Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: multifariousness Court: kerala Year: 1996 Page 1 of about 4 results (0.008 seconds)

Jan 05 1996 (HC)

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. E.K. Andrew

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-05-1996

Reported in : [1999]95CompCas537(Ker)

..... what is involved in this case is an 'institutional' decision and not one taken by an officer specifically empowered to do it. 'if an administrator has to carry on his multifarious functions efficiently, it becomes essential for him to take the assistance of subordinates within his department. a decision in such a case is called 'institutional' because the decision as a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 23 1996 (HC)

Dr. V.P. Gopinathan Vs. Commissioner of Wealth-tax

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Feb-23-1996

Reported in : [1996]221ITR401(Ker)

..... . a resume of these aspects giving rise to statutory provisions relating to exemptions would not be without any profit. these facets statutorily recognised being the aspects introducing exemption provisions are multifarious on their representation of perspectives. the educational purpose, religious purpose, charitable purpose have everywhere been the content of exemption provision. added thereto it would also be found that the buildings .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 23 1996 (HC)

Dr. Vs. P. Gopinathan V. Commissioner of Wealth Tax.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Feb-23-1996

Reported in : (1996)133CTR(Ker)493

..... . a resume of these aspects giving rise to statutory provisions relating to exemptions would not be without any profit. these facets statutorily recognised being the aspects introducing exemption provisions are multifarious on their representation of perspectives. the educational purpose, religious purpose, charitable purpose have everywhere been the content of exemption provision. added thereto it would also be found that the buildings .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 02 1996 (HC)

Aspinwall and Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax (No. 1)

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Feb-02-1996

Reported in : [1996]220ITR611(Ker)

..... challenging the same for whatever it is worth. we have to appreciate the submission based on a practical approach, coming from learned senior counsel for the department that form the multifarious considerations in not challenging the order, one of them being the smallness of the amount involved. at any rate as we have considered the position independently ourselves, we agree with .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //