Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Sorted by: old Court: uk supreme court Year: 2012 Page 1 of about 61 results (0.062 seconds)

Feb 29 2012 (FN)

In the Matter of Lehman Brothers International (Europe) (In Administra ...

Court : UK Supreme Court

Decided on : Feb-29-2012

..... been met, for clients which are insurance undertakings with respect of client money received in the course of insurance mediation activity according to their respective interests in it; (4) on failure of the firm, for the payment of the costs properly attributable to the distribution of the client money in ..... is an error for (4)], for the clients (other than clients which are insurance undertakings when acting as such with respect of client money received in the course of insurance mediation activity and that was opted in to this chapter) for whom that money is held, according to their respective interests in it; (3) after all valid claims in (2) have .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 31 2012 (FN)

R (on the Application of Km) (by His Mother and Litigation Friend Jm) ...

Court : UK Supreme Court

Decided on : May-31-2012

..... of the computation should, in broad terms, have been explained; and such was its third significant mistake. even a session of mediation which took place in may 2010 proved abortive for want of the explanation; but at least the mediator facilitated the extraction from cambridgeshire of a commitment to provide it within 14 days. in the event cambridgeshire finally provided a full .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 10 2012 (FN)

Compucredit Corp. Vs. Greenwood

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-10-2012

compucredit corp. v. greenwood note:?where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. the syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the court but has been prepared by the reporter of decisions for the convenience of the reader. see united states v. detroit timber & lumber co., 200 u. s. 321 . supreme court of the united states syllabus compucredit corp. et al. v. greenwood et al. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit no. 10 948.?argued october 11, 2011 decided january 10, 2012 although respondents credit card agreement required their claims to be resolved by binding arbitration, they filed a lawsuit against petitioner compucredit corporation and a division of petitioner bank, alleging, inter alia, violations of the credit repair organizations act (croa). the federal district court denied the defendants motion to compel arbitration, concluding that congress intended croa claims to be nonarbitrable. the ninth circuit affirmed. held: because the croa is silent on whether claims under the act can proceed in an arbitrable forum, the federal arbitration act (faa) requires the arbitration agreement to be enforced according to its terms. pp. 2 10. (a) section 2 of the faa establishes a liberal federal policy favoring arbitration. moses h. cone memorial hospital v. mercury constr. corp., 460 u. s. 1 . it requires that courts enforce arbitration .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 10 2012 (FN)

Gonzalez Vs. Thaler

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-10-2012

gonzalez v. thaler note:?where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. the syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the court but has been prepared by the reporter of decisions for the convenience of the reader. see united states v. detroit timber & lumber co., 200 u. s. 321 . supreme court of the united states syllabus gonzalez v. thaler, director, texas department of criminal justice, correctional institutions division certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fifth circuit no. 10 895.?argued november 2, 2011 decided january 10, 2012 after the intermediate state appellate court affirmed his state-court conviction, petitioner gonzalez allowed his time for seeking discretionary review with the state s highest court for criminal appeals to expire. roughly six weeks later, the intermediate state appellate court issued its mandate. when gonzalez subsequently sought federal habeas relief, the district court dismissed gonzalez s petition as time barred by the 1-year statute of limitations in the antiterrorism and effective death penalty act of 1996 (aedpa). under 28 u. s. c. 2244(d)(1)(a), state prisoners have one year to file federal habeas petitions running from the date on which the judgment became final by the conclusion of direct review or the expiration of the time for seeking such review. the district court held that gonzalez s judgment had become final .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 11 2012 (FN)

Perry Vs. New Hampshire

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-11-2012

perry v. new hampshire note:?where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. the syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the court but has been prepared by the reporter of decisions for the convenience of the reader. see united states v. detroit timber & lumber co., 200 u. s. 321 . supreme court of the united states syllabus perry v. new hampshire certiorari to the supreme court of new hampshire no. 10 8974.?argued november 2, 2011 decided january 11, 2012 around 3 a.m. on august 15, 2008, the nashua, new hampshire police department received a call reporting that an african-american male was trying to break into cars parked in the lot of the caller s apartment building. when an officer responding to the call asked eyewitness nubia blandon to describe the man, blandon pointed to her kitchen window and said the man she saw breaking into the car was standing in the parking lot, next to a police officer. petitioner barion perry s arrest followed this identification. before trial, perry moved to suppress blandon s identification on the ground that admitting it at trial would violate due process. the new hampshire trial court denied the motion. to determine whether due process prohibits the introduction of an out-of-court identification at trial, the superior court said, this court s decisions instruct a two-step inquiry: the trial court must first decide whether the police used .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 18 2012 (FN)

Golan Vs. Holder

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-18-2012

golan v. holder note:?where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. the syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the court but has been prepared by the reporter of decisions for the convenience of the reader. see united states v. detroit timber & lumber co., 200 u. s. 321 . supreme court of the united states syllabus golan et al. v. holder, attorney general, et al. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the tenth circuit no. 10 545.?argued october 5, 2011 decided january 18, 2012 the berne convention for the protection of literary and artistic works (berne), which took effect in 1886, is the principal accord governing international copyright relations. berne s 164 member states agree to provide a minimum level of copyright protection and to treat authors from other member countries as well as they treat their own. of central importance in this case, article 18 of berne requires countries to protect the works of other member states unless the works copyright term has expired in either the country where protection is claimed or the country of origin. a different system of transnational copyright protection long prevailed in this country. throughout most of the 20th century, the only foreign authors eligible for copyright act protection were those whose countries granted reciprocal rights to american authors and whose works were printed in the united states. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 18 2012 (FN)

Maples Vs. Thomas

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-18-2012

maples v. thomas note:?where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. the syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the court but has been prepared by the reporter of decisions for the convenience of the reader. see united states v. detroit timber & lumber co., 200 u. s. 321 . supreme court of the united states syllabus maples v. thomas, commissioner, alabama department of corrections certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the eleventh circuit no. 10 63.?argued october 4, 2011 decided january 18, 2012 petitioner cory r. maples was found guilty of murder and sentenced to death in alabama state court. in 2001, maples sought postconviction relief in state court under alabama rule 32. maples alleged, among other things, that his underpaid and inexperienced trial attorneys failed to afford him the effective assistance guaranteed by the sixth amendment. his petition was written by two pro bono attorneys, jaasai munanka and clara ingen-housz, both associated with the new york offices of the sullivan & cromwell law firm. as required by alabama law, the two attorneys engaged an alabama lawyer, john butler, to move their admission pro hac vice. butler made clear, however, that he would undertake no substantive involvement in the case. in 2002, while maples state postconviction petition was pending, munanka and ingen-housz left sullivan & cromwell. their new employment .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 23 2012 (FN)

United States Vs. Jones

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-23-2012

united states v. jones note:?where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. the syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the court but has been prepared by the reporter of decisions for the convenience of the reader. see united states v. detroit timber & lumber co., 200 u. s. 321 . supreme court of the united states syllabus united states v. jones certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the district of columbia circuit no. 10 1259.?argued november 8, 2011 decided january 23, 2012 the government obtained a search warrant permitting it to install a global-positioning-system (gps) tracking device on a vehicle registered to respondent jones s wife. the warrant authorized installation in the district of columbia and within 10 days, but agents installed the device on the 11th day and in maryland. the government then tracked the vehicle s movements for 28 days. it subsequently secured an indictment of jones and others on drug trafficking conspiracy charges. the district court suppressed the gps data obtained while the vehicle was parked at jones s residence, but held the remaining data admissible because jones had no reasonable expectation of privacy when the vehicle was on public streets. jones was convicted. the d. c. circuit reversed, concluding that admission of the evidence obtained by warrantless use of the gps device violated the fourth amendment. held: the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 23 2012 (FN)

National Meat Assn. Vs. Harris

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-23-2012

national meat assn. v. harris note:?where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. the syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the court but has been prepared by the reporter of decisions for the convenience of the reader. see united states v. detroit timber & lumber co., 200 u. s. 321 . supreme court of the united states syllabus national meat association v. harris, attorney general of california, et al. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit no. 10 224.?argued november 9, 2011 decided january 23, 2012 the federal meat inspection act (fmia), 21 u. s. c. 601 et seq., regulates a broad range of activities at slaughterhouses to ensure the safety of meat and the humane handling of animals. the department of agriculture s food safety and inspection service (fsis), which administers the fmia, has issued extensive regulations to govern the inspection of animals and meat, as well as other aspects of slaughterhouses operations and facilities. see 9 cfr 300.1 et seq. the fsis inspection procedure begins with an ante-mortem inspection of each animal brought to a slaughterhouse. if, at that inspection, a nonambulatory animal is found to suffer from a particularly severe disease or condition, it must be classified as u. s. condemned and killed apart from the slaughtering facilities where food is produced. 309.3, 311.1 et seq. nonambulatory animals that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 08 2012 (FN)

Rabone and Another Vs. Pennine Care Nhs Foundation Trust

Court : UK Supreme Court

Decided on : Feb-08-2012

lord dyson 1. some time after 17.00 hrs on 20 april 2005, melanie rabone hanged herself from a tree in lymepark, cheshire. she was 24 years of age and was the loved daughter of mr and mrs rabone. at the time, she was on two days' home leave from stepping hill hospital, stockport where she was undergoing treatment for a depressive disorder as an informal patient (ie one who was not detained under the mental health act 1983 ("the mha")). she had been admitted to the hospital as an emergency following a suicide attempt. she was assessed by the hospital as a high risk of a further suicide attempt. mr and mrs rabone have always maintained that the hospital authorities should not have allowed her home leave and that they were responsible for their daughter's tragic death. they started proceedings against the pennine care nhs trust ("the trust") alleging negligence and breach of the right to life protected by article 2 of the european convention for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms ("the convention"). the trust eventually admitted negligence, but they have never admitted liability for breach of article 2. a number of issues were raised in the proceedings all of which are live in this appeal. the claim failed because the judge (simon j) held that the operational duty implicit in article 2 did not apply in this case: there was no duty on the hospital authorities under article 2 to take reasonable steps to guard melanie against the risk of suicide: [2010] ewhc .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //