise of the powers conferred by section 15 of the prevention of blackmarketing and maintenance of supplies of essential commodities act, 1980 (no. 7 of 1980), the government of gujarat, hereby directs that the person known as shri dilipkumar amratlal ganatra, in respect of whom a detention order no. dtn/eca/10/91, dated 9-9-1991 shall be granted parole to the detenu for a period of 7 days (seven days), i.e., from 4th november, 1991 to 10th november, 1991 on his agreeing to abide by the conditions specified below:(1) he shall be of good bahaviour during the period of his temporary release from his detention (hereinafter referred to as the said period).(2) he shall not attend to his business nor indulge in any activity which may be prejudicial to the maintenance of supplies of essential commodities during the said period.(3) during the period, he shall not do directly or indirectly any business in essential commodities nor indulge in any activity which may be prejudicial to maintenance of supplies of essential commodities.(4) he shall surrender to the superintendent of the vadodara central jail, vadodara, on the said period unless his order is cancelled earlier in which he is directewd to surrender in the order relating to such cancellation.(5) he shall be liable to be arrested and detained earlier before the expiry of the said .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 20 1992 (HC)

Gujarat State Financial Corporation Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-20-1992

Reported in : [1992]195ITR518(Guj)

r.k. abichandani, j.1. the assessee is a financial corporation constituted under the state financial corporation act, 1951, with the object of promotion of industrial development in the state by providing long-term finance to medium and small scale industries. by a notification issued under section 8 of the provident funds act, 1925, that act was made applicable to the assessee-corporation and, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 48 of the state financial corporations act, 1951, the board of directors of the assessee-corporation constituted a fund known as the 'gujarat state financial corporation employees' provident fund' (hereinafter referred to as the 'fund'). under regulation 4 of the gujarat state financial corporation employees' provident fund regulation, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the 'regulations'), the fund was created and as provided in regulation 5, the fund was to be held by the corporation and administered by a board of administrators. regulation 10 provided for subscribers' accounts in which the subscriptions, contributions and interest on subscriptions and contributions were to be credited. under regulation 11, it was made incumbent upon the corporation to credit interest on the amounts standing to each subscriber's credit at a rate indicated therein. admittedly, in the assessments which were made for the assessment years 1962-63 to 1971-72, the interest amounts so credited deduction in the computation of the assessments which were made for to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 1992 (HC)

Cheldas Khushaldas Patel and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-31-1992

Reported in : (1992)103CTR(Guj)1; [1992]196ITR200(Guj)

r.c. mankad, actg.c.j.1. petitioner no. 1 in special civil application no. 3583 of 1989 is a partnership firm carrying on business as a tobacco commission agent. petitioners nos. 2, 3 and 4 are partners in the said firm ('the firm' for short). the firm was duly registered under the relevant provisions of the income-tax act, 1961 ('the act' for short). the firm and its partners had prepared statements of their income and returns for the assessment years 1976-77 to 1979-80 in time and handed them over to their income-tax practitioner. an application under form no. 12 for continuance of registration of the firm was duly signed and the same was also handed over to the income-tax practitioner in time for each of the said assessment years. advance tax also had been paid in due course. the income-tax practitioner engaged by the petitioners, however, did not file their returns for the said assessment years within the prescribed time. the petitioners on coming to know that their returns were not filed within the prescribed time, engaged another income-tax practitioner who filed them on december 4, 1980. the returns of the income of the firm and the partners for the assessment years 1976-77 and 1977-78 were filed beyond a period of two years prescribed for completing the assessments for those years. the firm and the partners, on filing of the returns, as aforesaid, also paid tax under section 140a of the act. the income-tax officer accepted the returns for the assessment years 1978-79 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 06 1992 (HC)

Jodha Khoda Rabari and Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Gujarat and Etc.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-06-1992

Reported in : 1992CriLJ3298

k.g. shah, j. 1. on 20th september 1984 the people of mangadh, a small village of bhavnagar district experienced a horrifying nightmare when there was a carnage resulting in ten brutal murders in a span of less than two hours, committed by a group of assailants by their wanton firing and use of other weapons at unarmed innocent victims. according to the prosecution, the accused did this with a view to settling the scores with the patels, who were acquitted in a case, arising from the incident of 1982 where three darbars (rajputs) had lost their lives. of course, in between, there were many criminal cases between them. thus, in the present proceedings, we are required to deal with a case where revenge or vendetta is alleged to be the sole motive. the present appeals arise out of the judgment and order of conviction and sentences rendered in sessions case no. 5 of 1985, with which was consolidated, sessions case no. 124 of 1985, by the learned sessions judge, bhavnagar, who at the end of the trial convicted the accused for various offences and inflicted various sentences.2. it may be stated that there were twelve accused who were charged for the offences under sections 120b, 143, 147, 148, 302 read with sections 149, 302 read with section 114, 302 read with sections 34, 302 read with sections 120b, 307 read with sections 149, 307 read with sections 34, 307 read with sections 114 and 307 read with section 120b, i.p.c. some of the accused were also individually charged for the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 06 1992 (HC)

State of Gujarat Vs. Rajput Bhikhaji Kaluji and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-06-1992

Reported in : (1993)1GLR810

k.j. vaidya, j. 1. these two appeals, one by the state of gujarat for enhancement of the sentence against the respondent-accused bhikhaji kaluji only, and the another by bhikhaji kaluji and three others against their respective orders of conviction and sentence, arise out of the common judgment and order dated 31-12-1982, rendered in sessions case no. 108 of 1982 by the learned assistant sessions judge, mehsana, wherein respondents on their being tried for the alleged offences punishable under sections 307, 326, 323, 324 of i.p.c. and section 135 (i) of the bombay police act, 1951, were at the end of the trial ordered to be convicted and sentenced as under:the accused no. 1 bhikhaji kaluji was convicted for the offence punishable under section 307 of i. p. c and sentenced to suffer r.i. for two years and to pay a fine of rs. 300/- and in default r.t. for one month. while accused nos. 2 and 3, viz., hemaji kaluji and kaluji bhimaji were convicted for the offence punishable under section 323 of i.p.c. and each one of them was sentenced to suffer r.i. for one month and to pay a fine of rs. 100/- and in default further r.i. for 15 days, while the accused no. 4 motiji hathiji was convicted for the offence punishable under section 324 of i.p.c. and sentenced to suffer r.i. for 4 months and to pay a fine of rs. 200/- and in default further r.i. for 15 days.2. recalling few relevant facts of the prosecution case in brief, it may be stated that incident in question took place on 21-3- .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 12 1992 (HC)

Puriben Manilal Patel (Decd.) Through Her Heirs Pramilaben Madhubhai P ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-12-1992

Reported in : (1992)1GLR751

s.d. shah, j.1. rule. mr. mangukia learned a.g.p. waives service of rule. with the consent of parties matter is heard finally today.the petitioners in these petitions are heirs and legal representatives of one deceased puriben, wife of manilal somabhai patel who expired on 14-4-1984 and who by duly executed registered will bequeathed her properties to the present petitioners. they are challenging in these three petitions the order passed by the competent authority dated 6th november, 1989 on application/declaration made by deceased puriben on 30-3-1979 under section 21 of the urban land (ceiling & regulation) act, 1976 and also against the common judgment and order rendered by the urban land ceiling tribunal. ahmedabad, in appeal nos. ahd/460, ahd/461 and ahd/462 of 1989, dated 31st january, 1991 rejecting the said appeals.2. in order to appreciate the questions of law raised in these petitions by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, it is necessary to set out the relevant facts hereunder.(i) deceased puriben, wife of manilal somabhai patel was the holder of three parcels of land bearing s. no. 256, 257 and 273. with respect to said parcels of land, exemption under section 20 of the said act was granted as the said parcels of land were being used for the purpose of agricultural operations. the said exemption granted under section 20 of the act was admittedly not cancelled and was operative when the competent authority passed impugned order and the urban land .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //