Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Year: 2014 Page 100 of about 8,063 results (0.026 seconds)

May 19 2014 (HC)

Mst. Amna Bi and ors. Vs. Aziz Ur- Rehman Decd. Thr. Lrs.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-19-2014

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi + % rsa no.171/2010 19th may, 2014 mst. amna bi & ors. through: ......appellants mr. shariq mohammad, adv. versus aziz ur- rehman decd. thr. lrs. ...... respondents through: mr. jabbar hussain, adv. coram: hon ble mr. justice valmiki j.mehta to be referred to the reporter or not?. valmiki j.mehta, j (oral) cm no.20025/2013 (for restoration) there is no opposition to this application and which is therefore allowed. the appeal is restored to its original number. rsa1712010 1. this second appeal is filed under section 100 cpc impugning the concurrent judgments of the courts below; of the trial court dated 27.1.2004 and the first appellate court dated 18.3.2010; whereby the suit of the respondent-plaintiff for declaration of ownership has been decreed. respondent no.1 (now represented by his legal heirs) was the sole plaintiff in the trial court. the plaintiff was declared to be the owner of the suit properties bearing nos. 431 and 486, shehzada bagh, inderlok, delhi.2. a reference to the impugned judgment shows that the appellants/defendants claimed that ownership of the suit property came to habib-ur- rehman, real brother of plaintiff sh. aziz-ur-rehman (appellants no.2 to 6 being the children of late habib-ur- rehman), because, as per the case of the appellants-defendants there was a family settlement between the plaintiff aziz-ur-rehman and his brother habib-ur-rehman whereby the suit properties fell to the share and ownership of .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 22 2014 (HC)

Present:- Mr. Akshay Singh Advocate Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-22-2014

..... -10493 of 2014 for grant of pre-arrest bail in a case registered at the instance of gurmeet kaur alleging that the petitioners have maltreated her. matter was sent to mediation centre. the parties have entered into a settlement that gaurav nijhawan will part company on payment of lumpsum alimony to the complainant. the firs.instalment has been paid. the second .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 21 2014 (HC)

Narinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-21-2014

..... 3. mr.jatinderp pal singh, advocate for respondent no.4. (along with respondent no.4.) amritpreet kaur - in person (alleged detenue).**** surinder gupta, j. (oral) the file sent to the mediation and conciliation centre of this court before lunch break, has been received back. the meeting of the petitioner with his daughter-amritpreet kaur was arranged there. now the parties are .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 22 2014 (HC)

Hema Kunju Vs. Commercial Tax Officer, Thrissur

Court : Kerala

Decided on : May-22-2014

..... , it is deemed that the appeals be restored to the files of the first appellate authority on terms. the petitioner shall pay an amount of rs.2500/- each to the mediation centre and produce the receipt before the first appellate authority within a period of two weeks from today wp(c).12813/2014 4 upon which both the appeals are to .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 26 2014 (HC)

Present: Mr. B.S.Jaswal Advocate Vs. Versus

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-26-2014

crm no.m-25374 of 2011 -1- in the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh crm no.m-25374 of 2011 (o&m) date of decision:26.05.2014 joga singh .... petitioner versus state of punjab & another .... respondents coram: hon'ble ms. justice anita chaudhry present: mr. b.s.jaswal, advocate for the petitioner. mr. gazi mohd., dag, punjab. mr. b.r.bansal, advocate for respondent no.2. ***** anita chaudhry, j.(oral) the instant petition has been filed under section 482 cr.pc for quashing of f.i.r. no.11 dated 14.01.2010 registered for the offence punishable under sections 420, 466, 467, 468, 471 and 120-b ipc at police station beas, district amritsar and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom. few facts will unfold the case: the district manager of punjab state warehousing corporation (hereinafter referred as 'pswc') lodged a fir levelling allegations of forgery and cheating. they named six persons whose involvement was suspected by them. a suit of recovery for over rs.25 lacs was filed against m/s r.k.rice mills, tangra, which was decreed on 23.05.1998. subsequent to the passing of the decree, pswc wrote to the revenue officials asking for details of the property owned by ramesh kumar @ ramesh kumar- defendant. the sdm forwarded the details along with copy of fard bura sonia 2014.05.28 14:14 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh crm no.m-25374 of 2011 -2- haquit. the allegations are that ramesh chander with an intention to play fraud on .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 26 2014 (HC)

Muhammed Shareef Vs. Suhrabi

Court : Kerala

Decided on : May-26-2014

..... claim maintenance under section 125 of cr.p.c. it is also submitted that the parties have already come to terms on a settlement arrived at on the intervention of mediators, but this very material aspect, though presented before the court, was not considered by the trial court.3. on hearing the learned counsel, i find that the revision petitioner has .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 28 2014 (HC)

S/Shri S.K.Monga and Aman Sharma Advocates for Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-28-2014

crm no.m-13008 of 2014 1 in the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh crm no.m-13008 of 2014 date of decision:-28.5.2014 sher khan ...petitioner versus state of punjab ...respondent coram: hon'ble mr.justice mehinder singh sullar present: mr.vijay lath, advocate for the petitioner. ms.amarjit kaur khurana, addl. ag punjab for the state. s/shri s.k.monga & aman sharma, advocates for the complainant. mehinder singh sullar, j.(oral) petitioner sher khan son of habib, has directed the instant petition for the grant of concession of anticipatory bail, in a case registered against him, vide fir no.14 dated 24.1.2014 (annexure p1), for the commission of offences punishable u/ss 406 and 420 ipc by the police of police station sohana, district s.a.s.nagar (mohali).2. notice of the petition was issued to the state.3. after hearing the learned counsel for the parties, going through the record with their valuable help and after deep consideration over the entire matter, to my mind, the present petition deserves to be accepted in this context.4. during the course of preliminary hearing, the following order was passed by this court on 22.4.2014:- learned counsel, inter-alia, contended that habib father of the petitioner was arvind kumar sharma 2014.05.29 10:39 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh crm no.m-13008 of 2014 2 owner in possession of the land in question as per the jamabandi for the year 2000-01 (annexure p3). after his death, the petitioner .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 27 2014 (HC)

Sunil Singhal and anr Vs. Unknown

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-27-2014

..... september, 2013. the daughter of the complainant is being maintained by the petitioners whereas the son born out of the wedlock is with the complainant. the matter was sent before mediation centre but it could not be amicably resolved, as such, the petition has been sent back for adjudication by this court. learned counsel for the petitioners has vehemently argued that .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 26 2014 (HC)

Present: Mr. Pawan Sharma Advocate Vs. Pinky and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-26-2014

..... committed by her. therefore, she should be prosecuted in accordance with the summons issued by the trial court. he would also submit that the matter may be referred to the mediation and conciliation centre for conciliation of the matter.7. there is no dispute to the fact that parveen kumar alongwith his two brothers and two sisters executed a general power .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 29 2014 (HC)

Mustafa Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : May-29-2014

..... seen from the annexure b affidavit filed by the 2nd respondent that the matter has crl.m.c.no.2777 of 2014 4 been settled due to the intervention of mediators and the amount due in the transaction has been received as well. on going through the allegation it is seen that it is a matter of civil nature which resulted .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //