Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Sorted by: old Court: rajasthan Year: 2004 Page 1 of about 62 results (0.038 seconds)

Nov 10 2004 (HC)

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation and anr. Vs. Nand Lal Saras ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Nov-10-2004

Reported in : AIR2005Raj112; 2005(2)ARBLR102(Raj); RLW2005(2)Raj946; 2005(2)WLC682

..... settlement and after receiving observations of the parties, the court may reformulate the terms of possible settlement and refer the same for arbitration, conciliation, judicial settlement including lok adalat or mediation, as the case may be. when the dispute is referred for arbitration or conciliation the provisions of the act of 1996 apply as if the proceedings were referred for settlement .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 06 2004 (HC)

Virendra Singh and ors. Vs. Kashiram (Deceased by L.Rs.)

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-06-2004

Reported in : AIR2004Raj196; 2006(1)CTLJ378(Raj); RLW2004(3)Raj1979; 2004(3)WLC711

a.c. goyal, j.1. this is first appeal by the defendants challenging the judgment and decree dated 28-2-1992 whereby learned additional district judge, kishangarhbas decreed the plaintiffs suit. the parties in this appeal shall be referred as arrayed in the plaint.2. the plaintiff sh. kashiram (since deceased) filed a suit on 26-2-1986 for cancellation of a gift deed dated 20-6-1977 and for declaration that the defendant no. 1 sh. virendra singh is not the adopted son of the plaintiff with the averments that agricultural land measuring 15 beeghas 5 biswas as mentioned in para 1 of the plaint and agricultural land measuring 16 and half beeghas as mentioned in para 2 of the plaint is in khatedari and in possession of the plaintiff. the plaintiff is having three daughters -- all married and his wife. the defendants virendra singh and his father deen dayal are also residents of village bheekhawas. the defendant no. 2 sh. deen dayal is an advocate and on account of his contacts with the plaintiff, the plaintiff developed his confidence in defendant no. 2. both the defendants in conspiracy approached the plaintiff and stated that the plaintiff is having about 32 beeghas of land and in case half of this land is transferred by way of will, the plaintiffs land would be saved from ceiling and after some time the will would got be cancelled. thus, taking the plaintiff in confidence the defendant no. 2 got his thumb impressions on a number of papers at mundawar on 20-6-1977 by playing .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 07 2004 (HC)

Kanti Lal Vs. Legal Representatives of Late Smt. Chand Kumari

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-07-2004

Reported in : RLW2004(2)Raj1190; 2004(2)WLC26

prakash tatia, j.1. this second appeal by the plaintiff- appellant, is against the judgment and decree dated 5.4.1980 passed by the learned addl. district judge no. 2, jodhpur whereby the learned addl. district judge no. 2 set aside the judgment and decree dated 24.7.1978 passed by the trial court decreeing the suit for eviction against respondent-defendant smt. chand kumari (now deceased), under the rajasthan premises (control of rent and eviction) act. 1950 (for short the act of 1950).2. the appellant-landlord-plaintiff filed the present suit for eviction of his respondent-tenant-defendants; smt. chand kumari and her son narendra kumar. according to the plaintiff, the suit property described in para no. 1 of the plaint was let out to the defendants and the defendants were paying the rent @ of rs. 50/- per month. according to plaintiff, the defendants have committed default in payment of rent as they did not pay the rent of the premises to the plaintiff from june, 1968 to april, 1970. the plaintiff also claimed rs. 500/- which was due in defendants on account of arrears of rent of the period prior to june 1968. the second ground for eviction was subletting of the premises by the defendants after closer of their business, which they were running in the name of m/s. ganesh timber co., to one shri rashid and another person shri mukand chand and to a firm shri rathore transport third ground for decree for eviction against the tenant was the personal need of the plaintiff who .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 08 2004 (HC)

Vidhya Devi Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-08-2004

Reported in : 2004CriLJ2332; RLW2004(2)Raj1261; 2004(2)WLC691

sunil kumar garg, j.1. this appeal has been filed by the accused appellant from jail aggrieved from the judgment and order dated 9.10.2002 passed by the learned addl. sessions judge (fast track), bhilwara in sessions case no. 51/2001 by which he convicted the accused appellant for the offence under sections 302, 307 and 324 ipc and sentenced her in the following manner:-name of ac-cused appellantconvictedunder section sentence awarded tothe accused appellantvidhya devi302 ipc life imprisonment and to pay fine of rs. 1000/-, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo 2 months ri.307 ipc seven years ri and to pay fine of rs. 500/-, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo one month ri.324 ipc two years ri and to pay fine of rs. 500/-, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo 15 days ri.all the above substantive sentences were ordered to run concurrently.2. it may be stated here that this court vide order dated 8.12.2003 appointed shri pradeep choudhary, advocate as amicus curiae to assist the court and he has argued the case on behalf of the accused appellant.3. it arises in the following circumstances:-on 18.2.1996 at about 3.45 pm, pw1 debilal lodged an oral report (ex.p/1) with the police station hamirgarh district bhilwara before pw10 bahadur singh, who was at that time sho of that police station stating inter-alia (hat on 18.2.1996 at about 2.30 pm when he was in his house, he heard the cries of magni wife of gulab to the effect 'maro-maro' and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 15 2004 (HC)

Kahtoon Begum (Deceased) Through Her Lrs Vs. Bhagwan Das and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-15-2004

Reported in : RLW2004(1)Raj502

a.c. goyal, j.1. all these three second appeals have been preferred against the judgment and decree dated 15.9.1998 whereby learned additional district judge no. 2, jaipur city, jaipur while dismissing three appeals affirmed the judgment and decree of eviction passed by learned civil judge (junior division), west, jaipur city, jaipur on 9.4.1997.2. the relevant facts in brief are that the suit shop was let out on 12.8.1961 at monthly rent of rs. 25/- to the original tenant sh. chhote khan by jaipur cloth retailer association (in short the association). the association vide registered gift deed ex. 5 dated 20.2.1986 gifted this shop to pushthi margiya vaishanva mandal (in short the mandal) under intimation to sh. chhote khan vide a registered notice dated 25.2.1986. the mandal vide registered sale deed ex.1 dated 12.9.1986 sold this shop to the plaintiff-landlord sh. bhagwan das for a consideration of rs. 75,000/- under intimation to sh. chhote khan vide registered notice dated 4.10.1986, who filed the present suit on 25.2.1987 for arrears of rent and eviction on the grounds of default in payment of rent and personal reasonable and bonafide requirement as pleaded in paras 5 to 7 of the plaint.3. vide written statement filed on 11.1.1987 the defendant- tenant sh. chhote khan while admitting the facts of tenancy denied both the grounds of eviction with further pleas that the association had no right to execute the gift deed and transaction of sale is sham and the mandal also had .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 23 2004 (HC)

Madan Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-23-2004

Reported in : I(2004)DMC746; RLW2004(2)Raj1319; 2004(2)WLC61

shiv kumar sharma, j.1. the appellant and co-accused gyarsi were indicted before the learned additional sessions judge (fast track) ajmer in sessions case no. 15/2001 (5/98) for having committed murder of smt. parvati. the learned trial judge vide judgment dated august 23, 2001 acquitted co-accused gyarsi but convicted and sentenced the appellant as under:-under section 302 ipc to suffer imprisonment for life arid fine of rs. 1000/- in default to further suffer 3 months simple imprisonment. under section 498a ipc to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three years and fine rs. 500 in default to further suffer 1, 1/2 months simple imprisonment. the sentences were ordered to run concurrently. 2. on november 19, 1997 while smt. parvati (now deceased) was admitted in jln hospital ajmer, sho police station alwar gate ajmer recorded her parcha bayan (ex.p-12). in the parcha bayan parvati stated that a day before i.e. on november 18, 1997 at 11.00 pm her husband madan (appellant) poured kerosine oil on her and set her ablaze. he used to demand dowry, ornaments and scooter which could not be met therefore he decided to kill her. nawal kishore, her devar (brother in law) then called a doctor to treat her in the house. thereafter her father brought her to the government hospital. parcha bayan of parvati was taken by constable devendra singh (pw. 15) and he gave it to mahila police station at 9.30 pm, where a case under sections 307 and 498a ipc was registered against the appellant and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 27 2004 (HC)

Gobari Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-27-2004

Reported in : RLW2004(3)Raj1645; 2004(2)WLC52

shiv kumar sharma, j.(1). the appellant was indicted before the learned judge special court (women atricities & dowry cases) kota in sessions case no. 378/97 for having committed murder of madhu. learned judge vide judgment dated january 20, 2001 convicted and sentenced the appellant as under:-section 302 ipc to suffer imprisonment for life and finers. 2000/-, in default further suffer six monthsrigorous imprisonment.section 376 ipc to suffer ten years rigorous imprisonment andfines rs. 2000/-, in default further suffer sixmonths rigorous imprisonment.section 201 ipc to suffer three years rigorous imprisonment andfine rs. 1000/-, in default further sufferthree months rigorous imprisonment.sentences were ordered to run concurrently.(2). madhu, a girl of 16 years of age, who left her house on may 4, 1997 at 5.00 pm for jungle in order to attend the call of nature, did not return back and her half naked dead body was found lying in a trench. a written report (ex.p-5) was lodged by informant shri nath (pw.2) with the police station kanwas where a case under section 302 ipc was registered and investigation commenced. inquest report was drawn, dead body was subjected to post mortem, statements of witnesses under section 161 cr.p.c. were recorded, the appellant was arrested and injuries found on his person were examined. on the basis of information supplied by the appellant chhurri, pant, shirt and shoes were recovered and recovery memos were drawn. on completion of investigation .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 04 2004 (HC)

Man Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-04-2004

Reported in : RLW2004(3)Raj1997; 2004(3)WLC184

f.c. bansal, j.1. the instant appeal is directed against the judgment dated july 27, 2000 passed by learned special judge (women atrocities & dowry cases), kota whereby appellant man singh has been convicted and sentenced to suffer imprisonment for life and a fine of rs. 5,000/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months under section 302 of the indian penal code.2. the brief facts of the prosecution case are that one receiving information from m.b.s. hospital, kota on march 31, 1997 to the effect that smt. manju bai w/o man singh, by caste rajput, age 27 years, r/o - kota has been admitted in the hospital in burnt condition, pw 9 dwarka prasad, the then sho, p.s. gumanpura, kota reached the hospital and recorded 'parcha-bayan' ex. p7 of smt. manju bai at 8:15 p.m. wherein she stated that her marriage took place 14-15 years ago. she is haying to sons and two daughters. today at about 6:00 p.m. her husband and her father-in-law ramcharan were quarreling each other on account of illicit relations of her husband with kamla kumhar. when she told him about his. illicit relations with kamla, he lost his temper, poured oil on her and set her on fire. thereafter he fled away. her father-in-law ramcharan and neighbour hemsingh extinguished the fire. she got burn injuries. thereafter she was brought to the hospital. on the basis of 'parcha-bayan' ex. p7, a case under section 307 ipc was registered at p.s. gumanpura, kota at 9:30 p.m. on 31.3. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 19 2004 (HC)

Thawri and ors. Vs. Harji Lal and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-19-2004

Reported in : 2006ACJ2279

prakash tatia, j.1. heard learned counsel for the appellants.2. this appeal is against the award dated 10.12.2003 by which the claim petition of the claimants was dismissed by the motor accidents claims tribunal, salumbhar ( no, 2), udaipur. tribunal dismissed the claim petition of the claimants only on the ground that the deceased himself was the driver of the vehicle and because of some problem, the vehicle was stopped. the trolley attached to the vehicle was lifted with the help of jack and deceased was trying to repair the trolley. at that time, the jack slipped out resulting in the accident that caused the injuries to the deceased devilal and he ultimately died. the tribunal held that the claimants failed to prove that respondent harji lal was driving the vehicle at the time of accident. the tribunal also considered the evidence as well as documents placed on record by the claimants and thereafter, reached to the conclusion that the claims the claimants have stated factually wrong facts and they failed to prove any accident from the use of the 'motor vehicle', there fore, the claim petition, which is factually wrong and is also not maintainable, was dismissed by the tribunal.3. learned counsel for the appellants submits that there was oral evidence of the witnesses and there is no reason to disbelieve those witnesses. it is also submitted that though there are pleadings in the claim petition itself that the trolley attached to the tractor was on jack and bearing of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 20 2004 (HC)

Kanhaiya Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-20-2004

Reported in : RLW2004(3)Raj1937; 2004(3)WLC100

f.c. bansal, j.1. this appeal is directed against the judgment dated september 27, 2000 passed by learned additional sessions judge no. 1, bundi whereby appellant kanhaiya lal has been convicted under section 302 of the indian penal code and sentenced to suffer imprisonment for life and a fine of rs. 1,000/- and in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months.2. briefly stated the facts of the prosecution case are that on 11.02.93 at 2.30 a.m. 'parcha-bayan' ex.p20 of deceased hariom was recorded by pw21 udailal, a.s.i., p.s. lakheri wherein it was stated by hariom that on the same night he was sleeping on a cot in a thatched room of his house. in the adjoining room his brother and his mother were sleeping. there was light in the house. at about 1.30 a.m. kanhaiya lal khateek entered into his house and inflicted injury with 'chhura' on his chest. he caught hold of kanhaiya lal and raised an alarm whereupon his brother ghanshyam, his sister-in-law (bhabhi) and his mother came there. thereafter kanhaiya lal fled away. he was brought to the hospital by hariom panchal, radhey shyam panchal, durga prasad sharma and ghanshyam and they got him admitted for treatment. it was alleged in ex.p20 that on account of previous enmity and with the intention to kill, kanhaiya lal had caused injury to him. on the basis of 'parcha-bayan' ex.p20, a case under section 458 1pc was registered by the sho, lakheri. formal fir is ex.p23. the investigating officer .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //