Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Sorted by: old Court: rajasthan Year: 2005 Page 1 of about 69 results (0.009 seconds)

Apr 28 2005 (HC)

Laxmi NaraIn @ Latoor Vs. the State of Raj. and Ladu

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-28-2005

Reported in : RLW2005(3)Raj1678; 2005(3)WLC780

..... ran away from there, then they started beating us. ladies were also beaten and they drove the tractors towards us to kill us. then to mediate, prabhata, ramchandra gurjar, narain, harsai etc. came there and mediated with great difficulty. if these persons had not been there then our so many persons would have been crushed and killed by tractors. these persons had .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 10 2005 (HC)

Jagan Lal and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jun-10-2005

Reported in : RLW2006(1)Raj46; 2005(4)WLC370

shiv kumar sharma, j.1. this appeal impugns the judgment dated october 28, 2002 of the. learned additional sessions judge (fast track) hindaun city rendered in sessions case no. 63/2001 (27/99) whereby the six appellants (herein after to be referred as 'accused'), who are the members of one family, have been convicted and sentenced as under:(1) jagan lal:under section 302 ipc:to suffer imprisonment for life and fine of rs. 500/-, in default to further suffer three months rigorous imprisonment.under section 148 ipc:to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year.under section 447 ipc:to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three months.under section 326/149 ipc:to suffer rigorous imprisonment for five years and fine of rs. 2000/-, in default to further suffer six months rigorous imprisonment.under section 323/149 ipc:to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months.under section 3/25 arms act:to suffer simple imprisonment for one year and fine of rs. 1000/- in default to further suffer one month simple imprisonment.(2) ramkesh:under section 302/149 ipc:to suffer imprisonment for life and fine of rs. 500/-, in default to further suffer three months rigorous imprisonment.under section 148 ipc:to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year.under section 447 ipc:to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three months.under section 326/149 ipc:to suffer rigorous imprisonment for five years and fine of rs. 2000/-, in default to further suffer six months rigorous imprisonment.under section 323/149 ipc .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 18 2005 (HC)

Maharaj Himmat Singh and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-18-2005

Reported in : AIR2006Raj94; 2006(1)WLC278

orderprakash tatia, j.1. heard learned counsel for the parties.2. the present controversy has a chequered history as the controversy started when the union of india issued a notification under section 23(1) of the defence and internal security of india act, 1971 (for short 'the act of 1971') for requisitioning a total land measuring 645 acres. copy of the notification has been placed on record by the petitioners as annex. ii. the description of the property has been given in the notification which is as under: ______________________________________________________________ name of khasra area in acres remark village number jodhpur 298 7.20 state govt. land jodhpur 297 13.60 area 2 1.00 acres jodhpur 426 296.20 private land area jodhpur 632 62.00 acres jodhpur 632/1 158.00 jodhpur 632/4 digeri 170.00 total : 645.00 _____________________________________________________________ 3. it appears from the facts that so far as requisitioning the property by the union of india under the act of 1971 was never challenged by the petitioners and today also, there is no dispute about the requisitioning of the property by the union of india mentioned in the notification dated 6-5-1976 (annex. 11). how much land was acquired by the said notification is also not in dispute. however, the petitioners apprehending that their land may be acquired by the state government under the provisions under sections 7-a and 9-a of the rajasthan land reforms and acquisition of land owner's estates act, 1963 ( .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 21 2005 (HC)

Rukmani Devi and anr. Vs. Nand Kishore Through Its Legal Representativ ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Oct-21-2005

Reported in : RLW2006(1)Raj340; 2005(4)WLC734

shiv kumar sharma, j.1. the plaintiff appellants in the instant special appeal seek to quash the judgment dated january 27, 1986 of the learned single judge whereby three civil first appeal, bearing nos. 202/1973, 56/1974 and 185/1974 were decided.2. it is contended on behalf of the appellants that finding of learned single judge that family settlement was not compulsorily registrable is erroneous, as terms of family arrangement were reduced into writing in it. the counsel for the respondent nand kishore, on the other hand supported the impugned judgment.3. having considered the submissions advanced before us and scanned the material on record, we notice that the learned single judge in the impugned judgment observed that the family settlement between the members of the family had taken place as per ex.a-1 which was signed by all the parties, except chunni bai. it was also held that since the family settlement was acted upon by the parties, nothing remained to be partitioned by the court. ratio indicated in kale and ors. v. deputy director of consolidation and ors. : [1976]3scr202 , was considered by the learned single judge and it was held that the family settlement was not compulsorily registrable under section 17 of the registration act.4. in kale and ors. v. deputy director of consolidation and ors. supra, their lordships of the supreme court indicated that the family arrangement may be even oral in which registration is not necessary. registration would be necessary only .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 14 2005 (HC)

Sobhag Kanwar (Smt.) Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Dec-14-2005

Reported in : RLW2006(1)Raj857; 2006(2)WLC280

s.n. jha, c.j.1. the petitioner along with her sister roop bai filed revenue suit for declaration of their rights and possession over the lands of khasra nos. 29, 72, 75/1 and 75/2 measuring 27 bighas and 14 biswas situated in village chapras, tehsil bundi, by order dated 10th april, 1978 the assistant collector-11, bundi dismissed the suit. the petitioner preferred appeal before the revenue appellate authority which was dismissed on 24th april, 1981. she then filed second appeal before the board of revenue which too was dismissed on 10th october, 1988. she seeks quashing of the said orders. she also seeks quashing of the order of collector, bundi dated 03rd november, 1955 holding that the lands escheated to the darbar/state in terms of sub- section 32 of the bundi tenancy act, 1942 on the death of kishan dan. she also seeks quashing of mutation no. 29 dated 02nd february, 1958 mentioning the name of respondent no. 6 modu with respect to the lands. the petitioner further seeks declaration that the provisions of section 32(a) and (b) of the bundi tenancy act, 1942 are unconstitutional. it is mainly because of the provisions of section 32 of the said act, that the petitioner's claim was rejected by the authorities.2. the case of the petitioner briefly is that her father kishan dan was the khatedar tenant of khasra nos. 29, 72, 75/1 and 75/2 measuring 27 bighas and 14 biswas situated in village chapras, tehsil bundi. he died in samvat 2006 (corresponding to 1949 a.d.) leaving .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 04 2005 (HC)

Richhpal Singh and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-04-2005

Reported in : RLW2005(1)Raj682; 2005(1)WLC548

n.n. mathur, j.1. thousands of teachers by way of instant bunch of writ petitions, as mentioned in schedule appended to each petition, have challenged the constitutional validity of the rajasthan panchayati raj (amendment) ordinance, 2004 and rajasthan panchayati raj (amendment) rules, 2004 providing for selection of teachers gr.iii by the public service commission and have prayed for restoring the autonomy to the panchayati raj institutions in the matter of selection & appointment of primary school teachers. petitioner-teachers have also prayed for restoration of the notification dated 14.7.2003 providing to fill-up the posts of teacher gr.iii to the extent of 75% from para teachers/shiksha sahyogi and 25% from the open market. it is further prayed that their services be regularized as teacher gr.iii, who have been in continuous service for a considerable time as para teacher/shiksha sahyogi.background facts:2. the factual matrix in juxtaposition with the relevant rules may be set out in detail because the very narration of chronology of events would illumine the contours of controversy.3. the cadre of teachers gr.iii in the state of rajasthan is divided in two categories viz; (i) the teachers working under the panchayat samitis and (ii) the teachers working in the education department, government of rajasthan. the service conditions of teachers working in the panchayat samitis were initially governed by the provisions contained in the rajasthan panchayat samitis and zila .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 04 2005 (HC)

Ranchod B. Das Vs. Lrs of Kanhaiya Lal

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-04-2005

Reported in : RLW2005(3)Raj2056; 2005(2)WLC10

prakash tatia, j.1. the trial court decreed the suit of the appellant-plaintiff for eviction of his tenant-respondent, from the suit premises, vide judgment and decree dated 16.8.1994. the appellate court reversed the judgment and the decree of the trial court vide judgment and decree dated 5.4.1997. hence, this second appeal by the appellant-plaintiff-landlord against the judgment and decree of the first appellate court dated 5.4.1997.2. brief facts of the case are that the plaintiff-appellant, who was in service in the year 1974, let out one of his shop, out of his three shops, situated in his house to the defendant- deceased kanhaiya lal on 2.10.1974 on rent of rs. 110/- per month excluding the charges for the electricity, water and house-tax. the plaintiff filed the suit for eviction against the defendant-tenant on 28.10.1977. the plaintiff in his plaint stated that the suit shop was let out to the defendant for commercial purposes but instead of doing the business in his own name, the defendant obtained licence from competent authority for running the shop in the name of his wife and started business in the shop in the name of his wife without the permission of the plaintiff. not only this but in violation to the terms and conditions of the tenancy agreement, the defendant-tenant started residing in the shop from 1.6.1976 with his wife and children. the defendant also damaged the property causing loss to the plaintiff. the plaintiff further submitted that plaintiff's son .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 10 2005 (HC)

Madan and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-10-2005

Reported in : RLW2005(2)Raj1460; 2005(2)WLC216

dalip singh, j.1. this appeal has been filed by the accused appellants against the judgment dated 19.12.1998 passed by the additional sessions judge, rajgarh, district alwar in sessions case no. 33/1995 convicting and sentencing accused appellant no. 1 madan, for the offence under section 302 i.p.c. read with section 34 i.p.c. to imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of rs. 5,000/- and in default of payment to further undergo one year's simple imprisonment; and convicting and sentencing accused appellant no. 2 patwari for the offence under section 302 i.p.c. to imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of rs. 5,000/- and in default of payment to further undergo one year's simple imprisonment. accused-appellant patwari was further convicted and sentenced for the offence under section 3/25 of the arms act for three years and to pay a fine to further undergo three months simple imprisonment. he was further convicted and sentenced for the offence under section 5/27 of the arms act for three years rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of rs. 500/- and in default of payment of fine to further undergo three months simple imprisonment. all the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.2. the brief facts giving rise to the instant appeal are that on 14.03.1995, complainant pw-4 ram kishore lodged a first information report with the allegations that on the previous night of 13.03.1995 at about 10:00 or 11:00 pm his brother isar (the deceased), his wife pw-5 vimla and his children .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 27 2005 (HC)

Rameshwar and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-27-2005

Reported in : RLW2005(2)Raj1015

f.c. bansal, j.1. the instant appeal is directed against the judgment dated 30.09.2000 passed by the learned special judge (women atrocities & dowry cases), kola in sessions case no. 188/1997 whereby all the accused appellants have been convicted and sentenced as under:-rameshwar, kanwar under section 366 ipc r.i. for three years and a lal, tulsi rain, ashok fine of rs. 1,000/-, inand udai lal each default of payment offine to further suffer r.i.for three months.under section 376(2) r.i. for ten years and a(g) ipc fine of rs. 5,000/-, indefault of payment offine to further suffer r.i.for six months.under section 376 ipc no separate sentencehas been imposed.rami bai and kanchan under section 366 ipc r.i. for three years and abai each fine of rs. 1,000/-, indefault of payment offine to further suffer r.i.for three months.2. the prosecution case, in nutshell, is that on 22.02.92 at about 3.00 p.m. prosecutrix hemlata (pw5) was abducted from kola city and taken to rawatbhala by all the appellants and kept her in a hut. in the night appellants rameshwar, kanwarlal, tulsiram, ashok and udailal forcibly committed sexual intercourse with her. next day she was taken to another village by all the appellants and again in the night appellants rameshwar, kanwarlal, tulsiram, ashok and udailal committed rape on her in a house. in the morning she was taken to the house of appellant ashok situated in village gudda. in that house also sexual intercourse was forcibly committed with her by the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 15 2005 (HC)

Emarata Ram Pooniya Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-15-2005

Reported in : RLW2005(3)Raj1755; 2005(2)WLC358

n.n. mathur, j.1. the appellants by way of separate writ petitions challenged the process of selection on the post of teachers gr.ii/senior teachers, pursuant to the zone-wise advertisements viz; jaipur, jodhpur, kota, udaipur, ajmer & churu. the respondents after due consideration of merit in accordance with the prescribed procedure, issued provisional merit list of 5712 candidates on 19th september 2003. on coming to know of the result, out of thousands of unsuccessful candidates, few of them in total 9 writ petitions under article 226 came to be filed in october 2003, challenging the process of selection, on diverse grounds. the learned single judge dismissed all the writ petitions by impugned judgment dated 4.11.2004 mainly on the ground that no interference is warranted with the selections made on the basis of practice in vogue for long time, more particularly at the instance of the candidates, who have taken a chance and participated in the selection process. learned single judge partly allowed the writ petition being s.b. civil writ petition no. 5709/2003 'dharamveer v. state' and directed the respondent-state to exclude candidates from consideration possessing the degree from such of the institutions, which are situated in the state of j & k, as they are not recognized by the national council for teacher education (in short, 'the ncte'). learned single judge also held that the knowledge of rajasthani language and culture is an essential part and, as such, directed the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //