Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Sorted by: recent Year: 2016 Page 1 of about 2,076 results (0.023 seconds)

Dec 22 2016 (HC)

Jasmine Kaur Chandhok vs.jaspal Singh Chandhiok & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-22-2016

..... 52/2013 page 4 of 5 11. consequently, this court is of the view that the respondents are obliged under the settlement agreement executed before the mediation centre as well as by the order dated 29th september, 2011 to pay for the minor son s fees for fiitjee/similar tuition classes in addition to ..... 2013 page 2 of 5 4. as respondents were not agreeable to the same, this court had requested ms. manindra acharya, senior advocate to act as a mediator in the present case. however, efforts to amicably resolve the matter were not successful. consequently, this court has no other option but to proceed ahead with the ..... statement of the parties is recorded. now to come up for further proceedings on 18.01.2012. the relevant portion of the settlement agreement executed before the mediation centre on 24th september, 2011 is reproduced hereinbelow:-" 2.it is also agreed between the parties that smt. jasmine kaur will live with his husband sh. ..... amicably settled with the defendants in the mediation cell vide order dated 24.09.2011. as per the statement, he will withdraw the case after the period of 1 year after looking at the ..... court of civil judge, tis hazari courts in suit no.64/2011. the relevant portion of the said order is reproduced hereinbelow:-" matter received from the mediation cell as settled. it is submitted on behalf of the plaintiff that the matter has been cont.cas(c) 52/2013 page 1 of 5 2. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 22 2016 (HC)

Yash Kumari & Anr vs.state ( Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-22-2016

..... still not paid by the accused persons to the complainant. it is also not in dispute that a settlement was arrived at between the parties before the delhi high court mediation and conciliation centre in which the accused persons agreed to pay rs.1.95 crores to the complainant. it is also not in dispute that the accused persons had paid ..... from the record that the present bail application was filed on 15.01.2015. order dated 19.01.2015 shows that the parties agreed for mediation and the matter was referred to the delhi high court mediation centre and the arrest of the petitioners/accused persons was stayed. order dated 18.03.2015 shows that the parties had arrived at an amicable .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 19 2016 (HC)

Samiah International Builders Pvt Ltd vs.sanjeev Nirvani

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-19-2016

..... sharma, advocates versus sanjeev nirvani ..... respondent through : respondent in person. coram: hon'ble ms. justice hima kohli % pursuant to the parties being referred to the delhi high court order1912.2016 mediation and conciliation centre, a settlement agreement dated 7.12.2016 has been placed on record.2. counsel for the appellant and the respondent, who appears in person, state that the ..... of directors authorizing its representative to arrive at a settlement with the other side. the settlement agreement has also been signed by the counsel for the appellant and the learned mediator.6. as the counsel for the appellant and the respondent jointly state that they have arrived at the aforesaid settlement of their own free will and volition and without any ..... own expenses.8. at this stage, learned counsel for the appellant states that in view of the fact that the parties have arrived at a settlement through the court annexed mediation, the appellant is entitled to claim refund of the court fees in terms of section 16 of the court fees act. rfa4682014 page 2 of 3 9. in view of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 16 2016 (HC)

Suresh Vs. State of Karnataka, By State Public Prosecutor

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-16-2016

..... was lodged in kadur police station and number of panchayats were also conducted. about two years back, the appellant assaulted the deceased and sent her to her parents house. after mediation once again, she was sent back to the house of the accused. about two months prior to the incident, once again, the accused assaulted and sent her back to the ..... is also the complainant. in his evidence, he has spoken about the instances of cruelty meted out to the deceased in the house of the accused and about the various mediation convened to bring out the rapprochement between the accused and the deceased. according to pw- 1, on the date of the incident, he had gone to arasikere along with his ..... testimony of pw.1, pw.2 -the brother and mother of the deceased as well as the testimony of pw -8 paternal uncle of the deceased and pw-7, who mediated the alleged disputes between the deceased and the accused. these witnesses have deposed about the various instances of cruelty suffered by the deceased at the hands of the accused and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 15 2016 (HC)

D. Govindaraj Vs. The Indian Bank, Represented by its Manager

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-15-2016

..... taken place, confirmation alone shall be stayed. therefore, on 12.12.2013, this court directed the matter to be posted before the tamil nadu mediation and conciliation centre. but, there was no settlement arrives in the mediation and the matter has been return back to the court. 8. the further case of the petitioner/judgment debtor is that he has filed the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 15 2016 (HC)

K. Kuppanna Gounder (Died) and Others Vs. R. Sivakami and Others

Court : Chennai Madurai

Decided on : Dec-15-2016

..... in the evidence of dw1 for not sending reply to the notice of the 1st respondent. the courts below ought to have seen that after issue of notice there was mediation through elders and the 1st respondent agreed for partition of 'a' schedule property only and agreed to receive 1/4th share in 'a' schedule property. the courts below failed to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 15 2016 (HC)

Inderwati vs.state & Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-15-2016

..... -in-law which is resulting in disharmony in the matrimonial home. counsel further submits that the matter stands duly resolved between the husband and the wife before a mediation centre; report of the mediator has been placed on record.5. learned counsel for respondents no.5 & 6 submits that there is no interference from their side neither there is any threat to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 15 2016 (HC)

Pramila vs.state & Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-15-2016

..... -in-law which is resulting in disharmony in the matrimonial home. counsel further submits that the matter stands duly resolved between the husband and the wife before a mediation centre; report of the mediator has been placed on record.5. learned counsel for respondents no.5 & 6 submits that there is no interference from their side neither there is any threat to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 14 2016 (HC)

Obaidur Rahman vs.m/s Palfinger Cranes India Pvt Ltd

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-14-2016

..... settlement agreement dated 7.12.2016. the same has been signed by the plaintiff and the authorised representative of the defendant/company as also their respective counsels and the learned mediator.4. as counsels for the parties jointly state that their clients have arrived at the aforesaid settlement of their own free will and volition and without any undue influence or ..... holiday order1412.2016 1. on account of milad-un-nabi (birthday of prohet mohammad).2. pursuant to the parties being referred to mediation, a settlement agreement dated 07.12.2016 has been forwarded by the delhi high court mediation and conciliation centre. the terms and conditions of the settlement are recorded in para 6 of the settlement agreement, wherein the plaintiff has .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 14 2016 (HC)

Hawa Singh vs.state & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-14-2016

..... for quashing of fir no.361/2011 dated 14.12.2011, under section 354 ipc registered at police station nangloi on the basis of the settlement/agreement arrived at delhi mediation centre, tis hazari courts, delhi respondent no.2 namely, smt. meenakshi dated 28.07.2016.2. respondent-state submitted that the respondent no.2 present in the court has been .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //