Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Sorted by: recent Court: delhi Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 266 results (0.029 seconds)

Jul 07 2003 (HC)

Ashok Kumar Dhingra and ors. Vs. the Oriental Insurance Company Limite ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-07-2003

Reported in : AIR2004Delhi161; 2003(70)DRJ470

..... with the insurance company. rule 14(2) requires the ombudsman to dispose of a complaint 'fairly and equitably'. a complaint filed before the ombudsman may be settled by agreement through mediation of the ombudsman. in such eventuality, the ombudsman, as prescribed under rule 15 makes recommendations which, if accepted by the complainant, would dispose of the complaint fully and finally and .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 30 2003 (HC)

Mr. Akshay Kapur and ors. Vs. Mr. Rishav Kapur and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-30-2003

Reported in : 2003(2)ARBLR508(Delhi); 105(2003)DLT467; 2003(69)DRJ332; 2003(3)RAJ189

..... an effective alternate system of dispute resolution, conceptually quicker and cheaper than the jural establishment. there is a conscious shift from the courts to the arbitral tribunals. in this respect, mediation has become the substitute to arbitration. these are not the only differences between the two acts. i do not feel the necessity to adumbrate others since they may not be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 24 2003 (HC)

DeseIn Private Limited Vs. Industrial Tribunal Iii and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-24-2003

Reported in : 2004(72)DRJ365

..... , may make a complaint in writing, [in the prescribed manner, - (a) to such conciliation officer or board, and the conciliation officer or board shall take such complaint into account in mediating in, and promoting the settlement of, such industrial dispute; and(b) to such arbitrator, labour court, tribunal or national tribunal and on receipt of such complaint, the arbitrator, labour court .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 21 2003 (HC)

Dr. Harbhajan Singh Awla Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-21-2003

Reported in : 2003VIIIAD(Delhi)337; AIR2004Delhi172; 108(2003)DLT628; 2004(72)DRJ146

..... to be borne in mind in exercising the discretion. firstly, there are constraints within which the corporation has to exercise its discretion. the corporation is a public utility organisation where mediating motion is efficiency and effectiveness of public service. efficiency and effectiveness of public service are the basic concepts which cannot be sacrificed in public administration by any statutory corporation. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 23 2003 (HC)

Daler Singh Vs. State of Nct of Delhi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-23-2003

Reported in : 2004(72)DRJ465

..... additional amount of was being demanded; complainant was told that the pass-port would not be given back, without payment of rs. 5.0 lacs. surinder singh, who was a mediator tried to persuade the complainant to arrange for another sum of rs. 2 to 3 lacs to get the passport. on 12.8.2003, the complainant came to delhi with .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 30 2003 (TRI)

Rajesh Kumar Soni and Shri Krishna Vs. Cc

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Jul-30-2003

Reported in : (2003)(90)ECC541

..... reply to the show cause notice, he claimed that the money was meant for purchase of a mini bus from one shri om parkash rao by soni through jaiswal as mediator. keshari's position has, thus, been contradictory before and after the issuance of the show cause notice.nevertheless, the department's case, as brought out in the impugned order and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 24 2003 (HC)

Assn. of Victims of Uphaar Tragedy and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) a ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-24-2003

Reported in : II(2003)ACC114; 2003ACJ1631; 2003IIIAD(Delhi)321; 104(2003)DLT234; 2003(68)DRJ128; 2003RLR333

..... parapet wall but the management of the theatre had also constructed a dispensary above the ramp which was also in clear violation of the building bye laws. construction of inter-mediate floor with the aid of r s joists was also in violation of the building bye laws. the municipal corporation of delhi has not placed any material on record to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 18 2003 (HC)

Tata Iron and Steel Company Ltd. Vs. Jhalani Tools Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-18-2003

Reported in : 2003IIIAD(Delhi)547; 104(2003)DLT834; 2003(69)DRJ592; [2003]47SCL757(Delhi)

..... the agreement by the petitioner company. in this respect, i am not taking into account the letter dated 23rd february, 1998, cited by the petitioner which was issued by a mediator between the parties as it was private correspondence and was termed as personal and confidential. 13. the explanationn given in respect of the acknowledgment given by shri y.c. jhalani .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 02 2003 (HC)

Raj Singh Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-02-2003

Reported in : 2004(74)DRJ423

s.k. agarwal, j.1. this is a petition under section 482, cr.p.c. read with section 439, cr.p.c. for setting aside the order dated 11.7.2003 cancelling the bail granted by the court of additional sessions judge, delhi (for short, 'asj') in case fir no. 338/2002 under sections 420/467/468/471/120b, ipc, p.s. bawana (n.w. distt.), delhi.2. prosecution allegations are that: smt. ratni devi died intestate; the will dated 14.4.1989 purported to have been executed by smt. ratni devi was forged by petitioner in connivance with the others; on the basis of this forged will, petitioner got mutated the agricultural land measuring 27 bighas and 2 biswas, situated at village bawana, delhi, in the revenue record, in his favor on 19.3.1997. the land in question was acquired by the government and the petitioner obtained compensation of about rs. 45.00 lacs towards part of the land measuring about 20 bighas on 23.3.1998. the prosecution case further is that the will in question has been found to be a forged document by the handwriting experts of forensic science laboratory. they came to this conclusion after comparison of the thumb impression of smt. ratni devi, vis-a-vis her thumb impression available on record of the primary co-operative agricultural development bank ltd., bahadur garh, haryana.3. on the last date of hearing, learned counsel for petitioner argued that genuine thumb impression of smt. ratni devi was not taken, as a basis for comparison and sought time to submit, as to in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 28 2003 (HC)

Smt. Santosh Sharma Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-28-2003

Reported in : 2004IAD(Delhi)202; 108(2003)DLT510; 2003(71)DRJ788

a.k. sikri, j.1. this writ petition raises an interesting question. to put succinctly, land of the petitioner was subject matter of notification dated 13.11.59 under section 4 of the land acquisition act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as `the act') proposing to acquire khasra no. 410/1 in village malikpur cantt., delhi. after inviting objections, declaration under section-6 was issued vide notification dated 20.9.1962 for acquiring the said land. this acquisition was challenged by filing cwp. no. 581-d/63.during the pendency of this writ petition another notification dated 24.2.1965 under section 4 was issued for acquisition of certain land in village malikpur cantt., delhi including khasra no. 409 owned by petitioner's father. after completing the formality of inviting objection, the declaration under section 6 was issued by notification dated 16.11.66. interestingly no challenge was made to this acquisition by the father of the petitioner (predecessor- in- interest).writ petition no. 581-d/63 was decided vide order dated 16.12.70 and was allowed. interestingly although acquisition of land comprising khasra no. 409 (acquisition no. 2) was not under challenge, in the said judgment dated 16.12.70 the acquisition qua khasra no. 409 was also quashed. the question that arises for consideration is as to what is the effect of the judgment even when the acquisition process relating to khasra no. 409 was not challenged. there are other related questions also. 2. in order to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //