Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Year: 2012 Page 7 of about 3,548 results (0.021 seconds)

May 22 2012 (HC)

Vinod Chopra and Another Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-22-2012

..... of the matrimonial home and, thereafter divorce petition was filed. efforts were also made by this court to reconcile the matter. parties were also sent to mediation and conciliation centre of this court and, however, mediation failed. hence, in view of these facts, it is not such a case in which extraordinary relief of anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 02 2012 (HC)

Ricky Ahuja and Others Vs. State of Punjab and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-02-2012

..... agreed to abide by the terms and conditions of the present agreement. 10. that the matter has been mutually, amicably and voluntarily settled between the parties through the process of mediation without any undue influence, pressure or misrepresentation and the parties hereby agree and undertake to abide by the aforesaid terms and conditions and not to raise any dispute, whatsoever, in ..... . about 58 days after the solemnization of their marriage. 7. during the pendency of the present applications, good sense prevailed and the parties have amicably settled their dispute before the mediation and conciliation centre of this court, by means of compromise deed/agreement dated 29.5.2012, which, in substance, is as under:- "1. that ricky ahuja who is husband of .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 13 2012 (HC)

Shyamnath Rai Vs. the State of Bihar

Court : Patna

Decided on : May-13-2012

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.15817 of 2011 ====================================================== shyamnath rai .... .... petitioner/s versus the state of bihar .... .... opposite party/s ===================================================== 13. 01-2012 the petitioner being the husband is apprehending his arrest in a compliant case in which cognizance has been taken under section 498a of the indian penal code and section 3/4 of the dowry prohibition act. with the agreement of both sides, the matter was referred to mediation centre of the patna high court on 26.09.2011. the report of the mediation centre, at flag-a, reflects that no acceptable settlement could be reached between the parties. both sides agree for mutual parting ways on payment of one time alimony. learned counsel for the petitioner prays for some time to seek instruction with regard to the payment of one time alimony. put up this case on 13th of february, 2012 at 2.10 pm in chambers. let the interim order dated 20.05.2011 be continued. (dinesh kumar singh, j) amrendra kumar/-

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 19 2012 (HC)

Vellappally Constructions, Vs. Gracy Thampi

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Dec-19-2012

..... b. radhakrishnan & a.v.ramakrishna pillai, jj.= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = ex.f.a. nos. 30 & 32 of 2012 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = dated this the 19th day of december, 2012 judgment thottathil b. radhakrishnan, j.mediation settlement perused. recorded. appeal ordered is terms of the mediation settlement. consequentially all orders of attachment are lifted hereby. sd/- thottathil b. radhakrishnan judge sd/- a.v.ramakrishna pillai judge krj.20/12

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 03 2012 (HC)

Smt. Chaitali Bhagat Vs. Dipesh Bhagat

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-03-2012

....1 f.a.no.727 o 03. 08.2012 shri r.d.hundikar, counsel for the appellant. after hearing the arguments it appears that because of trifle matters.both the appellant and respondent are residing separately and the matter can be sorted out if it is referred for mediation. accordingly, we direct both the parties to appear before this court on 10th september,2012 so that the matter can be referred for mediation. issue notice to the respondent to cause personal appearance before this court on the next date of hearing. p.f.be paid within three working days by reregisterd ad mode. (krishn kumar lahoti) (tarun kumar kaushal) judge judge vj

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 30 2012 (HC)

Present : Mr. Kanwaljit Singh Senior Advocate with Vs. Sandeep Singh a ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-30-2012

..... were only required to settle the matter outside the court , which meant that they were to make an attempt for amicable settlement which would mean the settlement through conciliation or mediation and not adjudication by means of arbitration. this contention cannot be accepted because of the reason that the three persons named are specifically treated as arbitrator(s) in the agreement ..... . no doubt, the mandate to the three persons is to settle the matter outside the court. however, this settlement can be by means of mediation or even settling the dispute through adjudication. as far arbitration case no.11 of 2012 (o&m) -6- as these persons are concerned, their role as arbitrators is clearly spelled .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 13 2012 (HC)

Present Mr.G.S.Sirphikhi Advocate Vs. State of Punjab and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-13-2012

..... court. learned crl. misc. not m-34900 o 2. .counsel for the petitioners has drawn my attention to the compromise arrived at between the parties with the intervention of the mediation and conciliation centre of this court during the proceedings of criminal misc. no m-.30246 of 2011. the terms of compromise have come in the ..... mediation proceedings dated 5.10.2012 (annexure p2).the contested decisions made by the courts leave scars on the litigants who lose the battle. in a decision based on compromise, none .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 06 2012 (HC)

Indian Railways Catering and Vs. Cox and Kings India Ltd. and anr

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-06-2012

..... which, over a period of time, became the bone of contention. some correspondence was exchanged between the parties and there were attempts to drown the flames of differences even through mediation. however, things instead of improving became bad to worse and ultimately, the irctc vide letter dated 12th august, 2011, terminated the joint venture agreement on the basis of some purported .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 16 2012 (HC)

Management Vs. the Presiding Officer.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-16-2012

..... .2.1999.7.the workman raised an industrial dispute against the non-employment before the government labour officer at erode. the said conciliation officer, as he could not bring about mediation, gave his failure report on 21.5.1999. on the strength of the failure report, the workman filed a claim statement dated 'nil' before the labour court, salem. the labour .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 21 2012 (HC)

P.Nirmala Vs. K.Muruguselvam

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-21-2012

..... /wife informed that his mother has spoken ill of her conduct and asked his father over the phone as to whether he is equal to her father and based on mediation of rajanga nadar, he has permitted the appellant/wife to be in his house and further, she spoke in singular term in front of his parents like 'thlh nghlh' and .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //