Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Year: 2009 Page 1 of about 1,687 results (0.021 seconds)

Apr 16 2009 (HC)

Mahindra Lifespace Developers Ltd. Under the Companies Act, 1956 Vs. t ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-16-2009

Reported in : 2009(3)BomCR587; 2009(111)BomLR2048

..... wearing different hats from time to time. according to respondent no. 2, he had indicated that he would prefer to resolve the disputes between the parties as a mediator. a mediator is a term having distinct with connotation and distinct functions and obligations to that of an arbitrator. an arbitrator is primarily a tribunal to resolve the dispute by adjudicative ..... conciliator can suggest some terms of settlements too.' attempts made by respondent no. 2 were actually for resolving the disputes between the parties by recourse to the process of mediation rather than by adjudication process. he talked to the parties individually, putforth proposal of one party to the other and tried to bring up a commonly acceptable solution to ..... the approach of mediator is to encourage mutual agreement rather than to impose a settlement. it is not simplicitor a remedy but a system having appropriate of dispute resolution. one must remember that ..... a neutral person facilitates discussions between the parties in an attempt to get the parties to reach an agreement that is mutually agreeable to both the parties. in short mediation is a method to dissolve disagreement designed to help disputing parties resolve their own dispute even without obtaining legal counsel. it is a nonadversarial approach to conflict resolution and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 20 2009 (SC)

R. Manjula Vs. V. Raja

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-20-2009

Reported in : 2009(2)AWC1622(SC); 2009(2)BomCR51; 2009(1)SCALE626; (2009)2SCC511:2009AIRSCW2495.

..... advised by honourable committee members. sufficient time was granted to think and decide the issue. after consultation of our elders and as per benevolent advice of mediation centre we are whole heartedly willing to live together along with our children at our native village, arcot, vellore district in tamil nadu.3. in view of the aforesaid happy ..... court legal services committee.2. learned counsel for the parties has also filed a joint compromise memo which reads as follows:we both appeared before vellore district mediation centre, vellore (tamil nadu state) for five dates (i.e.) on 17.10.2008, 31.10.2008, 7.11.2008 14.11.2008 and 28.11.2008. we both were ..... compromise memo. joint compromise memo recorded. the mediation centre has successfully conducted enquiry as per the directions of honourable supreme court legal services committee. parties are now living together after compromise efforts.this information submitted to honourable supreme ..... , tamil nadu. during the pendency of the matter, a bench of this court directed the parties to appear before the district mediation centre, vellore to explore the possibility of setting the disputes. by report dated 4.11.2008 the mediation centre has reported as follows:the parties have appeared and advises given. parties given time to think and decide. parties filed joint .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 04 2009 (SC)

Narinder Kumar Malik Vs. Surinder Kumar Malik

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-04-2009

Reported in : 2009(6)ALT1(SC); 2010(2)MhLJ15(SC); 2009(1)SCALE388; (2009)8SCC743; 2009AIRSCW6561

..... must be arrived at. thus, on 24th january 2008 a statement was made that mediation talks have failed. the matter, then came up for hearing again before another division bench of the high court on 24th july 2008, but learned ..... given an opportunity to iron out the differences between them. but despite the best efforts made by the learned judges of the high court, the mediator and the senior advocate appointed in this behalf they were not able to convince the parties that it is a fit case where an amicable settlement ..... documents of ownership are to be executed.11. on 12th may 2005 despite having arrived at a settlement, high court directed them to approach the learned mediator for resolving their points of differences, if any, but, instead of resolving the same, their differences continued to rise.12. a registered notice dated 22nd ..... .l. mehta, addl. district judge, delhi who was requested to be a mediator. on 17th march 2005 it was noted by the high court that parties have entered into a settlement as mou was already entered into between the parties ..... also on account of the strong belief of the division bench of the high court that the parties being real brothers should settle the matter among themselves through mediation. accordingly, on 17 th december 2004 an order was passed, with the consent of the parties, that both the brothers would appear before mr. m .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 27 2009 (SC)

Alok Mishra Vs. Garima Mishra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-27-2009

Reported in : 2009(3)SCALE332; (2009)12SCC270; .2009AIRSCW6620

..... further claims or demands against each other and all the disputes and differences in this regard have been amicably settled by the parties hereto through the process of conciliation/mediation.9. that the parties undertake to the hon'ble court to abide by the terms and conditions set out in the agreement and not to dispute the same hereinafter ..... filing of transfer petition (civil) no. 870/2007 and transfer petition (civil) no. 445/2008 before the hon'ble supreme court of india.2. the matter was referred to mediation and conciliation centre delhi high court for exploring the possibilities of settlement between the parties.3. the parties agreed that ms. kamlesh mahajan and mr. inderbir singh alag, advocates would ..... arijit pasayat, j.1. these transfer petitions were listed in the supreme court lok adalat held on 7th february, 2009. with the efforts of the mediators of the delhi high court mediation and conciliation centre, the parties had arrived at a settlement which reads as follows:this settlement agreement is entered into on 6th day of february, 2009 between:shri alok ..... act as their conciliators/mediators in the matter of mediation and conciliation proceedings.4. the parties pursuant to discussions, deliberations and negotiations held with the assistance and help of the mediators have resolved their disputes/differences and have agreed to dissolve their marriage on the following terms and conditions .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 14 2009 (HC)

Rajinder Singh Saluja Vs. Sarbjyot Kaur Saluja and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-14-2009

Reported in : 159(2009)DLT629; (2009)155PLR2

..... still hope that the parties are able to find some final solution to their dispute. however, though we have put to the parties whether they are willing to go for mediation, only the appellant expressed his intent to do so but respondent did not.19. at this stage, learned counsel for the respondents state that her client has reconsidered the matter ..... and would like an endeavour to be made before the delhi high court mediation & conciliation centre on 20th may, 2009, making it clear that pendency before the mediation centre would have no ramification on the implementation of the order passed by us today. the mediation centre to appoint a mediator of sufficient seniority who has expertise in handling matrimonial matters.20. list for ..... directions on 31st july, 2009 for report of the mediator as well as the local commissioner.

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 27 2009 (SC)

Bhaskar Lal Sharma and anr. Vs. Monica

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-27-2009

Reported in : 2009(5)LHSC3175; JT2009(10)SC109; 2009(10)SCALE744; (2009)10SCC604

..... also an application under section 9 of the hindu marriage act, 1955 for the purpose of harassing her in-laws but at the same time she had been asking for mediation of their matrimonial dispute.33. mrs. vinay malhotra, the mother of the respondent, on the other hand, urged that:i. the appellants had been harassing and torturing the respondent in ..... mediator and the mediation processes were resorted to on day to day basis. indisputably however, the said negotiation failed. the matter was listed before this court on 11.6.2008. the parties were given ..... in transfer petition (criminal) no. 258/2007 and this court by an order dated 9.5.2008 directed the complainant and vikas to report to the senior coordinator of the mediation cell at tis hazari courts, delhi to explore the possibilities of resolving/settlement of their matrimonial discord. pursuant thereto the parties appeared before the learned senior .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 14 2009 (HC)

Tulip Hotels Pvt. Ltd. a Company Incorporated Under the Companies Act, ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-14-2009

Reported in : 2010(1)MhLj73

..... meaning. in para 23 hon'ble apex court has made following observations :- 'whereas on the one hand, keeping in view the parliamentary intent, settlement of all disputes through negotiation, conciliation, mediation, lok adalat and judicial settlement are required to be encouraged, it is equally well settled that where the jurisdiction of a court is sought to be taken away, the statutory ..... which is made of medola. it may be treated at par with conciliation and arbitration. in such a case the parties agree for settlement of dispute by negotiation, conciliation or mediation. the proceedings adopted are not binding ones, whereas the arbitration is a binding procedure. even in relation to arbitration, an award can be the subject matter of challenge. the provisions .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 21 2009 (HC)

Ajay Kumar JaIn Vs. Baljit Kaur Jain

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-21-2009

Reported in : 160(2009)DLT401

..... , various benches made an endeavour to see that an overall settlement could be arrived at. the matter was also referred for mediation. however, none of the proceedings for settlement proved to be successful. we may note that even after the mediation proceedings failed, endeavour was made for settlement, but even the same proved to be fruitless. on the other hand, we found .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 02 2009 (HC)

Mr. Ethan SteIn and anr. Vs. Mr. Balkrishna V. Doshi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-02-2009

Reported in : 157(2009)DLT180

..... the respondents in fact suggest this, relying on letters written by mr. vijay s.t. shankardass, wherein he has stated that he considers himself discharged from the responsibilities of assisting, mediating or carrying out conciliation in relation to various differences and disputes between the partners of the partnership firms. he also states that the disputes have been resolved by the lapse ..... s.t. shankardass wrote back to the petitioners, stating that he had made himself sufficiently clear in that he had discharged the responsibilities undertaken by him when he agreed to mediate in the matter and further ethan, really, there is not much that i can help with anymore now, as in my respectful view matters more or less ..... over the years as now being concluded, with matters resolved as best as they could under the circumstances be. i would therefore, consider myself discharged from my responsibilities of assisting, mediating and carrying out conciliation in relation thereto to the extent that i had undertaken them. however, if i can be of any further assistance to any of you individually or ..... erstwhile partners as envisaged in the aforesaid memorandum of understanding and minutes or as may have been subsequently raised by the various partners.consequently, i shall regard my task of mediation and resolution of various differences and disputes between the three erstwhile partners of the three entities, sdb, sdb(nd) and sdb(a) as envisaged under the aforesaid memorandum of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 27 2009 (HC)

State of Punjab and ors. Vs. Ajmer Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-27-2009

Reported in : (2009)154PLR749

..... the court's own time has been wasted, it could again direct imposition of costs even to the service institutions attached to the court like legal services authority or the mediation centre. the rejection of the request for reopening the case for adducing evidence in my view was totally unjustified under the circumstances.8. again in c.r. no. 414 of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //