Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Sorted by: old Year: 2012 Page 7 of about 3,622 results (0.021 seconds)

May 23 2012 (HC)

Prabhakar Kumar Kushwaha Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : May-23-2012

..... of 2010, pending in the court of j.m.f.c., patna shall remain stayed. however, the matter may be referred to the high court legal services committee, patna for mediation of the matter. (shivaji pandey, j.) vinay/-

Tag this Judgment!

May 29 2012 (HC)

Naresh Batra Vs. Vikram Batra and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-29-2012

..... the counsel on behalf of the respondents was shown. on 5.9.2011, the adjournment was sought on the ground that the matter was pending between the parties before the mediation centre. thereafter, again the petition was adjourned from time to time till 7.3.2012. on that day, this case alongwith other petitions pending between the parties was ordered to ..... seven years. during its pendency, the petition has gone through the hands of 24 judges. no doubt, some time was consumed during the period this petition was taken up for mediation, which failed, but still one request after another was made to seek adjournment for the purpose of negotiated settlement. this had to be brought to an end and the cases .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 30 2012 (HC)

Madhuri Murthy. Vs. Mr.Shivakumar ChallA.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : May-30-2012

..... appointed by the state under the act. nevertheless, the learned family judge observed that if both the parties consent that the matter should be referred to mediation, the question of referring it to an expert mediator does not arise. hence, this order is subject matter of the present writ petition.it is noticed that this petition was dismissed on the ground that .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 31 2012 (FN)

R (on the Application of Km) (by His Mother and Litigation Friend Jm) ...

Court : UK Supreme Court

Decided on : May-31-2012

..... of the computation should, in broad terms, have been explained; and such was its third significant mistake. even a session of mediation which took place in may 2010 proved abortive for want of the explanation; but at least the mediator facilitated the extraction from cambridgeshire of a commitment to provide it within 14 days. in the event cambridgeshire finally provided a full .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 04 2012 (HC)

Balarama Naicker. Vs. Lakshmi.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-04-2012

..... obtained patta for 11 cents by wrongly representing to the authorities concerned. only then, the defendant came to know this. however, when the mediation process was initiated in the month of july in the village, consequent to the mediation, the plaintiffs have entered into a sale agreement with the defendant on 27.07.1996 to sell eastern portion of the suit property .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 05 2012 (HC)

The Divisional Railway Manager. Vs. C.Shanmugavel

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-05-2012

..... at sl.no.434 instead of sl.no.491.6. thereafter, the workman raised an industrial dispute before the conciliation officer. the conciliation officer, as he could not bring about mediation, submitted his failure report to the central government. the central government through their ministry of labour by an order dated 17.08.2004 directed the following issue to be adjudicated .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 05 2012 (HC)

K.R.Nageswara Rao and ors. Vs. the Presiding Officer and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-05-2012

..... labour officer, chennai protesting against the illegal transfer of the office bearers as soon as the trade union was formed. since the conciliation officer as he could not bring about mediation sent a failure report to the state government. the state government by g.o.(d)no.263 labour and employment dated 24.03.1992 referred the dispute relating to transfer .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 05 2012 (HC)

The Deputy General Manager. Vs. the Presiding Officer

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-05-2012

..... raised an industrial dispute under section 2-a(2) of the i.d.act before the central government labour department. since the conciliation officer as he could not bring about mediation sent a failure report to the central government. the central government through ministry of labour by their order dated 21.04.2005 referred the following issue for adjudication by the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 05 2012 (HC)

The Deputy General Manager. Vs. A.Madanabalan and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-05-2012

..... authority.(g)the workman, thereafter, raised an industrial dispute before the cgit under section 2-a of the industrial disputes act. the conciliation officer, as he could not bring about mediation between the parties, sent a failure report to the central government. the central government, through ministry of labour referred the following issue for adjudication by the cgit, vide order dated .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 05 2012 (HC)

The Management of Sundaram Fasteners Ltd. Vs. the Presiding Officer an ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-05-2012

..... labour officer, krishnagiri under section 2-a (2) of the industrial disputes act. similarly other workmen also moved the labour officer. the conciliation officer, as he could not bring about mediation between the parties, gave a failure report dated 5.9.2002. on the strength of the failure report, the workman filed a claim statement dated 19.8.2002 before the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //