Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Year: 1960 Page 1 of about 484 results (0.016 seconds)

Mar 08 1960 (HC)

S. Natesa Pillai Vs. Jayammal

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-08-1960

Reported in : AIR1960Mad515; 1960CriLJ1470

..... personally he has no objection to sending his daughter but his relations were giving him trouble, the reason being that on several previous occasions she had undergone several troubles and mediation was effected and on that account whatever might have happened be pacified them and sent her but did not get a good name and everybody was angry with him. he .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 18 1960 (FN)

Telegraphers Vs. Chicago and N.W. R. Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Apr-18-1960

..... these proposals. at a meeting between north western's chief executive officer and the union's president and its general counsel at madison, wisconsin, during the period of the mediation efforts, north western's official asked if there was any "possibility" of "working out these station closing matters and the discontinuance of the position of these station agents" ..... , but instead constitutes an attempt to freeze assignments regardless of the controlling agreement and regardless of the necessity or justification for such assignments." [ footnote 2/6 ] in the mediation meetings and other meetings between the parties, north western suggested several means of cushioning the effects of discontinuing these "one-man" agency jobs, including (1) the transfer of ..... of their rights under the [railway labor] act [inasmuch as] no adequate administrative page 362 u. s. 363 remedy can be afforded by the national railroad adjustment or mediation board[s]," this court concluded "that the district court has jurisdiction and power to issue necessary injunctive orders notwithstanding the provisions of the norris-laguardia act. we need add ..... western railway company ("north western") is a major interstate common carrier by railroad. the order of railroad telegraphers ("union") is a railway labor union, certified by the national mediation board as the representative of the page 362 u. s. 346 station agents and various other employees of north western. north western's lines extend westerly and northerly from .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 20 1960 (FN)

Locomotive Engineers Vs. Missouri-kansas-texas R. Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-20-1960

..... submitted the dispute to the national railroad adjustment board, to national committees and disputes committees established by the collective bargaining agreements, and to the national page 363 u. s. 530 mediation board. they amended their complaint in the district court to allege the various submissions. after a hearing, the district court granted the injunction pending decision by the adjustment board, but ..... of two of their five-man way-freight crews and changing the home or away-from-home terminals of the remaining crews. after unsuccessfully invoking the services of the national mediation board, the unions representing the members of these crews called a strike. the railroads submitted the dispute to the national railroad adjustment board and sued for injunctive relief. the ..... home terminals of the remaining crews. the petitioner brotherhoods, representing the engineers, firemen, conductors and brakemen affected, protested the issuance of the orders and invoked the services of the national mediation board. nonetheless, the railroads put the change into effect. after the board advised the parties that it did not consider the dispute one subject to ..... mediation, the unions called a strike. on the same day, the railroads filed a complaint for injunctive relief in the federal district court and obtained a temporary restraining order. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 25 1960 (FN)

Oil Workers Unions Vs. Missouri

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-25-1960

..... regulation prescribed by the governor hereunder." [ footnote 5 ] see notes 1 3 and 4 supra. [ footnote 6 ] the court did reaffirm an earlier decision ( state ex rel. state board of mediation v. pigg, 362 mo. 798, 244 s.w.2d 75) upholding the constitutionality of provisions of the king-thompson act relating to the state board of ..... mediation and public hearing panels, "[t]o the extent that those sections are a necessary predicate for the additional sections . . . with which we are now concerned. . . ." 317 s.w.2d at .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 27 1960 (SC)

The Printers (Mysore) Private Ltd. Vs. Pothan Joseph

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-27-1960

Reported in : AIR1960SC1156; [1960]3SCR713

..... no dispute as such between them which could attract the arbitration agreement. he also held that an attempt was made by the parties to settle their differences amicably through the mediation of mr. behram doctor but the said attempt failed because the appellant was not serious about it and was just trying 'to protract, defeat and delay the plaintiff's moves ..... by mr. behram doctor and copies of which have been supplied by him to both the parties indicate that mr. behram doctor attempted to mediate between the parties and presumably the parties were agreeable to secure the mediation of mr. behram doctor to resolve the dispute. we ought to add that the copy of the said proceedings produced by the appellant contains .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 20 1960 (FN)

Steelworkers Vs. Warrior and Gulf Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-20-1960

..... the union to strike after the grievance procedure has been exhausted without a settlement, and where arbitration is not prescribed as the final recourse. other contracts permit a strike if mediation efforts fail, or after a specified cooling-off period." collective bargaining, negotiations and contracts, bureau of national affairs, inc., 77:101. [ footnote 6 ] cox, reflections upon labor arbitration, 72 harv .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 10 1960 (HC)

J.K. Cotton Manufacturers Ltd., Kanpur Vs. U.P. Government and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-10-1960

Reported in : AIR1960All734; [1960(1)FLR564]

..... services essential to the life of the community or of employment. the act is based on the necessity of achieving collective amity between labour and capital by means of conciliation, mediation, and adjudication. the object of the act is the prevention of industrial strife, strikes and lockouts and the promotion o industrial peace and not to take the place of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 20 1960 (FN)

Schilling Vs. Rogers

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-20-1960

..... , 8 u.s.c. 1254), bears little resemblance to the situation involved here. see heikkila v. barber, 345 u. s. 229 , 345 u. s. 233 ; switchmen's union v. national mediation board, 320 u. s. 297 , 320 u. s. 301 . the structure of 32(a) does not permit of any such distinction in this case. compare h.r. 4840, 78th cong .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 18 1960 (SC)

State of Bombay Vs. K.P. Krishnan and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-18-1960

Reported in : AIR1960SC1223; (1961)63BOMLR127; [1960(1)FLR392]; (1960)IILLJ592SC; [1961]1SCR227

..... the background of the steps which the conciliation officer has taken under s. 12(1) to (4). the conciliation officer has held conciliation proceedings, has investigated the matter, attempted to mediate, failed in his effort to bring about a settlement between the parties, and has made a full and detailed report in regard to his enquiry and his conclusions as to ..... for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to a fair and amicable settlement. the duty and function of the conciliation officer is, as his very name indicates, to mediate between the parties and make an effort at conciliation so as to persuade them to settle their disputes amicably between themselves. if the conciliation officer succeeds in his ..... mediation s. 12 (3) requires him to make a report of such settlement together with the memorandum of the settlement signed by the parties to the dispute. section 18(3) provides .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 30 1960 (SC)

Basant Lal Banarsi Lal Vs. Bansi Lal Dagdulal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-30-1960

Reported in : AIR1961SC823; [1961]2SCR780

sarkar, j.1. the appellant is a commission agent and pucca aratiya and has been acting as such for the respondent since november 7, 1951, in the course of which various contracts were made between them in greater bombay. on february 26, 1952, two of such contracts were outstanding, one of which was in respect of groundnuts and was a forward contract. 2. in march 1952, disputes arose between the parties as to whether these contracts had been closed, each side making a claim on the other on the basis of its own contention. eventually, on march 18, 1952, the appellant referred the disputes to arbitration under the arbitration clause contained in the contracts. on october 7, 1952, the arbitrators made one composite award for rs. 22,529-15-9 against the respondent in respect of the said disputes. it is not very clear whether this award covered other disputes also. 3. this award was duly filed in the bombay city civil court under the arbitration act, 1940, for a judgment being passed on it. thereafter, on july 17, 1953, the respondent made an application to the bombay city civil court for setting aside the award contending that forward contracts in groundnuts were illegal as the making of such contracts was prohibited by the oilseeds (forwards contract prohibition) order, 1943, issued under the essential supplies (temporary powers) act, 1946, and hence the arbitration clause contained in the forward contract in groundnuts between the parties was null and void. it was said that the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //