Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Year: 1955 Page 7 of about 277 results (0.021 seconds)

Mar 15 1955 (HC)

Ukakhasia Uchai Khasia Vs. Manipur State and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Mar-15-1955

Reported in : 1956CriLJ249

orderbrij narain, j.1. this is an application in revision on behalf of ukakhasia against the order of the senior extra assistant commissioner, imphal dated 23-12-1954 by which it has been held that the case under section 161/116, i.p.c. started against the petitioner by the jiribam police on the complaint of the opposite party no. 3 shri naba kumar singh, has been held to be triable by the senior e, a. c, and not by a special judge as provided by section 7, criminal law amendment act, 1952 (act xlvi of 1952).2. it appears from the complaint dated 15-3-1954 that according to the prosecution the petitioner went to the quarters of the opposite party no. 3 at about 9 a.m. on 15-3-1954 and told him that he had filed a petition in the court of she opposite party no. 8 a week back for getting settlement at latingkhal makha. the opposite party no. 3 told the petitioner that the petition might be lying with the amin and an enquiry might be made in the office, but the petitioner refused to leave the room and offered the opposite party no. 3 a packet of capstan cigarettes.the opposite party no. 3 asked the petitioner to leave the room immediately. when the former stood up for going inside the quarter to take his bath, the petitioner still remained in the room and so the opposite party no. 3 got suspicious and he found that the petitioner had on that very moment inserted five 10-rupee notes under the cover of the table where the opposite party no. 3 was sitting. the petitioner was then .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 04 1955 (HC)

V.V. Muvva Gopalakrishna Yachendra and ors. Vs. V.V. Sarvagna Krishna ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-04-1955

Reported in : AIR1955AP264

..... fact, the sum of rs. 1,000/- was not the amount mentioned by one party and accepted by the other. this was fixed by the rajah of bobbili as a mediator who arrived at the figure after taking into consideration several factors mentioned therein.(15) it may also be mentioned taht the parties, namely, the appellants always treated this allowance as ..... last being a minor, by his father and guardian kumar yachama nayudu bahadur, appointed the rajah of bobbili as mediator to determine the amount of allowance to be given to the three above-named brothers and to their purusha santhathi. the mediator taking fully into consideratioin the status of all the parties, the condition and respectability of the estate and all other .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 08 1955 (HC)

P.S. Ranga Iyer Vs. Chidambara Iyer and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-08-1955

Reported in : (1956)1MLJ503

..... follows:2. ' while we were living as members of a joint hindu family, we decided to become divided and three schedules, namely a, b and c were prepared through the mediation of messrs. t.g. ramaswami ayyar, p.r. ramakrishna ayyar, v.v. subramania ayyar and t.s. narayana ayyar and all of us signed those schedules. a schedule properties were ..... branch and the family business were also kept undivided. further it is stated that instead of completing the partition by the award the parties accepted the schedules prepared by the mediators and in respect of the properties comprised in these schedules division has become complete and the other properties are kept in common. paragraph 7 provides that 'the undivided properties which ..... the mortgage in question is one among the various items dealt with thereunder. paragraph 1 of the document states that for the purpose of dividing the joint family properties certain mediators, were appointed who prepared three schedules for allotting the properties to the three main branches of which samu bhattar's branch was one. the schedule intended to be allotted to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 19 1955 (HC)

In Re: K. Johnson

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-19-1955

Reported in : 1957CriLJ1210

..... sub-magistrate, bhimavaram. on appeal, the sub-divisional magistrate, bhimavaram,, confirmed the conviction and the sentence.2. in revision, the learned counsel for the petitioner contends that there were no mediators at the time of the seizure and that the mandatory provisions of section 103, criminal procedure code, which are made applicable to all searches under the madras prohibition act by reason of ..... of section 103, criminal procedure code, is that having regard to the time and the place where the accused was apprehended with the contraband, it was not possible to get ab any mediators. having regard to the circumstances of the case, i think this explanation is reasonable and satisfactory. the burden of showing why it was not possible to comply with the provisions .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 15 1955 (SC)

Thakur Amar Singhji Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-15-1955

Reported in : AIR1955SC504; [1955]2SCR303

..... of the treaty was the resumption of the lands usurped by the nobles, and the reduction of the nobles to their proper relation of subordination to the maharaja. through the mediation of sri david ochterlony agreements were entered into in 1819 similar to those made at udaipur. the usurped lands were restored to the maharajah and the nobles were guaranteed in ..... that there was a dispute between rawat himmat singhji the then holder of the estate, and the maharajah of udaipur, and that it was settled in march 1855 through the mediation of the then agent to the government, sir m. montgomery, and that under the terms of the settlement, the tikana was recognised as the exclusive property of the holder. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 07 1955 (FN)

Tee-hit-ton Indians Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Feb-07-1955

..... longer occupied by its ancient inhabitants, was parceled out according to the will of the sovereign power and taken possession of by persons who claimed immediately from the crown, or mediately, through its grantees or deputies." pp. 21 u. s. 590 -591. see buttz v. northern pacific r. co., 119 u. s. 55 , 119 u. s. 66 ; martin v. waddell, 16 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 20 1955 (HC)

In Re: Hanumantha Rao

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-20-1955

Reported in : 1957CriLJ930

..... showed his shop. the accused then took me to ponnur at 7 p. m. and took me to the shop of p. w. 10. i sealed his shop before the mediators, i examined p.w. 10 and others. on the next day, i searched the shop of p, w. 10 and seized brandy chits exhibits p-5 and p-7 and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 03 1955 (SC)

The Automobile Products of India Ltd. Vs. Rukmaji Bala and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-03-1955

Reported in : AIR1955SC258; (1955)ILLJ346SC; [1955]1SCR1241

..... for securing and preserving amity and good relations between the employers and workmen. the appropriate government is authorised by section 4 to appoint conciliation officers charged with the duty of mediating in and promoting the settlement of industrial disputes and by section 5 to constitute a board of conciliation for promoting the settlement of industrial disputes. section 6 empowers the appropriate .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 16 1955 (HC)

Shiv Omkar Maheshwari Vs. Bansidhar Jagannath

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-16-1955

Reported in : AIR1956Bom459; (1956)58BOMLR3; ILR1956Bom100

..... between merchants inter se and between them and their constituents'. clause 3(g) likewise provides: 'in case of mutual disputes arising between merchants in the aforesaid business to act as mediators or arbitrators between the members of the chamber and their constituents in all sales and purchases and in all matters of difference or disputes arising between the members of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 05 1955 (HC)

Chakko Bhai Ghelabhai Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Sep-05-1955

Reported in : 21(1955)CLT521; [1956]7STC36(Orissa)

..... state. the term 'court' has acquired the meaning of 'a place where justice is administered' and also applies to persons who exercise judicial functions under authority derived either immediately or mediately from the sovereign power. all tribunals, however, are not courts in the sense in . which the term is understood. thus arbitrators, committees of clubs and the like though they may .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //