Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Year: 1977 Page 10 of about 475 results (0.020 seconds)

Sep 01 1977 (HC)

K. Venkaiah and ors. Vs. K. Venkateswara Rao and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-01-1977

Reported in : AIR1978AP166

..... ; it has acquired the meaning of the place where justice is administered and, further, has come to mean the persons who exercise judicial functions under authority derived either immediately or mediately from the sovereign. all tribunals, however, are not courts, in the sense in which the term is here employed, namely, to denote such tribunals as exercise jurisdiction over persons by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 28 1977 (SC)

Kunwar Nripendra Bahadur Singh Vs. Jai Ram Verma and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-28-1977

Reported in : AIR1977SC1992; (1977)4SCC153; [1978]1SCR208; 1977(9)LC528(SC)

..... , appropriate action was not taken at the appropriate time, the provisions of the election law which have got to be construed strictly, must work with indifference to consequences, immediate or mediate. on the part of the officers also it will vitalise and invigorate a healthy democratic practice if, charged with the electoral duties, demanding high probity, they neither 'exhibit rank remissness .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 28 1977 (HC)

Tralok Chand and anr. Vs. Arjun Singh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-28-1977

Reported in : AIR1978HP2

..... be at once executed, would be indulging in a mere pastime. one can easily give instances of cases in which the decrees duly passed by competent courts' cannot be im-mediately executed. but that fact has never been understood to mean that there is an implied ouster of jurisdiction of the court to entertain and dispose of the suit.' this decision .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 27 1977 (FN)

Bounds Vs. Smith

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Apr-27-1977

..... writers, see johnson v. avery, 393 u.s. at 393 u. s. 488 ; procunier v. martinez, 416 u. s. 396 , 416 u. s. 421 -422 (1974). independent legal advisors can mediate or resolve administratively many prisoner complaints that would otherwise burden the courts, and can convince inmates that other grievances against the prison or the legal system are ill-founded, thereby .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 29 1977 (SC)

State of U.P. Vs. Mohammad Musheer Khan and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-29-1977

Reported in : AIR1977SC2226; 1977CriLJ1897; (1977)3SCC562; 1977(9)LC546(SC)

..... , however, mohammad musheer stated: on 17-2-73 a quarrel had taken place between accused shamim and deceased nirmaljeet in course of that scuffle shamim was being beaten meantime, while mediating,someone stabbed nirmaljeet.shamim's statement in the sessions court under section 342, in this regard, was in these terms:the reason of my absconding was that on 17-2 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 21 1977 (HC)

K. Mohideen Ibrahim Vs. M. Muhammed Abdullah

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-21-1977

Reported in : AIR1978Mad97; (1978)1MLJ386

..... . according to the plaintiff, he and the defendant gave an undertaking to the police not to put up any new construction without settling their disputes either with the aid of mediators or through a competent court. overruling the objections raised by the plaintiff, the commissioner of virudhunagar. municipality granted permission to the defendant to put up constructions. in pursuance of that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 04 1977 (HC)

Muniammal Vs. Raja

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-04-1977

Reported in : AIR1978Mad103

..... was afflicted with leprosy, the plaintiff did not want to live with him and she resorted to questionable ways of living, which the defendant's family resented. due to a mediation effected at the instance of the relations, the plaintiff entered into full satisfaction of the decree in o. s. no. 15 of 1943 under the original of ex. b-2 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 13 1977 (FN)

Lee Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-13-1977

lee v. united states - 432 u.s. 23 (1977) u.s. supreme court lee v. united states, 432 u.s. 23 (1977) lee v. united states no. 76-5187 argued april 25, 1977 decided june 13, 1977 432 u.s. 23 certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the seventh circuit syllabus after the prosecutor's opening statement in petitioner's bench trial for theft in violation of the assimilative crimes act and the applicable indiana statute, petitioner's counsel moved to dismiss the information on the ground that it did not allege specific intent as required by the indiana statute. the court tentatively denied the motion subject to further study, whereupon petitioner's counsel outlined the defense and did not object to going forward with the trial. at the close of the evidence, the court, though observing that petitioner's guilt had been proved beyond any reasonable doubt, granted petitioner's motion to dismiss. thereafter, petitioner was indicted for the same crime and convicted. the court of appeals affirmed, rejecting petitioner's claim that the double jeopardy clause barred the second trial. petitioner contends that (1) he should never have had to undergo the first trial, because the court was made aware of the defective information before jeopardy had attached, and (2) once the court had determined to hear evidence despite the defective charge, he was entitled to have the trial proceed to a formal finding of guilt or innocence. held: petitioner's retrial after dismissal of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 20 1977 (FN)

United Airlines, Inc. Vs. Mcdonald

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-20-1977

united airlines, inc. v. mcdonald - 432 u.s. 385 (1977) u.s. supreme court united airlines, inc. v. mcdonald, 432 u.s. 385 (1977) united airlines, inc. v. mcdonald no. 76-545 argued march 29, 1977 decided june 20, 1977 432 u.s. 385 certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the seventh circuit syllabus claiming that petitioner united airlines had violated title vii of the civil rights act of 1964 by requiring stewardesses, though not stewards, to remain unmarried as an employment condition, one romasanta, a stewardess who had been discharged by petitioner because of her marriage, brought this title vii suit as a class action on behalf of herself and all other united stewardesses discharged because of the no-marriage rule. the district court ruled that only those stewardesses who, upon discharge because of marriage, had filed charges under either a fair employment statute or united's collective bargaining agreement constituted the class, and because that class was too small to satisfy the numerosity requirement of fed.rule civ.proc. 23(a)(1), the court granted united's motion to strike the complaint's class allegations, but allowed 12 married stewardesses who had protested their discharge to intervene as additional parties plaintiff. the district court certified for appeal its order striking the class allegations, but the court of appeals declined to accept the interlocutory appeal. the litigation proceeded as a joint suit on behalf of the original and intervening .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 04 1977 (FN)

United States Vs. MartIn Linen Supply Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Apr-04-1977

united states v. martin linen supply co. - 430 u.s. 564 (1977) u.s. supreme court united states v. martin linen supply co., 430 u.s. 564 (1977) united states v. martin linen supply co. no. 76-120 argued february 23, 1977 decided april 4, 1977 430 u.s. 564 certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fifth circuit syllabus after a deadlocked jury was discharged when unable to agree upon a verdict at the criminal contempt trial of respondent corporations, the district judge granted respondents' timely motions for judgments of acquittal under fed.rule crim.proc. 29(c), which provides that "a motion for judgment of acquittal may be made . . . within 7 days after the jury is discharged [and] the court may enter judgment of acquittal. . . ." the government appealed pursuant to 18 u.s.c. 3731, which allows an appeal by the united states in a criminal case "to a court of appeals from a . . . judgment . . . of a district court dismissing an indictment . . . except that no appeal shall lie where the double jeopardy clause of the united states constitution prohibits further prosecution." the court of appeals dismissed the appeal. held: the double jeopardy clause bars appellate review and retrial following a judgment of acquittal entered under rule 29(c). pp. 430 u. s. 568 -576. (a) the "controlling constitutional principle" of the double jeopardy clause focuses on prohibitions against multiple trials, united states v. wilson, 420 u. s. 332 , 420 u. s. 346 , and where an .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //