Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jul-27-2005
Reported in : 2005(4)CTC264; (2005)3MLJ693
..... not to indulge in this kind of practice in future, it would be appropriate to direct the petitioner to pay rs. 25,000/- as costs to be paid to tamilnadu mediation and conciliation centre, high court, madras, within one month.14. with the above direction, the writ petition is dismissed. consequently, w.p.m.p. nos. 7605 and 7606 of 2005 .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : May-05-2005
Reported in : 2006(4)CHN703
..... made by some villagers. however, he candidly admitted that he had not got any letter from his niece nor had he made any complaint to anybody except holding panchayat salisi (mediation) in bringing about the compromise between the couple. there is nothing unnatural that the unfortunate girl made so many complaints against her husband about the ill-treatment. there is also .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : House of Lords
Decided on : Oct-20-2005
..... in which an agreement on costs had been agreed between personal injury lawyers and liability insurers. the civil justice council offered mediation services, although the consultation paper correctly observed that mediations work only if both sides want to try to find a mediated solution (see para 49). 36. there are substantial differences between the costs in personal injury litigation which are the subject .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Oct-03-2005
Reported in : AIR2005SC3647; 2005CriLJ4367; JT2005(12)SC215; 2005(8)SCALE34; (2005)8SCC183; 2005(2)LC1509(SC)
..... and proceeded to the place in question along with two constables. on his way he took two persons along, one of them being a police constable to act as a mediators/independent persons. the memo of search proceeding is exhibit p.1. after reaching the spot he prepared a panchnama. exhibit p.2 which is signed by the accused persons, two ..... our view, there is no substance in the argument. p.w. 5 is a reserve policeman and there is no bar in law for a policeman to act as a mediator/paunch witness. it should be kept in view that this was a raid which was conducted by excise officials and not by the police.6. the main thrust of the .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Decided on : Jun-22-2005
Reported in : (2005)96TTJ(Delhi)1
..... business opportunities in india for the assessee in relation to its products.further, it is specifically provided inter alia, that the indian counterpart has no role to play as a mediator between the assessee and any indian buyer, it cannot bind the assessee in any manner while promoting its products in india and that the final terms of contract for sale ..... or merchandise on behalf of the assessee. while dealing with the issue of "business connection", we have given a categorical finding that eci has no role to play as a mediator between the assessee and any buyer. it cannot bind the assessee in any manner while promoting its products in india and that the final terms of contract for sale of .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad
Decided on : Jul-25-2005
Reported in : (2006)100TTJ(Ahd.)1042
..... the certificate, it was also mentioned as the assessee-firm was builder and distributor of tata pipe and genith pipe and fixtures, they have to pass on secret commission to mediators. our attention was also drawn to the affidavit of shri govardhan, proprietor of moti builders & organisers who was carrying on business as a builder and developer of immovable property for ..... of the nature of business the assessee was involved, there was a general practice that secret commission is given by the traders or suppliers to the purchasers or to the mediators of the purchasers. as per the certificate in the activities of builder and developer, plumber used to purchase on behalf of developer or builder, therefore generally trader passes on the .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : US Supreme Court
Decided on : Jun-27-2005
..... the user can download desired files directly from peers computers. as this description indicates, grokster and streamcast use no servers to intercept the content of the search requests or to mediate the file transfers conducted by users of the software, there being no central point through which the substance of the communications passes in either direction.[ footnote 4 ] although grokster and ..... servers. the advantage of peer-to-peer networks over information networks of other types shows up in their substantial and growing popularity. because they need no central computer server to mediate the exchange of information or files among users, the high-bandwidth communications capacity for a server may be dispensed with, and the need for costly server storage space is eliminated .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Jul-15-2005
Reported in : 2005(5)ALD223; 2005(6)ALT60
..... 16-1-1973, for a valuable consideration. the said agreement of sale was not filed into court, by stating that it was handed over to one of the mediators, while disputes arose, and the mediator did not return it, thereafter. therefore, it emerges that the appellants failed to prove the transfer of the suit schedule property in their favour, from ramachandram.13 .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Aug-10-2005
Reported in : 2005CriLJ3896
..... 19-6-2001 at 4.45 p.m. p.w. 11 arrested accused nos. 1 to 3 at rentachintala railway station and recorded their statements in the presence of the mediators. accused no. 1 disclosed that the weapons used in the crime were kept in the bushes near agricultural market-yard of rentachintala village. accordingly, p.w. 11 proceeded to the ..... market-yard and in the presence of the mediators, recovered two knives, an iron rod and one bloodstained shirt (m.os. 1 to 4) from the bushes in the market-yard. the case was taken on file as p .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Sep-09-2005
Reported in : 2005(6)ALD534
..... share of the produce from out of the schedule properties. third defendant has no right to do so and he is not justified in doing so. the efforts of the mediators also became futile. the plaintiff reliably learnt that the third defendant brought into existence some sham, nominal, collusive and fraudulent documents for a portion of the plaint schedule properties in ..... extent of ac.2-14 cents in s.no. 114 situated in pudipatla to five persons, in the year 1986. prior to the filing of the suit there was no mediation with regard to the so-called interest of the plaintiff in respect of the demands of her share in the suit properties. the plaint schedule properties are not joint family .....Tag this Judgment!