Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Year: 1974 Page 1 of about 507 results (0.019 seconds)

Feb 19 1974 (FN)

Sampson Vs. Murray

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Feb-19-1974

..... holding it invalid for failure to comply with rule 52(a). this was the precise course taken by the court of appeals for the district of columbia circuit in national mediation board, supra, on which the majority relies. see also sims v. greene, supra. in addition, the government had other courses it could have taken in this case. in view of ..... applies to preliminary injunctions, and as no findings of fact and conclusions of law have yet been filed in this case, no valid preliminary injunction was ever issued. see national mediation board v. air line pilots assn., 116 u.s.app.d.c. 300, 323 f.2d 305 (1963); sims v. greene, 160 f.2d 512 (ca3 1947). nor would it ..... n 8, supra. [ footnote 58 ] the court of appeals for the second circuit, in an opinion cited by the court of appeals for the district of columbia circuit in national mediation board v. airline pilots assn., 116 u.s.app.d.c. 300, 323 f.2d 305 (1963), described these principles as follows: "it is because the remedy is so drastic ..... a temporary restraining order continued beyond the time permissible under rule 65 must be treated as a preliminary injunction, and must conform to the standards applicable to preliminary injunctions. national mediation board v. airline pilots assn., 116 u.s.app.d.c. 300, 323 f.2d 305 (1963). we believe that this analysis is correct, at least in the type of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 09 1974 (FN)

Passenger Corp. Vs. Passengers Assn.

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-09-1974

..... passengers who are the prime casualties when passenger service is discontinued. each case involving the availability of judicial review stands on its own feet. in switchmen's union v. national mediation board, 320 u. s. 297 , we denied judicial review since the collective bargaining right was being protected by a neutral agency, the national ..... mediation board. there is no such body standing between the passengers and amtrak. amtrak is a private for-profit corporation which is only construing its own enabling act. if passengers are .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 18 1974 (HC)

Arukonathan Vs. Jayaraman and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-18-1974

Reported in : (1975)1MLJ164

..... not be recognized by any court executing the decree--vide order 21, rule 2 (3). the appellant has been too clever and ingenious to give the date of the alleged mediation and agreement. but then, he has in clause (d), charged the decree-holders with having contravened the agreement of adjustment and paid sale batta in the teeth of the agreement ..... order 21, rule 90.12. reference may also be made to clause (d) of paragraph 4 of the application, in which reliance is placed by the appellant on an undated mediation, at which it was allegedly agreed between the decree-holders and the appellant that the appellant should pay them a sum of rs. 9,000 on or before the 30th .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 13 1974 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Prem Chand Jute Mills Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Dec-13-1974

Reported in : [1978]114ITR769(Cal)

..... wanted to settle the deadlock ; there were heavy losses due to more than one factor, namely, quarrels between groups of directors and heavy costs ; they attempted a settlement through the mediation of the central government's investigation. these indicated not the desire not to carry on the business or wind up the business but to regularise the business and to carry ..... belong to these groups applied to the central government on the 3rd of february, 1958, to intervene and direct an investigation into the affairs of the company. due to the mediation of the jute controller the parties came to a settlement on the 7th march, 1958, as to the terms and conditions on which the mill were to be run. therefore .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 04 1974 (FN)

Granny Goose Foods, Inc. Vs. Teamsters

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Mar-04-1974

..... limits permitted under rule 65(b), and where the required findings of fact and conclusions of law have not been set forth, the order is invalid. see, e.g., national mediation bd. v. air line pilots assn., 116 u.s.app.d.c. 300, 323 f.2d 305 (1963); sims v. greene, 160 f.2d 512 (ca3 1947). [ footnote 18 ] rule .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 04 1974 (SC)

Prem Raj Vs. Ram Charan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-04-1974

Reported in : AIR1974SC968; (1974)2SCC1; [1974]3SCR494

s.n. dwivedi, j.1. kariya and his wife sava purchased the house in dispute by a registered deed on april 2, 1905. kariya died in 1936 leaving behind him sava and ram charan, his son. on august 16, 1951 ram charan mortgaged the house to prem raj (the appellant). prem raj obtained a preliminary decree for foreclosure on august 16, 1952 and also the final decree on july 16, 1955. in the meanwhile on march 7,1952 sava gifted the entire house to prakash chandra, son of ram charan, the respondent. fortified by this gift, prakash chandra frustrated several attempts of the appellant to get possession of the house in execution of his decree. he made three unsuccessful attempts to execute the decree till the end of 1954. he made the fourth attempt on april 25, 1956. shortly thereafter, on december 7, 1956, prakash chandra instituted a suit against the appellant and his father rani charan for a declaration that the preliminary and final decree for foreclosure in favour of the former were not binding on him and for a perpetual injunction restraining the appellant from taking possession of the house in execution of the aforesaid decree. the suit was dismissed on november 25, 1955. he filed an appeal and obtained an order staying execution of the decree on december 31. 1958. the appeal court partly allowed his appeal on october 21, 1959. it was held that he was the owner of a half share in the house by virtue of the gift deed from sava in his favour. so the appeal court issued an .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 29 1974 (HC)

Yaparti Sambaiah Vs. Jasti Basavapurna

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-29-1974

Reported in : AIR1975AP15

..... into court. the commissioner accordingly seized it and produced it into court along with his report. the defendant, who was aware of the said seizure which was made under a mediators report, did not take any exception to the provision of law invoked in the petition or the power of the court to isssue an ex parte commission. as a matter ..... adjusted towards profits made by the plaintiff in running the lorry for about 11/2 months. he also stated that after taking possession of the lorry in the presence of mediators he has repaired it by spending rs. 11,000/-. having come to know about the said repairs the plaintiff has come forward with this mala fide suit and got an .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 09 1974 (HC)

Kankanala Venkata Subbaiah Vs. Kankanala Rathamma and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-09-1974

Reported in : AIR1975AP197

..... filed on behalf of the respondents is that the agreement of arbitration was signed by them on 5-3-1972 in the presence of puvvada venkata subbaiah and the other mediators went to hyderabad and to their advocate and puvvada venkata subbaiah had signed the compromise at the instance of arbitrators and against their wish, that they have no authority to ..... the dispute. that decision has been given by the arbitrators taking into consideration the benefit of both the parties. there is no item of property in respect of which the mediators have decided and which is not the subject-matter of the suit. hence, there is no merit in this submission. 25. in the result, c. m. p. no. 9782/72 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 16 1974 (HC)

Praga Tools Limited Vs. Praga Tools Limited, Mazdoor Sabha and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-16-1974

Reported in : (1975)ILLJ218AP

..... functus officio, and thereafter cannot hold conciliation proceedings to bring about an amicable settlement between the workmen and the management. it is the primary function of the conciliation officer to mediate in and promote settlements in the interest of industrial peace. i am, therefore, of the opinion that there is no bar to hold conciliation proceedings, again, notwithstanding the fact that ..... (3)(d) but would be one under section 18(1) of the act.10. under section 4, the government is empowered to appoint conciliation officers charged with the duty of mediating in and promoting the settlement of industrial disputes. his duties are detailed in section 12. where any industrial dispute, exists or is apprehended, he is to hold conciliation proceedings in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 17 1974 (HC)

Yerra Kanakarao Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-17-1974

Reported in : 1975CriLJ953

..... paper packet was found to contain 2 kgs. of pressed ganja. thus, a total of 200 kgs. of pressed ganja was seized under mediator's report. ex. 'p-l. it was attested by p.w. 3. a mediator. a charge-sheet was thereafter laid against the accused.6. the defence of the accused was one of denial. they pleaded that they were .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //