Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: multifariousness Court: delhi Year: 2007 Page 1 of about 12 results (0.022 seconds)

Jul 26 2007 (HC)

Milkfood Limited Vs. Union Bank of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-26-2007

Reported in : 2007(2)CTLJ362(Del)

..... aforesaid, delhi courts will have jurisdiction in the present matter. the issue is thus decided accordingly.issue 3 does the present suit suffer from misguide of cause of action and multifariousness as disclosed in preliminary objection no.3? opd43. the issue was not pressed by learned counsel for the defendant.4. is the suit barred by limitation qua bank guarantee no ..... court to try and entertain the suit for the reasons disclosed in the preliminary objection no.2? opd3. does the present suit suffer from misguide of cause of action and multifariousness as disclosed in preliminary objection no.3? opd4. is the suit barred by limitation qua bank guarantee no.614, 615 and 626 for the reasons disclosed in preliminary objection no .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 29 2007 (HC)

Kangaro Industries (Retd.) and ors. Vs. Jaininder JaIn and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-29-2007

Reported in : 2007(34)PTC321(Del)

..... , who would have, perhaps, been well advised to strive to sort out amicably their ongoing dispute over use of trademark 'kangaro' instead of slugging it out by entangling themselves in multifarious litigious bouts.2. the learned single judge's description adequately summarized the nature of a business family's feud which had transversed the borders of the country and found itself .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 17 2007 (HC)

Sh. Deep Chand Vs. Sh. Kulanand Lakhera and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-17-2007

Reported in : 140(2007)DLT765; 2007(95)DRJ683

..... dismissed for the reason, when disposed on 3.4.1995, petitioner was not in settled possession. he entered upon illegal possession in the year 1973. when challenged, he restored to multifarious litigation to hold on to his possession. period between 1973 to 1995 was of litigation. thus possession would be litigious possession. 96. sh. s.k. puri, learned senior counsel for ..... act 1954 have attained finality, but warrant of possession could not be executed as petitioner had an interim stay in the suit. the said suit has since been dismissed. the multifarious proceedings initiated by the petitioner came to an end in the year 1995 and thereafter, m.c.d. took possession. 102. petitioner cannot take advantage of his possession between 1973 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 04 2007 (HC)

Rajesh Dalal Vs. State (Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-04-2007

Reported in : 2008CriLJ937

..... that he has been implicated only because he is a friend of rajesh dalal and instrumental in getting the marriage performed between rajesh dalal and dolly, which has festered into multifarious litigation.he contends that pw-4 and pw-6 have narrated a highly improbable story which is not supported by any corroborative evidence. he further contends that the trial court ..... of 2003, that the entire case is stage-managed and false. it is an outcome of a marital discord between the appellant, rajesh dalal and dolly, which has resulted in multifarious litigations including the present one. he submits that the alleged kidnapping which is sought to be proved with the aid of pw-4, smt. vijaya awasthy, as also pw-6 .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 17 2007 (TRI)

S.C. Awasthi S/O S.N. Awasthi, Vs. National Water Development

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Decided on : May-17-2007

1. shri s.c. awasthi, the applicant herein, has sought multifarious reliefs based upon different facts and causes of action. he seeks setting aside of order dated 13.4.2007 transferring him from new delhi to bhubaneswar. he also seeks the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 23 2007 (HC)

Anupam Sharma Vs. Nct of Delhi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-23-2007

Reported in : 146(2008)DLT497

..... with matrimonial litigation it is but the desire of every judge to try and resolve the matter by amicable consent of parties for the reason a single settlement results in multifarious litigation going to an end.62. energies of the citizens of india is better utilized if the same is channelized for a constructive purpose and not court litigation.63. mediation .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 12 2007 (HC)

Rama Beri and anr. Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-12-2007

Reported in : 2007(99)DRJ186

..... should not encourage settlement. the view taken was that dispute being essentially a matrimonial dispute, every attempt has to be made to try and find an agreed solution so that multifarious litigations between the parties is avoided.10. to that extent, the attempt by the learned additional sessions judge to find an amicable solution to the problem is a laudable step .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 19 2007 (HC)

Sandeep Batra Vs. Ge Capital Services India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-19-2007

Reported in : 146(2008)DLT323

..... claim while under order 2 rule 2 cpc plaintiff is required to include whole of his claim in framing the suit. the principles underlying section 11 of the cpc is multifarious litigation inter se the parties and not make the defendant to face litigation twice for the same cause of action arising from a transaction. plaintiff cannot split the cause of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 23 2007 (TRI)

Usha Asthana Vs. Shri Ram Singh Hospital and Heart Institute

Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

Decided on : Nov-23-2007

..... . 5. counsel for the appellant while pleading for the higher compensation contended that the district forum did not take into consideration that the appellant asked for compensation on account of multifarious deficiencies in service and negligence on the part of the op. firstly the refusal of the bed pan by the maid of the icu unit which forced the appellant to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 25 2007 (TRI)

Sh. Gurubaksh Kumar S/O Sh. Kishan Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Decided on : Oct-25-2007

..... of manpower to run and maintain the projects and systems and, therefore, the respondents have not relieved the applicant for deputation as a result of mounting work pressure due to multifarious responsibilities entrusted to the bureau. it is also pleaded that the applicant is misleading this tribunal by alleging that the respondents have released other officials for deputation after his case .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //