Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Sorted by: recent Page 8 of about 104,797 results (0.040 seconds)

Apr 17 2017 (HC)

Manoj Kumar Bhagat Vs. Kamal Manjari

Court : Jharkhand

..... on the ground of cruelty, has been dismissed by the court below.3. it may be stated that during the pendency of this appeal in this court, an effort of mediation between the parties was taken for amicable settlement of their matrimonial dispute, but the effort has failed. as such, we have heard this appeal on merits.4. according to the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 17 2017 (HC)

M/s. Yash Investment Consultants, Represented By Its Proprietrix B. Pr ...

Court : Karnataka

..... conciliators. it is not known as to how the parties who were at loggerheads could settle their dispute at the instance of the conciliators even before referring them to the mediation or lok adalath. be that it may, without even ascertaining the correctness of the settlements made in the joint memos, the learned magistrate referred the parties to lok adalath by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 10 2017 (HC)

Manjesh Jha Vs. Mrs Kanchan Jha

Court : Jharkhand

..... , has been dismissed by the court below.3. it may be stated that the efforts for mediation between the parties at the hands of a trained mediator was also taken through the trained mediator at jharkhand high court legal services authority, ranchi, but the efforts of mediation have also failed. as such learned counsels for both the sides were heard on merits.4. according .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 16 2017 (HC)

Chandra Kishore Paul Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr

Court : Jharkhand

..... .2014 passed in a.b.p. no. 658 of 2014, has been cancelled. it has been submitted by learned senior counsel for the petitioner that conciliation was held in the mediation centre and pursuant to which a joint compromise petition was filed on the basis of which vide order dated 22.12.2014, the petitioner was granted anticipatory bail in connection .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 09 2017 (SC)

Krishna Veni Nagam Vs. Harish Nigam

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... file of ii presiding judge, family court, jabalpur, madhya pradesh shall stand transferred to the family court, hyderabad, andhra pradesh. if the parties seek mediation the transferee court may explore the possibility of an amicable settlement through mediation. it will be open to the transferee court to conduct the proceedings or record evidence of the witnesses who are unable to appear in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 06 2017 (HC)

Ghanshyam Sonkar Vs. Janki Devi Sonkar and Ors.

Court : Kolkata

..... with costs assessed at 100 gms to be deposited with the state legal services authority, west bengal, within a fortnight from date, to be kept earmarked for utilisation by the mediation and conciliation committee of the high court. (biswanath somadder, j.) (sankar acharyya, j.) pa

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 21 2017 (HC)

D. Kesavan Vs. D. Anitha

Court : Chennai

..... the matrimonial home and often picked up quarrel with him. she always threatened him by stating that he should not contact his parents at any time. though many attempts of mediation were conducted between them both in u.s.a and in india, to change her behaviour, it ended in futile. after some time, without even informing him, she has left .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 17 2017 (SC)

Jitender Arora and Ors. Vs. Sukriti Arora and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... 's stay with her mother, we would like some responsible and competent person to monitor the arrangement. we, accordingly, request mrs. sadhana ramachandran, who works for the delhi high court mediation and conciliation centre, to monitor the arrangement on behalf of this court. mrs. ramachandran shall visit the mother and the child at the address noted above on a date and ..... and to mrs. ramachandran as and when she wishes. both the petitioner and the respondent are directed to pay heed to the advice of mrs. ramachandran and take part in mediation, as suggested by her, with an open mind. list on may 01, 2013. before that date, mrs. sadhana ramachandran is requested to submit a final report. on 01.05.2013 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 17 2017 (HC)

J. Meena Vs. T. Manikandan

Court : Chennai

..... her return from the office, used to pick up the child from the in-laws house around 05.30 pm. 3.3. from september 2014, there was some mediation and according to the mediation, the child should be with the appellant for four days, including sundays and with the respondent for three days, viz., thursdays to saturdays. 3.4. while the circumstances .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 15 2017 (HC)

Shivesh Kumar Jha Vs. Minu Jha Alias Golden

Court : Jharkhand

..... . this clearly shows that the said suit was filed with ulterior motive.16. again we find that though it is alleged that the respondent misbehaved with the mediator during a mediation proceeding, but the mediator has not been examined by the plaintiff appellant to prove this allegation.17. these instances clearly show that the plaintiff appellant has filed the suit in the court ..... and ransacked the household articles, but neither the mother, nor the bhagini of the plaintiff appellant has been examined to support this allegation. it is further alleged that during the mediation proceeding, the wife had misbehaved with the presiding officer, but the said presiding officer had also not been examined in the court below to support the allegation of the plaintiff ..... on its own merits.6. this court also had taken efforts for re-conciliation between the parties and the matter was even sent for reconciliation at the hands of trained mediator at jhalsa, ranchi, but the said effort has also failed. accordingly, the matter is now decided on merits. -3- 7. in the court below, five witnesses were examined on behalf ..... in the local court had also misbehaved with the plaintiff appellant. the matter was sent for conciliation between the parties to the mediation centre and it is alleged that the respondent wife misbehaved with the presiding officer of the mediation centre, for which also, misc. case no. 3347 of 2008 was brought. the plaintiff appellant again wanted to contact the respondent for .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //