Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Year: 1998 Page 10 of about 1,500 results (0.025 seconds)

Sep 15 1998 (HC)

A.P. Public Health and Medical Employees Union Vs. Director of Health, ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-15-1998

Reported in : 1998(5)ALD622; 1998(5)ALT320

..... the recognised collective bargaining agent, it is not possible for the respondents 1 and 2 to carry on the administration smoothly and effectively. the industrial disputes act, 1947 envisages negotiation, mediation and conciliation. many grievances of the employees working in the departments headed by the respondents 1 and 2 can be sorted out by resorting the aforementioned modes of dispute-resolution .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 21 1998 (HC)

Namuduri Atchyutaramaiah Vs. Osuri Gangadharam (Died) by Lrs. and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-21-1998

Reported in : 1998(6)ALD713; 1998(6)ALT758

..... court, the tahsildar submitted his report stating that the tenant was given possession on 5-10-1976 in pursuance of the orders of the sub-collector in the presence of mediators and also the village officers, but the defendant could not retain his possession as he was thrown out from the land by force and the landlord had taken possession of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 21 1998 (HC)

Secretary to Government of India, Ministry of Defence and anr. Vs. Ind ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-21-1998

Reported in : 1998(5)ALT32

orders.r. nayak, j.1. this first appeal is by the defendants directed against the judgment and decree dated 29-11-1993 passed in o.s. no. 276 of 1988 on the file of iii addl. judge, city civil court, hyderabad at secunderabad, decreeing the suit filed by the respondents - plaintiffs. the respondents are the plaintiffs. the parties are referred to in this judgment as they are arrayed in the suit. the plaintiffs filed the suit o.s. no. 276 of 1988 for decree declaring the plaintiffs to be the owners of the suit land bearing sy. no. 234 admeasuring ac. 2.33 gts. situated at tokatta village, bowenpally, secunderabad taluk, hyderabad district (hereinafter shortly referred to as 'suit land') and for perpetual injunction restraining the defendants 1 and 2 from interfering with the possession of the plaintiffs.2. the material averments in the plaint be stated briefly as under:the 1st plaintiff is the widow and the 2nd plaintiff is the daughter of one late b.v. prakasa reddy. b.v. prakasa reddy was the owner and pattedar of the suit land and he died in the year 1982 leaving behind the plaintiffs as his legal heirs and successors. b.v. prakasa reddy had leased out the suit land to one achaiah, s/o ramaiah. the tenancy certificate was issued in the name of achaiah and after the death of achaiah, his two brothers viz., sainna and jogaiah continued to be in possession of the land as tenants. the ownership of b.v. prakasa reddy remained unchallenged. when the matter stood thus the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 13 1998 (HC)

Mewa Ram and Another Vs. Dy. Director of Consolidation, Faizabad and O ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-13-1998

Reported in : 1998(4)AWC826

r.h. zaidi, j.1. heard the learned counsel for the parties.2. since learned counsel appearing for the parties agreed and requested that this petition may be disposed of finally at this stage, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2 also does not propose to file any counter-affidavit in this case, this petition is being disposed of at this stage finally.3. by means of this petition under article 226 of the constitution of india, the petitioners challenge the validity of the order dated 26.10.1998 passed by respondent no. 1.4. it appears that land in dispute was recorded in the name of muneshwar in the basic year. according to the petitioners, sri muneshwar died on 11.2.77. after his death petitioners applied for mutation of their names in the revenue papers relating to the land in dispute, on the basis of a will dated 12.10.70, alleged to have been executed by muneshwar in their favour. the claim of the petitioners was objected to and opposed by respondent no. 2. it was pleaded that she happened to be the widow of predeceased son of muneshwar, namely, ram dutt, therefore, she inherited the land in dispute and her name was liable to be mutated in place of muneshwar. the execution of the will by muneshwar in favour of petitioners was also denied by respondent no. 2.5. the parties produced evidence, oral and documentary, in support of their cases. the consolidation officer by his judgment and order dated 5.9.81 allowed the objection of the petitioners and directed for mutation .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 06 1998 (HC)

Parma Pandey and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-06-1998

Reported in : 1999CriLJ1348

ordero.p. jain, j.1. this writ petition is directed against the revisional judgment dated 29th september, 1998 by district and sessions judge, mau who has dismissed the revision filed by the petitioners.2. the relevant facts of the case are that respondent no. 2 vijai bahadur pandey filed a criminal complaint against the present petitioners under sections 463, 464, 467, 468, 420 and 379, i.p.c. it was alleged in the complaint that on 27th april, 1981 the accused persons obtained the thumb impression of one sheo pujan pandey on a piece of paper and a forged will was fabricated by the accused persons. this forged will, it is alleged, was produced by the accused persons in mutation proceedings and later on in a civil suit instituted in the year 1996. it was also alleged in the complaint that the will was stolen from the record of revenue court by the accused persons. the complaint was filed in the court on 11th august, 1997.3. the learned magistrate summoned the accused by his order dated 4th december, 1997. an application was filed on behalf of the accused persons for recall of the order. by order dated 2nd april, 1998 the magistrate deleted section 379, i.p.c. and the rest of the order was confirmed. being aggrieved against order dated 2nd april, 1998 the present petitioners filed a revision before the court of sessions inter alia on the ground that the prosecution for the offences under the above sections is barred by the provisions of section 195(1)(b)(ii), cr.p.c. by the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 05 1998 (HC)

Smt. Kanta Sachdev Vs. Devidas

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-05-1998

Reported in : II(1998)DMC368

..... malkani dw 2. the wife has also examined one ballumal pw 3 to prove that as vice president of the sindhi panchayat consisting of members of the community he had mediated for reconciliation between the parties and according to him their differences could not be patched up as the husband has re- married.5. the case set up by the husband .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 06 1998 (HC)

Deepa @ Deepchand and anr. Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-06-1998

Reported in : 1998(1)MPLJ412

d.p.s. chauhan, j.1. the appeal is at the behest of deepa @ deepchand and bego bai @ faggo bai, who were convicted in s. t no. 18/87, vide judgment and order dated 12-2-1988, whereby appellant no. 1 deepa @ deepchand was convicted for commission of the offence punishable under section 302, of the indian penal code, and was sentenced to imprisonment for life, whereas appellant no. 2 bego bai @ faggo bai was convicted under section 302 with the aid of section 34 of the indian penal code, and was sentenced to imprisonment for life.2. the brief facts of the case are that there was dispute between the accused persons and basodi in relation to the land comprising in khasra no. 21/3, measuring 8.607 hectare, situated in village kachhari, p. s. keolari, tehsil and district seoni. basodi lal claims to have received this land from the maternal grand mother late batto bai, whereas on the basis of sale deed (ex. d/5) jeevanlal, the father of deepa @ deepchand and his mother bego bai wanted to have possession over this land. on 18-9-1986, in the morning accused deepa @ deepchand and his mother bego bai reached the field which is called talab bali jheel. on getting information about it from sunita bai (pw/10), deceased jambati accompanied with her daughter sona bai (pw/8) went to the field for stopping the accused persons from cultivating the land and sowing the seeds. jambati bai on reaching the field stopped deepa @ deepchand from ploughing and sowing the field wherein an altercation .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 06 1998 (HC)

Deepa Alias Deepchand and anr. Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-06-1998

Reported in : 1999CriLJ413

d.p.s. chauhan, j.1. the appeal is at the behest of deepa alias deepchand and bego bai alias faggo bai, who were convicted in s.t. no. 18/87, vide judgment and order dated 12-2-88, whereby appellant no. 1 deepa alias deepchand was convicted for commission of the offence punishable under section 302, of the ipc, and was sentenced to imprisonment for life, whereas appellant no. 2 bego bai alias faggo bai was convicted under section 302 with the aid of section 34, of the ipc, and was sentenced to imprisonment for life.2. the brief facts of the case are that there was dispute between the accused persons and basodi in relation to the land comprising in khasra no. 21/3, measuring 8.607 hectare situated in village kachhari, p.s. keolari, tensil and district seoni. basodi lal claims to have received this land from the maternal grand-mother late batto bai, whereas on the basis of sale deed (ex.d/5) jeevanlal, the father of deepa alias deepchand and his mother bego bai wanted to have possession over this land. on 18 9-86, in the morning accused deepa alias deepchand and his mother bego bai reached the field which is called talab bali jheel. on getting information about it from sunita bai (pw/10), deceased jarnbati accompanied with her daughter sona bai (pw/8) went to the field for stopping the accused persons from cultivating the land and sowing the seeds. jambati bai on reaching the field stopped deepa alias deepchand from ploughing and sowing the field wherein an altercation took .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 21 1998 (HC)

Brundaban Patnaik Vs. Commissioner, Land Record and Settlement and ors ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Aug-21-1998

Reported in : 2001(I)OLR53

order1. heard shri behuria for the petitioner, shri k. patnaik. learned additional government advocate, for opposite parties 1 and 2 and shri n. panda for opposite party no. 3.2. the petitioner has filed this writ application challenging the correctness of the order dated 22.9.1997 of the commissioner, land records and settlement, orissa, cuttack in r.p. case no. 6774 of 1996 (annexure-1). by the impugned order the commissioner has directed the tahasildar to take up the case under para 17 (1) of the mutation manual and verify the sale deed of the petitioner to know his legal entitlements. the commissioner has observed that the plot in question be remeasured alongwith the suit hal plot no. 225 and the records be corrected if found necessary. the tahasildar has also been further directed to ignore the possession of any excess area, if found, without valid title.3. according to the petitioner, he has been in possession of land measuring ac. 0.050 decimals uninterruptedly without any hindrance from any quarter although in the registered sale deed no. 8486 dated 6.10.1970, the extent of the land was noted as ac. 0.041 decimals. in support of the petitioner's stand that he has been in possession of land in excess of the land mentioned in the sale deed, the learned counsel for the petitioner brings to our notice the order of the asst. settlement officer dated 2.9.1983 passed in objection case no. 1873/330 which was filed at the instance of one bijoy kumar pattnaik. in the said order .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 20 1998 (HC)

Prem Kaur Vs. Sadhu Singh (Deceased)

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-20-1998

Reported in : II(1998)DMC329

v.k. jhanji, j.1. this is defendant's second appeal directed against the judgment and decree of the first appellate court whereby on appeal by the plaintiff, judgment of the trial court decreeing the suit has been set aside and inconsequence thereof, suit of the plaintiff has been decreed.2. land in suit was owned by babu singh son of sunder singh who died in or about the year 1976. sadhu singh, his brother filed suit alleging that babu singh was unmarried and died issueless and being the brother, he is the only legal heir of babu singh, deceased. he alleged that defendant, prem kaur, although has got no concern whatsoever with the land in dispute, but in collusion with the revenue officer, gotmutation of the land entered in her name by alleging herself to be widow of babu singh, deceased. plaintiff alleged that he requested patwari halqa many a times to enter mutation in his name, but patwari has been postponing the matter on one pretext or the other. hence, suit for declaration to the effect that plaintiff is owner in possession of land measuring 65 big has 12 biswas comprised in khasra numbers fully described in the heading of the plaint. upon notice of the suit, defendant appeared and filed written statement, denying the averments made in the plaint and contended that babu singh though died issueless, but was survived by prem kaur defendant being his widow. defendant contended that babu singh had entered into kareva and duly got executed and registered a krevanama on 19.1 .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //