Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Year: 1986 Page 1 of about 680 results (0.019 seconds)

Oct 24 1986 (HC)

S.A. Halima Bivi Ammal Vs. S.A. Fatima Bivi and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-24-1986

Reported in : AIR1987Mad129; (1987)IIMLJ351

..... the purpose of this case. the lower court has given cogent and convincing reasons for rejecting the evidence of d.ws.1 to 3 with reference to mediation as unsatisfactory and unacceptable. 29. in order to show that only subsequent to the said family arrangement mutation in respect of the house at rajagiri was ..... 1, he would have written a letter to the concerned panchayat board to that effect, but there was no necessity for him to have mentioned about the mediation, settlement and other things. under this, it is stated that the settlement deed dated 24-12-1968 was not acted upon and it was not accepted by ..... the appellant he gave instructions for the preparation of the written statement and at that time, he knew the date, month and the year of the said mediation. if it is so, there is absolutely no reason as to why the date and month were not specifically mentioned in the written statement. it is ..... as per exhibit a-1 she got the said properties. in these circumstances, the irresistible conclusion that can be arrived at is that the allegation that there was mediation is false. p.- w. i would stoutly deny any such arrangement. according to her, from the date of the settlement deed, she is in possession ..... said arrangement in her notice under ex. a. 25. when d. w. 3 states in his evidence that he was one of the mediators and in the said mediation the entire house at rajagiri was given to the first respondent and the entire lands at vadakkumangudi were given to the appellant and from the date .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 24 1986 (HC)

A. Kothandapani and ors. Vs. Sampathkumar and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-24-1986

Reported in : AIR1987Mad204; (1987)IMLJ297

..... act is discretionary. the trial court has properly exercised its discretion and refused to grant stay at the instance of the defendants who set up a definite case of completed mediation in the reply notice. i do not find any warrant for interfering with the discretion of the trial court.14. in the result, the appeal fails and is dismissed. there ..... a case of concluded mediation it is not open to the defendants to seek refuge under the arbitration clause. 10. the decisions relied on by the appellant will not apply to the facts of the ..... got dissolved by efflux of time on 28-8-1983. when the plaintiffs issued a notice demanding partition the reply of the defendants was that there was already a concluded mediation pursuant to which the plaintiffs had agreed to take a sum of rs. 5.50 lakhs for their share and leave the properties to the defendants. having thus set up ..... of udumalpet dismissed the petition on the grounds that the dispute did not fall under the arbitration clause and that the defendants having set up an arrangement by a prior mediation were not entitled to invoke the arbitration clause.6. it is the said order of dismissal which is challenged before me. mr. b. t. seshadri, learned counsel appearing for the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 01 1986 (FN)

Golden State Transit Corp. Vs. Los Angeles

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Apr-01-1986

..... drivers, represented by local page 475 u. s. 610 572 of the international brotherhood of teamsters, signed a short-term contract in order that operations would continue while negotiation and mediation proceeded. this interim contract was to expire at midnight, february 10, 1981, the day before the city council was scheduled to consider action on the franchise renewals. on february 2 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 04 1986 (HC)

All India Labour Union Vs. Jeewanlal (1929) Ltd. and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-04-1986

Reported in : (1986)88BOMLR560; (1995)IIILLJ755Bom

..... workers. in the year 1981, a dispute arose between the employer and the workers in relation to pay allowances and other conditions of employment. on august 20, 1981 through the mediation of the conciliation officer, the employer and the workmen came to an amicable settlement which was reduced to writing in a memorandum , dated 20.8.1981. under this settlement, the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 09 1986 (FN)

Bowen Vs. Academy of Family Physicians

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-09-1986

..... action may be overcome by inferences of intent drawn from the statutory scheme as a whole. see, e.g., morris v. gressette, 432 u. s. 491 (1977); switchmen v. national mediation board, 320 u. s. 297 (1943)." block v. community nutrition institute, 467 u.s. at 467 u. s. 349 . [ footnote 5 ] the pertinent text of 1395ff reads as follows: "(a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 18 1986 (SC)

Om Prakash Shukla Vs. Akhilesh Kumar Shukla and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-18-1986

Reported in : AIR1986SC1043; 1986LabIC796; 1986(1)SCALE475; 1986Supp(1)SCC285; [1986]1SCR855; 1986(3)SLJ235(SC); 1986(2)LC184(SC)

..... passed at least the high school examination the intermediate examination conducted by the board of tion conducted by the board high school and inter- of high school and inter- mediate education united mediate education, u.p. or provinces, or any other any other examination which examination which has been has been or may be declared or may be declared by the by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 29 1986 (HC)

The Workmen of Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. by Hindustan Constructi ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-29-1986

Reported in : (1987)ILLJ451Mad; (1987)IMLJ40

..... , the special deputy commissioner of labour, the assistant commissioner of labour-1 and assistant commissioner of labour (establishment general) were also appointed as conciliation officers charged with the duty of mediating in promoting the settlement of industrial disputes act. in addition there were several labour officers at different places in the state of madras, who were also so appointed. then there ..... , 1966, subsequently amended, the governor of tamil nadu hereby appoints the officers specified in column (2) of the table below to be the conciliation officers charged with the duty of mediating in and promoting the settlement of industrial disputes for the area specified in column (3) of the table and for the industries specified in the corresponding entries in column (4 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 29 1986 (HC)

The Workmen of Hindustan Construction Company Ltd., represented by the ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-29-1986

Reported in : (1987)1MLJ40

..... , the special deputy commissioner of labour, the assistant commissioner of labour, i and assistant commissioner of labour (establishment general) were also appointed as conciliation officers charged with the duty of mediating in and promoting the settlement of industrial disputes under section 4 of the act. in addition there were several labour officers at different places in the state of madras, who ..... august, 1966, subsequently amended, the governor of tamil nadu hereby appoints the officers specified in column (2) of the table below to the conciliation officers charged with the duty of mediating in and promoting the settlement of industrial disputes for the area specified in column (3) of the table and for the industries specifies in the corresponding entries in column (4 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 29 1986 (HC)

Padmabai Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-29-1986

Reported in : 1987CriLJ1573

..... had made any such accusation.16. now. the evidence of the deceased's father, brother and brother-in-law and so also of p.w. 4 mst. dayabai who had mediated to bring about the settlement of marriage is found to show that rs. 15,000/- in cash and rs. 5,000/- in kind, had already been paid to the appellant .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 20 1986 (HC)

C.K. Xavier Vs. Bhagaraj Singh and anr.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Oct-20-1986

Reported in : AIR1987Ker145

..... also known to the parties. appellant was not willing in the first instance to settle at anything less than rs. 20,000/-. however, on the intercession and pleas by the mediators p.ws: 2, 3 and 4, he agreed to accept rs. 18,000/- in full settlement of his dues under the decree. the amount was received and as per his .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //