Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: multifariousness Court: allahabad Year: 1917 Page 1 of about 2 results (0.004 seconds)

Jun 23 1917 (PC)

Afzal Shah and anr. Vs. Lachmi NaraIn and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jun-23-1917

Reported in : AIR1918All425; (1918)ILR40All7

..... question the finding of law on which their suit was dismissed by the court below. the pleas in the memorandum of appeal are that the suit is not bad for multifariousness, that it was maintainable as framed and that the reliefs claimed therein could have teen granted in one suit against all the defendants. it is unnecessary for us, as the ..... , and this dismissal has been affirmed by the additional district judge in appeal. the only point dealt with by the lower appellate court was that the suit was bad for multifariousness. as a matter of fact there had been an order by the predecessor in office of the learned judge who finally disposed of the appeal, which was no doubt well .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 23 1917 (PC)

Saiyed Afzal Shah and anr. Vs. Lachmi NaraIn and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jun-23-1917

Reported in : 42Ind.Cas.856

..... question the finding of law on which their suit was dismissed by the court below. the pleas in the memorandum of appeal are that the suit is not bad for multifariousness, that it was maintainable as framed and that the reliefs claimed therein could have been granted in one suit against all the defendants it is unnecessary for us, as the ..... this dismissal has been affirmed by the additional district judge in appeal.2. the only point dealt with by the lower appellate court was that the suit was bad for multifariousness. as a matter of fact there had been an order by the predecessor in office of the learned judge who finally disposed of the appeal, which was no doubt well .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //