Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: medical degrees act 1916 section 2 definitions Year: 1973 Page 35 of about 344 results (0.253 seconds)

Jun 18 1973 (FN)

United States Vs. Scrap

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-18-1973

..... they had no way to answer such allegations, which were wholly barren of specifics. but if that were really a problem, the railroads could have moved for a more definite statement, see fed.rule civ.proc. 12(e), and certainly normal civil discovery devices were available to the railroads. similarly, the district court cannot be faulted for ..... and refuse-recovery charts appear on pp. 718 and 719 respectively.] [charts omitted.] page 412 u. s. 720 |412 u.s. 669app2| appendix ii to opinion of douglas, j., dissenting in part section 102 of the national environmental policy act, 42 u.s.c. 4332 provides: " 4332. cooperation of agencies; reports; availability of information; recommendations; international and national coordination of efforts. ..... the environment within the meaning of epa was "transparent," and "a ruse." 346 f.supp. at 20201. this leads to an analysis of 102 of nepa. [ footnote 2/4 ] that section is directed to "all agencies of the federal government," which of course includes the interstate commerce commission. it directs the agency to interpret and administer "the policies, regulations, ..... desirable alternative to solid waste disposal which the council strongly supports. the degree to which this technique will be used depends almost entirely on economics. transportation costs, to the degree they increase secondary or scrap materials costs compared to the raw materials with which they compete, act as a disincentive to recycling. the council believes that several rail haul .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 18 1973 (FN)

Employees Vs. Missouri Pub. Health Dept.

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Apr-18-1973

..... are barred by sovereign immunity where the state has not voluntarily surrendered its immunity. otherwise, there would have been no reason for the court's lengthy quotation from hamilton's definition of the ancient doctrine: "it is inherent in the nature of sovereignty not to be amenable to the suit of an individual without its consent. this is the general sense ..... , 15, 16-17, 18. but 16(b) remained the same. prior to 1966 and afterward, it read in relevant part: "any employer who violates the provisions of section 6 or section 7 of this act shall be liable to the employee or employees affected in the amount of their unpaid minimum wages, or their unpaid overtime compensation, as the case may be, and ..... us: "the course of decisions concerning sovereign immunity is a good illustration of the conflicting considerations that often struggle for mastery in the judicial process, at least implicitly. in varying degrees, at different times, the momentum of the historic doctrine is arrested or deflected by an unexpressed feeling that governmental immunity runs counter to prevailing notions of reason and justice. legal ..... hospitals, schools, or institutions are public or private or operated for profit or not for profit." (emphasis added.) [ footnote 2/6 ] section 16(b), 29 u.s.c. 216(b), provides in relevant part: "any employer who violates the provisions of . . . this act shall be liable to the employee or employees affected in the amount of their unpaid minimum wages, or their unpaid .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 24 1973 (HC)

P. Chandrasekharan Vs. the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu Represented by It ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-24-1973

Reported in : (1974)1MLJ387

..... . these provisions, in short, are the relevant provisions for our purposes.3. section 24 of the advocates act of 1961, as it originally stood prior to the amendment of 1968, prescribed certain educational qualifications, to wit, a degree in law from any university in the territory of india or such other university ..... verification and enquiry admits such a person or persons as advocates on the state roll. we are not in the instant case concerned with section 58-aa (2).6. the second requirement which would enable a person to seek such entry into the bar council of tamil nadu is the subject of ..... territory of pondicherry and restraining the first respondent from so permitting the second respondent to practise are unsustainable.2. the entire case depends upon the interpretation of section 58-aa of the advocates act of 1961 in the light of the arrete of 1932. the arrete dealing with the institution of bar ..... the bar council of madras, be admitted as an advocate on the state roll maintained in respect of the said union territory.(2) notwithstanding anything contained in this act every person who, immediately before the date on which the provisions of chapter iv are brought into force in the union territory ..... entered into the arena of the profession of law. (2) all persons who are entitled to practise the profession of law, whether by way of pleading or acting or both under the law in force in the said union territory, belong to a 'definite class' entitled to be enlisted as advocates of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 18 1973 (FN)

Weinberger Vs. Hynson, Wescott and Dunning, Inc.

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-18-1973

..... defines what constitutes "general recognition" among experts. hynson contends that the "lack of substantial evidence" is applicable only to proof of the actual effectiveness of drugs that fall within the definition of a new drug and not to the initial determination under 201(p) whether a drug is "generally recognized" as effective. it would rely solely on the testimony of physicians ..... of procedural due process where, as in this case, the commissioner construes his regulations to deny a hearing as to the efficacy of a drug established and used by the medical profession for two decades, and where its effectiveness page 412 u. s. 639 is supported by a significant volume of clinical data and the informed opinions of experts whose qualifications ..... 24 ] see hearings, supra, n 14. [ footnote 25 ] hynson also argues that lutrexin is exempt by operation of 107(c)(2), which provides: "an application filed pursuant to section 505(b) of the basic act which was 'effective' within the meaning of that act on the day immediately preceding the enactment date shall be deemed, as of the enactment date, to be an application ..... where there is an adjudication page 412 u. s. 626 "on the record of [a] hearing." but that assumes an individualized hearing and adjudication as is common in regulatory proceedings. section 554(e), however, does not place administrative proceedings in that straitjacket. it provides that an agency "in its sound discretion, may issue a declaratory order to terminate a controversy or .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //