Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Sorted by: recent Court: supreme court of india Year: 2006 Page 1 of about 159 results (0.076 seconds)

Aug 29 2006 (SC)

Ramdev Food Products Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Arvindbhai Rambhai Patel and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-29-2006

Reported in : AIR2006SC3304; 2006(6)ALD36(SC); 2007(1)ALLMR(SC)402; (2007)1GLR594; JT2006(8)SC393; 2006(33)PTC281(SC); 2006(8)SCALE631; (2006)8SCC726

..... and property held by them so as to enable them to be in peace, harmony and understanding in the family. the said settlement was arrived at through the mechanism of mediation of the well- wishers of the family. mou was, thus, entered into for the purpose of distribution of the properties and business and the same was given effect to on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 11 2006 (SC)

Pappu Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-11-2006

Reported in : AIR2006SC2659; 2006CriLJ3640; JT2006(6)SC308; 2006(7)SCALE24; (2006)7SCC391

..... of offence punishable under section 302 read with section 34 ipc. before the high court it was pleaded that the incident had occurred all of a sudden without any pre-mediation over a very trivial issue and some misunderstanding of the appellant, other accused persons and the complainant madhu singh and his father mal singh. during the course of verbal altercation ..... for the appellant submitted that the background facts projected by the prosecution clearly show that the assault was given in the course of a sudden quarrel. there was no pre-mediation and the accused did not take advantage and had also not acted in a cruel manner. only one blow by lathi was allegedly given by picking up a lathi. prior .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 04 2006 (SC)

Hari Shankar Singhania and ors. Vs. Gaur Hari Singhania and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-04-2006

Reported in : AIR2006SC2488; 2006(2)ARBLR1(SC); 2006(3)BomCR10; 2006(2)CTC597; JT2006(4)SC251; (2006)3MLJ243(SC); 2006(4)SCALE74; (2006)4SCC658; 2006(1)LC423(SC)

..... me.44. it is thus seen that the above facts would clearly go to show that the contesting respondent nos. 1-9 are not at all interested in any conciliation, mediation or arbitration but only interested in enjoying the bulk of the immovable properties of the firm and refusing to carry out their obligations under and pursuant to the said deed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 16 2006 (SC)

Bapu Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-16-2006

Reported in : 2007CriLJ310; I(2007)DMC67SC; JT2006(10)SC197; 2006(11)SCALE561; 2006AIRSCW5911; (2007)2SCC(Cri)545; (2007)1Crimes1(SC).

..... , maternal cousin of the deceased, pw5 govind pardeshi, executive magistrate at bhadgaon, pw6 yanushka, head constable at p.s. bhadgaon, dr. damodar pw7, latabai pw8, adhikar shamrao patil pw10, the mediator in the settlement of the marriage of deceased shobhabai with the appellant and dinkar ingale pw11. 5. pw1 is a witness on the scene of the offence and the recoveries ..... and the mediator also persuaded the accused person that they should not trouble shobhabai and their demands will be satisfied within a short period. however, within a period of 2-3 days thereafter ..... with an understanding that unless she brings rs. 10,000/- by way of 'mul', she will not return to her matrimonial home. however, the parents and brother as also the mediator of the marriage of shobhabai with the appellant, somehow or the other, convinced her and brought her back to the house of the appellant. the brother of the deceased shobhabai .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 19 2006 (SC)

Yuvaraj Ambar Mohite Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-19-2006

Reported in : 2006(10)SCALE369; 2006(3)ShimLC319

..... -2 were autorickshaw drivers. appellant was a teacher of judo karate and was teaching in school no. 9 situated at dhule. he was well acquainted with the deceased who was mediating in the dispute between him and pw-2. on 2.9.1988, appellant came to the hotel near s.t. stand where the deceased and pw-2 had been taking ..... code. he pleaded not guilty thereto. the prosecution in support of its case examined ten witnesses. pw-2 was the complainant in the case against appellant wherein the deceased was mediating. pw-5 is the first informant who had examined the deceased and declared her dead. dr. prakash patil (pw-9) who conducted the autopsy opined that the death was homicidal ..... commission of an offence under section 326 of the indian penal code for causing hurt to another autorickshaw driver machindra baburao thombare (pw-2). the deceased was called upon to mediate in the said dispute. pw-2 with a view to settle the dispute between himself and appellant herein met each other in the morning of 3.9.1988. appellant thereafter .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 13 2006 (SC)

Hansa Industries Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Kidarsons Industries Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-13-2006

Reported in : AIR2007SC18; (SCSuppl)2007(1)CHN78; [2006]134CompCas1(SC); JT2006(9)SC100; 2006(10)SCALE170; (2006)8SCC531; [2006]72SCL117(SC)

..... compensatory equalization payment to the company. parties by consent can, however, agree to a larger amount. 6. that shri p.n khanna, retired judge is at present acting as a mediator. he will act as a commissioner, to separate 30.14% of the assets of the company to be given to shri narendra nath nanda group as set out hereinbefore. 10 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 24 2006 (SC)

Surendra and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-24-2006

Reported in : AIR2006SC3063; JT2006(8)SC445; 2006(8)SCALE469; (2006)11SCC434

..... that mina had gone to police station prior to him. 6. in the first information report, pw-2 categorically stated:my father and sister went there to act as a mediator, so my brother dilip ran awayhe also stated:it is true that mina was not present when the accused assaulted my father.he admitted that there was a dispute as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 16 2006 (SC)

C.T. Radhakrishnan Vs. C.T. Viswanathan Nair and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-16-2006

Reported in : AIR2006SC910; (SCSuppl)2006(2)CHN40; JT2006(1)SC318; 2006(1)KLT459(SC); 2006(1)SCALE258; (2006)1SCC794

..... of kunhimalu amma and her four children who were in joint possession with viswanathan nair, the son of ammini amma was fixed at rs. 2,500/- at the instance of mediators and kunhimalu amma and her children had decided to release their rights for that consideration in favour of viswanathan nair and they were doing so under the transaction, on receipt .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 14 2006 (SC)

Shanti Devi Vs. Daropti Devi and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-14-2006

Reported in : 2007(2)AWC1153(SC); (SCSuppl)2007(2)CHN83; 2006(5)CTC262; 2006(13)SCALE577

s.b. sinha, j.1. leave granted.2. an order of remand passed by a division bench of the delhi high court dated 07.11.2003 passed in r.f.a. no. 435 of 1992 is in appeal before us.3. the parties are sisters being the daughters of shri tara chand madan and smt. budho bai (since deceased). tara chand madan died on 21.03.1954. smt. budho bai executed a deed of sale in respect of the property bearing no. 16/26, old rajinder nagar, new delhi, by a registered deed dated 14.06.1965. she allegedly disowned respondent no. 1 as her daughter. a will was executed by her on 22.02.1977, beneficiary whereof was said to be the appellant. smt. budho bai died on 20.04.1980.4. appellant filed an application for mutation of her name. respondent filed a suit for perpetual injunction, which was marked as civil suit no. 308 of 1980, claiming, inter alia, for the following reliefs:(a) a decree for perpetual injunction restraining the defendant no. 3 from dealing the said property in any manner whatsoever and from getting the said property no. 16/26, situated at old rajinder nagar, new delhi, together with the lease hold rights of the land thereunder admeasuring 85 sq. yds. or thereabouts substituted/transferred exclusively in her name to the exclusion of the plaintiffs from defendants nos. 1 & 2 on the basis of the alleged will dated 22.02.1977 and also restraining the defendants 1 and 2 from enforcing or acting in any manner whatsoever on the basis of the said alleged will dated 22.02.1977 and thereby .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 13 2006 (SC)

Meera Chauhan Vs. Harsh Bishnoi and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-13-2006

Reported in : 2007(1)AWC469(SC); 2007(1)CTC89; [2007(3)JCR155(SC)]; 2006(13)SCALE581

tarun chatterjee, j.1. leave granted.2. bungalow no. 12 at thimayya road, cantonment lucknow (hereinafter referred to as the 'suit property') originally belonged to smt. vimla bishnoi since deceased who was the mother of the respondent nos.1 and 2. by a registered will executed by her, the suit property was bequeathed in favour of anil bishnoi, who is the respondent no. 2 in this appeal. on 15th of may 1996 smt. vimla bishnoi expired. on 11th of june 1996 harsh bishnoi, who is the respondent no. 1 in this appeal, applied for mutation before the army authorities, which was rejected by them by an order dated 5th january 1998. 3. a suit has been filed, being suit no. 199/2002, in the court of civil judge (sr. div.) lucknow by the respondent no. 1 for declaration of title over the suit property against the respondent no. 2 on the basis of an oral family settlement of the year 1988. in the plaint, the respondent no. 1 herein, has prayed for permanent injunction restraining the respondent no. 2 from interfering with his possession over the suit property. in the suit, an application for injunction restraining the respondent no. 2 from transferring, alienating or encumbering the same has been filed. on 6th may 2002 on the application for injunction, an ex-parte interim order of injunction restraining the respondent no. 2 from transferring, alienating or encumbering the suit property was passed. it is therefore clear that no interim order of injunction was granted by the court against .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //