Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: multifariousness Court: andhra pradesh Year: 2008 Page 1 of about 7 results (0.036 seconds)

Jan 17 2008 (HC)

Avala Raja Reddy Vs. Gunti Radha Krishnaiah Chetty

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-17-2008

Reported in : 2008(2)ALT70

..... pat. 613, the parties having gone to trial on an issue of title on the merits; defendants were not allowed to succeed in appeal on the contention that there was multifariousness. it is settled law that where paramount title has been adjudicated on, in a mortgage or redemption suit the defeated party will not be allowed to raise the contention that ..... be a joinder of causes of action of this description, and in sarala sundari v. sarada prasad (1904) 12 c.l.j. 602 the ground of decision was thai such multifariousness was fatal to the suit.but even under the old code it was recognized that this general rule was subject to exceptions, and in the code of 1908 the rule ..... inconvenience and expense caused to the defendants. the written statement of the present appellants (as is common in india) contained a plea that the suit was bad for misjoinder or multifariousness, but their lordships have not been satisfied, that at any time before the commencement of the trial any appropriate and serious application was made to the court upon the face .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 21 2008 (HC)

Barla Rami Reddy and ors. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by Its ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-21-2008

Reported in : 2008(3)ALD752; 2008(3)ALT336

..... it from time to time by the government for the efficient administration of the act. these provisions thus clearly show that the government is assigned pivotal role and entrusted with multifarious functions under the act to achieve the purpose and objects of the act. by interpreting the words 'or otherwise' by giving their natural and etymological meaning, it does not lead .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 26 2008 (HC)

Exotic Granite Exports Rep. by Its Managing Partner Sri. K. Ramachandr ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-26-2008

Reported in : 2009(5)ALT200

..... and capable of yielding a positive gain of as much as rs. 11 crores on estimate basis. apart from the fact that the petitioner is a public sector corporation, its multifarious experience, availability of infrastructure and resourcefulness would enable it to carry on mining on sound and effective lines with minimal overheads which ultimately would result in hiking its revenue further .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 05 2008 (HC)

Ranga Parameswari and ors. Vs. Ranga Madhusudhan Rao

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-05-2008

Reported in : 2008(6)ALD334; 2009(1)ALT397

..... with subsequent interest till the date of appeal on the respective sums separately and not on the lump sum amount.7. section 6 of the act, dealing with multifarious suits, reads as hereunder:6. multifarious suits.-(1) in any suit in which separate and distinct reliefs based on the same cause of action are sought, the plaint shall be chargeable with a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 21 2008 (HC)

Namala Govindu Vs. B. Lakshmanna and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-21-2008

Reported in : 2008(2)ALD472

..... of possession. obviously the relief of foreclosure and relief of possession arise on two different causes of action. nonetheless such different causes of action can be joined together in a multifarious suit. in this regard it is appropriate to consider the provisions of order ii of the code of civil procedure. while rule 1 of order ii postulates that the suit .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 07 2008 (HC)

A.P. Power Generating Employees Union, Vijayawada thermal Power Statio ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-07-2008

Reported in : 2008(4)ALD687

..... did not raise any objection, and thereby, they are estopped from claiming the present relief.5. the board used to have its own skilled staff, who are ready to discharge multifarious functions. either as an economy measure, or on account of restrictions imposed by the government, some of the works were being executed, by engaging contract labour, supplied by the labour .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 14 2008 (HC)

Ch. Manikya Sarma Vs. Rajendra Singh Bhatia

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-14-2008

Reported in : 2009(2)ALT424

ordervilas v. afzulpurkar, j.1. this revision is preferred by a landlord who suffered a reversal of an eviction order under the impugned order of the lower appellate court.2. the brief facts are that the landlord is the owner of premises bearing nos.15-8-457 and 457/1, situated at feelkhana, hyderabad. while premises no. 457/1 is a mulgi (shop), the premises no. 457 is a residential portion located just behind 457/1.3. it is alleged that the respondent-tenant was let out the mulgi initially in april, 1976, and thereafter, residential portion was also let out in august, 1979. while the rent of the mulgi is rs. 225/- per month, the rent of the rear side residential portion is rs. 125/- per month. it is alleged that the tenant is irregular in payment of rent and that the tenant stopped carrying on business and kept the mulgi under lock and stopped using the residential portion also and has shifted to nanded, maharashtra state, one year back. since both the premises are under the lock and key for over one year without use and unoccupied by the tenant, the eviction petition was filed on the ground that the tenant has ceased to occupy the suit premises for over one year.4. the tenant filed a counter alleging that the premises obtained by him are under different tenancy and they are separately let out for different purposes on different dates and as such contended that a single eviction petition suffers from mis-joinder. the tenant denied that there is any default in payment of rent .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //