Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mediation Year: 2018 Page 1 of about 1,611 results (0.040 seconds)

May 23 2018 (HC)

Ramji Lal & Anr vs.nand Kishore & Anr

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-23-2018

..... become personally liable to pay to the plaintiff remuneration for the services rendered to another entity. the hurried manner in which the settlement agreement was reduced into writing at the mediation centre, and even the further hurried manner in which it was mechanically acted upon by the court, have embroiled the parties into a new situation which, obviously, was not ..... dismissed as compromised. (emphasis supplied) 12. noticeably, while the plaintiff and his counsel would seek the suit to be disposed of as compromised in terms of the settlement before the mediation centre, the petitioners (defendants) by their statements though admitting the settlement, were under the impression that the suit was to be dismissed as compromised.13. the senior civil judge ( ..... it reduces the burden on the courts of the adjudicatory responsibilities which are time consuming, rendering the need for approach to the appellate or revisional courts virtually nugatory. if the mediation process is handled properly, and in accordance with law, it creates a win-win situation, the benefits of which are reaped not only by the disputants but also by ..... for the invaluable services thereby provided, the hallmark whereof is that it is an exercise in which the litigants, aided and assisted by their respective counsel and a neutral mediator, participate of their own volition with the objective of searching for common grounds that would throw up solutions to the vexed problem they face, the solutions being such as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 14 2018 (HC)

Nutan Batra vs.m/s Buniyaad Associates

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-14-2018

..... terms of a possible settlement and refer the same for- (a) arbitration (b) conciliation (c) judicial settlement including settlement through lok adalat; or (d) mediation (2) where a dispute has been referred- (a) for arbitration or conciliation, the provisions of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 (26 of 1996) shall ..... to make it obligatory for the court to refer the dispute after the issues are framed for settlement either by way of arbitration, conciliation, mediation, judicial settlement or through lok adalat. it is only after the parties fail to get their disputes settled through any one of the alternate ..... sufficient if the court merely describes the nature of dispute (in a sentence or two) and makes the reference. secondly, the definitions of judicial settlement and mediation in clauses (c) and (d) of section 89(2) shall have to be interchanged to correct the draftsman?s error. clauses (c) and (d ..... in the intervening period, this position has undergone a change once again, and parliament has intervened to encourage adr including inter alia arbitration and mediation.11. on a literal reading of section 16, a plaintiff would be entitled to the refund of the court fees on a mere reference ..... been incorporated in a compromise decree. this court has framed rules under part x and section 89 (2)(d) of the cpc, entitled the mediation and conciliation rules, 2004. rules 24 and 25 of the said rules require an agreement between the parties to be reduced into writing and signed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 14 2018 (HC)

M/S Narinjan Das Anand and Sons vs.senbo Engineering Ltd and Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-14-2018

..... cannot be blamed for acting on his instructions. moreover, the authorized representative of the defendant no.1/company had been appearing with mr. bhattacharya, advocate before the learned mediator. had there been any substance in the plea of the defendant no.1/company that no instructions were given to their previous counsel for negotiating a settlement with the plaintiff ..... company through mr.somnath mukherjee, the very same authorised representative, the averments made in the affidavit filed by mr. bhattacharya, advocate were denied. it was reiterated that since the mediation had failed, there was no question of a settlement being arrived at between the parties. mr. bhattacharya, advocate was given an opportunity to rejoin to the affidavit filed on ..... him before the learned mediator, including on 09.07.2015.16. categorically denying the contention of the counsel for the defendant no.1/company that he had no instructions to make a statement ..... agreeable. he explains that it was in this background that a joint request was made to the court on 03.07.2015 that the suit may be referred to mediation. immediately thereafter, learned counsel had informed the authorised representative of the defendant no.1/company about the development and the said authorised representative had attended all the proceedings alongwith .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 15 2018 (HC)

Rajat Gupta vs.rupali Gupta

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-15-2018

..... the arbitration and conciliation act (in case of a settlement through conciliation) and/or section 21 of the legal services authorities act, 1987. (in respect of a settlement by a mediator or a lok adalat) [refer: afcons infrastructure ltd. (supra)]. (12) if the obligations under the settlement agreement/undertaking/consent order/decree are breached by one party, then, at ..... inter se disputes and differences, and arrive at a settlement, whether of their own accord, or with the aid and assistance of the court or on exercising the adr processes (mediation/conciliation/lok adalat), or otherwise, the settlement agreement that may be drawn up, must incorporate the following:-"i) record in clear, specific and unambiguous language, the terms/stipulations ..... adr process, the supreme court held that in civil suits, the appropriate stage is after completion of pleadings, but in family disputes or matrimonial cases, the ideal stage for mediation is immediately after the respondent is served and before the objection/written statement is filed, for the reason that in such cases, the relationship between the parties becomes hostile ..... motion. kkd on 18.12.2012.-. in court. yes. joint statement of settlement recorded on 01.12.2012 before family court, patiala house.-. in court. yes. settlement recorded by mediation centre dated 29.05.2015.-. in court. yes- settlement agreement dated 05.05.2015.-. outside court yes- settlement agreement dated 05.05.2015.-. outside court yes. settlement deed dated .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 03 2018 (HC)

Jpc Infrastructure and Construction Pvt. Ltd vs.alstom Systems India P ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-03-2018

..... contract, an arbitrator be appointed by this court.7. the learned counsel for the respondent on the other hand says even if the offer of mediation is held to be ignored yet the petitioner ought to have given an offer to refer the disputes to arbitration, as per rules of arbitration ..... an overriding effect over any other contrary provision in such contract. 6. hence it is submitted that since the respondents have ignored the offer for mediation or the arbitration hence now in its reply cannot ask the petitioner to go to paris for getting the arbitration done as it would per se ..... .07.2017. however after the filing of the petition the respondent sent a letter dated 01.08.2017 calling upon the petitioner to apply for mediation and arbitration in accordance with rules of arbitration of the international chambers of commerce.3. the learned counsel for the petitioner submits the parties are resident ..... 2. the learned counsel for the petitioner says the petitioner has served a notice dated 01.04.2017 upon the respondent for sending the dispute to mediation but there was no response. later a notice dated 09.06.2017 was sent by the petitioner invoking the arbitration but yet again there was ..... relating to this subcontract, or breach thereof, no party shall proceed to arbitration unless the parties have made reasonable efforts to resolve the same through mediation as provided in clause 29.2.1 above. 29.3 reference to arbitration is 29.3.1 in unsuccessful the dispute or difference between the parties .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 12 2018 (HC)

Rohit Kumar vs.sunil Tyagi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-12-2018

..... entered into by means of an application signed by the parties filed in court, or the written signed agreement is entered into outside the court including in mediation proceedings, then the o .ref. no.01/2016 page 3 of 4 requirements of order xxiii rule 3 cpc are satisfied, and the court in ..... by the parties, and which is an admitted position in this case because parties have entered into a settlement in writing under the signatures before the mediation centre, and which is sufficient for disposal of the suit under order xxiii rule 3 cpc. no other aspect therefore was required to be looked into ..... framed to be answered by this court under section 113 cpc are that there existed an agreement in writing between the parties to the suit before the mediation centre. this agreement in writing was also signed by the parties. once that is so then the requirements of order xxiii rule 3 cpc are ..... trial court has framed the following questions for being answered by this court. o .ref. no.01/2016 page 1 of 4 the manner in which mediation rules 2004 were framed in delhi. does affcons judgment affect the above position?. can rule-25 be justified under general rule making power?. when will an ..... institution or person become lok adalat?. what are the relevant provisions of lsa act applicable to mediation?. can it be said that provisions of lsa act will not apply to mediation?. section-89(2)(c) is an illustration of legislation by reference. i. ii. iii. iv. v. vi. vii. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 06 2018 (HC)

Narinder Nath Seth & Ors. Vs.lata Seth & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-06-2018

..... dated 2nd may, 2013 of the supreme court set out here-in-above also does not record that any settlement was arrived at before the supreme court mediation centre, as would ordinarily have been recorded had it been so. on the contrary, as aforesaid the applicants/defendants no.1 to 5 simplicitor withdrew the ..... mutual settlement dated 1st may, 2013.8. it is pleaded by the applicants/defendants no.1 to 5 in this application (i) that in the mediation directed by the supreme court, the parties were able to arrive at a settlement on 1st may, 2013 and the special leave petition was accordingly withdrawn ..... interest of all parties that the matter was brought to an end by way of a settlement. vide subsequent order dated 18th march, 2013, the supreme court mediation centre was directed to attempt settlement of the matter between the parties. cs(os) no.2658/1999 page 2 of 17 6. however, thereafter on 2nd ..... the outset state that though the parties, vide order dated 18th march, 2013 of the supreme court, were directed to appear before the supreme court mediation centre on 23rd march, 2013 but there is nothing to cs(os) no.2658/1999 page 10 of 17 show that the parties so appeared before ..... (a) to (d) have opposed the application pleading as under: (i) that no settlement was arrived at before the supreme court mediation centre, and there is no report of the mediation centre recording the settlement and the settlement was not accepted by the supreme court; in spite of the same, the special leave petition .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 31 2018 (HC)

Chandra Gupt vs.bharat Gupt & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-31-2018

..... directed to appear before the court concerned on 16.11.2016 i.e. the date already fixed, for making their respective statements. sd/- (rajiv thukral) mediator, mediation centre tis hazari courts, delhi/11.11.2016 21. as would be evident from the above, the defendants under the [emphasis added]. aforesaid settlement have ..... have been referred by the court of sh. harun pratap, civil judge-04, central, tis hazari courts, delhi and assigned to me for mediation. process of mediation explained to the parties. single and joint sessions were held. after due discussions, both parties have agreed to settle their disputes in full and ..... present case, it has been found that not only was the former suit for the same relief as the present suit, but also that a mediated settlement akin to a decree has already been arrived at therein and whereunder the plaintiff is entitled to recover possession. however the plaintiff, instead of ..... possession was akin to the relief of recovery of possession.8. the counsel for the plaintiff then contended that the settlement arrived at before the mediation cell had not been acted upon.9. it was however observed in yesterday?s order that even if that be so, the plaintiff, who ..... signed the said settlement for himself and on behalf of his wife defendant no.2; the settlement was also signed by counsel for the parties and mediator; (xx) that by virtue of the settlement dated 11th november, 2016, the defendants were to vacate the portions / areas in their occupation and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 10 2018 (HC)

Kamal Kapoor and Ors. Vs.kulvinder Kaur Chatwal & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-10-2018

..... the said option, this court directed that execution petition would be proceeded with. it was recorded on 16th march, 2017 that subsequent to the settlement agreement entered into in the mediation centre, the complaint under section 138 of the ni act was rejected and the defendants were acquitted. during the course of hearing, the counsel for the defendants under 9. instructions from ..... denials, the court shall direct the parties to the suit to opt either mode of the settlement outside the court as specified in sub-section (1) of section 5 . for mediation, 7. the trial court, thereafter, relied upon both - the receipt and the settlement agreement and rejected the leave to defend filed by the defendants. appeal proceedings 8. in the ..... a possible settlement and refer the same for - (a) arbitration; (b) conciliation; rfa3402016 page 3 of 6 the provisions of (c) judicial settlement including settlement through lok adalat; or (d) mediation. (2) where a dispute has been referred - (a) for arbitration or conciliation, the provisions of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 (26 of 1996) shall apply as if the proceedings ..... be withdrawn after realization of the settled amount but the defendant did not make any payment to the plaintiffs in terms of settlement/agreement dated 09.01.2015 in the mediation centre, rohini courts, delhi. reliance is placed upon afcons infrastructure ltd. & anr. vs. cherian varkey construction co. (p) ltd. & ors. civil appeal no.6000 of 2010 (arising out of slp .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 17 2018 (HC)

Sainik Welfare Org – India vs.nehra Infrastructures & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-17-2018

..... , is empowered, in the absence of an arbitration clause, to take cognizance of the settlement agreement and convert the same into a decree. under section 89 of the cpc, the mediation centre, which recorded the settlement between the parties, would be nothing but an authority under the legal services authority act, 1987 and the settlement agreement would be a judicial settlement ..... that applicants will not misuse the liberty of bail in any manner and in case the accused/applicants violates any conditions of the terms of settlement arrived at before the mediation centre and the statements recorded today in the court, io/prosecution shall be at the application for cancellation of bail. to move liberty with this both the applications stand ..... . though the settlement agreement dated 6th august 2014, does not constitute an award under section 30 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996, it cannot however be said that once mediation has been effected between the parties, the settlement agreement can be resiled from. the settlement agreement being an agreement between the parties, duly accepted, signed and given effect to, cannot ..... of the flats in soldier square and veer sadan. during the pendency of these two section 9 petitions, a settlement agreement has been entered into between the parties before the mediation centre, tis hazari, where the bail applications of the... respondents 2 & 3 were pending. the settlement agreements dated 6th august, 2014 were duly entered into o.m.p. 88/ .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //