Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: medical degrees act 1916 section 2 definitions Court: himachal pradesh Year: 1980 Page 1 of about 4 results (0.029 seconds)

Aug 26 1980 (HC)

Dalip Singh Vs. Jaisi Ram and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-26-1980

Reported in : AIR1981HP49

..... that, therefore, a sale of such absolute estate by her after the coming into force of the succession act, was pre-emptible under sub-section (1), and not under sub-section (2) of section 15 of the pre-emption act. the learned judges thus invoked the doctrine of merger in arriving at their conclusion that the estate inherited by ..... be dismissed on the findings that the right to pre-empt this disputed sale is governed by sub-section (2) and not sub-section (1) of section 15 of the pre-emption act and hence vests in plaintiffs nos. 2 and 3 and not in plain-tiff no. 1. this naturally would amount to giving recognition to two ..... widow had succeeded to the land in dispute through her husband and that the sale was, therefore, pre-emptible under clause (b) of sub-section (2) of section 15 and this being so section 15 (i) (a) could not apply in this case. plaintiff no, 1 whois the brother of the vendor had, therefore, no right ..... only provision in this behalf would be found in section 22 of the punjab pre-emption act which reads as under : '22. plaintiff may be called on ..... out at the very outset that there is no provision in the punjab pre-emption act or in any other law which requires that in a suit for pre-emption the plaintiff must deposit l/5th or any other definite part of the pre-emption money failing which his suit shall be dismissed. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 30 1980 (HC)

Asa Singh and ors. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-30-1980

Reported in : AIR1981HP75

..... by the learned counsel for the respondents. if it is so, it is contended that the appellants 2 to 5 were entitled to the benefit of sections 6 and 7 of the limitation act. under section 6 of the limitation act. in the case of a minor, the claim petition could be filed after the disability had ceased ..... produced by the appellants in support of the application for condoning the delay in filing the petition. a.w. 1 is dr. kailash chand sharma, medical officer-in-charge. civil hospital, solan. it is stated by him that he has been in charge of the hospital since november 1967 and that the ..... justice where no serious negligence or inaction or want of bona fides is imputed to the claimant.10. without considering the impact of sections 6 and 7 of the limitation act. let us examine whether the tribunal and the learned single judge are right in dismissing the application for condoning the delay in filing ..... was barred by limitation as the same was filed after sixty days. the appellants had also filed a separate application purporting to be under section 5 of the indian limitation act for condoning the delay, mainly on the ground that he could not tile the petition within time due to his ill health. the ..... is to be allowed, we are not inclined to go into the question whether the appellants were entitled to the benefit of sections 6 and 7 of the indian limitation act or not.14. once the application for condoning the delay to entertain the claim petition is allowed, the question arises whether the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 29 1980 (HC)

The Nalagarh Dehati Co-operative Transport Society Ltd., Nalagarh Vs. ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-29-1980

Reported in : AIR1981HP1

..... the record, the error would be obvious and no elaborate reasoning would be necessary to find it.17. in the selection committee for admission to the medical and dental college, bangalore v. m. p. nagaraj, air 1972 mys 44, a similar question came up for decision before the division bench-in ..... the supreme court or a high court taking a different or contrary view on a point covered by the said judgment.'2. under section 55 of the punjab cooperative societies act, 1961 (the 'act') the respondents raised disputes with the petitioner. these disputes were referred to arbitration. awards were given against the petitioner. under ..... given. in rajah kota-giri venkata subbamma rao v. rajah vellanki venkatrama rao, (1900) 27 tnd app 197 (pc) lord davey said :'the section does not authorise the review of a decree which was right when it was made on the ground of the happening of some subsequent event.'8. in ..... that the subsequent decision of the supreme court is on the same footing as a subsequent legislation with retrospective effect.14. however, the explanation added by act 104 of 1976 to rule 1 of order xlvii. has laid the controversy to rest. it. came into effect on 1st february, 1977. it ..... before a learned single judge of this court. it was, inter alia, contended that clause 1 (a) of section 87 of the act having been deleted by the himachal pradesh cooperative societies (amendment) act, 1972, the award could no longer be executed as a decree. the learned judge negatived the contention in view .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 01 1980 (HC)

Rakesh Kumar and Etc. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-01-1980

Reported in : AIR1981HP80

..... modified reservations of seats (i e. rural areas), you have to submit a certificate of the category on the prescribed form obtainable from the principal, h. p. medical college, simla-1. the definition of rural area is as under:--'a candidate must have received education from 1st io 8th standard in a common rural school situated in any village not having ..... category shall be accepted.the modified definition of sportsman is as under:--'those who have represented india or combined universities or who hold distinctions of all india level or those who have represented the states or the ..... the block education officer under whose jurisdiction the school in which the candidate received education up to 8th standard falls.'the rural area certificate along with application as per the definition, given above, will be received up to 12th september, 1980 in the office of the assistant registrar (examinations), himachal pradesh university, simla-5, whereafter, no certificate for change of ..... detained with a view to preventing him from acting in any manner prejudicial to the security of the state if the government by order issued in this behalf declares that it would be against the public interest to communicate to him the grounds on which the detention order has been made.(2) nothing in sub-section (1) shall require the authority to disclose .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //