Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Year: 1968 Page 1 of about 563 results (0.015 seconds)

Nov 15 1968 (SC)

Management of Fertilizer Corporation of India Vs. the Workmen

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-15-1968

Reported in : AIR1970SC867; [1971(21)FLR73]; 1970LabIC743; (1970)IILLJ25SC; [1969]2SCR706

..... management would not even agree to implement the directions given by the central government. it was very evasive in its replies when pressed to act upon the cabinet decision. several mediation talks were held and conciliation also failed. therefore, under those circumstances, the workmen honestly felt that a responsible body like the appellant was notamenable to reason and hence a sense ..... days, it would be forced to adopt agitational approaches to seek compliance with its demands. the management did not comply with this demand regarding payment of bonus and attempts at mediation failed and the workmen went on strike from october 17, 1966 and the reference to adjudication was made on november 2, 1966.14. before the tribunal the workmen pressed their .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 30 1968 (HC)

T. Abdullah, Muthavalli of and as Representing the New Street, Mosque ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-30-1968

Reported in : (1970)2MLJ510

..... old street mosque, the defendant. we have referred to the fact that in 1932, some claim to title were set up by the plaintiff mosque which went before some mediators. but this mediation did not settle any question with regard to title but was more or less an award made by certain jamaiths, that is, persons representing several mosques in that area .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 06 1968 (FN)

Volkswagenwerk Ag Vs. Fmc

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Mar-06-1968

..... to these demands, and the ensuing strike tied up shipping for almost three months at all pacific ports. president roosevelt appointed a national longshoremen's board to intervene, after a mediation board had failed to settle the dispute. the union and management agreed to submit to arbitration by the board, and to end the strike while arbitration was proceeding. both sides ..... existing contract also had to be filed with the board. the contracts did not require approval by the board, but were to be used to assist the board in its mediation activities and in its promotion of peaceful settlement of labor disputes. [ footnote 3/9 ] the board was instructed in the 1938 act to submit to congress by 1940 its recommendations ..... , and congress, in 1938, amended the act, creating a maritime labor board (mlb) with the duty of encouraging collective bargaining and assisting in the peaceful settlement of labor disputes through mediation. a provision of the 1938 amendment, 1005, 52 stat. 967, required all maritime employers to file with the mlb within 30 days a copy of every contract with any group .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 12 1968 (HC)

Mallihal Village Panchayat Vs. State of Mysore

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-12-1968

Reported in : AIR1969Kant345; AIR1969Mys345

..... that the selection was preceded by a consideration of the relevant factors and a visit to the site by the new health minister who eventually concurred in the choice after mediation between the rival aspirants by mr. nijalingappa produced no useful results.7. the decision of the supreme court in venkateswara rao v. government of andhra pradesh, : [1966]2scr172 on which .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 29 1968 (HC)

Vijaya Kumar Machinery and Electrical Stores Vs. Alaparthi Lakshmikant ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-29-1968

Reported in : [1969]74ITR224(AP)

..... the file of the district munsiff's court, tenali, against the second defendant for dissolution and accounts. there was a mediation between the two defendants and brahmayya, the payee under the promissory notes, was one of the mediators. on the advice of the mediators, the two partners settled their disputes and entered into a registered agreement on 8th may, 1957 (exhibit b-5 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 1968 (HC)

Bhopal Singh and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-22-1968

Reported in : AIR1968Raj305; 1968CriLJ1572

..... the accused bhanwarsingh and the deceased bhoorsingh bv his intervention inderstngh, second son of bhoorsingh, was asked by chhatusingh to bring bhoorsingh from the post office so that he may mediate between the parties and bring abuut a compromise between bhoorsinghand bhanwarsingh. meanwhile chhatu-singh sat down in the kotari of bhanwar singh. the prosecution case is that at that time ..... of section 149. indian penal code.it is true that all the accused reside in the same gowadi and the possibility of their coming to the spot to witness the mediation by chhatu singh or to see what had actually happened cannot be ruled out. i have looked into the statements of the eye witnesses p w 4 san-watsingh, p .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 28 1968 (SC)

Malkiat Singh and anr. Vs. the State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-28-1968

Reported in : (1969)1SCC157

ramaswami, j.1. this appeal is brought, by special leave, from the judgment of the punjab high court, dated november 4, 1965, by which criminal revision petition no. 263 of 1965 and criminal miscellaneous case no. 224 of 1965, were dismissed. 2. the case of the prosecution is that on october 19, 1961, sub-inspector banarasi lal of food and supplies department was present at samalkha barrier along with head constable badan singh and others. the appellant malkiat singh then came driving truck no. p. n. u. 967. babu singh was the cleaner of that truck. the truck carried 75 bags of paddy weighing about 140 maunds. as the export of paddy was contrary to law, the sub-inspector took into possession the truck as also the bags of paddy. it is alleged that the consignment of paddy was booked from lakerkotia on october 18, 1961, by qimat rai on behalf of messrs. sawan ram chiranji lal. the consignee of the paddy was messrs devi dayal brij lal of delhi. it is alleged that qimat rao also gave a letter, ex. p-3, addressed to the consignee sawn ram and chiranji lal were partners of messrs. sawan ram chiranji lal and they were also prosecuted. in the trial court malkiat singh admitted that he was driving the truck which was loaded with 75 bags of paddy and the truck was intercepted at samalkha barrier. according to malkiat singh, he was given the paddy by the transport company at malerkhotla for being transported to delhi. the transport company also gave him a letter assuring him that it was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 03 1968 (SC)

Payment of Wages Inspector Vs. Surajmal Mehta and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-03-1968

Reported in : AIR1969SC590; 1969(17)BLJR821; [1969(18)FLR284]; (1969)ILLJ762SC; 1969MhLJ848(SC); [1969]2SCR1051

shelat, j. 1. this appeal, by certificate, is directed against the judgment and order of the high court of madhya pradesh andraises the question of the scope of jurisdiction of the authority under the payment of wages act, 4 of 1936 (hereinafter referred to as the act). 2. on the licence of the barnagar electric supply and industrial company, of which respondent 1 was at all material times the managing director, having been revoked by the madhya pradesh government and the company's undertaking having been taken over by the madhya pradesh electricity board, respondent 1 served notices on the company's employees that their services would no longer be required as from october 1, 1962, thereupon the appellant on behalf of 20 employees of the company filed an application under section 15(2) of the act to recover from respondent 1 wages for the notice month and retrenchment compensation amounting to rs. 12,853.60p. payable to the employees under section 25ff of the industrial disputes act, 1947. on respondent 1 contesting the claim as also the jurisdiction of the authority, the authority raised certain preliminary issues, namely : (1) whether the said application was maintainable in view of the revocation of the company's licence, (2) whether the authority had jurisdiction to determine the liability of respondent 1 for retrenchment compensation before the amount thereof was ascertained under section 33c(2) of the industrial disputes act and (3) whether in view of the services of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 1968 (HC)

The Public Prosecutor Vs. Kota Venkata Subramma and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-19-1968

Reported in : 1969CriLJ1074

..... or injustice would be caused by any overjealous officers against the accused.7. it is incumbent on the part of the food inspectors to call only mediators who are independent and disinterested with a view to induce confidence in the fair trial as well as the method or manner in which the procedure ..... or persons required to be called by the food inspector as per the provisions of section 10(7) of the act must be independent and disinterested mediators but not the food mistries, peons working under the food inspector or any subordinate of the department at whose instance the prosecution was launched, as the ..... .17. in the public prosecutor v. pasala jogi : air1966ap96 anantanarayana ayyar j. held that the act of the food inspector in getting only one mediator instead of two as contemplated by the provisions of section 10(7) of the act does not mean that the sale and seizure cannot be acted ..... evidence of the sanitary coolie to the effect that two customers came to the shop who were not requested by the sanitary inspector to act as mediators and in those circumstances, the evidence of the food inspector cannot be accepted by the court and the order of acquittal passed by the magistrate ..... wherever possible to get such witnesses for the seizure or taking of samples of food articles. in cases where it was not possible to obtain the mediators for witnessing the taking of or seizure of simples of food articles, the food inspector's failure or omission to comply with the provisions of section .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 11 1968 (HC)

Public Prosecutor Vs. Kanumarlapudi Ramalingaiah

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-11-1968

Reported in : AIR1969AP445; 1969CriLJ1478

..... retail shop. this shop is situated in ravi anjaiah street, 8th ward, tenali. the food inspector of tenali municipality purchased a sample of oil from him in the presence of mediators after paying the necessary price. the sample so purchased was divided into three equal parts and sealed in bottles. once bottle was handed over to the accused. the other was .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //