Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Year: 1966 Page 1 of about 399 results (0.016 seconds)

Mar 01 1966 (SC)

Maturi Pullaiah and anr. Vs. Maturi Narasimham and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-01-1966

Reported in : AIR1966SC1836

..... she got under the said arrangement to her daughter's son subbaramayya. subsequently disputes arose between achamma and subbaramayya, and, as a result, a settlement was effected between them by mediators, under which achamma got absolute title to a one-third share of the properties given by bengaramma to subbaramayya and subbaramayya took two-thirds share. after the death of bengaramma ..... singh had three sons. one of the sons died before the father leaving 2 sons. in 1884, after some quarrels, kalka bakhsh singh executed a document through the intervention of mediators providing how the properties were to be divided between the sons. the judicial committee held that it was a family arrangement arrived at by the ..... mediation or arbitration of two gentlemen, who were old friends of the family, and interested in maintaining its honour, and that it was plainly intended to be operative immediately, and to .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 23 1966 (FN)

Railway Clerks Vs. Florida E. C. R. Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : May-23-1966

..... make rather sweeping departures in numerous respects from the existing collective bargaining agreements. negotiations between fec and the unions broke down. the unions then invoked the mediation services of the national mediation board relative to the proposed changes, but the carrier refused. page 384 u. s. 242 the unions thereafter agreed to submit the underlying dispute ..... reached. the act makes no provision for compulsory arbitration. section 5 first [ footnote 3 ] does, however, provide for voluntary arbitration at the suggestion of the national mediation board. the suggestion was made, but both the unions and fec refused. further negotiations were unsuccessful, and, on january 23, 1963, the nonoperating unions struck. when that ..... of supervisory personnel and replacements, with whom it made individual employment agreements which were substantially different from the existing collective bargaining agreements. fec refused union-proposed mediation by the national mediation board. then, although both sides had rejected arbitration prior to the strike, the unions changed their position and urged arbitration; again, fec refused. the ..... and job abolitions made on behalf of nonoperating railroad employees of virtually all class i railroads, including the florida east coast railway company (fec), negotiations and mediation occurred under the railway labor act. section 2 seventh provides in part that no carrier shall change employee pay rates, rules, or working conditions as embodied in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 05 1966 (FN)

Transportation Union Vs. Union Pacific R. Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Dec-05-1966

..... of the telegraphers' contract, under the pitney case. [ footnote 2/12 ] under the railway labor act, such contractual renegotiation would be a "major" dispute, subject to the jurisdiction of the mediation board, not the adjustment board. see n. 7, supra. see also order of railroad telegraphers v. chicago & n.w. r. co., 362 u. s. 330 (1960), where the court upheld ..... . 722 -728 (1945), adhered to on rehearing, 327 u. s. 661 (1946). to the extent that resolution of such disputes is subjected to a legal structure, it is the national mediation board, not the railroad adjustment board, which is the responsible federal agency under the railway labor act. [ footnote 2/8 ] the board, with its peculiar bipartisan, private composition, 3 first ..... , 1966, 80 stat. 208). the court adverts to 2 of the act, which sets forth the purposes of the railway labor act (including, of course, provisions relating to the national mediation board and provisions creating general duties and rights of carriers and employees -- none of which defines the powers of the adjustment board). section 2 sets forth a number of purposes .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 25 1966 (HC)

Mysore Sugar Company Employees' Union Vs. Commissioner of Labour (Stat ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-25-1966

Reported in : (1968)ILLJ491Kant

..... settlement was not so arrived at, the counter-affidavit of which the deponent is the secretary of the company makes it clear that the settlement was reached in consequence of mediation by the state conciliation officer. the secretary repudiates the truth of the allegation made on behalf of the union that the memorandum of settlement had already been prepared before it ..... have emanated only after there was discussion that there should be a 15 per cent cut in the presence of the conciliation officer, and, only after there was the requisite mediation and aid on the part of the state conciliation officer to promote a settlement. 22. the assertion in the affidavit of the company's secretary that the conciliation officer brought .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 03 1966 (HC)

Boddu Veeraiah and ors. Vs. Aripirala Venkata Laxmamma and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-03-1966

Reported in : AIR1968AP276

..... first defendant has also given evidence as d w. 7 and he speaks to the various details of the debts and the disputes raised by him which were settled by mediators resulting in the execution of ex. b-9. d. w. 3 also speaks about the disputes raised by the first defendant, that he was present at that time, and that ..... not binding on him, that immediately after satyanarayana acquired properties under the surrender, the first defendant raised the said disputes for which there was a mediation by respectful persons and that in pursuance of the mediation, the surrenderee satyanarayana executed the said gift in favour of the first defendant conveying a part of the properties acquired by him under the deed of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 25 1966 (HC)

Qhamarunnissa Begum Vs. Fathima Begum and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-25-1966

Reported in : AIR1968Mad367

..... fifth defendant and mother of gulzar, when disputes arose can have no bearing on the decision of the question now in issue. any statement of rabia bi at the attempted mediation agreeing to the division of the cash in the iron safe among the heirs of the deceased cannot bind the minors.(12) in our view, from the mere fact that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 28 1966 (FN)

United States Vs. Guest

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Mar-28-1966

..... constitutional questions deliberately not reached in part ii seems to me, to say the very least, extraordinary. [ footnote 2/2 ] for a discussion of the deportations, see the president's mediation comm'n, report on the bisbee deportations (november 6, 1917). [ footnote 2/3 ] the court's reliance on united states v. moore, 129 f. 630, is misplaced. that case held .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 18 1966 (HC)

Soodamania Pillai (Minor) Through Paternal Aunt and Guardian Shenbagat ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-18-1966

Reported in : (1966)2MLJ308

..... not rely on exhibit a-16 as creating a relationship of mortgagor and mortgagee and entitling redemption. viewed as a mere covenant on the basis of the determination of the mediators to hand over possession on payment of rs. 450 paid to the original mortgagees the suit as one for enforcement of the covenant will be clearly barred by limitation. as ..... for redemption and at the end of the year, if the sum of rs. 450 was paid, she would give up the property in accordance with the decision of the mediators. it is recited therein that in terms of the decision, she would meanwhile be enjoying the property as under othi. the property was not taken possession of pursuant to the ..... sale deed was a minor aged about 12 years. the rights of the plaintiff were immediately asserted by his maternal uncle on his behalf and there is evidence of a mediation pursuant to which maharasi ammal gave a yadast or a memorandum of agreement dated 5th april, 1943, exhibit a-16. this document refers to the purchase by the executant maharasi .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 07 1966 (FN)

South Carolina Vs. Katzenbach

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Mar-07-1966

..... administrative determinations in numerous cases involving the statutory rights of private parties. for example, see united states v. california eastern line, 348 u. s. 351 ; switchmen's union v. national mediation bd., 320 u. s. 297 . in this instance, the findings not subject to review consist of objective statistical determinations by the census bureau and a routine analysis of state statutes .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 1966 (FN)

Engineers Vs. Chicago, R.i. and Pac. R. Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-31-1966

..... award upon . . . the interests of the carrier and employees affected"; and (3) "[d]ue consideration to the narrowing of the areas of disagreement which has been accomplished in bargaining and mediation." today, the court concludes that congress sought only to shear off the visible portion of the iceberg, leaving the continued existence of state "full crew" laws as a bar to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //