Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-06-2014
..... the court for arguments on the petitioner s application, again the respondent expressed her intention to settle the matter and once again the matter was sent for mediation.17. however, the mediation was declared failed on 12th february, 2013 due to non-appearance of the respondent and the matter was re-sent and listed before court on 23rd february, 2013 ..... respondent, who appeared in the court on 1 st november, 2008. on that day, both the parties expressed their willingness to settle their disputes.15. the matter was sent for mediation on 5th december, 2008 as agreed by the parties. however, in between december, 2008 and january, 2013, the matter kept on adjourning before the ..... mediation cell but the parties could not be able to resolve their disputes.16. the petitioner has stated that even when the matter was again listed on 10th january, 2013 in .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-08-2014
..... the consumer dispute redressal forum has paid rs. w.p.(c) no. 30825 of 2013 :4. :75. 000/- to the complainant/1st respondent herein in the presence of counsel and mediator.4. the 1st respondent/complainant undertakes not to proceed with the execution proceedings e.p. no. 27/2009, pending before the consumer dispute redressal forum, kollam.5. the 1st respondent ..... counsel n. nagaresh and n. suresh babu and the 3rd respondent represented by power of attorney holder adbul suneer and counsel jacob p. alex were present. in the course of mediation, they have resolved their disputes and agreed to the following terms :1. parties have agreed that the 3rd respondent/judgment debtor will pay rs. 75,000/- in cash to the ..... settled before proceeding with the matter further, as suggested by the parties concerned.4. in the said circumstances, the registry is directed to list the matter before the nodal officer, mediation centre., high court of kerala on 03.01.2014, to explore the chance for settlement. the learned counsel appearing for either side undertakes to inform the position to the respective ..... any, issued till the next date of posting. " w.p.(c) no. 30825 of 2013 :3. :3. in the above circumstances, the matter was caused to be mediated and a report dated 03.01.2014 by the mediator along with memorandum of agreement under section 89 of the code of civil procedure read with rules 24 & 25 of the kerala civil procedure .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-10-2014
..... file its reply and the matter was posted on 27.02.2013. on 27.02.2013 the parties submitted that the matter could be referred to the delhi high court mediation & conciliation centre (dhcmcc) and, accordingly, they were directed to appear before the dhcmcc on 07.03.2013 and the matter was directed to be listed on 24.05.2013. however ..... referring the matter to mediation had directed the respondent to file its reply at least 10 days prior to the date, the same was not on record when the matter was taken up by the ..... , this court also directed that in the event the mediation was unsuccessful, the respondent should file its reply at least 10 days prior to the next date of hearing. the mediation was unsuccessful and the matter was again taken up by this court on 24.05.2013. although, this court while .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Kerala
Decided on : Feb-21-2014
..... was confirmed in appeal.2. when the r.c.r. came up for hearing, the parties opted to have the disputes considered for settlement before the mediation centre. accordingly, the matter was referred to the mediation centre. r.c.r no.393 of 2013 2 3. the petitioner (the 2nd respondent in the r.c.p), the 1st respondent (the petitioner in ..... to the rent control court to dispose of the r.c.p. in terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties before the mediation centre. the original of the settlement arrived at by the parties before the mediation centre shall be forwarded to the rent control court. the rent control revision is disposed of as above. sd/- (k.t.sankaran, judge .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-24-2014
..... tirlochan singh, for probate thereof; (i) that vide order dated 5th august, 2010 in fao(os) no.83/2007 arising from the aforesaid proceedings, the parties were referred to the mediation cell of this court; (j) that the settlement agreement dated 6 th august, 2010 supra was signed between the parties; (k) that the plaintiff agreed to the said settlement agreement ..... fraudulently is made out. it cannot also be lost sight of that the settlement agreement was arrived at before the mediation cell of this court through the aegis of trained professional mediator and if challenge to such settlement agreements arrived at before the mediation cell of this court were to be entertained on such pleadings, the same will severely hamper the efficacy and ..... faith in mediation which has been statutorily recognised as a dispute resolution method.25. even though the plaint does not contain the ingredients required to be pleaded to make out a case of .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Apr-09-2014
..... lead oral evidence in defence of the divorce petition. by sending the matter to the mediation centre, it is not expected that parties would continue to think of producing their witnesses on the next date unless the court is informed of failure to reach a settlement ..... i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document parties to mediation meant that a reasonable time ought to have been allowed afresh to the parties to thrash out a compromise, and failing which the petitioner should have been allowed time to ..... granted on 11th february 2014 and the same was not availed. if last opportunity was granted on 11th february 2014, i do not see why the matter was remitted for mediation thereafter to try working out an amicable settlement to put an end to the disputes between the parties. sending the mamta cr no.2618 of20142 2014.04.12 12:46 ..... of deposition and the same could only be concluded on 11th february 2014. on the next date fixed i.e 19th february 2014, the parties were referred by court to mediation which effort remained inconclusive on the next date of hearing i.e on 28 th february 2014, when unfortunately the remaining evidence of the respondent/husband, the petitioner before this .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Singapore Supreme Court
Decided on : Feb-18-2014
..... or otherwise. as an aside, one troubling aspect of this case was that the parties had already been engaged in aa 105/2013 and had settled it by way of mediation without any issue being taken as to the existence of a contract in writing within the meaning of the act. this fundamental issue was only raised in the adjudication response ..... without completing all the documentary formalities" alluded to in singapore construction adjudication review [2005-2007] (chow kok fong, christopher chuah and mohan pillay gen eds) (sweet and maxwell asia, singapore mediation centre, 2009) at para 2.4. it would accordingly be consistent with the policy and purpose of the act as outlined in terence lee at - as well as ..... july 2013. the plaintiff attempted to file an adjudication response at 4.35pm on 29 july 2013 and the defendant took objection on the basis that pursuant to the singapore mediation centre rules, the adjudication response would be considered as lodged the next day as it was lodged after 4.30pm. the adjudicator agreed with the defendant and did not consider ..... the position that the defendant was claiming against the wrong party and that it ought to look to the plaintiff for payment instead. aa 105/2013 was eventually settled at mediation on 18 july 2013 and, in exchange for a cheque payment from the plaintiff, the defendant re-issued, inter alia, the 8 january 2013 quotation by addressing it to the .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jul-22-2014
..... to come again on 19.12.2013. on 19.12.2013, the appellant assured that he would pay rs.7,000/- to smt. manisha (respondent) on the next date. the mediation proceedings were deferred to 15.01.2014. thereafter, he did not appear. learned counsel for the appellant has pleaded no instructions. in the facts and circumstances, it would be just ..... against ex parte, however, later her counsel put in appearance on 08.08.2013 and he was allowed to join the proceedings. the parties were directed to appear before the mediation and conciliation centre of this court vide order dated 06.11.2013. the appellant it was ordered shall pay rs.15,000/- as litigation expenses to the respondent on the ..... next date of hearing. mediation proceedings were conducted. however, the parties could not reach at any settlement. before the mediation and conciliation centre, the appellant paid a sum of rs.10,000/- on 06.12.2013 out of rs.15,000/- as ordered .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Kerala
Decided on : Aug-20-2014
..... of this judgment, shall take place on 4th, 5th or 6th of november, 2014 so as to give sufficient time to the parties to try and settle their differences through mediation in the meanwhile. if the matter remains unresolved even by the end of october, 2014, the 3rd respondent shall proceed with the hearing as directed above and pass orders in ..... mediation between the parties, the petitioner and respondents 4 and 5 shall approach the kerala mediation centre, high court complex, w.p.(c).no.141/2010 9 ernakulam, on 27.8.2014 to explore this possibility. the hearing before the 3rd respondent ..... between the petitioner and respondents 4 and 5, who are brothers, it would be in the best interest of the parties to try and settle the issues between them through mediation instead of attempting recourse to civil litigation which is bound to consume lot of their time and effort. to facilitate a .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Sep-24-2014
..... mediation. we hope, the mediation would succeed. in case it does not succeed, the endeavour, which we indicate to be made, cannot be used for any other purpose. (manjula chellur, cj.) (banerjee, j.) sn ..... we direct the parties to pay a further sum of rs.2 lacs to the mediator, to be paid by the appellants and the respondents in equal share at the firs.instance. place the matter three weeks after puja vacation. mr.abhrajit mitra, learned senior counsel ..... appearing for the appellants, would apprehend, in case of failure of mediation for any chance the process of survey might be used against him. his apprehension is misconceived. we have directed survey to be done only to smoothen the process of ..... be paid by the owners association. after the survey is done, the surveyor would submit his report in a sealed cover to the mediator when the mediator would proceed further in the matter to have the reconciliation process completed. the mediator held many sittings, as we understand from the parties. the parties, however, paid a consolidated remuneration of rs.1 lac. this time .....Tag this Judgment!