Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Sorted by: recent Court: karnataka Year: 2007 Page 1 of about 82 results (0.006 seconds)

Aug 30 2007 (HC)

Vasudeva S/O Hanamantappa Pattar and ors. Vs. the Commissioner and Sec ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-30-2007

Reported in : ILR2007(4)Kar4533; 2007(4)KCCRSN292.

..... parties, the court may reformulate the terms of a possible settlement and refer the same for -(a) arbitration;(b) conciliation;(c) judicial settlement including settlement through lok adalat; or(d) mediation.from the aforesaid provision, it is clear when a landlord who is dis-satisfied with the amount of compensation awarded, seeks a reference to a civil court and the civil .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 30 2007 (HC)

Vasudave and ors. Vs. the Commissioner and Secretary Government, Reven ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-30-2007

Reported in : ILR2007KAR4533; 2008(2)KarLJ666; 2007(6)AIRKarR559; 2008AIHC710(Kar)

..... parties, the court may reformulate the terms of a possible settlement and refer the same for -(a) arbitration;(b) conciliation;(c) judicial settlement including settlement through lok adalat; or(d) mediation.from the aforesaid provision, it is clear when a landlord who is dissatisfied with the amount of compensation awarded, seeks a reference to a civil court and the civil court .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 02 2007 (HC)

The Workmen of Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation Repr. by K.S ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-02-2007

Reported in : 2007(5)KarLJ393; ILR2007(3)Kar3755; 2007(5)AIRKarR257; AIR2007NOC2234

..... 32, winch is a special jurisdiction confined to enforcement of fundamental rights: what, if any, are the fundamental rights of workmen affected by the employer's sale of machinery whose mediate impact may be conversion of permanent employment into precarious service and eventual exit? lastly, but most importantly where does the citizen stand, in the context of the democracy of judicial .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 07 2007 (HC)

ibrahim S/O Abdulasab Kadpe Vs. Ismail S/O Abdulasab Kadpe and Jabbar ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-07-2007

Reported in : ILR2008KAR1539; 2008(5)KarLJ118; ILR2008(2)Kar1539; 2008(5)KLJ118; 2008(2)KCCR752; 2008(3)AIRKarR333; AIR2008NOC1957; 2008AIHC2560(Kar)

k. ramanna, j.1. it is the plaintiff's appeal for setting aside the judgment and decree dated 2.2.2002 passed in r.a. no. 16/99 by the civil judge(br.dn.) yadgir, reversing the judgment and decree passed in o.s. no. 393/95 dated 13.1.99 passed by the civil judge(jr.dn.) shahapur and further to restore the judgment and decree of the trial court and set aside the finding of the trial court on issue no. 4 held against the appellant/plaintiff and consequently to decree the appellant's suit in its entirety.2. the case of the appellant/plaintiff is that himself and defendants no. 1 and 2 are the brothers. respondent no. i/defendant no. 1 is the elder brother and defendant no. 2 is the younger brother. they are the sons of one late abdul sab kadpe who died 6 years prior to the filing of the suit. therefore, the appellant and respondents have succeeded the property left by the father late abdul sab kadpe. father of the appellant and defendant was the owner in possession of the lands bearing fay. no. 571/1 and sy. no. 290/1 measuring 9 acres 3d guntas and 3 acres 18 guntas respectively of dornahalli village, shahapur taluk. apart from that the father of the appellant and respondents own house bearing no. 7/119 of that village. it is the further case of the appellant/plaintiff that since their father was whimsical man having peculiar mentality, therefore, the above said properties wore transferred and mutated in the name of the first respondent as he was the elder male member of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 08 2007 (HC)

Methodist Church Represented by Its District Superintendent, Rev. Alex ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-08-2007

Reported in : 2008(2)KarLJ537

ordern.k. patil, j.1. though this matter is posted in orders list, with the consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties, the matter is taken up for final healing, reserved, and is disposed of as follows.2. petitioner in this is a methodist church, belgaum represented by its district superintendent. petitioner assailing the legally and legality and validity of the impugned order dated 8th november 2006. in proceedings no. kamsa/vatan/viva/60/2006-07 on the file of the first respondent- deputy commissioner, belgaum district, belgaum vide annexure k, has presented the instant with petition.3. the grievance of petitioner herein - methodist church ('church' for short) is that, it is a religious institution called as methodist church which has been in existence for the past 150 years. in 1850, the said church was called as 'methodist london mission church' functioning for christian religious activities. the said london mission church has handed over the missionary work at belgaum to methodist episcopal church in the year 1904. the lands bearing r.s.no. 971 was originally of the ownership of his highness ramchandra rao - gopal pattavardhan, chief of jamkhandi sanstan, and his highness pattavardan has executed a sale deed in the year 1883 in favour of one cursetji pestonji boyoe through his attorney, one datta ranade for a sum of rs. 9,000/- in respect of the lands bearing r.s.no. 971 measuring 26 acres 32 guntas situate at belgaum town as par the mutation certification. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 28 2007 (HC)

K. Pasala Reddy @ A.K. Pasalappa S/O Late A.P. Krishnappa Reptd. by Gp ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-28-2007

Reported in : 2008(3)KLJ63; 2008(1)KCCR158; 2008(1)AIRKarR590

ordern.k. patil, j.1. petitioner, questioning the order dated 3rd january 2005 passed by second respondent in proceedings no. rrt. (2)gr.272/1995-96 vide annexure j, has presented the instant writ petition.2. the grievance of the petitioner in the instant writ petition is that, petitioner claims to be the owner in possession and enjoyment of the land bearing sy. no. 11 measuring 01 acres 20 guntas situate at venkoji rao khane village, begur hobli, bangalore south taluk. further, the case of petitioner is that, the land in question was granted to him in the year 1952-53 and the said land comes within the jurisdiction of madivala village panchayth and that, petitioner has been paying the required taxes in respect of the said land. be that as it may.3. the second respondent has initiated suo motu proceedings invoking sub-section (3) of section 136 of the karnataka land revenue act and passed the ex-parte order dated 5th august 1998 directing the competent authority to cancel the entries pertaining to the petitioner in the revenue records and to take possession of the land in question. being aggrieved by the same, petitioner has filed the application to recall the said order dated 5th august 1998 directing to cancel the entries found in the name of the petitioner in the revenue records. in reply to the said application, the second respondent has issued the endorsement stating that, if petitioner is aggrieved by his order, petitioner is permitted to approach the appropriate legal .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 27 2007 (HC)

Smt. Shivagangavva W/O Late Bhimappa Vs. the Deputy Commissioner,

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-27-2007

Reported in : 2008(3)KarLJ49

ordern.k. patil, j.1. the petitioner, assailing the correctness of the impugned order dated 15.2.2005 passed by third respondent in no. rtdc:cr:9:2004-05; order dated 17.1.2006 passed by second respondent bearing no. rts:ap:159:2004-05 and order dated 7.7.2007 passed by first respondent bearing no. rts:ra:cr:77:2005-06 vide annexures-a, b and c respectively, has presented this writ petition.2. the grievance of petitioner in this writ petition is that, petitioner is a widow of bhimappa, who was the owner of lands bearing sy.nos. 38/2, 103/2 and 16/1+2, totally measuring about 18 acres 07 guntas, situate in kubihal village. the said lands were ancestral properties of late sri bhimappa, who died interstate on 17.12.2003 leaving behind the petitioner and daughter bangarewwa as legal heirs. 4th respondent after the death of sri. bhimappa has filed an application before the village accountant for sanction of mutation regarding his claim, in the relevant record of rights and other revenue records on the strength of an alleged registered will dated 9.10.2003 executed by late sri. bhimappa. after the receipt of the notice, petitioner has filed objections disputing the execution of will and requested not to effect mutation based on the said will. the 3rd respondent without considering the objections filed by petitioner properly and without taking a decision in strict compliance of the relevant provisions of the karnataka land revenue act and rules, has accepted the application filed by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 07 2007 (HC)

Sri Uppar Eranna S/O Let Uppar Yerriswamy Vs. the Deputy Commissioner ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-07-2007

Reported in : 2008(3)KarLJ55

ordern.k. patil, j.1. the petitioner, assailing the correctness of the order dated 25.6.2007 passed in appeal bearing no. 96/2006-07 by the 1st respondent vide annexure-g and the order dated 24.6.2006 passed by the 2nd respondent in appeal no. 108/2005-06 vide annexure-f and order dated 9.5.2005 passed in mr no. 56/2004-05 by the 6th respondent vide annexure-e, has presented this writ petition. further, petitioner has sought to direct the respondents-1 to 4 to change the katha in favour of the petitioner as per the sate deed dated 17.4.1985 bearing no. 232/85-86 vide annexure-a and to declare that the petitioner as the absolute owner of the land bearing survey no. 175, measuring 6 acres 18 guntas, situate at sanjeevarayanakote, bellary.2. the grievance of the petitioner in the instant case is that, petitioner is claiming that he has purchased the land in sy.no. 175 measuring 6 acres 18 guntas, situate at sanjeevarayanakote, bellary taluk by way of registered sale deed bearing no. 232/1985-86 dated 17.4.1985 from one smt. rindamma for a valuable consideration. in pursuance of the said registered sale deed, his name has been certified by the jurisdictions competent authority and recorded in the relevant record of rights. when things stood thus, the 6th respondent herein claiming her right on the basis of alleged agreement of sale executed by deceased smt. rindamma the vendor of the petitioner dated 21.1.2000, has filed a suit for specific performance against smt. rindamma in os .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 03 2007 (HC)

Jayalakshamma and anr. Vs. the Deputy Commissioner and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-03-2007

Reported in : 2007(6)KarLJ100; 2007(4)KCCR2523;

ordern.k. patil, j.1. petitioners, questioning the correctness of the impugned order dated 23rd march, 2004 in proceedings no. r.a. 51/2002-03 passed by first respondent and the order dated 22nd october, 1998 in proceeding's no. r.a. 157/1995-96 passed by second respondent vide annexure-a and b respectively, have presented the instant writ petition.2. the grievance of petitioners in the instant writ petition is that, petitioners herein claim that, the first petitioner is the wife and second petitioner is the son of late sri manje gowda and there was a partition between sri manje gowda, the husband and father of petitioners herein respectively and late sri ninge gowda, the husband of fourth respondent - who is none other than the father of late sri manje gowda. as per the partition deed entered into in the joint family consisting of late sri ninge gowda, his wife smt. puttamma and their son, late sri manje gowda in the month of july 1986, sy. no. 99/2 measuring an extent of 12 guntas came to the share of late sri manje gowda. accordingly, late sri manje gowda has filed the application before the tahsildar, hassan taluk, hassan seeking transfer of khata of the said property to his name by furnishing all the documents. accordingly, mutation was sanctioned in respect of an extent of 10 guntas in sy. no. 99/2 situate at b. katihalli, hassan taluk and the same was certified by the jurisdictional revenue inspector on 11th may, 1988, on the basis of the report submitted by the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 03 2007 (HC)

Gangappa Yamanappa Chalawadi Vs. the State of Karnataka by Its Secreta ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-03-2007

Reported in : 2008(2)KarLJ728; 2007(6)AIRKarR410

ordern.k. patil, j.1. petitioner- tenant, being aggrieved by the order dated 6th july 1988 passed by the land reforms appellate authority, bijapur in proceedings no. lra (tr) no. 15/1986, has presented the instant lrrp.2. the grievance of the petitioner in the instant case is that, petitioner was cultivating the land in s. no. 27/2 measuring 08 acres out of total extent of 10 aces situate at kabnur village in bijapur taluk and the deceased third respondent, now represented by his legal representatives was the landlord on the ground that, the third respondent had leased out the said land to the petitioner herein and that, petitioner has been cultivating the said land and accordingly, has filed form no. 7 for registration of occupancy rights on 21st november 1974 as per the amended karnataka land reforms act. the application filed by petitioner had come up for consideration before the land tribunal, bijapur on 23rd september 1981. the land tribunal has rejected the application filed by petitioner holding that, as per m.e. no. 521 dated 25th march 1975 in kabjedar column no. 9, it is shown as 'sarakara' and therefore, rejected the request of petitioner for registration of occupancy rights. assailing the correctness of the order passed by and land tribunal, bijapur dated 23rd september 1981, petitioner filed the writ petition no. 25385/1981 before this court. in view of the amendment brought to the karnataka land reforms act and upon constitution of the appellate authority, the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //