Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Year: 2012 Page 7 of about 3,548 results (0.016 seconds)

May 13 2012 (HC)

Shyamnath Rai Vs. the State of Bihar

Court : Patna

Decided on : May-13-2012

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.15817 of 2011 ====================================================== shyamnath rai .... .... petitioner/s versus the state of bihar .... .... opposite party/s ===================================================== 13. 01-2012 the petitioner being the husband is apprehending his arrest in a compliant case in which cognizance has been taken under section 498a of the indian penal code and section 3/4 of the dowry prohibition act. with the agreement of both sides, the matter was referred to mediation centre of the patna high court on 26.09.2011. the report of the mediation centre, at flag-a, reflects that no acceptable settlement could be reached between the parties. both sides agree for mutual parting ways on payment of one time alimony. learned counsel for the petitioner prays for some time to seek instruction with regard to the payment of one time alimony. put up this case on 13th of february, 2012 at 2.10 pm in chambers. let the interim order dated 20.05.2011 be continued. (dinesh kumar singh, j) amrendra kumar/-

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 19 2012 (HC)

Vellappally Constructions, Vs. Gracy Thampi

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Dec-19-2012

..... b. radhakrishnan & a.v.ramakrishna pillai, jj.= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = ex.f.a. nos. 30 & 32 of 2012 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = dated this the 19th day of december, 2012 judgment thottathil b. radhakrishnan, j.mediation settlement perused. recorded. appeal ordered is terms of the mediation settlement. consequentially all orders of attachment are lifted hereby. sd/- thottathil b. radhakrishnan judge sd/- a.v.ramakrishna pillai judge krj.20/12

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 03 2012 (HC)

Smt. Chaitali Bhagat Vs. Dipesh Bhagat

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-03-2012

....1 f.a.no.727 o 03. 08.2012 shri r.d.hundikar, counsel for the appellant. after hearing the arguments it appears that because of trifle matters.both the appellant and respondent are residing separately and the matter can be sorted out if it is referred for mediation. accordingly, we direct both the parties to appear before this court on 10th september,2012 so that the matter can be referred for mediation. issue notice to the respondent to cause personal appearance before this court on the next date of hearing. p.f.be paid within three working days by reregisterd ad mode. (krishn kumar lahoti) (tarun kumar kaushal) judge judge vj

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 18 2012 (HC)

Dildar Singh Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-18-2012

..... . the learned state counsel is unable to precisely state as to which dowry articles are to be recovered. the matter was also sent to the mediation and conciliation centre, however, as per the report of the mediator, the mediation also failed. keeping in view the totality of the circumstances and the fact that the petitioner is in service of the punjab government, and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 30 2012 (HC)

Present : Mr. Kanwaljit Singh Senior Advocate with Vs. Sandeep Singh a ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-30-2012

..... were only required to settle the matter outside the court , which meant that they were to make an attempt for amicable settlement which would mean the settlement through conciliation or mediation and not adjudication by means of arbitration. this contention cannot be accepted because of the reason that the three persons named are specifically treated as arbitrator(s) in the agreement ..... . no doubt, the mandate to the three persons is to settle the matter outside the court. however, this settlement can be by means of mediation or even settling the dispute through adjudication. as far arbitration case no.11 of 2012 (o&m) -6- as these persons are concerned, their role as arbitrators is clearly spelled .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 13 2012 (HC)

Present Mr.G.S.Sirphikhi Advocate Vs. State of Punjab and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-13-2012

..... court. learned crl. misc. not m-34900 o 2. .counsel for the petitioners has drawn my attention to the compromise arrived at between the parties with the intervention of the mediation and conciliation centre of this court during the proceedings of criminal misc. no m-.30246 of 2011. the terms of compromise have come in the ..... mediation proceedings dated 5.10.2012 (annexure p2).the contested decisions made by the courts leave scars on the litigants who lose the battle. in a decision based on compromise, none .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 27 2012 (HC)

Bandana Mishra Vs. Jyotiranjan Mishra

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Mar-27-2012

..... the learned counsel for the respective parties making allegations and counter allegations against each other, which are factual in nature, and further taking into consideration the failure report of the mediation centre, as this court feels that reunion in spite of all attempts having failed, there is bleak chance of such reunion between the parties, this court is of the view ..... the parties when the petitioner wife being personally present submitted that she is willing to join her husband. this court further attempted to mediate the dispute between the parties by sending the case to the court mediation centre. however, the mediator has sent a failure report to this court, inter alia, reporting that in spite of all attempts, the parties did not agree .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 05 2012 (HC)

Raghbir Singh Vs. Appropriate Authority I.T.Deptt

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-05-2012

..... we proceed to consider the arguments, we may mention that the petitioner and the auction purchaser made an attempt, with the permission of the court, to settle the matters through mediation. however, after some attempts it was reported to us that they failed and the parties could not reach any consensus..19. on a careful consideration of the matter in the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 16 2012 (HC)

Rajinder Kumar Gupta Vs. Rameshwar Prasad Gupta

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-16-2012

..... to prepare the drawings and take photographs and make video of the premises. direction issued was that the assistant engineer would submit a report which would be considered by the mediator..16. rajender did not permit the commission to be executed. he filed an application under order vii rule 11 cpc, rfa (os) 89-90/2011 page 4 of 7 registered ..... this request made pertained to physical partition and thus held that the best place to sort out the matter would be the table of a mediator and thus referred the parties to mediation, with a mandate to the mediator to evolve, by consent, any appropriate mode to physically partition the property..15. envisaging that without a visit to the property and without understanding ..... a qualified architect be appointed to assist the mediator in measuring the property at site. various other directions were also sought. vide order dated 01.09.2009, the learned single judge disposed of ia no.11209/2009 directing the ..... the physical contours thereof the learned mediator may not be able to evolve consensus, rameshwar filed ia no.11209/2009 praying to the learned single judge that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 06 2012 (HC)

Indian Railways Catering and Vs. Cox and Kings India Ltd. and anr

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-06-2012

..... which, over a period of time, became the bone of contention. some correspondence was exchanged between the parties and there were attempts to drown the flames of differences even through mediation. however, things instead of improving became bad to worse and ultimately, the irctc vide letter dated 12th august, 2011, terminated the joint venture agreement on the basis of some purported .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //