Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Sorted by: old Court: karnataka Year: 2005 Page 10 of about 95 results (0.008 seconds)

Dec 03 2005 (HC)

Dattappa (Deceased) by L.Rs Vs. Dasharath (Deceased) by L.Rs and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-03-2005

Reported in : 2006(2)KarLJ585

ordern.k. patil, j.1. petitioner, now represented by his legal representatives, being aggrieved by the order dated 14th september, 1989 on the file of the land reforms appellate authority, bijapur in l.r.'- no. 68 of 1989, setting aside the order passed by land tribunal, bijapur, dated 31st january, 1989 in no. klr.sr. 220, has presented the instant revision petition.2. the deceased tulajaram also, represented by his legal representatives as respondents 1 to 6 herein, claiming to be tenant, had filed form 7 under rule 20(1) of the karnataka land reforms rules, 1974 read with section 48-a(1) of the karnataka land reforms act, 1961 for registration of occupancy rights on 30th june, 1976. the said application filed by deceased tulajaram had come up for consideration before the land tribunal, bijapur on 15th march, 1979. the land tribunal, has ordered for registration of occupancy rights in favour of deceased tulajaram in respect of an extent of 4 acres 3 guntas in sy. no. 471/2c (03 guntas of pot kharab), holding that, the land in question is a tenanted land and the same vested in government as on the relevant date and therefore, he is entitled for registration of occupancy rights in his favour. aggrieved by the order passed by the land tribunal, bijapur, dated 15th march, 1979, the petitioner herein filed a writ petition no. 6143 of 1981 before this court. the said writ petition had come up for consideration before this court on 5th october, 1982 and the writ petition filed by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 09 2005 (HC)

Sri Chandrasen Bapusaheb Jadhav and anr. Vs. Sri Gangappa Yallappa Hol ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-09-2005

Reported in : ILR2006KAR1940

huluvadi g. ramesh, j.1. this appeal is by the plaintiffs being aggrieved by the judgment and decree passed by the learned principal civil judge (senior division) belgaum, in r.a. no. 40/1991 in allowing the appeal and setting the judgment and decree of the trial court in o.s. no. 877 1986.2. plaintiffs filed a suit before the i additional civil judge (junior division) belgaum in o.s. no. 87/1986 for possession of the suit property. according to the plaintiffs, suit property in sy.no. 90/1b situated at balekundri khurd village measures 4 acres 2 guntas and is assessed at rs. 9.72ps. the land is a watan land granted for officiating as patil of the village officer under the karnataka village offices abolition act, 1961 and bombay hereditary offices act, 1894. plaintiffs state that sy.no. 90/1 was divided into 90/1a and 90/1b. originally the land was held by balavantrao parashuram jadhav, bapusaheb parashuram jadhav and yeshwantrao parashuram jadhav. since the land was resumed by the government of mysore, it was re-granted to balavantro jadhav in the year 1966 by the assistant commissioner belgaum, and m.e.no. 2074 was rectified in pursuance of the regrant order. subsequent to this regrant order, partition took place and the suit land was allotted to the share of bapusaheb parashuram jadhav who died in the year 1976 and thus plaintiffs became the owners of the suit land prior to the introduction of the karnataka village offices abolition act, 1961. the suit land was alienated .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 15 2005 (HC)

Ramegowda Vs. the State of Karnataka Represented by Its Secretary and ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-15-2005

Reported in : ILR2006KAR632; 2006(1)KarLJ518

h.l. dattu, j.1. these appeals arise from writ petition no. 16077/2005 and writ petition no. 16351/2005 filed by sri r. ranganath and sri l. sathyanarayana respectively. respondent no. 5 in the writ petition sri. ramegowda was the contesting respondent. by a judgment dated 22.7.2005, the learned single judge has allowed the writ petitions and has quashed the government order bearing no. 182. mnv. 2005, bangalore, dated 13.6.2005. feeling aggrieved by the said order, the 5th respondent in the writ petitions has filed these appeals.2. the bangalore mahanagara palike is the fourth respondent in the writ petitions (hereinafter referred to as 'corporation' for short). recruitment to the various posts in the services of the corporation is regulated by the rules called 'the city of bangalore municipal corporations services (general) cadre and recruitment regulations, 1971'. the rules contain schedule of various posts in the services of the corporation. the highest post provided in the schedule in the cadre of engineers is the post of chief engineer. the method of recruitment to the said post is by promotion from the cadre of superintending engineer and if no suitable candidate is available for promotion, by deputation of an officer of the rank of chief engineer from the karnataka public works department, engineering services. the qualification prescribed for the post in the schedule is that the candidate must possess a degree in civil or mechanical engineering or a certificate of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 22 2005 (HC)

Talaguppa Plywood Products (P) Limited Vs. the Employees Provident Fun ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-22-2005

Reported in : [2006(109)FLR209]; ILR2006KAR1179; (2006)IILLJ593Kant

orderb.s. patil, j.1. in this writ petition, the petitioner is calling in question the order dated 12-7-2005 passed by the employees provident funds appellate tribunal directing the petitioner to deposit 50% of the amount determined by the regional provident fund commissioner towards the damages awarded pending disposal of the appeal.2. the regional provident fund commissioner-ii, sub-regional office, hubli, by order dated 3-6-2004 directed that for the period from april 1994 to february 2002, the petitioner herein shall pay a sum of rs. 28,60,448/ towards damages payable for non-payment of contribution to the employees provident fund accounts within time. the regional provident fund commissioner has further directed that the amount of damages shall be paid by the employer into the respective employees provident fund account maintained at the state bank of india within 15 days of the date of receipt of the order failing which action shall be taken under section 8b to 8g of the employees' provident fund account and miscellaneous provisions act, 1952, (for short 'the act') to recover the amount without further notice. this order came to be challenged by the petitioner before the tribunal. along with the appeal memo, the petitioner filed an application seeking interim stay of the order passed by the regional provident fund commissioner. the tribunal has passed the impugned order admitting the appeals for hearing and directing notice to the respondent but refusing to stay the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 22 2005 (HC)

Dilip Kumar Alias Srinivas and anr. Vs. Damodar Narayanrao Rammangudka ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-22-2005

v.g. sabhabhit, j.1. this appeal by defendants 1 to 7 is directed against the judgment and decree passed by the court of the dist. judge, gulbarga in r.a. no. 17/01 dated 30-6-2003 dismissing the appeal and cross-objections preferred by the defendant no. 2 and confirming the judgment and decree passed by the court of the addl. civil judge (sr. dn.), gulbarga, in o.s. no. 203/ 1995 dated 10-8-2001 wherein the suit of the plaintiff is partly decreed by holding that the plaintiff is entitled to partition and separate possession of 1/12th share in the suit schedule house bearing 1-3-185 situated at chincholi and in suit lands measuring 21 acres 11 guntas both situated at doulatpur village in chincholi taluk and dismissing the suit of the plaintiff for partition and separate possession in respect of the suit land in sy. no. 125 measuring 4 acres 27 guntas and for the relief of future mesne profits of the suit properties and further ordering that defendants 2 to 5 are also entitled to partition and separate possession of their 1/12th share each in the house property and the suit lands in sy. nos. 18 and 19 of doulatpur village.2. the essential facts of the case leading up to the filing of this appeal with reference to the rank of the parties before the trial court are as follows:the plaintiff filed o.s. 203/95 on the file of the addl. civil judge (sr. dn.), gulbarga, seeking for partition and separate possession of his 1/9th share in the suit schedule properties by metes and bounds .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //