Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Year: 2014 Page 11 of about 8,063 results (0.025 seconds)

Jan 13 2014 (HC)

Rani @ Raj Kaur Vs. Balwinder Singh @ Gora

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-13-2014

..... and only counsel for the parties appeared. then on 11.4.2013, the mediation proceedings failed and the case was sent back to this court. on 21.5.2013 it was observed by this court that despite repeated opportunities, the respondent has not paid ..... the appellant on the next date of hearing. on 3.12.2012, rs.5000/- was paid towards litigation expenses to the appellant. the parties were directed to appear before the mediation and conciliation centre on 22.1.2013 on which date the respondent was to pay the remaining amount of litigation expenses. in the ..... mediation and conciliation centre, a sum of rs.4000/- was paid by the respondent to the appellant on 5.3.2013. thereafter, the parties did not appear on 25.3.2013 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 05 2014 (HC)

Fao No. 2509 of 2012 (Oandm) Vs. Ravinder Kalra …..Respondent.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-05-2014

..... no.2509 of 2012 (o&m) -2- of the parties, the matter was referred to the mediation and conciliation centre functioning in the high court premises. the parties appeared before the mediation and conciliation centre on 20.11.2012. joint and single sessions were held. further, mediation was adjourned to 19.12.2012. on the said date, the respondent had not come present .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 11 2014 (HC)

Sreekumar R Menon Vs. J.M.Financial Assets Reconstructions Company Pri ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Feb-11-2014

..... this court with clean hands. interference is declined and the writ petition is dismissed with a cost rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand only) to be paid to the kerala mediation & conciliation centre, which has to be effected within one month; failing which, it will be open for the registrar general to issue necessary certificate to the beneficiary concerned w.p ..... r2 (k) interim order was passed directing the petitioner to satisfy a sum of rupees fifty lakhs. this was not complied with and later, the writ petition was referred to 'mediation', at the instance of the petitioner. in the course of further steps, annexure r2 (l) settlement was arrived at, agreeing w.p.(c) no. 3698 of 2014 :4. : to discharge ..... ) no. 3698 of 2014 :6. : so as to have the same caused to be released by way of appropriate proceedings. serve a copy of the verdict to the director, kerala mediation & conciliation centre as well. sd/- p. r. ramachandra menon, (judge) kmd .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 11 2014 (HC)

Present: Mr. P.S.Ahluwalia Advocate Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-11-2014

..... complainant would submit that only on the basis of the concession shown by the counsel for the complainant, interim bail was granted facilitating the parties to go before the mediation but the mediation has failed. interim bail granted by this court may be withdrawn and the main petition may be taken up after the petitioners are surrendered before the court. he has ..... would submit that investigation was complete and challan was also presented before the court of law.5. i find that the petitioners have already spent 2 months in jail. the mediation process, adopted by the court, in fact, failed. challan was already presented as rightly pointed out by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. the complainant has filed a civil .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 11 2014 (HC)

Vishal Sharma and Others Vs. State of Punjab and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-11-2014

..... i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh cr. misc. no.m-33749 of 2013 [2].above mentioned offences against the petitioners.now during the mediation proceedings before the mediation centre of the high court of punjab and haryana, the matrimonial dispute has amicably been resolved as husband and wife have decided to part ways by filing petition seeking ..... the parties is without any pressure or coercion from any one and the same is genuine one. complainant harmanpreet kaur has stated that the compromise has been effected before the mediation and conciliation centre of punjab and haryana high court. they have already filed the divorce petition as per the compromise dated 17.9.2013 under section 13- b of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 21 2014 (HC)

Sonia Vs. Harmesh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-21-2014

..... , karnal on 01.5.2014. they shall file a joint petition in the court of learned district judge, karnal. a copy of the settlement which was reached at in the mediation and conciliation centre on gaurav bhardwaj 2014.04.25 16:46 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document high court,chandigarh 216 fao no.m-410 of ..... filed the present appeal, in which notice of motion was issued on 19.12.2013. thereafter, the matter was referred to the mediation and conciliation centre functioning in the high court premises on 17.2.2014. in the mediation and conciliation centre, the parties amicably settled their disputes and a compromise dated 19.3.2014 was recorded. the compromise is on record .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 22 2014 (HC)

Trial Court Records Were Also Requisitioned. on 18.07.2013 It Vs. Smt. ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-22-2014

..... 2013 (o & m) -2- litigation expenses to the respondent on the next date of hearing; besides, the parties were directed to appear before the mediation and conciliation centre of this court on 26.08.2013. in the mediation proceedings recorded on 24.09.2013 a sum of rs.15,000/- was paid in cash to the respondent-wife. the case was sent ..... back by mediation and conciliation centre as the parties had failed to settle their dispute by way of an amicable settlement. on 24.02.2014, that is, on the previous date none appeared .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 30 2014 (HC)

“it Has Been Submitted That the Petitioner Has Not Vs. State of Punj ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-30-2014

..... petitioner has not even made the deposit of rs.20,000/- in the account of the complainant/respondent so as to facilitate the issue to be taken up before the mediation & conciliation centre of this court. suffice it to observe that the order dated 27.1.2014 had been passed in the presence of learned counsel for the parties and accordingly ..... on 12.02.2014. in order to explore the chances of amicable settlement, the parties are also directed to appear before the director, mediation and conciliation centre of this court on 24.02.2014. the report of mediation centre be called for 19.05.2014. meanwhile the petitioner shall deposit a sum of lucky rs.20,000/- in the account of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 09 2014 (HC)

Present: Ms.G.K.Mann Advocate Vs. State of Punjab and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-09-2014

..... heard counsel for the parties and perused the records. the agreement / compromise annexure p4 makes it evident that the parties were referred to the mediation and conciliation centre of this court in crm-m-5767-2011. the mediation proceedings were succesful as the parties agreed to bury their hatchet, forget their past with an intent to start the life afresh. the compromise ..... . due to this, a number of cases / litigation cropped up between the two families, both civil and criminal. the dispute between tejinder kaur and sham singh was referred to the mediation and conciliation centre of this court in crm-m-5767-2011. the entire dispute between the parties was settled with the intervention of ..... mediator vide agreement / compromise annexure p4 dated 21.03.2011. it is argued with vehemence that in pursuance of the said compromise which has been signed by tejinder kaur, her father .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 08 2014 (HC)

Arvind Shukla Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-08-2014

..... that the petitioner is the main accused. the compromise having been arrived at before the mediation centre cannot be made a ground to seek the concession of pre-arrest bail especially when the petitioner in the capacity as a husband has not been able to build ..... the demands. recoveries appear to have not yet been effected. counsel for the complainant has intervened to oppose the petition contending that no doubt the matter was compromised before the mediation and conciliation centre but the conduct of the petitioner in resuming cohabitation is not established to be bonafide. after considering all the above said circumstances, i am of the opinion ..... demand of dowry. there are specific allegations of harassment and beating. counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he has been falsely implicated and that the matter when sent to mediation and conciliation centre of punjab and haryana high court, was amicably settled and resolved. it is the complainant who has resiled from the terms of the compromise and refused to .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //