Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Year: 1998 Page 10 of about 1,500 results (0.024 seconds)

Mar 25 1998 (HC)

Hansa Industries Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Kidarsons Industries P. Ltd. a ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-25-1998

Reported in : 1998IIIAD(Delhi)27; [1998]94CompCas552(Delhi); 1998(45)DRJ149

..... compensatory equalisation payment to the company. parties by consent can, however, agree to a larger amount. 6. that shri p.n.khanna, retired judge is at present acting as a mediator. he will act as a commissioner, to separate 30.14% of the assets of the company to be given to shri narender nath nanda group as set out hereinbefore.10 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 27 1998 (HC)

Baburajan Vs. Parukutty and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Feb-27-1998

Reported in : AIR1998Ker274

..... before the district court. arguments were heard on the civil miscellaneous appeal. summer vacation for the courts intervened before the order was pronounced. according to the plaintiff, there was a mediation in the dispute between the son and the father, in the presence of the two uncles of the plaintiff, pws. 2 and 3 and the brother of kuttappu one ayyappu .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 27 1998 (HC)

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Girdhari Lal and Etc.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-27-1998

Reported in : AIR1998Raj240; 1998(3)WLC76; 1998(1)WLN216

..... that the arbitral tribunal remains within the limits of its jurisdiction; (iv) to minimize the supervisory role of courtsin the arbitral process: (vi) to permit an arbitral tribunals to use mediation, conciliation or other procedures during the arbitral proceedings to encourage settlement of disputes; (vii) to provide that every final arbitral awardis enforced in the same manner as if it were .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 05 1998 (HC)

L. Dakshinamoorthy, Advocate, 61, Kalianman Koil Street, Komarapalayam ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-05-1998

Reported in : 1998(2)CTC592

..... and two more clauses were added. even according to the complaint, these two more clauses were added without their authority. it must be stated that the petitioner was not a mediator. he only helped the arbitrator, and it is his case that the arbitrator also agreed to have those clauses included. if this is the scope of the complaint, what is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 25 1998 (HC)

R. Sankaranarayanan Vs. Anandhavalli

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-25-1998

Reported in : (1998)2MLJ490

..... hereby direct that the marriage between the appellant and the respondent shall stand dissolved by a decree of divorce.during the last fourteen years, in spite of an attempt for mediation, there was no reconciliation and there was no contact at all between the spouses. on the other hand, they have spent these valuable period of youth in the litigation, fighting .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 05 1998 (HC)

L. Dakshinamoorthy, Advocate Vs. Bar Council of Tamil Nadu Represented ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-05-1998

Reported in : (1999)1MLJ188

..... and two more clauses were added. even according to the complaint, these two more clauses were added without their authority. it must be stated that the petitioner was not a mediator. he only helped the arbitrator, and it is his case that the arbitrator also agreed to have those clause included. if this is the scope of the complaint, what is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 19 1998 (HC)

Ranjitham Ammal Vs. Maragathammal and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-19-1998

Reported in : (1999)1MLJ753

..... document in favour of one murugesan, as such the default was on the part of the plaintiff; that the defendants have not violated the terms and conditions of agreement; that mediation was done in december 1978 and the draft sale deed was given to the defendants only then; that a suit to recover possession is filed by the defendants in the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 25 1998 (HC)

Abdullah Jhat and anr. Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir and anr.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on : Sep-25-1998

Reported in : 1999CriLJ3034

..... accused for separation from the joint family. seven months after the marriage, she left the house against the wishes of the accused and was brought back after great persuasion and mediation by the village elders. however, her relationship with other family members continued to be sore, with the result that the accused remained tense and depressed. the situation was aggravated further .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 03 1998 (TRI)

Shri Nihal Khan and (4) ors. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Mar-03-1998

Reported in : (1998)(60)ECC385

..... . he denied the suggestion that bhoore khan had heard from sahadia of pakistan about his receiving gold or silver from him. he also denied the suggestion that he acted as mediator in between sahadia and achar rajad. he denied any enmity with achar rajad.he did not ask achar rajad to bring any gold for him nor he has any connection .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 1998 (TRI)

Virendra Kumar Rai and Others Vs. Competent Authority

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Lucknow

Decided on : Jan-28-1998

Reported in : (1998)233ITR11Luck

1. this batch of appeals under section 68-o(1) of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (ndps act), arise out of a common order of the competent authority, lucknow, dated august 30, 1996, made under section 68-i(1), (2) and (3) of the ndps act, forfeiting the properties of the appellants mentioned in the said order.2. virendra kumar rai, the appellant in f.p.a. no. nd-8/lkw of 1996 was detained under section 3(1) of the prevention of illicit traffic in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1988 (pitndps), under a detention order dated april 4, 1990, for illicit trafficking in ndps, in which a reference was made by an earlier detention order dated october 1, 1986, made under section 3(1) of the conservation of foreign exchange and prevention of smuggling activities act, 1974 (cofeposa).3. the properties of the appellants were forfeited as illegally acquired properties by the competent authority by earlier orders. the said orders were questioned before this tribunal and were set aside and remanded to the competent authority for fresh disposal and again orders forfeiting the properties were passed, which were again questioned before this tribunal on the ground that the appellants had no opportunity of putting forth their case, as they had no notice of the proceedings taken by the competent authority. this tribunal by order dated february 7, 1996, set aside the orders of forfeiture and directed the competent authority to give four weeks time to the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //