Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Year: 2005 Page 10 of about 2,223 results (0.019 seconds)

Sep 09 2005 (HC)

K. Munirathnam Naidu Vs. K. Aadi Lakshmamma and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-09-2005

Reported in : 2005(6)ALD534

..... share of the produce from out of the schedule properties. third defendant has no right to do so and he is not justified in doing so. the efforts of the mediators also became futile. the plaintiff reliably learnt that the third defendant brought into existence some sham, nominal, collusive and fraudulent documents for a portion of the plaint schedule properties in ..... extent of ac.2-14 cents in s.no. 114 situated in pudipatla to five persons, in the year 1986. prior to the filing of the suit there was no mediation with regard to the so-called interest of the plaintiff in respect of the demands of her share in the suit properties. the plaint schedule properties are not joint family .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 07 2005 (HC)

Pothyamsetti Satyanarayana Reddy and ors. Vs. State of A.P.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-07-2005

Reported in : 2006CriLJ27

..... the behaviour of the accused towards her to him and other family members. she underwent mental agony and requested him for action. he requested p.w. 6 and others for mediation and the deceased narrated the happenings to them and they in turn asked the accused to keep quiet. on that, the accused kept quiet for some time. but, later they ..... mind. the deceased asked him to change the house and he was trying to shift the house. on account of the activities of the accused, the deceased underwent mental agony. mediators were also sent by p.w. 1 to the accused and they stopped their activities for some time and later resorted to the same practice in more aggressive form. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 15 2005 (HC)

M. Ramakrishna Vs. M. Satyamma and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-15-2005

Reported in : 2005(2)ALD(Cri)917; I(2006)DMC726

..... there were disputes between the petitioner and the 1st respondent, when the first respondent stated to him that she would withdraw the m.c. as per the decision of the mediators, petitioner should have been present in the court on the day of hearing to ensure that 1st respondent would abide by the terms of the compromise, allegedly entered into and ..... 2001 to set aside the order in m.c. alleging that there was a compromise between him and the 1st respondent whereat, she, after receiving the amount settled by the mediators, agreed to withdraw the m.c. filed by her and so, he, believing the representation of the 1st respondent that she would withdraw the m.c., did not attend the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 30 2005 (HC)

Suruvu Parshaiah Vs. State of A.P.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-30-2005

Reported in : 2005(2)ALD(Cri)806; 2006CriLJ824

..... of offence panchanama is not substantive evidence and that mere marking of panchanama is not sufficient and that the contents of panchanama are to be brought on record through the mediators or through the investigating officer through whom the panchanama is marked. i have come across several cases where the contents of panchanama were not brought on record and simply panchanamas ..... used only to corroborate the oral testimony given in the court. here in the instant case, ex. p-20 is said to have been prepared in the presence of two mediators viz. karunabathula premsagar rao and nandi rajendra prasad and they are cited as witnesses in the charge-sheet as lws-15 and 16. lw-15 was not examined and nandi .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 20 2005 (HC)

Thippiripati Ijaiah Alias Ajay Vs. State of A.P.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-20-2005

Reported in : 2006(1)ALD(Cri)339; 2006CriLJ1117

..... came to the police station and informed that her elder sister set fire to herself. then he got admitted kattamma into hospital.16. pw-7 is one of the inquest mediators. his evidence indicates that he was not present at the time of inquest. the remaining evidence available on record is two dying declarations. one is recorded by pw-13 and ..... -14, c.i. of police at the relevant point of time, conducted inquest on the dead body of the deceased in the presence of panch witnesses. pw-7 is inquest mediator, ex. p. 14 is inquest report. as per the inquest report, the deceased said to have died due to burn injuries, which were caused by pouring kerosene on the deceased .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 07 2005 (HC)

Nath Singh and ors. Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-07-2005

Reported in : II(2005)DMC114

..... raises a serious doubt about the conduct of the appellants. all the witnesses have deposed that the appellants were practising cruelty and giving ill-treatment to the deceased. there was mediation by the panchayat and there was compromise and thereafter she was taken to her in-laws house and this shows that her death took place under suspicious circumstances within seven ..... maternal uncle's house from where she had written letter to her father and thereafter continuously she lived at her parents house at village ghamori. thereafter, there was panchayat and mediation by the relatives of both the sides and thereafter she died under suspicious circumstances in the house of accused persons who are in-laws. this fact also cannot be overlooked .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 03 2005 (HC)

G. Srinivas Goud Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Oct-03-2005

Reported in : 101(2006)CLT129

..... proceedings and proceeded to the place in question along with two constables. on his way he took two persons along, one of them being a police constable, to act as mediators/independent persons. the memo of search proceeding is exhibit p-1. after reaching the spot, he prepared a panchnama, exhibit p-2 which is signed by the accused persons, two ..... our view, there is no substance in the argument. p.w. 5 is a reserve policeman and there is no bar in law for a policeman to act as a mediator/ panch witness. it should be kept in view that this was a raid which was conducted by excise officials and not by the police.6. the main thrust of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 03 2005 (SC)

G. Srinivas Goud Vs. State of A.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-03-2005

Reported in : AIR2005SC3647; 2005CriLJ4367; JT2005(12)SC215; 2005(8)SCALE34; (2005)8SCC183; 2005(2)LC1509(SC)

..... and proceeded to the place in question along with two constables. on his way he took two persons along, one of them being a police constable to act as a mediators/independent persons. the memo of search proceeding is exhibit p.1. after reaching the spot he prepared a panchnama. exhibit p.2 which is signed by the accused persons, two ..... our view, there is no substance in the argument. p.w. 5 is a reserve policeman and there is no bar in law for a policeman to act as a mediator/paunch witness. it should be kept in view that this was a raid which was conducted by excise officials and not by the police.6. the main thrust of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 28 2005 (HC)

Laxmi NaraIn @ Latoor Vs. the State of Raj. and Ladu

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-28-2005

Reported in : RLW2005(3)Raj1678; 2005(3)WLC780

..... ran away from there, then they started beating us. ladies were also beaten and they drove the tractors towards us to kill us. then to mediate, prabhata, ramchandra gurjar, narain, harsai etc. came there and mediated with great difficulty. if these persons had not been there then our so many persons would have been crushed and killed by tractors. these persons had .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 02 2005 (HC)

Moulasab Bandgisab Goundi Vs. Yamanappa Ameenappa Hikodi

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-02-2005

Reported in : AIR2005Kant412; ILR2005KAR5230; 2006(5)KarLJ295

huluvadi g. ramesh, j.1. this second appeal is by the plaintiff being aggrieved by the judgment and decree passed by the ii addi. district judge, bijapur in r.a. no. 7/88 wherein the learned district judge has dismissed the appeal filed by the plaintiff and confirmed the judgment and decree passed by the addl. civil judge, bijapur in o.s. no. 169/83.2. the plaintiff had filed a suit to declare that the defendant no. 5 has not acquired any right, title or interest in the alleged sale deed dated 10-5-1982 executed by defendants 1 to 4 and also to issue permanent injunction restraining the defendant no. 5 from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit land by the plaintiff and to order for delivery of possession if the court finds that the plaintiff is not in possession or lost the possession of the suit land. the plaintiff said to have purchased the suit schedule property from defendants 1 to 4 for a valuable consideration of rs. 10,000/- under a sale deed dated 30-7-1979 which is to the extent of 3 acres 10 guntas situated at tadalagi village, basavana bagewadi taluk. it is stated that immediately after the sale deed the title of the suit property passed to the plaintiff and the possession was also given and he started cultivating the property, and that subsequently, defendants 1 to 4 without the knowledge of the plaintiff have executed the sale deed dated 10-5-1982 in favour of defendant no. 5 in respect of the same property for a sale consideration .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //