Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Year: 1956 Page 8 of about 332 results (0.019 seconds)

Feb 27 1956 (FN)

Mastro Plastics Corp. Vs. Labor Board

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Feb-27-1956

..... modification;" "(2) offers to meet and confer with the other party for the purpose of negotiating a new contract or a contract containing the proposed modifications;" "(3) notifies the federal mediation and conciliation service within thirty days after such notice of the existence of a dispute, and simultaneously therewith notifies any state or territorial agency established to ..... mediate and conciliate disputes within the state or territory where the dispute occurred, provided no agreement has been reached by that time; and" "(4) continues in full force and effect, without .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 09 1956 (HC)

In Re: Boddu Sanyasi Patrudu and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-09-1956

Reported in : 1957CriLJ939

..... inspector of police p. w. 22, the latter deposing that he had not seen either the chase or the apprehension or the recovery of a gold wristlet from him, the mediator's report ex. p-44 recites that it was the circle inspector that chased a-13 while running and caught him and brought him before some ..... mediators, and on searching his person, those two jewels were found. having regard to this contradiction which should be regarded as a vital one, it should be said that there is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 02 1956 (HC)

In Re: Shaik Server

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-02-1956

Reported in : 1957CriLJ1393

..... railway police sub-inspector, took up investigation and on 11-1-1955 searched the house of the petitioner who is a sundry shop keeper at guntakal, in the presence of mediators, one of whom was p.w. 5. he seized two gunny bags which were found in the petitioner's house. one of these gunny bags contained 4 pieces of cots ..... gist of the petitioner's defence is that he was not aware of the contents of the two gunny bags which were left with him by basigadu and buddodu. the mediator p.w. 5 himself admitted in his further cross-examination:p.w. 7 brought three madigas along with him to the house of the accused. they told us that they .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 16 1956 (HC)

State Vs. Raghunath Prasad

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-16-1956

Reported in : AIR1957All273

..... obtained possession of that set.raghunath prasad was prosecuted on the allegation that, though he had mortgaged the radio set with nathu lal agarwal, he had continued to be in 'mediate possession of the set'. the learned magistrate held that raghunath prasad was not in possession of it and, consequently, acquitted' raghunath prasad.3. we have heard learned deputy government advocate .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 08 1956 (HC)

Newspaper Ltd. Vs. State Industrial Tribunal and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-08-1956

Reported in : AIR1956All597; (1957)ILLJ32All

..... the terms of employment or with the conditions of labour, of any person.' it authorises the central or the, state government to appoint conciliation officers charged with the duty of mediating in and promoting the settlement of industrial disuptes and also for the constitution of boards of conciliation for promoting the settlement of industrial disputes and courts of inquiry and industrial .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 18 1956 (HC)

Rajamma Vs. Varadarajulu Chetti and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-18-1956

Reported in : AIR1957Mad198

..... chetti, the plaintiff's father is said to have settled the maintenance claim of his daughter by executing ex. b-3 in pursuance of the arbitration award ex. b-2 mediated under the muchalika ex, b-l. the plaintiff has always been residing with her lather, because she has not joined her husband, this being a pre-puberty marriage. in 1950 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 27 1956 (HC)

Palwanna Nadar and ors. Vs. Annamalai Ammal

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-27-1956

Reported in : AIR1957Mad330

..... have up till now a female child by name annamalai ammal aged six years. as regarding to my promise given at the time of your marriage in the presence of mediators that i should give you immovable pioljerlies. i have by this deed given you the properties shown in schedule hereto valued at rs. 600 and now itself placed you in .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 29 1956 (HC)

Kiriti Bhushan Saha Mandal Vs. Tarubala Dasi

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-29-1956

Reported in : AIR1957Cal511,61CWN572

..... a right. (3) 'under-tenant' means a person who has acquired a right to hold non-agricultural land for any of the purposes provided in this act either immediately or mediately under a tenant and includes also the successors in interest of persons who have acquired such a right.' 14. the definition in section 2(5) is very wide. literally read .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 10 1956 (FN)

Mesarosh Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Oct-10-1956

mesarosh v. united states - 352 u.s. 1 (1956) u.s. supreme court mesarosh v. united states, 352 u.s. 1 (1956) mesarosh v. united states no. 20 argued and decided october 10, 1956 opinions delivered november 5, 1956 352 u.s. 1 on motion to remand syllabus in a federal district court, petitioners were convicted of conspiring to violate the smith act by advocating the overthrow of the government of the united states by force and violence. the court of appeals affirmed. while a review was pending in this court, the solicitor general moved that the case be remanded to the district court for a determination as to the credibility of the testimony of one of the government witnesses at the trial. he stated that the government believes that the testimony of this witness at the trial "was entirely truthful and credible," but that, on the basis of information in its possession, the government now has serious reason to doubt the truthfulness of testimony given by the same witness in other proceedings. parts of the testimony of this witness in other proceedings were positively established as untrue, and the solicitor general stated on the argument that he believed other parts to be untrue. petitioners moved that the case be remanded to the district court for a new trial. held: solely on the basis of the government's representations in its written motion and the statements of the solicitor general during the argument on the motions, and without reaching any other issue, the government's .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 14 1956 (FN)

Cahill Vs. New York, N.H. and H. R. Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : May-14-1956

cahill v. new york, n.h. & h. r. co. - 351 u.s. 183 (1956) u.s. supreme court cahill v. new york, n.h. & h. r. co., 351 u.s. 183 (1956) cahill v. new york, new haven & hartford railroad co. no. 436 decided may 14, 1956 351 u.s. 183 on a motion to recall and amend the judgment syllabus 1. the motion of respondent to recall the judgment of this court in this case is granted, and the judgment is amended to provide for a remand of the cause to the court of appeals for further proceedings. pp. 351 u. s. 183 -184. 2. the original order entered by the court in this case, 350 u.s. 898, is deemed erroneous, and it is recalled in the interest of fairness. p. 351 u. s. 184 . 3. even when a petition for rehearing has been denied, rule 58(4) of the rules of this court, barring consecutive and out-of-time petitions for rehearing, does not preclude a motion to correct the kind of error involved in the court's original order in this case. p. 351 u. s. 184 . 4. this cause is not moot, though the judgment has been paid. p. 351 u. s. 184 . 350 u.s. 898, judgment recalled and amended. per curiam. respondent filed a motion to recall and amend the judgment in the above-entitled cause, 350 u.s. 898, for the purpose of remanding the cause to the united states court of appeals for the second circuit for further proceedings. prior to the filing of this motion, and after the district court denied an application for a stay of execution, the judgment was satisfied, but petitioner was informed that .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //