Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Sorted by: old Year: 2012 Page 1 of about 3,622 results (0.026 seconds)

Jan 06 2012 (HC)

Indian Railways Catering and Vs. Cox and Kings India Ltd. and anr

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-06-2012

..... which, over a period of time, became the bone of contention. some correspondence was exchanged between the parties and there were attempts to drown the flames of differences even through mediation. however, things instead of improving became bad to worse and ultimately, the irctc vide letter dated 12th august, 2011, terminated the joint venture agreement on the basis of some purported .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 09 2012 (HC)

Chhotu and Others Vs. Ram Kumar

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-09-2012

..... is the complete answer to the problem in hand. 12. as is evident from the record that in the instant case, the parties have lawfully settled their dispute before the mediator, as per terms and conditions of compromise dated 9.2.2011 in the manner stated hereinabove. therefore there is no impediment in translating their wishes into reality and to quash ..... respect to the subject matter being compromised today and all the disputes and differences in this regard have been amicably settled by the parties hereto through the process of conciliation/mediation. 12. that the parties undertake before the honble court to abide by the terms and conditions set out in the agreement and not to dispute the same hereinafter in ..... the provisions of section 482 cr.p.c. 6. during the pendency of this petition, good sense prevailed between the parties and they have amicably settled their disputes before the mediator of this court on 9.12.2011 with the following terms and conditions:- (i) it has been agreed between all the parties that none of the parties shall have any .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 16 2012 (HC)

Rajinder Kumar Gupta Vs. Rameshwar Prasad Gupta

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-16-2012

..... to prepare the drawings and take photographs and make video of the premises. direction issued was that the assistant engineer would submit a report which would be considered by the mediator..16. rajender did not permit the commission to be executed. he filed an application under order vii rule 11 cpc, rfa (os) 89-90/2011 page 4 of 7 registered ..... this request made pertained to physical partition and thus held that the best place to sort out the matter would be the table of a mediator and thus referred the parties to mediation, with a mandate to the mediator to evolve, by consent, any appropriate mode to physically partition the property..15. envisaging that without a visit to the property and without understanding ..... a qualified architect be appointed to assist the mediator in measuring the property at site. various other directions were also sought. vide order dated 01.09.2009, the learned single judge disposed of ia no.11209/2009 directing the ..... the physical contours thereof the learned mediator may not be able to evolve consensus, rameshwar filed ia no.11209/2009 praying to the learned single judge that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 20 2012 (HC)

Moolchand Kharaiti Ram Hospital and Vs. Moolchand Kharaiti Ram Hospita ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-20-2012

..... steps will be taken to enforce the impugned award in the present writ petition". 1.3 during the pendency of the petition attempts were made to settle the disputes through mediation. the management entered into individual settlements with some of the employees and on that basis it filed an application cm no. 7977 of 2004 seeking to set aside the impugned .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 25 2012 (HC)

Kuldeep Singh Vs. State of Haryana and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-25-2012

rakesh kumar garg, j.(oral) - vide this petition, a prayer has been made for quashing of fir no.170 dated 26.05.2008, under sections 406, 498-a, 120-b, 34, 506 ipc, registered at police station assandh, district karnal, on the basis of alleged compromise (annexure p-2). 2. according to the averments, a compromise had been reached between the parties before ms. vani gopal sharma, mediator, conciliation centre, karnal on 11.03.2011. however, complainant-respondent no.2 who is present in the court has specifically stated that the petitioner has not honoured the compromise and therefore, she is not agreeing for quashing of fir on the basis of which alleged settlement took place before the mediation and conciliation centre, karnal. 3. in view of the aforesaid fact alone, this petition is liable to be dismissed. 4. ordered accordingly. 5. since the plea of petitioner has not been accepted and respondent no.2-complainant, who is a lady and has been dragged to defend this petitioner unnecessarily, the petitioner is liable to pay a sum of rs.10,000/- to respondent no.2, within one month from today. in case, he fails to pay the aforesaid amount, the same shall be recovered from him, as arrears of land revenue. 6. it is also necessary to notice that the reply filed by the deputy superintendent of police, assandh, challan has been presented. the trial court is directed to decide the complaint pending before it, as early as possible, preferably within six months from today.

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 30 2012 (HC)

Khaleek Ahmed Vs. Mohd Naved Ansari and anr

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-30-2012

..... by the will and consent of the parties are thereafter permitted to be withdrawn; the idea of the petitioner being threatened by goons standing outside the mediation centre does appear to be a far- fetched story; there also being no explanation as to why this story did not surface on the following two ..... issues, the same shall be reduced to writing and signed by the parties or their constituted attorney; the agreement so signed shall be submitted to the mediator/conciliation who shall, with a covering letter signed by him, forward the same to the court in which the suit or proceeding is pending. there ..... between the parties for 27.08.2010 meaning thereby that the parties had agreed to comply with the terms and conditions of their settlement recorded by the mediator. even on the next date, there was no grievance. thereafter the petitioner/defendant no.2. turned around from his stand and took a diametrically opposited ..... case, a settlement had been arrived at between the plaintiff and defendant no.1. which was duly incorporated and contained in this settlement recorded by the mediator on 20.07.2010. thereafter the matter was adjourned for two dates i.e. 16.08.2010 and 27.08.2010 on which dates counsel for ..... this court is the order dated 07.01.2011 vide which the objections of the defendant to the settlement arrived at between the parties before the mediation centre, karkardooma court, delhi on 20.07.2010 had been allowed to be set aside and the objections raised by the defendant that he had .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2012 (HC)

Shri Amit JaIn Vs. Harvinder Kaur

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-31-2012

..... directed on the 11th of february, 2011 that the defendant shall not file its written statement to the plaint for the reason that the parties had consensually been referred to mediation. the mediation process was also ongoing..22. i may also notice the vehement argument of mr. anil aggarwal, learned counsel for the plaintiff to the effect that shri jitender singh (husband ..... the district courts and had consequently requested his colleague shri sameer bhatnagar, advocate to appear in the matter and make a request for adjournment on account of pendency of the mediation review petition no.512/2011 in cs (os) no.314/2011 11 proceedings. mr. siddhartha tanwar, learned counsel for the defendant has contended that the defendant took advantage of the ..... even remotely draw the court's attention to the direction which was made by the court on 11th february, 2011 specifically directing that in view of the pendency of the mediation, the defendant shall not file its written statement to the plaint..20. the direction by the court putting in abeyance the filing of the written statement was an important factor ..... 23rd february, 2011, the learned joint registrar also recorded a statement by learned counsel for the applicant-shri harmeet singh in the suit that the matter was fixed before the mediation cell on 3rd march, 2011. ia no.2929/2011 being the impleadment application was listed before the joint registrar thereafter on 18th march, 2011 when counsel for the plaintiff accepted .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 05 2012 (HC)

Raghbir Singh Vs. Appropriate Authority I.T.Deptt

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-05-2012

..... we proceed to consider the arguments, we may mention that the petitioner and the auction purchaser made an attempt, with the permission of the court, to settle the matters through mediation. however, after some attempts it was reported to us that they failed and the parties could not reach any consensus..19. on a careful consideration of the matter in the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 06 2012 (HC)

Bali Ram Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-06-2012

Reported in : 2012CrLJ2890

..... eye witnesses and the dr. b.k. agarwal, p.w. 5, there does not appear a single line of evidence which could indicate that the act was accomplished with pre mediation and further that the appellant appeared committing the act of giving a single blow with the instrument, intending to commit the murder of the deceased or was knowing consciously that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 07 2012 (SC)

V.D.Bhanot Vs. Savita Bhanot

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-07-2012

..... had been resolved and the parties had decided to file an application for withdrawal of the special leave petition. the matter was, thereafter, referred to the supreme court mediation centre and during the mediation, a mutual settlement signed by both the parties was prepared so that the same could be filed in the court for appropriate orders to be passed thereupon. however .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //