Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Sep-05-2003
Reported in : 2003(2)ALD(Cri)538; I(2004)DMC546
..... declarations made to witnesses, and so there are no grounds to interfere with the conviction and sentence recorded against the appellants.7. p.w. 7 is one of the inquest mediators who was present at the time of the inquest. he opined that the deceased died as a result of burns. ex. p. 4 is the inquest report. the doctor who .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Madhya Pradesh
Decided on : Nov-14-2003
Reported in : 2004(2)MPHT437; 2004(1)MPLJ252
..... is to be drawn against the plaintiff as per section 114(g) of the evidence act and (e) from the evidence of jagdish singh saini (p. w. 2) who was mediator between the vendor and the vendee, it is found that the vendor even did not know the vendee and the signatures of both of them were obtained on this agreement .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Orissa
Decided on : Apr-09-2003
Reported in : AIR2003Ori180; 96(2003)CLT182
..... has advanced an important argument that even if the plaintiffs are held to have an interest in the joint family properties, but since it has been already divided at the mediation of villagers, therefore, the suit for partition is untenable in law. it is stated that the partition had taken place in the year 1976 and in evidence thereof a partition .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Feb-28-2003
Reported in : AIR2003P& H191; II(2004)DMC410; (2003)134PLR500
..... the matrimonial home. this was about 5/6 months after she had been turned out. in response to this letter, the uncle of the respondent namely shanker and surjan the mediator to the marriage between the parties accompanied by other persons came to see ram kishan, sarpanch of village kotla. thereafter all of them went to the house of the appellant .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Feb-17-2003
Reported in : AIR2003SC1620; 2003(1)ALD(Cri)495; 2003CriLJ1536; JT2003(3)SC474; 2003(2)MPHT408; RLW2003(3)SC411; 2003(2)SCALE250; (2003)3SCC528; 2SCR69
..... persons were culprits.8. it was the stand of the learned counsel for the appellants that the injuries sustained by the deceased were in course of sudden quarrel without pre-mediation and without cruel intents and, therefore, section 302 ipc was not applicable. according to him, section 302 ipc cannot be applied even if the prosecution case is accepted in toto .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-24-2003
Reported in : II(2003)ACC114; 2003ACJ1631; 2003IIIAD(Delhi)321; 104(2003)DLT234; 2003(68)DRJ128; 2003RLR333
..... parapet wall but the management of the theatre had also constructed a dispensary above the ramp which was also in clear violation of the building bye laws. construction of inter-mediate floor with the aid of r s joists was also in violation of the building bye laws. the municipal corporation of delhi has not placed any material on record to .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-18-2003
Reported in : 2003IIIAD(Delhi)547; 104(2003)DLT834; 2003(69)DRJ592; 47SCL757(Delhi)
..... the agreement by the petitioner company. in this respect, i am not taking into account the letter dated 23rd february, 1998, cited by the petitioner which was issued by a mediator between the parties as it was private correspondence and was termed as personal and confidential. 13. the explanationn given in respect of the acknowledgment given by shri y.c. jhalani .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jul-07-2003
Reported in : AIR2004Delhi161; 2003(70)DRJ470
..... with the insurance company. rule 14(2) requires the ombudsman to dispose of a complaint 'fairly and equitably'. a complaint filed before the ombudsman may be settled by agreement through mediation of the ombudsman. in such eventuality, the ombudsman, as prescribed under rule 15 makes recommendations which, if accepted by the complainant, would dispose of the complaint fully and finally and .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-24-2003
Reported in : 2004(72)DRJ365
..... , may make a complaint in writing, [in the prescribed manner, - (a) to such conciliation officer or board, and the conciliation officer or board shall take such complaint into account in mediating in, and promoting the settlement of, such industrial dispute; and(b) to such arbitrator, labour court, tribunal or national tribunal and on receipt of such complaint, the arbitrator, labour court .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Kerala
Decided on : Nov-10-2003
Reported in : 2004CriLJ1462; 2004(1)KLT153
..... prosecution to prove the hostility between the two became hostile to the prosecution. pw.7, another neighbour, also turned hostile, apart from pw10, who had been cited to prove the mediation held to appease the hostility between the two. therefore, the hostility between the two was not proved. the motive was thus not established. there was no eye witness and there .....Tag this Judgment!