Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Sorted by: recent Page 4 of about 110,804 results (0.041 seconds)

Oct 16 2019 (SC)

John D Souza Vs. Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... . till such time, the stay of proceedings before the labour court granted by this court shall continue to operate. if the parties are able to resolve their dispute amicably, the mediation centre of the high court of karnataka at bangalore shall send its report to this court. registry is directed to list the matter before the court within two weeks from ..... dispute, we have not lost the hope and are sanguine that better sense will prevail upon both the parties and they will make an earnest and renewed effort through the mediation centre of high court of karnataka at bangalore for amicable settlement of the dispute. this can only happen by adopting 33 the give and take approach, especially to avoid prolonged ..... , however, no allegations of financial irregularity or embezzlement of funds. it has come on record that when the proceedings were pending before the high court, the parties were directed to mediate and submit their settlement proposals. the appellant also submitted his proposal which is on record, in which he demanded 75% of back wages whereas the corporation agreed to pay 50 ..... litigation. the appellant may agree to take less than 75% back wages and the corporation may incline to offer more than 50% back wages. mediators will surely make efforts to bridge the gap and see that the dispute comes to an end. both the parties, must also bear in mind that the recourse to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 16 2019 (HC)

Virender Kumar vs.sardar Iqbal Singh

Court : Delhi

..... /2019 page 1 of 3 110005, more particularly as shown in red colour in the site plan attached to the eviction petition.3. parties were referred to delhi high court mediation & conciliation centre and they have amicably settled the disputes. a settlement agreement dated 19.08.2019 has been executed between the parties.4. parties are present in person in court .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 16 2019 (HC)

Mannu Arora & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... .1 and respondent no.2, they started living separately from 14.08.2017.7. the petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 have entered into an amicable settlement in the mediation centre, saket courts, new delhi vide settlement deed dated 28.08.2019 and settled all their disputes amicably. the total settlement amount is ?61,00,000/-(rupees sixty one lakhs .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 15 2019 (HC)

Red Roses Public School vs.reshmawati & Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... preferred a civil suit no.522/2011 to claim the benefits of pay and perks as admissible under the sixth central pay commission report.3. that suit was referred to mediation. in mediation, the parties arrived at a settlement on 05.06.2012. the respondent also signed the said lpa5162019 page 1 of 19 settlement, wherein she was described as a sweeper ..... of bias, since there were several others, including her own relatives serving in the same school, who had made the same claim and the claim had been mutually settled in mediation to the satisfaction of all concerned. no other person had been targeted or subjected to disciplinary proceedings like the respondent.18. the learned single judge, in our view, could not ..... in misconducts alleged in articles of charge i, ii, iii and iv, has violated the terms and conditions no.4.3, 4.5 and 7 of the memorandum of settlement mediated on 05.06.12 and decreed by court of civil judge 1 south district court at saket, new delhi on 06.06.12 in suit no.522/2011 as well .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 14 2019 (HC)

Satish Kumar vs.khushboo Singh & Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... ) the defendants have caused injury to the plaintiff; (xv) on 6th december, 2018, an undertaking was recorded that the parties will not pursue any case against each other until the mediation proceedings are pending and it was due to this that the plaintiff could not file the suit immediately; and, (xvi) on 16th january, 2019, the plaintiff discovered that the defendants .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 10 2019 (HC)

Action Ispat & Power Pvt. Ltd. Vs.shyam Metalics & Energy Limited & Or ...

Court : Delhi

..... made in its behalf. the matter was adjourned to 7.11.2016. thereafter, attempts were made to settle the issue before the delhi high court mediation and conciliation centre. however, on 26.02.2018, the failure of mediation was reported to the ld. company judge.3. on 27.08.2018, the winding up petition was admitted and official liquidator (hereinafter ol ) was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 10 2019 (HC)

Ashutosh Garg vs.state & Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... has been settled and they do not wish to prosecute the matter any further.9. the petitioner and respondent nos.2 & 3 have entered into an amicable settlement before delhi mediation centre, tis hazari courts, delhi vide settlement deed dated 15.02.2019.10. taking into account the aforesaid facts, this court is inclined to quash the concerned fir as no .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 10 2019 (HC)

Ex. Inspector Lala Ram (Executive) vs.union of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

..... . w.p.(c) 10766/2019 page 6 of 7 20. resultantly, the writ petition is dismissed with costs of rs.10,000/- to be deposited in the delhi high court mediation centre within six weeks from today. g.s. sistani, j anup jairam bhambhani, j october10 2019/ck w.p.(c) 10766/2019 page 7 of 7

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 01 2019 (HC)

Sher Ali @ Iran & Anr vs.the State & Anr

Court : Delhi

..... matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.9. the petitioners and respondent no.2 have entered into an amicable settlement before the mediation cell on 27.07.2019.10. taking into account the aforesaid facts, this court is inclined to quash the concerned fir as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 30 2019 (HC)

Frankfinn Aviation Services (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs.mr. Rahul Chauhan & Ors

Court : Delhi

..... and cautioning the counsels, the error is overlooked at this stage.16. however, a copy of this order along with the settlement agreement be forwarded to the coordinator of the mediation cell of this court for ensuring that in future such errors do not occur.17. a decree is accordingly passed, in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants, in ..... agreement provided for the same and not provided for withdrawal of the suit.10. this is thus found to be yet another settlement agreement emanating from the mediation cell of this court where the mediation cell as well as the counsels have not applied themselves to the legality of the settlement cs(comm) 866/2018 page 2 of 4 they are entering ..... chauhan; (ii) fly high academy; and, (iii) ajay sharma as well as their counsels and the mediator has been received from the mediation cell of this court.4. i have perused the said settlement agreement. in terms of the said settlement agreement, the suit, insofar as against the defendant no.4 ..... , in this suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trade mark, passing off and for ancillary reliefs, were vide order dated 25th april, 2019 referred to the mediation cell of this court.3. mediation has been successful and a settlement agreement dated 28th august, 2019 purporting to be signed by the plaintiff and the defendants no.1 to 3 namely (i) rahul .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //